NIST scientists committed fraud in their investigation of the 9/11 collapse of the third building to fall on that day -- World Trade Center 7.
They tried to sell the world on the idea that solid steel could ever offer zero resistance. WTC7 fell at perfect free fall on 9/11. That perfect free fall lasted for the first 8 floors of collapse. Free fall means zero resistance, but solid steel -- as we all know -- never offers zero resistance.
The 9/11 Commission only went as far as collapse initiation and did not discuss the event after that point, assuming that collapse was inevitable. But many of the commission members felt the investigation was fraudulent.
Many skeptics say that "someone would've talked." And they did, but the mainstream media (owned by the same companies which run the military industrial complex which benefited from all the wars) didn't listen.
Meet The 9/11 Whistleblowers (5:20) -- https://youtube.com/watch?v=30RF0V8gkcg
9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses (9:57)
CIA 9-11 Whistleblower Susan Lindauer Interview (9:53)
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate (14:29)
David Chandler 2010 "9/11 Analysis" (58:28)
9/11: Best Physical Evidence for Explosives (1:48:10)
When there's evidence of a cover up (as with the NIST scientists' fraud), then there is very likely something that is being covered up. New York officials committed a major felony by having the crime scene scrubbed of evidence long before the official investigation began. Much of that evidence was shipped all the way to China as scrap metal.
When scientists start their timing of an event artificially early and take the average rate of change, they miss a lot of details by this fraudulent method (drylabbing). That's like measuring the average speed of a race car by including the minute before the start where the car was revving its engines. That minute had zero velocity. The result is a much slower and fraudulent velocity.
This doesn't surprise me. I worked many years as a project director in large construction projects. All experts in my teams were surprised of perfect vertical collapse.
I understand, Buildreps. Until about 3 years ago, I never gave politics and conspiracies much thought. But it seems that 9/11 was not an isolated case of major conspiracy done with a smooth, almost sexy coordination and the illusion of something else going on.
Global warming seems to be another one. We can all agree that pollution is bad, but many of the empirical climate scientists don't think CO2 is a pollutant, but a natural gas of life. And some I've heard disagree with the global warming scare, saying that global warming is a good thing. Heck, we're in an Ice Age. It would be good to get out of the cold for a change. Two-plus million years is long enough. The Holocene interglacial period is part of the current Ice Age. But someone stands to make lots of money off of Carbon Taxes. I suspect that Climate-Gate was merely the tip of the iceberg on this.
Plus, the whole idea of "conspiracy" seems to have been given an Orwellian spin. If someone questions the official conspiracy theory with facts, they are accused of being "conspiracy theorists." Facts are conspiracy theory? And some people treat the idea of conspiracy as if it never happens. I teach college IT and mathematics and I've seen my share of conspiracies to cheat on exams, quizzes and projects. I don't think I'm the only one on the planet to witness conspiracies. But those who own the mainstream news media, also own the military industrial complex. If they are the conspirators, then it would serve their needs to marginalize the idea of "conspiracy." That way, more people would not look. The peer pressure of Ego would act as an effective barrier.
So, it would seem that a removal of ego (self-concern) from each of us would help eliminate the leverage of the conspirators over the world at-large.
Awareness helps. But we need to change ourselves into better human beings. As Christ said, we need to love others as ourselves and to wish for them everything that they desire, including turning the other cheek. If we can do this, we might end up with no more False Flag black ops like 9/11 and Operation Northwoods.
by Rod Martin Jr4 years ago
There have been numerous plans in American history for the government to murder American citizens for political gain.I seriously doubt that the Operation Northwoods document is the only tangible, direct evidence of such...
by sannyasinman6 years ago
. . and that the official explanation is a physical impossibility. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkXeNawH … r_embedded
by Rod Martin Jr3 years ago
I've corresponded and chatted with a number of Americans who think the 9/11 Truth movement has been thoroughly "debunked." But when pressed for details on the source of their belief, they can't provide any....
by @ikepius3 years ago
Hello people! As we prepare to be plunged into another bloody war, it has come to my knowledge that an interview with Osama Bin Laden, which was done during the height of the Iraq invasion, but which was censored by the...
by sannyasinman3 years ago
It's OK to disagree with the governments version of what caused the twin towers and building 7 to collapse on 9/11. A new campaign for truth, and a recent poll shows that 1 in 2 Americans have doubts about the...
by Jerad Maplethorpe6 years ago
I am by no means asserting that our government orchestrated 9/11, but I would like to know how these terrorists living in caves on the other side of the world were able to pull off such a precise chain of events?Your...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.