jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (15 posts)

Science & Religion: Why can't they coexist?

  1. Bohemilee profile image61
    Bohemileeposted 2 years ago

    I have had discussions with many people on religion and what their beliefs are. Because I am not as religious or spiritual as some, the discussion normally turns into a debate; Science vs Religion. Now of course that was not my intention because I have no problem with people believing in whatever they want to believe in,  but I often find that when speaking to a person with religious beliefs, some are quick to disregard the evidence in science (especially when it comes to how the world was created) in order to maintain their stance in regards to religion. So why does one have to be disregarded in order for the other to remain prevalent? Why can't a person have religious beliefs and still accept scientific theories as well?

    1. wilderness profile image95
      wildernessposted 2 years ago in reply to this

      Probably because they give diametrically opposed answers to some of the same questions.

      Some believers change the meaning of their holy scripture to match with reality, some refuse.  And the battle continues.

      1. profile image61
        retief2000posted 2 years ago in reply to this

        This is hardly true. The Vatican has operated an observatory since the 1780s. The "Big Bang Theory" was proposed by a Catholic priest. Science hardly contradicts religion, even the theory of evolution. The drive to reveal the truth about God's creation is at the root of Catholic teaching on science.

        1. wilderness profile image95
          wildernessposted 2 years ago in reply to this

          Oh?  I did not realize that the theory of evolution teaches that homo sapiens sprang full grown and evolved from the dust of the earth.  Or that the female of the species originated as a rib in the male.

          1. profile image61
            retief2000posted 2 years ago in reply to this

            That is a rather narrow understanding of Christian thought on science and evolution. There are 1.2 Billion Catholics in the world whose one Church teaches a very different lesson than you offer as representative of all Christianity. Perhaps a little broader scope might help, I suspect it will not, as you have decided that your own deeply held prejudices supersede facts.

            1. wilderness profile image95
              wildernessposted 2 years ago in reply to this

              I don't think it will ever be possible to understand or even know the thousands of differing ideas from hundreds of Christian sects.  Add in the other religions of the world and I know it won't.

              On the other hand, I've never had a Christian ever tell me that mankind evolved from an ape-like creature.  Always that God made man, and without need or use of prior species.  It's also the way I was taught in a Christian household.  It is, in fact, the basis for the reasoning that women are lesser creatures than man, that they should follow man rather than lead.  So I was taught, and so most sects seem to believe as well although that is beginning to change.

              And of course, it is what God's Word, given in the holy scriptures, teaches as well.

              1. profile image61
                retief2000posted 2 years ago in reply to this

                It is sad that your education in Christianity was so narrow as to separate you from the loving glory of God's natural world and all the things that He created, things like stellar nurseries, the accretion of solar dust to form planets, the mutation of chromosomes and the rise of life. The entire Universe has a Creator whose love set it all in motion. A Creator who gave humans the intellect and curiosity to reveal the grandeur of the Natural world, full of natural laws and natural systems - including evolution.

                Can Man have evolved and have been created by God? Yes. It is a poor believer who compels God to match his personally limited understand. It is the finite and mortal telling the infinite and immortal what is what. We are a fun and funny species.

                Is it what the Old Testament teaches? or is it a limited understanding of what simple people were given so that they my comprehend God and creation. Your experience in your household is very different than mine in a Catholic one and in Catholic education for 16 years.

                1. wilderness profile image95
                  wildernessposted 2 years ago in reply to this

                  Yes, yes.  I've seen the glory of nature, from stellar nurseries (through a telescope, not a photo) to the absolute majesty of the giants of the earth; the redwood trees.  All I missed out on was the myth of a god creating it all and I even got my fill of that during childhood. 

                  Absolutely man could have evolved AND been created.  It just isn't told that way in His Word.

                  If the book was written by a god, for people of all ages, it should be readable and match the comprehension of the reader.  An easy task for an omnipotent god, but one that was not done - perhaps because it wasn't written (or inspired, or overseen, or anything else) by a god at all?  Perhaps it was written by man, for man's purposes and according to man's knowledge of the time?  A far more reasonable and likely scenario than that a creature from another universe did it all, IMHO.  Especially as that entity has now been missing for thousands of years...

                  But it always ends this way doesn't it?  You insist there is a god that performed specific actions, and worse, actions that do not align with it's own word.  You just can't provide any evidence of any of it, but still expect to be believed and that's where it always ends.

                  1. profile image61
                    retief2000posted 2 years ago in reply to this

                    So how do you communicate omnipotence, omnicience and omnipresence, as well as, the complex nature of the universe, physics, quantum mechanics, genetics, etc...to illiterate 17th century blacksmiths let alone 8th century BC goatherds? Stories teach lessons. Men write stories. Some stories are written with the inspiration of God. The mistake is thinking that the Old Testament is a dictated science book. That, apparently, is the error of atheists, agnostics and fundamentalists.

                    As for the missing entity, that doesn't comport with any thing the Catholic Church teaches about God and his relationship with humanity. It hardly ends with my mind slamming shut.

    2. Sed-me profile image83
      Sed-meposted 2 years ago in reply to this

      Respectfully, you may not know enough ppl. I believe they cannot exist without one another. Most Christians believe that God is the great mathematician and the creator of all things science. You should talk to those who do not separate the two.

      1. Bohemilee profile image61
        Bohemileeposted 2 years ago in reply to this

        Thank you, I appreciate your response. However, I did not say that ALL religious people that I have spoken with can't have one without the other, I said SOME.  So my question was focused on that percentage of people. Also there are other religions aside from Christianity.  I didn't specify a particular group because I have spoken to multiple people from various religions.

  2. Kathryn L Hill profile image83
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years ago

    "Why can't a person have religious beliefs and still accept scientific theories as well?"

     
    A person can.
    I do.
    Many do.
    Especially the reasonable ones.

    The unreasonable ones…?
    Well, each to their own.

    TWISI

 
working