jump to last post 1-50 of 73 discussions (406 posts)

Enabler Hillary Will Drop Out | Bill Clinton's Sex Scandals | Orgy Is

  1. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    The New York Times is one of the mainstream news outlets that has gone further left-wing than the others with out-right lies, so I am wondering how they will cover this story.  They cannot keep covering up for the Clinton Crime Family and save face.

    This is a good report by the NYP.   
    Here's the link:  http://nypost.com/2015/02/14/bill-clint … ary-again/

    I am thankful for Trump talking about Hillary being an enabler for Bill Clinton's sex scandals. Rapes, sexual abuse and several visits to convicted pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein's "Orgy Island" is open for conversation.  I think Hillary needs to drop out because her campaign is a bust.   

    What do you think, will Hillary drop out of the race for president?   

    Trump insider Roger Stone joins the show to discuss how the corrupt Clinton’s days of intimidating are over thanks to the American people waking up.
    http://www.infowars.com/roger-stone-the … n-is-over/

    http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13022033.jpg

    1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
      AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Am I a horrible person for laughing at the photo you provided?

      Yeah probably.

      And no, I don't think Hillary will drop out. I seriously doubt that she would have spent millions or billions or whatever she spent on a campaign, all because of an issue she had to have known would come up in the attacks against her. Unless she's a complete moron.

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        I laughed when I posted the image.  I do have a dry sense of humor, so no, I do not think you are a horrible person by any means. I think you are a honest person, you say what you mean and mean what you say. 

        Hillary is a moron, and one very deceptive moron.  Trump hasn't even started on her yet from a foundation of evidence. It will be interesting to watch these 19th royal-blood cousins battle.  I will gladly research anything Hillary throws at the America Party, its the new Trump party!

        1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
          AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Why thank you. I try smile

          I think they're both horrible candidates, but if I had to choose I'd choose Canada.

          Seriously though. If we could find some candidates without criminal or civil charges being threatened, that'd be great.

          1. wilderness profile image95
            wildernessposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            "Seriously though. If we could find some candidates without criminal or civil charges being threatened, that'd be great."

            Unlikely, IMO.  You don't get to be rich and famous without making enemies, and it has become the norm for those enemies to try their luck in our broken court system.

            But it WOULD be nice if our choices did not include those with a criminal history, and that should not be impossible.  Again, though, the American public has become so inured to such things that they re-elect the same politicians that stole from them just months or weeks ago.

            1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
              AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              True. And if you're not rich and powerful, you're not getting candidacy. What a crappy system.

            2. colorfulone profile image86
              colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              "Inurd" sums that up very well.  Hollywood entertainment and mainstream media seem to be close cousins with the present state of the Rainbow House.  Its not really funny but I do laugh at the darkness.

          2. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            I'm not sure Canada is any better off with their politicians, maybe they are.  It sure is beautiful country, I live near the border.

            I love that Bernie is still a burr in Hillary's saddle...may it lead to infection!  He beat her by 9 points in Colorado and its a virtual tie in Oklahoma with only a .5% difference.

            1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
              AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              Quite true. But at least the people are nicer (supposedly.) Although I have to admit, the one and only person I knew from Canada was a criminal psychotic nutcase. So there goes the validity of my reasoning, at least from a personal point of view.

              Bernie? I noticed he's done better than people thought. I don't know much about his political views though.

      2. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        I have come into agreement with your thinking.  Hillary isn't just running for president, she is running to get the power of being the president, and she is literally running for her life to save herself from prison (where she belongs).  She won't drop out, she could potentially spend a billion dollars to buy her way to the WH.

      3. 61
        retief2000posted 5 months ago in reply to this

        JEB spent tens of millions on a primary candidacy that never fogged the mirror. He is not a moron. He is, like Hillary, arrogant. Arrogance blinds people. The Clintons have been very successful avoiding any dire legal consequences for actions that would have landed any Republican in the hoosegow.

        1. Live to Learn profile image82
          Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          And that is the truth of it. Throughout my life I have noticed that Democrats never apologize for missteps, transgressions or when caught in low moral situations. They just keep going as if there is no shame in it and it has little effect on their careers. Republicans, on the other hand, appear to always stand up and admit their mistakes. Admit that they are mistakes. And their careers suffer for it.

          I suppose the moral of the story is that if you are a complete sh*t and you are a politician, be a democrat so it doesn't adversely effect your career.

    2. promisem profile image94
      promisemposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      The New York Times is one of the most respected newspapers in the world. It has exceptionally talented, intelligent and professional journalists who work hard at providing the news.

      Accusing it of intentionally lying is a ridiculous and totally false insult. Ironically, the insult is a lie itself.

      I am a professional journalist of 35 years with senior management experience, and I can tell you flat out that I have never met a single journalist who acts the way you claim. And I have met hundreds of them.

      What is far more disturbing is the right-wing propaganda machine that convinces so many naive conservatives that all media is made up of lying liberals and communists -- with the lone exception of Fox News.

      I can easily see the end of democracy if this path continues. It's obviously in decline already as the right-wing multi-billionaires buy every major election in the country.

      Thank God we still have newspapers that try to report the news and don't bend under their greedy thumbs.

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        I would expect such bias from a liberal journalist.  We shall have to agree to disagree, because I am sure you are convinced in your belief. 

        "Donald Trump attorney demands retraction from New York Times" 2 days ago.  The women NYT was quoting have come forward and said they never said what was reported...it was right out lies.  I know very well that the NYT covers for the Clintons and liberals with lies.

        Jayson Blair - "Truth, Lies and Subtext". The New York Times.
        John Swinton - "The business of a New York journalist is to distort the truth, to lie outright, ..."
        There are many such reports about the NYT...its endless.
        I'm sorry but you are wrong.  - Cheers! 
        http://www.newsfocus.org/media_control.htm

        Under Obama it is legal for the US media to report propaganda to its citizens.  He repealed the HR 4310 law in 2012.

        I'm not a Republican or a Democrat, both parties have been deceptive. 
        Its time for some real change for the benefit of all Americans.

        1. promisem profile image94
          promisemposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          LOL. I'm a liberal journalist? Fox News has really done a number on you.

          I have voted Republican most of my life including Ronald Reagan both times. My son is an aide to a respected Republican representative. My father was a long-time party official.

          I base my principles as much as possible on truth and reason and not on propaganda from the sorry likes of Fox News.

          Legal to report propaganda? Have you ever heard of libel laws? A newspaper would be sued for millions of dollars for lying on purpose.

          You know all of this about Clinton and NYT how? Do you work there? Are you a professional journalist? Have any of them been successfully sued over their Clinton coverage or throw in jail?

          Journalists in this country are threatened, intimidated and even killed for daring to report what some people don't want to hear. They have completely stopped reporting on organized crime and black ops because they have been killed for doing so.

          You smear their reputations and good names by spreading ridiculous lies.

          Shame on you for using your Constitutional right of free expression to make such comments on a respectable site like HubPages.

          1. Valeant profile image89
            Valeantposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            Well, that ends this argument.  Well played sir.

            1. colorfulone profile image86
              colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              PROMISEM, knows better than that because I have personally informed him about how the media is used to spread propaganda, legally.  Obama repealed the anti-propaganda law which now allows the government to spread their propaganda. 

              Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, and Rep. Adam Smith, D- Wash., which was inserted into the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act.

              https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr5736/text

            2. promisem profile image94
              promisemposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              Thanks, Valeant. In looking at it again, I regret being a little too forceful. But I get frustrated at some of the posts I have seen.

      2. Bill Yovino profile image90
        Bill Yovinoposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Well said, though it won't matter to these people. Anyone who doesn't buy into the garbage being sold by Trump is a victim of the evil liberal media.

    3. gmwilliams profile image85
      gmwilliamsposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Not a chance in Hades.  Hillary is in this race to the .......DEATH!

      1. paradigmsearch profile image92
        paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Hillary versus Donald. Either one is hell. We are f-cked.

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Well said.

      2. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        I don't know why Trump hasn't crushed Hillary yet. He has talked about some of the points I knew he would hit her with, but he hasn't brought out the sledge hammer yet.  So far his strategy has been working pretty well to get him this far.  He has the ammo so he must be waiting for the right timing.

        If Trump becomes president (I hope he does), and if he turns on his supporters and America...I will be the first one calling him Benedict Arnold.  I am putting my faith and trust in God, and believing that Donald J. Trump is being raised up by God Himself to walk fully in the Light, because I believe in a big God.  Trump is a phenomenon and that doesn't happen just by human power.

    4. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      "The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias....."  From the Wikipedia account of the New York Post.

      Before reading your posting here, Colorfulone, I knew nothing at all about the New York Post.   So please don't accuse me of any bias, my Dear.   But if you will associate yourself with such willfully-biased journalism, don't be surprised if you are seen as sadly misinformed....to say the least.

      I am in no position to judge whether what you or anyone else in America are saying is true.  But so far, I  have  not seen anything that you have said as being totally honest and above board.

      Gossip is often scandal and scandal is often gossip.  Either possibly being equally untrue.

    5. rhamson profile image77
      rhamsonposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      I said over four years ago that Hillary will be our next President unless the GOP can come up with a suitable contender. Well the GOP dropped the ball again and we are going to see the results of that blunder. Just as Romney was not the answer to Obama, Trump is not the answer to Hillary. We need to get our heads out of our A$$ES and find a solution to these poor choices the mobster intellect of the two parties have made us swallow.

    6. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      He even loves them, but the only way to have forgiveness of our sins and to have fellowship with God is through His Son, Jesus Christ. 
      Its spiritually awakening!

    7. Barbara Kay profile image86
      Barbara Kayposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      The New York Post is a Republican site that is little better than the Enquirer. I can't believe people believe anything they post.

      If you are going to put spouse's in the debate, I've seen several naked photos of Trump's wife on Facebook in the last week. That is ok?

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Actually, the National Enquirer is more reliable at ground breaking investigative reporting than the majority. I'm not a loyal reader, but when they bust a top story, they have their ducks in a row.

        The NYP can be bias, but tends to be non-partisan from the stories I have read and researched for myself.  I'm not a regular reader. 

        Ask straight men if its okey to see a naked women on Facebook.  I don't go for that stuff, while I do have friends who are strippers...I never go see them perform.

    8. johnmariow profile image82
      johnmariowposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      I think Hillary will win the election despite Bill's affair(s) . . . unless Trump unites the Republican Party.

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        What Republican party are you referring to, the elites?

        1. jeffduff profile image83
          jeffduffposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          By elites, are you referring to the fact that there are more Democrat millionaires in Congress than Republican millionaires?  Perhaps you are referring to a different kind of 'elite' politician - I mean, other than the elitism of significant wealth and economic power?

          1. Castlepaloma profile image23
            Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            Trump was a former Zionists agent, would that still make him an elistist?

            1. jeffduff profile image83
              jeffduffposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              Wow, I had no idea that Trump did that!  Um ... exactly how does that pertain to the overall topic of this thread?

              1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                Since Trump is going after bill on pedophilla  actions and Hillary his enabler.

                You think Hillary might bring up Trump's  Zionist pass. Or it's too hot and dangerious a thing to talk about. Even Allex Jones dose not want to talk about Zionism. I always find the most deep rooted things that leaders don't want to talk about. That is where the core source of the real problems are

      2. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        The establishment of the Republican party is not much different than the establishment of the Democratic party, they just play different rolls.  They all have their favorite means to get richer and they don't listen to what the people want.   

        Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama...all their polices stay the same or or build upon each other. Nothing has gotten fixed.  Hillary would be more or the same, and worse. 

        I'm don't sound like a ray of sunshine, but I am smiling because of Trump.

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          I don't think he will get elected. If he dose, welcome to fascism.

          1. Valeant profile image89
            Valeantposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            Trump's tax plan also favors the rich, i.e. him and people like him.  How does this help the situation?

            It's like the situations in Louisiana, Kansas, and now Wisconsin.  Trickle down is more like a policy to hoard.

            http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/ … yone-else/

            1. Castlepaloma profile image23
              Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              Small business is the backbone of the country, yet we would not want to hurt the   Richman's profits or would we?

    9. Stevennix2001 profile image82
      Stevennix2001posted 5 months ago in reply to this

      I haven't read any of the responses to this post, so I apologize if anyone brought this up already, but I seriously doubt she'll drop out at this point.  If she hasn't dropped out by now, then I think it's safe to say she's going to try to go all the way with her campaign.  i think the main reason is because she's the establishment's last hope to remain in control over in Washington DC.  Nobody within the establishment really wants Trump to win because most of his politics are too extreme, and he's too unpredictable.  They already managed to royally f**k over Bernie Sanders, and every establishment candidate on the GOP side has kind of failed stopping Trump, so really she's the establishment's last hope to remain in control.

      To be honest, I think Donald Trump is going to be the next president.  I said this before in private conversations and I'll say it here in this public forum.  Bernie Sanders was the ONLY CANDIDATE that could've stopped Donald Trump in a general election.  Hilary is a smart woman, but she's not going to beat Trump.

      Her BS saying how she's a washington outsider because she happens to be a woman was ungodly stupid to say on her part, and only tells voters that she  thinks we're all idiots.  She's been a senator for  years, and she was the first lady for 8 years in Washington DC, so I would hardly call her an outsider.  The fact that she uses that alone to get Bernie supporters to rally around her is pathetic, and it won't work.

      Trump is also a freaking idiot as well, but I will  give him credit where credit is due.  I don't think I've ever seen anyone run a presidential campaign as successfully as he has with today's mainstream media.  I mean the guy is practically rewriting the book on how to run for president at this point, and whoever his campaign managers are, they deserve a freaking raise when he wins. 

      Look, I'll be the first to admit that i do NOT want Trump to win, but he's going to win whether we like it or not. Think about it.  Every single time a GOP candidate (not named Trump) was leading in the polls, some sort of LEAK always came out about said candidate.  I don't know about any of you, but don't you find it kind of suspicious that when Dr. Ben Carson was leading in the GOP polls for awhile that suddenly all these leaks came out about him not exactly being truthful in his autobiography?  Granted, you could say that was nothing more than a byproduct of damn good journalism, and that Trump had nothing to do with that story.  Fair enough. After all, I have no proof to back this up.

      However,  the timing of these leaks seems far too coincidental, and they only seem to happen around candidates that are beating Trump in the polls.  Just saying.

      Not to mention the fact that  unless Trump has something insulting to say to someone on a debate stage, then he's practically useless because most of his answers are vague and ambiguous.   And with someone like Hilary, he's got a lot of material to attack her with.  He has nothing to attack to Bernie with because his record is about as clean as you can get as far as we know.  No scandals behind him.  Sure, you can call him a socialist or communist, but that's really all you got. 

      Therefore, if a debate had been between Bernie and Trump, then Trump would lose because it would force him to focus on the issues, which is not his strong point in debates.

      And whenever Trump loses a debate (which happens a lot), he retreats to his twitter. Cries like a baby about it, while saying how the establishment is trying to rig the election by making it sound like the other person won the debate even though he claims he won.

      He couldn't do that to Bernie Sanders because he's anti establishment too.  In fact, there's way more evidence of the establishment trying to royally f**k him over during this election race than any other presidential candidate, so Trump wouldn't be able to say that on his twitter whenever he lost a debate to Sanders on Live TV.

      Hilary is too ingrained in the establishment, so she's really nothing more than an open target for Trump.

      Sure, you can say that Hilary can always mudsling back, but here's another problem.  Because she's part of the establishment, Trump can easily spin it like he always does, and has done thus far.  Look at what Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz said about Trump during the GOP primaries.  Most of the crap they talked about him was proven facts.  he did rip off people with Trump University.  He did file for bankruptcy a few times, during his lifetime.  Yet when you bring this up to people, Trump spins it by simply saying, "Well it's the establishment trying to start a smear campaign against me, so don't trust them."  And for whatever BS reason, people eat that s**t up.  I don't know what it is, but Trump is arguably the best best bulls***er that I've ever seen.  It almost seems like Trump is untouchable. 

      Not to mention the fact that Hilary doesn't even have the full support of the democrat party.  whereas with most republicans, it seems like they're starting to rally around trump simply because they don't want to see Hilary win.   

      It's amazing to watch, and i think if anything else, I think Trump is showing how social media can and will probably play a huge role in politics moving forward.  I don't want Trump to win, but he's going to win.  Unless Bernie Sanders decides to run as an independent, I seriously doubt anyone can stop Trump at this point.  He's going to be our next POTUS folks.  You heard it here first.

  2. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago

    No doubt Bill had a sexual problem like JFK yet both were good President's.

    In Bill case the Republican did everything they could to impeach him. They knew adultery is no. 1 worst sin in America. Half the men in American cheat on their wives, but they don't get fired for it. I say stay out of people's bedroom, let wives punished them, not the state.

    How can Trump talk, when he had 2 wives left him for cheating affairs. Hillary forgave Clinton. Also Trump said to Hillary and Bill it was a terrible thing these Republican did to you both over this sexual scandal. Nobody I have ever heard that more 2 face than Trump.

    1. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Can you back up what you said, please.  That sounds like static to me. 

      Did you listen to the video? http://www.infowars.com/roger-stone-the … n-is-over/

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Info wars, Allex Jones is very bias towards Trump. Allex blowhorn and Trump appeal 80-90% of what most people already know. Then the rest they try to divert you away from the deep truth.

        Clinton has no rape convictions only sexual misconduct and that is nobodies business except between two aldults and wife.

        Adulterous is no ground to fire anyone, Trump and Allex  (two face) knows better. It's an extreme cheap shot to accuss Bill of serial pedophilla. (A person sexually attracted to children) low blow.

        Pro wrestling is more ethical

        1. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Bill Clinton paid off Paula Jones, like $800,000 to settle her sexual harassment case out of court.  What's that if its not admitting?  She and several other women are willing to come forward to tell what Bill and Hillary Clinton have done to their lives ... RAPE-PAC.   

          You are smart  and I know you have a cue as to what is going on from things you say in the forums.  Trump knows better what is going on and wants to stop the likes of the Rothschilds and the corrupt politicians rule in America. This isn't about Trump and he knows it.  I think you know it too.  Does the man know how to make smart deals with ice running through his vains?  I think so, and I think that is what we need...a very smart alpha-male.

          Alex Jones...I appreciate.  I would put him up against any of the mainstream journalists as far as reporting the truth goes. 

          I'm bias of Trump and Alex Jones...and respectfully so.

          1. Castlepaloma profile image23
            Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            The whole system works on bribery. People are voting for the lesser of the two evils.

            This bloodsport is going to change, it's when the public's has that enough abuse from the Federal  Government. The abuse has to be greater than their fear of death.

            Lately many are awake and ready. I've clearly envision It's going to get very mass messy at first. Then very beautiful afterwards,better because most people are much better than this crap.

          2. 81
            Hxprofposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            Alex Jones?? Mr. Conspiracy?  You'd put him up against any mainstream journalist?  Not for me.  And I don't trust journalists in general, mainstream or not. Yes, they're all biased, and some spew garbage that's entirely grounded in their bias; that kind of thing makes them poor journalists.  I look at everything reported as coming from someone's bias or from outright lies and then apply my own filter.

            1. colorfulone profile image86
              colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              I'll tell you what I like about Alex Jones the most, is that he reads declassified government documents and reports on things that have happened, and he is very good at connecting the dots.  Conspiracies exposed! I spend a fair amount of time reading declassified gov. docs., because I want to know what the heck happened.  Its great when I can switch on a video with AJ and listen to him and his guests who are experts in their fields and very intelligent. 

              This evening I spend maybe three hours listening to AJ and Green Beret, Special Forces Officer, MMA, UFC Tim Kennedy talk.  Maybe you don't want to know what to expect with ISIS in the days ahead in America.  Tim wants people like you to wake up and be ready, and he wants you to know to trust and rely on our veterans and military.  I had a great time, and am well informed.

              I know Alex is getting a lot of propaganda reported about him and that is because he is on the front line exposing the corruption in government, Globalists, and they want to shut him up and brainwash the brainwashed so they won't listen to the truth he has to say.  - Cheers!

          3. Lady Lorelei profile image78
            Lady Loreleiposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            ....and further on this topic of paying people off. Trump's ex wives have a gag order they have to sign to get their alimony agreement. Oh, he also has the majority of people who works for him or on his campaign sign one as well. Heaven forbid anything he has done or said ever get out into the public eye or old egocentric Donald starts screaming "I'll sue I'll sue".

            1. colorfulone profile image86
              colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              It is very common for people who divorce to have gag orders, especially for parents so that they are not disparaged in front of their children.  It is a wise thing to do, legally, its not a bad thing or illegal.  There can be huge disparities between religions for example, its endless when I begin thinking about reasons for it. I use to handle divorce cases and gag orders were not uncommon and were agreed to by both parties. 

              Good to see you!  smile

  3. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    Bill Clinton took twice as many flights on Pedophile Island billionaire's Lolita Express than previously reported.

    1. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      I believe nothing I hear,only half of what I see. Especially with a megalomaniac like Trump.

      If it's proven true, that Bill had sex with children. Hillary must divorce him right after the election. Then Bill should be submitted to a hospital until he is cured.

      Otherwise it"s just another drunk up charge by a crap slinging Beth vs Mcfly.

  4. paradigmsearch profile image92
    paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Monica_lewinsky.jpg
    Hmm...

    Not bad, Bill. Not bad. Keep up the good work.

    Bill is a hard dog to keep on the porch. - Hillary Clinton

    1. paradigmsearch profile image92
      paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      On a more serious note, here's what Hillary had to say on the subject in 1999: http://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/a … linton.usa . The whole article is quite interesting, actually.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Bill Clinton was our first black President.

        Because he likes ugly white women and plays the saxophone.

        1. paradigmsearch profile image92
          paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          They're going to come after you with pitchforks for that one.

        2. AshtonFirefly profile image82
          AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          You might get reported for that...

        3. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          It wasn't complimentary that Bill Clinton was called the first black president but he was called that.  Funny that you should mention that.  There were seven presidents before Obama who were part black but Obama gets called the first, but John Hanson was the first under the Articles of Confederation.

          Was Obama America's first gay president?

    2. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      I watched a YouTube video where Monica told about her recovery from devastation after her affair with Bill in the White House.  Her mother kept a close eye on her for sometime to make sure she didn't do any harm to herself.  She rose above all the deliberate bullying, humiliation and shame in the aftermath on social media (that's when those tactics began).

      She was young and in love with the president, and one day that fantasy just ended.  I like her a lot.

      1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
        AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        So she had an affair with the President of the United States and then was devastated by the shame, bullying, and humiliation? I'm sorry but she was an idiot if she thought no one would find out.

        1. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Bill and Monica were not trying to hide their affair, it was out in the open and everyone knew about it if they were paying attention.  There was a big sex scandal.  Bill ended up getting impeached.

          I'm not sure she was an idiot, she was a young intern at the WH, and Bill likes to have women.

          1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
            AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            Yes I remember that.

            Still, she had to know the risk, whether or not it was open. Perhaps my opinion is personally strong on this, but if I feel that if you do something in full knowledge that you are causing or could cause pain or havoc in another person's life,  then you have no right to complain when people react negatively. She had to know the risk. If you are going to get involved with a high profile person, you have to accept the fact that any and all of your actions are subject to that same scrutiny, and you WILL be under fire. Again, perhaps I am too harsh, but I'm sick of people not just being able to say, "I was wrong, and I deserve the negative reaction I get" and taking full accountability for their actions without fishing for compassion and excuses and in her case, (I feel) trying to make herself into a victim. She put herself in that position knowingly and with full knowledge of possible consequences.
              This would be the case, regardless of whether or not it concerned the President. If a woman knowingly has an affair with a married man, there is no person who will feel that the negative reaction she gets from it is unwarranted.
              Perhaps my own feelings blind an objective opinion on this matter. I also find it difficult to believe that people involved with high profile individuals, do so out of pure intentions or "love."

            1. colorfulone profile image86
              colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              It could get bloody having an affair with a married man, not wise at all.  I actually thought somewhat like you before I listened to Monica's story.  Since then I have had compassion for her because of the living hell she must have went through.   Its a good thing she had the sperm DNA.

              1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
                AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                I'm sure she did go through hell, but she opened that door and walked right down into it.

                I'm sure thinking this way is probably not fair, and if it is, I'm sure karma will get me for it.

        2. paradigmsearch profile image92
          paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          She was 22 at the time. I wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed at that age either. big_smile

          1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
            AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            She was obviously sharp enough to be an intern in the White House in the company of the President of the United States.

            I do get your point, however smile

            1. paradigmsearch profile image92
              paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              Good point.

              There are indeed at least a million women on any given day who would boink a sitting president in a heartbeat if given the chance,  and the more publicity the better. big_smile

              1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                If I were gay, I'd do him.

                1. paradigmsearch profile image92
                  paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  And there's another million. lol

                  1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
                    AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                    yikes EW. To both. Just ew.

    3. Kathryn L Hill profile image85
      Kathryn L Hillposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Monica, Monica, Monica. roll

  5. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago

    Who?

    Either someone without a sense of humor.

    I'm white and allowed to joke about white people. Is white the only entitlement to right.

    1. AshtonFirefly profile image82
      AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      People who get easily offended and find racism in comments where there is none.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Funny how most people major in minority things.

        Where I mention about many top authority give statements there will be an America dollar crash at the end of this month.

        Nobody cares until the killing starts.

  6. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    Roger Stone Explains Why The Clintons Are Pure Evil (Part 1)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqYOXtXOFlY

    Author of "The Clintons' War on Women"

    1. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      I just think Hillary is lesser of the two evils. Why people vote for evil is beyond me.

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        I believe Trump is the right guy, but I could be wrong.  As far as Hillary goes, she would be the worst ever, and it would be hard to bet Obama.  Bill is responsible for NAFTA, and Hillary is all for it and for TPP which would be an even bigger disaster for the economy. 

        Be careful of the brainwashing against Trump in liberal media. 
        He is not racist, etc.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCHZbB-M9oE

        1. Quilligrapher profile image89
          Quilligrapherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Again, as is your practice, you post an accusation and run from your obligation to provide facts to support your false claim. While you are quite willing to ignore Mr. Trump’s long history as a racist, most Americans are not nearly as gullible. Donald Trump’s reputation as a racist rests squarely on his own actions and statements. At some point it may occur to you that your ultraconservative handlers don’t want you to know the truth.

          Let’s explore the facts found in the public record together and cut out the irrational rhetoric about brainwashing by the liberal media. Of course, you never offer solid facts and it is clear that you have no other choice but to make a baseless claim about brainwashing by a liberal media. It is probably the best you can do because those who want to know the truth, can find the truth.

          Donald Trump was sued, not once but twice, by the U.S. Department of Justice during his years as president of Trump Management Corporation. The first time, the Justice Department charged him with racial discrimination against blacks who tried to rent apartments in his properties located in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island. The Department of Justice charged his company with quoting different rental terms and conditions to black rental candidates than it did to white candidates, and, further, that the company lied to black applicants about apartments not being available.

          The Donald settled out of court and promised not to discriminate against black people, Puerto Ricans or other minorities. Never the less, just three years later, the Justice Department sued Trump Management Corporation again for failing to keep his pledge not to discriminate against black applicants by telling them apartments weren’t available. The facts are as unavoidable as they are unsavory. Mr. Trump has a long and infamous history as a redlining Realtor {1}

          This is NOT brainwashing by the liberal media, this is the public record revealing Donald Trump as a lifelong racist. In 2016, Trump lied to the free press in this country about his “great relationship with the blacks,” and Colorfulone happily chimes in with "Be careful of the brainwashing against Trump in liberal media.  He is not racist." roll Yeah, right!

          Obviously, some posters would rather print lies than acknowledge the truth. Tell us that you did not know that the New Jersey Casino Control Commission fined the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino $200,000 because of Trump’s policy to remove African-American card dealers from a gaming table if a patron requested it. A state appeals court not only upheld the fine but included in its decision, “In our view, the transcript fairly reeks of Trump Plaza's guilt.”{2}

          Brainwashing??? roll Not at all! Just facts that Trump’s supporters ignore.

          A former Trump Castle employee has vivid memories of Mr. Trump’s racism. “When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown recalled in a interview with the New Yorker.  "I remember it: they put us all in the back.” {3}

          Occasionally, you may hear someone claim that some blacks are lazy, but, a racist will insist, irrationally to be sure, that ALL blacks are lazy! Mr. Trump has proven himself to be a bona fide racist and that is something with which you and his other supporters must live. 

          He once said this about the black financial executive at his Trump Plaza Casino: “And isn't it funny. I've got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day. . . . I think the guy is lazy. And it's probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It's not anything they can control. [Ed: Bold font added for educational purposes.] {4}

          Then, there was this headline in the New York Daily News: “TRUMP HIT WITH RACE SUIT BLACKS: DON DEALT US OUT OF CASINO JOBS.”  {5}

          It also seems like Colorfulone would like us all to believe that Donald Trump was graduated from an elite New York Military academy, went on to become a presidential candidate and had never, in all of those years, heard the name David Duke and the Klu Klux Klan!

          When asked by CNN if he would disavow the support of David Duke and the KKK, Mr. Trump actually said, "Honestly, I don’t know David Duke. I don’t believe I’ve ever met him. I’m pretty sure I didn’t meet him. And I just don’t know anything about him."

          Again, to be perfectly clear, he said, “Honestly, I don’t know David Duke." Yet, the public record shows that Mr. Trump knows a great deal about David Duke and his status as a white supremacist. Mr. Trump issued a statement in 2000 saying, “the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. (Pat) Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. (Lenora) Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.” Interesting, isn’t it? In 2016, Mr. Trump claimed he didn’t know anything about David Duke and the KKK! {6}

          The bottom line? Mr. Trump, not the liberal media,  is responsible for his actions, statements, and ugly reputation as a racist. The facts are available in the free press and they stand unchallenged to this day on their own merits. It is about time that Mr. Trump’s supporters admit that they can not blame all of his racist baggage on meaningless, unsupported, buzz words like “brainwashing” by “the liberal media.”

          If you have proof the media reports above are false, then produce the facts (not just more worthless opinion stolen from other sources) and engage in a rational discussion without all the self-serving rhetoric meant to deflect attention away from the truth.
          http://s2.hubimg.com/u/6919429.jpg
          {1} http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/donald_ … tion_suit/
          {2} http://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/10/19/ … 719467200/
          {3} http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/ … antic-city
          {4} http://articles.philly.com/1991-05-10/n … nald-trump
          {5} http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/mon … e-1.726389
          {6} http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli … /81101906/

          1. IslandBites profile image86
            IslandBitesposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            And, as expected... Not a word.


            "They are sleazes when they know the facts but ignore them."
            Very appropriate! LOL

            1. PrettyPanther profile image86
              PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              big_smile

            2. colorfulone profile image86
              colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              One of the last liberal rags I would go to for reliably information is Salon, and those other sites listed there have left-wing agenda bias as well.  You need to allow men and boys in women's and girl's bathrooms and locker rooms BS!

              Recently Salon has been romanticizing pedophilia with their very own resident Todd Nickerson pedophile.  That's the new agenda to brainwash idiots who don't have a moral code of ethics.  But, if you want to go to sites that have a darkside agenda and cannot be trusted, you go for it.  Don't say I didn't warn you. 

              Quill is very good with words.  People will try to dazzle with brilliance, but its more like baffling with BS,  IMHO. I usually ignore such because its a waste of time going down that rabbit trail.  I'm totally aware of Quill's baffling M.O. in the HubPages Forums and exercise my right to ignore.  But, I am glad to see him practicing freedom of speech while its still possible.  The left's Orwellian censorship campaign and political correctness is well underway. 

              Did Yoko Ono have an affair with Hillary Clinton?  She says she did.

              1. PrettyPanther profile image86
                PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                LOL, somebody said Trump participated in orgies with underage girls.  Look it up.  If you're going to believe Yoko, and give a whit about Hillary's sex life, then you better do the same for your orange loverboy.

                1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                  Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  Is'nt that an image for peace.

                  HIllary and Yoko in bed together.

                  1. colorfulone profile image86
                    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                    Well, that's one way to look at it.  Thanks for the humor. 

                    Hillary and the True Beast She Is interview with a former Clinton insider. 
                    * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho1aqqiGReg

              2. Quilligrapher profile image89
                Quilligrapherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                Now that you have had the opportunity to post facts to support your false claim, we can analyze what we know on a rational level and sort the truth from the lies.

                The proofs you submitted to support your claim that Donald Trump’s reputation as a racist was the result of "brainwashing against Trump in liberal media.  He is not racist. ": None. Not even one. 

                Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude you do not have facts to support your claim and it is another lie you have planted in this forum.

                Donald Trump has a long and unsavory history as a racist. He acquired this reputation as a direct result of his own statements, actions, and corporate policies. {1}

                Mr. Trump was sued twice by the U.S. Department of Justice for racial discrimination. {2}

                Donald Trump’s casino was fined $200,000 by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission because of his policy of discrimination against black dealers. {3}

                Donald Trump became so irate when we saw black employees on the casino floor, management had to herd all blacks into a back room whenever Donald and Ivana were in the  casino. {4}

                Mr. Trump lied to CNN about knowing David Duke and the agenda of the Klu Klux Klan. {5}

                Finally, these facts should also be obvious to most by now. Everyone has a right to their own opinions and everyone has a right to be wrong. But, based on what I’ve read, no one has exercised these two rights in this forum more than you have and this is a fact!
                http://s2.hubimg.com/u/6919429.jpg
                {1} http://hubpages.com/forum/post/2816554
                {2}  http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/donald_ … tion_suit/
                {3} http://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/10/19/ … 719467200/
                {4} http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/ … antic-city
                {5} http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli … /81101906/

            3. IslandBites profile image86
              IslandBitesposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              smile

      2. AshtonFirefly profile image82
        AshtonFireflyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        I'm conflicted on this. I look at Trump and want to vomit. I look at Clinton and want to vomit. But yet, here I am, an American citizen, supposedly responsible for the outcome of my country, and...I can't decide who would do the most damage. I think there should be provisions made in the Constitution to where if the populace finds that two candidates are more horrible than they originally assumed, that they can get rid of both of them and start over. sad

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          There is a chance of that when America collapses from the dollar coming home. President are only there to give us an illusion of freedom, we don't.

          The black pastor said Trump is a humble Christian and other countries don't fear America military so we need a stronger military.

          Onward Christain soldiers hit those walls, boarder and bring all countries to their knees, plus ourselves.

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            A lot of people say that Trump is a humble Christian, but the mainstream media likes to demonize him and brainwash the masses.  The more I listen to the guy the more I like him.  Its going on three years since I have watched MSM TV and I like to think I am better for it, maybe. 

            I look at Bill Clinton and Killary and feel no joy, no love, no compassion...just negative feelings.  Grr!
            Clinton Sexual Assault Victim Describes Her Encounter With The Former President
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFbh6uPBKuY

            1. Castlepaloma profile image23
              Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              I know there is a lot of womaniser out there and don"t agree with there over aggressive behavior. If I was a women I would know my Marshal art well. If I said no to too much manhandling. Then he kept on, he would get a hard kick in the balls and think twice about the next woman he tried that on. Is it that hard to say no to the President. I said no to GW Bush over a war sculpture, that encourage far worst, murder.

              1. colorfulone profile image86
                colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                The National Enquirer is reporting Democrat presumptive Hillary Clinton used an unsecured phone on numerous occasions to contact lesbian lovers.
                http://www.infowars.com/latest-hillary- … an-lovers/

                The next Clinton sex scandal:  Butch Hillary's lesbian lovers!   

                The National Enquirer has been very good at reporting the truth and uncovering scandals.  They don't go out on the limb with someone as powerful as a Clinton unless they have facts as a foundation.

                1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                  Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  I rather them having some kind of human contact. Than watching two people or more killing and stealing from each other like the behavior in the Government now.

                  I don"t even care if the Clintons have mass orgies with furrys or sex robots. As long as they are not harming. anyone.

                  1. colorfulone profile image86
                    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                    Hillary Clinton Laughs While Discussing Defense of Child Rapist
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ

                    http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13036634.jpg

                    The girl that was raped was 12 years old and justice has never been served on her rapist.

        2. 85
          Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          There are other candidates......

          I voted Libertarian last election, and looking to do the same this time around.

          It's simple. I get the Democrats out of my paycheck, and Republicans out of my private life.

          Win, win.

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            I do not see a separation of parties between the elites since Bush 1, "New World Order". Globalists, that Trump is exposing.

            Edited: I am a Libertarian (not what it has become).

            1. 85
              Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              Still better than tge ongoing clown show my friend

    2. Sychophantastic profile image82
      Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      It's a shame that you are blinded by your own idiocy. Quoting the National Enquirer? Really? You're either stupid or have some kind of psychological condition. Paranoia? Bipolar? You dismiss reliable sources and quote unreliable ones. There are plenty of non-partisan sources to quote from that have established the truth of various claims.

  7. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    The Clintons , bill and Hillary , are  the two most vile human beings ever put on this earth .

    1. PrettyPanther profile image86
      PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Wow, that's pretty vile. I thought maybe Idi Amin might be up there, or Pol Pot, or maybe even Hitler.  Wow, the two most vile human beings on the planet.  I've got to rethink what I know about them....

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        How about the Rockefellers or Rothschild's?

        1. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          I would add George Soros to that, too. 
          He is Hillary's biggest supporter.

      2. 85
        Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Forgot Stalin and Guerrera, and Castro. And the last 3 Chinese rulers

      3. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
        wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13080484.png

        On April 19,1993, 76 people (men, women, and children) under the direction of Janet Reno, were murdered by U.S. government forces at the Branch Davidian Compound near Waco Texas. Janet Reno, was under the direction of Bill Clinton. Bill and Hillary Clinton are directly responsible for these murders. Many of the men,women, and children died from inhaling the deadly CS gas that was fired into the compound by  government agents. This is a very gruesome, and torturous way to die.

        Hillary Clinton is quoted as delivering this message to Janet Reno that morning: "Torch the motherf---ers! Do it Today!" This is quite believable and in character with Hillary Clinton. In a video interview where she was asked about the killing of Moammar Gadahfi, Hillary Clinton commented: "We came, we saw, he died!" And then she giggled like a school girl, or a witch if you prefer. There is nothing "good" about either of these people. The massacre at Waco is just one episode in a long line of incidents connected to the Clinton's that have caused the deaths of hundreds of people. In the final analysis, I wouldn't be surprised to find that they are responsible for the deaths of thousands. And the part about Bill Clinton's sex life that is most troubling is that he, just like George Bush Sr, is a known pedophile. These are disgusting animals who both deserve a very long stay in a Federal Prison. I would vote for El Chapo before I would vote for Hillary, as he is the lesser of two evils.

        1. PrettyPanther profile image86
          PrettyPantherposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          You're entitled to your opinion, even if your supporting evidence is shaky, to put it lightly.

        2. Sychophantastic profile image82
          Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          More conspiracy theories. Morons believe conspiracy theories. And Obama was responsible for Hurricane Katrina, right? Something like 50% of Republicans believe that.

          1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
            wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            The video of Hillary laughing about murder is real. Watch it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y

            The massacre at Waco was real. Bill Clinton's longtime billionaire friend  Jeffery Epstein is real, and he is also a real convicted pedophile. It is also a fact that Clinton has flown to Epstein's "Orgy Island" on several occasions since Epstein was convicted of being a pedophile. No conspiracy theories, just facts.

            I am an Anarchist, and so I have no allegiance to either party. From your comment about Republicans, I gather that you live in a make believe world of "good guys and bad guys". Often we find that they are all bad guys. Just two sides of the same coin. Even a moron knows that!

          2. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            GW Bush was president during Katrina,  but 50% of Democrats believe that Repbulicans blame Obama. Oh wait, that doesn't make sense either, or does it? 

            Bush took a lot of heat because of the governments slow response to help the people in the hurricane's destruction.  Because of that, many African Americans died.  Some say it was racist, and that if they were white people that the government would have responded fast. We will never know why the hell the government was so slow.  But, I believe some people's lives could have been saved if timely help was sent.  Charity response teams were activated there before the government thought about showing up it seemed. 

            Obama could have taken the opportunity to speak out for African Americans, and the unacceptable slow response after Hurricane Katrina, but he did not.  I suppose because it wouldn't help him politically, I don't know...but I do care. 

            I just hope if people are in need and dying in America that the government will not be so slow.

        3. Sychophantastic profile image82
          Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          While the Branch Davidian's deaths were unfortunate, the fault for everything lies at the hands of its maniacal leader, David Koresh. The man was a terrorist by any modern definition, no different than any radical Islamic terrorist. Dealing with terrorists is never a pretty business.

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            The government massacred men, women, and children.  They were not terrorists.  That was Bill Clinton and Janet Reno to blame.

            Remember, Wounded Knee, Bloody Island, Greenwood, and the list goes on and on.

            1. Sychophantastic profile image82
              Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              The Branch Davidians were insane. When you're insane, insane things usually happen to you. Certainly, not the government's shining moment and a tragedy that should have been avoided, but David Koresh could have surrendered since he was guilty of numerous crimes.

              1. Sychophantastic profile image82
                Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                Here's an interesting quote about your favorite subject:

                “It is clear, in hindsight, that the facility was not sufficiently protected by the State Department and the Defense Department. But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is under-budgeted.

                “I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta. They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself.”

                Guess who it's from.

          2. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
            wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            WHOA! Talk about conspiracy theories! David Koresh was not a terrorist by any stretch of the imagination. He did not commit any terrorist acts, nor did the people of Waco complain or feel threatened. The government had an agenda, and it had nothing to do with Koresh being a terrorist. He allegedly had a cache of illegal weapons, but that has yet to be proven. Whether he did or not, it did not warrant executing 76 people and gassing little kids to death. There was no such urgency that demanded such a response. It was cold blooded murder, and the U.S. government has become very adept at murdering people and then covering their tracks.

            Investigations into the massacre have revealed:

            ... many suspect BATF and the FBI falsely claim that after the fire they found 48 automatic weapons, four live grenades and twenty metal tubes they labeled "silencers." These agencies have proved to no one outside of law enforcement that Davidian guns were illegally converted. Nor have they proved the grenades were live or the metal tubes were silencers.

            ... When a Davidian gun expert tried to look at the weapons, he only was allowed to do so through thick plastic, which would make it difficult to see if the changes had been made or if they had been done before or after the fire.

            ... While several agents alleged they heard automatic gun fire coming out of Mount Carmel, prosecutors could not provide such evidence in video tape or in vehicles shot at by Davidians. If Davidians had used such weapons, they would have done much more damage to vehicles and killed many more agents.


            I love how many Americans like to talk about their wonderful freedoms, and their love of God and country, and then take such a cavalier attitude toward the murder of children when the killing is being done by the government. Hillary Clinton is pure evil. And I am sure you didn't watch the video of her maniacally laughing about the torture and murder of Gadhafi. Only a sadist or a psychopath finds pleasure in killing. If George Washington were alive today, I would not call for his execution, although he would be most deserving of it. Nor would I laugh and cheer if someone tortured and killed Washington, a miscreant responsible for acts of genocide, kidnapping, rape, and theft. That is the difference between me and Hillary, I am a civilized human being.

            1. ahorseback profile image47
              ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              Wrench , You had me there for a minute ! Could Wrench-biscuit be  seeing things differently now , a clear ,precise, accurate  political  opinion ?  But then , the usual  psychosis  rant came to the surface , George Washington  and conspiracy theories ?   Please !
              http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13081308.jpg

              This saying , I've used for the usual liberal  mentally challenged   dismembering , but really ?  Really ? have I got to use it on YOU now ?

              1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
                wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13081361.jpg

                You can define me however you like. Unlike many of the little people in these Forums, I believe in free speech. Censorship is a cowardly act, but it is an act befitting the average American who likes to play in this sandbox. However, I must inform you that I do not fancy myself a liberal. That is because a great majority of those who subscribe to that label also believe in government, and a two party system. And so, as far as I am concerned the average liberal is just as mentally challenged as the far-right conservatives. I think it would be good for them and good for the country if all the liberals and all the conservatives stocked up on Viagra and booked themselves on a slow boat back to the Fatherland.

                I'm not joking! Look at who the American people have to choose from in this election cycle. Do you call that a choice? Yes, I believe presidential elections have always been rigged, but at least up until now they have put on a good show and made it believable. Now we've got the whole city of Flint Michigan suffering from lead poisoning, and one contender with no experience is talking about building a wall, and the other one who has some experience is a criminal who is in the pocket of every special interest group that can afford the price of admission.

                Sweet Jesus! If Hillary can bring in $250,000 just for giving one speech, she could help to rebuild Flint Michigan, Detroit, and several other major cities within the next 5 years. Why isn't she doing it? Why aren't all the rich people doing it? After all, Wall Street, Walmart, McDonalds, and every multi-million, multi-billion dollar business in the United States wouldn't have a nickel if not for the poor and the working class. They wouldn't have a dime to spend! And Donald Trump is talking about building a wall to protect us from dirt poor Mexicans and Terrorists, but as far as I know, nobody from the Islamic Jihad Foundation, or the Mexican Relief Society, have poisoned an entire American city. No not one! Donald Trump could save billions of tax-payer dollars by going after the real Terrorists: the ones  who sit in governor's mansions, in the Senate,on the Supreme Court,in the House of Representatives, and in Police precincts across the nation that have been infiltrated by the KKK. These are the miscreants who are guming up the works. No, I wouldn't classify myself as a liberal.

            2. Sychophantastic profile image82
              Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              And David Koresh had what to do with Hillary? Um, nothing. As for Khadafi, he was a terrorist. Are you going to start crying over the murder of Osama Bin Laden next?

              1. Live to Learn profile image82
                Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                What proof do we have that Osama bin Laden is really dead?

  8. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago

    I'm too sexy for my shirt and too sexy for America by far.

  9. paradigmsearch profile image92
    paradigmsearchposted 6 months ago
  10. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    A husband in the Bronx beat a would be rapist of his wife to death, and will likely be charged with man-slaughter.  Justice was served and a sicko stopped that time.  That husband is a hero!

    1. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Not long ago in Texas an unwritten law. if a man had found  an other man in bed with his wife (adulterist) . That husband could shoot and kill that man and then charges would be Dropped. adultery is number 1.  worst sin in a America.

      Half of Americans cheat on each other' along with trying pot at some point in their life.

      Are not American priority laws really screwed up?

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        From the book, "The Dangerous Passion: Why Jealousy Is as Necessary as Love and Sex"

        Chapter:  If I Can't Have Her, Nobody Can
        https://books.google.com/books?id=M5Ezu … mp;f=false

        1974 Texas adultery. Adultery is a terrible thing, it can and does destroy lives. Man does have deep homicidal roots, and so do women.  Its best not to take someone else's mate, its just not wise and it is a sin. Scary stuff!

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Murder would be number one in my sin list. Wail it dose not make the top ten worst sin list according to CNN poles.

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            CNN is lame.  smile 

            Pakistan recently passed the law that the husband can lightly beat their wives if they disobey.  That would be his word against her's?  0-0

            1. Castlepaloma profile image23
              Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              Maybe he, who made the law, should be slightly beaten up for the beating he is giving out.

              1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                Better yet, lock him up and take away his judgement rights for awail. Don't want to be a Hippocratic.

  11. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    Hey I know , let's get Katie Couric  to be the fair and equal judge of what we should all think about this !

    No wait , How about  Anderson Cooper ....oh no ,  Brian Williams !

    Anyone  else beginning to see which political party has the most biased media ?

  12. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    PP, you really could do some research before asking questions of the top of your head. 
    (Hint: Rothschilds)

    1. PrettyPanther profile image86
      PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Or, you could just explain why he doesn't just tell someone like Breitbart where the bodies are buried.  I'm sure your beloved news site would love to go dig up some bodies buried by Clinton's hitman.  Why hasn't it already happened?

  13. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    Hillary has been the single most deplorable  bigot when it comes to woman's issues  in the entire political world  , with the exception of her  husband Bill  . Why  , she enabled him  by attacking the victims like a rabid wolf  , tearing at the throats of rape and assault victims .  Why else was he impeached and disbarred and why else are they paying civil suits under the table ?
    That's who you 're voting for ?

    1. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      I'm so happy to not vote, because by taking no sake in something like an election. Watching each election and how things get worst, all because it's rigged.

      1. ahorseback profile image47
        ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Castle , its only rigged  for the leftist trash media  in the last twenty years or so , unfortunately for them the voting public is  just beginning to get angry about a media that's  agenda is slanted in favor of psuedo-socialism .    Outsider candidates are blowing party liners out of the water in popularity  so badly that they have to resort to electoral college trickery  to reclaim the fast disappearing two  party influence ,    ............Come back to America Castle , its becoming a new world !

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          After your wave of civil and world war crashed. I may hop on and surf the 3rd wave of progress .

  14. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    There you go with promoting Salon again. I really do not want to go through a debt with someone who promotes a site that romanticizes pedodphilia, Quill.  Horrendous!
    Find someone else to baffle or dazzle, and stop targeting me, please.

  15. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13046250.jpg

  16. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    Interesting how many accusations  come from the left  , yet when challenged with truths , they become
    a thing of the past .  Totally ignored , forgotten .   The Clintons are some of the craftiest political  criminals  ever to exist in modern times .  How conveniently the left can ignore exactly what they accuse of others .


    http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13046294.jpg

    1. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      In case you are referring to my posting, I have no knowledge of what the Clintons do in their private lives.  Anything cooked up by Newspaper Editors and TV Producers, regardless of which side of politics they sit on, is bound to be biased one way or another.   Also, not being familiar with the details of American politics as a whole, I cannot offer an opinion politically.  To be honest the politics do not really interest me, as they don't here in Australia.   But we are beset by similar commercial and editorial interests. 

      What I am really concerned about is the actions and reactions from people within the general public, i.e., the ordinary people in the street who decide whom they will vote for....based upon beliefs and prejudice in the main. 

      When you fall for the stories set up to entrap your mind, you swallow poisonous, scandalous gossip, and wonder why the person you vote into office as President turns out not to be the person you envisaged. 

      How can this situation ever change if the people of your country continue to bury your heads in the sand and just hope that things will happen for the best?

      I don't know, do you?

      1. ahorseback profile image47
        ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        One thing that I do know ,having survived the sixties and seventies "social revolution "  Is exactly how hypocritical that the left was  then and continues to be now at new and  hyper-elevated  levels .  Of all of the promised changes brought on by leftist's  activists  was a new transparency ,   There is no greater hypocrisy than to   call for  the most basic reinstitution and revitalization  of constitutional liberties while denying  honesty and truth , integrity and  freedom .  ESPECIALLY of the opposing ideologies.

        Leftist ideologies in America today are shamefully  lacking in transparency , integrity and honesty  . One quick look at the left - controlled mass media in America today shows  the perfect example of  centuries old bully-dictator style habits of  liberal one -government leadership ,  censorship,  boot- jacking followings , Mao-ist  dishonest reaction-ist's  and total hypocrisy .

        Free speech is awesome ,as long as it doesn't  interfere with  leftist agenda-ed  pre-programming .

        1. PrettyPanther profile image86
          PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          You and colorfulone are great ambassadors for the conservative cause in general and Donald Trump in particular.  I encourage you to continue posting your heartfelt rants, devoid of facts or any supporting evidence, and thoroughly lacking in substance, not because I admire it, but because you are exposing the U.S. conservative base for what it is.  You truly are representative of the new right.   Facts be damned.  "If I say it's true, it is, and if you ask me to support my assertions I will merely repeat them without any additional evidence, as though your questions were never asked." 

          Rational conservatives, please take back your party.  Don't leave the challenges to these anti-intellectual, factually devoid rants only to us on left.  Restore the intellectual conservatism of the past, so we can have a balance of ideas and a national discussion that benefits the country.  Give the left worthy adversaries, not crazy buffoons and obstructionist do-nothings.

          1. ahorseback profile image47
            ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            And you ?  Would you then say that you support the Non-transparency of these activist  leftist leaders , Obama , Clinton ,Sanders ,who profess  care, concern and compassion for the down trodden all the while  engaging in the  selling out of a once great nation for personal riches and  gain of self ?  I could go on all day  with fact , figure and  proof , yet  you wouldn't read it anyway , THAT is the great advantage of the left ,   blind ambition for promised  entitlements   , Who needs fact , statistics ,  proof , or truth when you can  live quite well on  political correctness alone .

            1. PrettyPanther profile image86
              PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              LOL, keep posting.  When have I ever said I support the non-transparency of anyone? 

              More nonsense.

              1. ahorseback profile image47
                ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                You are a liberal , naturally  transparency  evades  your political consciousness  .

                1. jonnycomelately profile image85
                  jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  As a rightist, does having your head in the sand cloud your view of heaven? lol

                  1. ahorseback profile image47
                    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                    http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13046642.png

                2. PrettyPanther profile image86
                  PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  I know, you said it so it must be true!  Freakin' hilarious.

                  Keep posting.

    2. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Hypocrites!

  17. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    According to 2 Cor 5:20, I am an ambassador. But not for Trump...it doesn't say that, so that is a false witness.  Be reconciled to God, and let your words be true.

    Oh, and read "The Clinton's War On Women", for detailed accuracy.  Listen to the many women Bill sexually abused and raped, and listen to them how Hillary attacked them and discredited them.

    1. Live to Learn profile image82
      Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      I'm just curious why you insist on continuously inserting your religion into political conversations? And, I'm pretty sure there is no part of the Bible that is talking about you.

      Edit. I just looked up the verse you quoted. I will say NOT and add a lol that you even suggested it.

    2. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Easy isn't it?  When you have nothing better to say, bring in a biblical quote, out of context, irrelevant, trying to prove your morally superior status. But dodging the real issue.

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Oh, that sounds self righteous!  Biblical moral talk is humorous at best coming from a proclaimed gay man who says he is an atheist. -  Obama is gay, his wife is a guy, and they want to force us to allow biological males in women's and girl's bathrooms and shower rooms.  Just saying how morally perverted its gotten with the perversion in the Rainbow House and LGBT agenda.  Nowhere in Scriptures is that acceptable.  But, that is external stuff. My responsibility is to live a life that is acceptable to the Lord, and the only way to do that is in and through Him (submission).

        Be reconciled to God. May He bless you.

        Nothing superior here, I'm just a sinner saved by grace, who doesn't go on sinning because Jesus removed it. ALL Glory to God, I can take no glory! 
        I have nothing to prove.

        Whew, what was the topic:  "Enabler Hillary Will Drop Out | Bill Clinton's Sex Scandals | Orgy Is"?

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Been to co-op washroom in Asia, no big deal. Only problem for me was letting Ladies go to the toilet first, it was hard holding it for so long.

          As far as gay, you will never get rid of 10% who want to ultimately love each other, just like you dream about.  Let people in hell fight over it forever.

          It's scary enough that half the marriages last forever

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            For sure, its not my problem.  When a self proclaimed gay atheist takes a stab at undermining who I am in Christ, he can expect a reply. This is nothing new with John, he has a history of throwing darts.  Its okey, the child's play sharpens me to stand up against the devil and his demons.

            "In addition to all of these, hold up the shield of faith to stop the fiery arrows of the devil." -  Ephesians 6:16

            God is Love, and I'm not a dreamer! smile

            1. Castlepaloma profile image23
              Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              Jonny is the devil?

              Is he anymore devil than the 1000s of other Gods. Or other atheists, aldultary, abortionist, sex out of wedlock, pot, porn eating shellfish so on and so on.

              Have I covered 90% of the planet sinners. Is this about hell on earth or will you allow the real God to sort out the devil's in the spiritual world.

              I hope it's the 99% unknown mass of the earth is underneath us is not hell.

              Because I claimed that fire the source of life, like the sun and stars just cool down, into us stardust babies.

            2. Live to Learn profile image82
              Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              He has to be when he can love even those who consistently make false and misleading statements and spend more time spouting lies than truths.

      2. Live to Learn profile image82
        Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        One has to dodge the real question when one's position doesn't have an honest leg to stand on.

  18. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago

    Good thing the Clintons are protected from the top worst sins in America - sex. Why? Because they believe in Jesus, tbey will be saved. since everyone is sinners most massively for sex. Man, it is soo.. comfortable being Christain . Hell for me regardless of no cheating, honesty and no harm to anyone, just because I don't believe.

    Satan and Hitler believe in Jesus too.Good thing war, murder and stealing are not on the top ten worst sins in America or Politician would be out of work.

    1. 85
      Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Hitler was a pagan, firmly believing in the nordic gods.

      If you need a source, blitzkrieg: rise and fall of the third reich

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Hitler was a Muslim.

        1. 85
          Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Don't recall ragnorak being mentioned in anything remotely resembling islam.

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            Google "evidence hitler was a muslim".

            1. 85
              Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              I prefer a source that includes hitler and his lieutenants' actual journal entries....

  19. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    Yep, God even loves them!  smile  That's why He gave us Jesus Christ, so that through and in Christ we can have fellowship with God.  Its spiritual.

    Revelation 4:11 - Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

    Ephesians 2:10 - For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

    Genesis 1:27 - So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    1 Corinthians 1:9 - God [is] faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

    Romans 5:8 - But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

    1. Live to Learn profile image82
      Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Ha ha. Yes, he does love them.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        I love everybody too, except my enemies, Because I don't have any. Well, at least none on earth I hang around with.

        1. jonnycomelately profile image85
          jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          (That's not counting icecreams called Heaven on a Stick and other killers of your waist line?)

          1. Castlepaloma profile image23
            Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            I screamed for ice cream.

            That is a love/hate realationships

        2. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Paul said that, "love is the greatest of all the virtues". 
          Love, Love, Love!

    2. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Again picking out numerous quotes, out of context, because in-context you would need to use your brain .....  so nonsensical.   
      Your post earlier, Cfo, was described as well-considered.  But it was mostly copy-and-paste, I suspect, so you will not be taking the credit, will you?
      smile

    3. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Crazy mixed up ideas in politics and religion.... are they synonymous?   If you can't get control through one, use the other.   Each is just a show piece of the imagination.

  20. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    The Clinton campaign is doomed to fail.  They admit that they keep getting rid of their minions that work for the campaign and get new ones in hopes that will make a difference, but its not their fault. Its Bill and Hillary that voters don't like. Its like they are locked into an old style that isn't working.

    They don't know how to deal with a free wheeling Trump, who is not programmed. He must be wild in their view and they have no idea where he might come at them next.  So! Their conventional rules of political warfare are out the window when it comes to Donald Trump.

    The Clintons tend to attack and discredit their critics, so when the women come forward to publicly accuse Bill in great detail with sexual assault, rape, biting them, exposing himself ... they will try to discredit the women.  Call them bad names for bad women. 

    The women need to be able to speak, so that people will listen. Then, Hillary will have her chance to speak, and the people can decide who they believe.  Its that simple. 

    There is a huge Washington Post hit piece coming out dealing with a Trump sex scandal. There will be a book on Donald Trump about his use of cocaine.  Trump has never used drugs in his life, he won't take as much as an aspirin.  It will cover a sex scandal (s). He dated beautiful models when he wasn't married, but never abused a women.  There are no sex scandals in Trump's life.  Finally, they will try to smear Trump as being gay. He is not gay, he is heterosexual.  The Washington Post is scouring for dirt that does not exist.  They reported that they have like 22 investigators digging, and when they cannot find anything...they will make things up.  (insider information)

    1. Live to Learn profile image82
      Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Let's see. Trump has made it clear he has no respect for women. Bill Clinton has pretty much done the same; although each in their own way but Bill isn't running for president. Trump is.

      If we used a man's lack of respect for women as the litmus test on who to vote for Trump would lose.

      1. wilderness profile image95
        wildernessposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        So would Hillary - I don't see her having any respect for women, men, or anyone on the planet except herself.

  21. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    Trump always says that there is no one who has more respect for women, and his track record shows it. There are many women who have come forward to says how Trump has empowered them in their careers. Many have praised how Trump helped them...on and on.   But, you won't hear about that on liberal mainstream media, nope...they won't report the truth, so how would their views ever know the truth.

    Trump is a well known celebrity, and there have never been any reports of sex scandals and disrespect toward women...not until he started campaigning against the Democrats.  Tabloids love to publish scandals, but there are none on Trump.   

    Anything to the contrary is only clear to those who are deceived and believe the lies.

    1. IslandBites profile image86
      IslandBitesposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Never? Are you sure?

      BY
      GEORGE RUSH
      JOANNA MOLLOY
      BAIRD JONES
      NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
      Tuesday, May 6, 1997, 12:00 AM
      http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/gos … e-1.764918

      By Howard Kurtz February 13, 1990
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ … 5b6084033/

      Tuesday, August 21, 1990
      By Glenn Plaskin
      Tribune Media Services Inc.

      http://community.seattletimes.nwsource. … ug=1088961

      March 05, 1990 Vol. 33 No. 9
      People
      http://www.people.com/people/archive/ar … 80,00.html

      THE DONALD’S LOVE LIFE MAKES BILL LOOK GOOD
      By Andrea Peyser October 19, 1999

      http://nypost.com/1999/10/19/the-donald … look-good/

      Even a book
      Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump  – May, 1993

      A few links just after a quick search. LOL I guess he's been in campaign for a looooong time.

    2. Live to Learn profile image82
      Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      As difficult as this may be for you to believe. This guy has little to no respect for women. By my definition of respect. Here are some Donald Trump quotes on women for you.

      1. this was a tweet from Donald

      Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
      26,000 unreported sexual assults in the military-only 238 convictions. What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women together?
      7:04 PM - 7 May 2013
        5,360 5,360 Retweets   3,421 3,421 likes



      2. “It’s certainly not groundbreaking news that the early victories by the women on ‘The Apprentice’ were, to a very large extent, dependent on their sex appeal.” — How To Get Rich, 2004


      3. “You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.” — from an interview with Esquire, 1991


      4. “I mean, we could say politically correct that look doesn’t matter, but the look obviously matters,” Trump said to a female reporter in a clip featured on “Last Week Tonight.” “Like you wouldn’t have your job if you weren’t beautiful.”


      5. When a lawyer facing Trump in 2011 asked for a break to pump breastmilk for her infant daughter, The Donald reacted very poorly. “He got up, his face got red, he shook his finger at me and he screamed, ‘You’re disgusting, you’re disgusting,’ and he ran out of there,” attorney Elizabeth Beck told CNN. Trump’s attorney does not dispute that his client called Beck “disgusting.”

      6. While @BetteMidler is an extremely unattractive woman, I refuse to say that because I always insist on being politically correct.
      11:59 AM - 28 Oct 2012
        2,380 2,380 Retweets   1,394 1,394 likes

      7. New York Times columnist Gail Collins recalled: “During one down period, I referred to him in print as a ‘financially embattled thousandaire’ and he sent me a copy of the column with my picture circled and ‘The Face of a Dog!’ written over it.”

      8. In 2012, Trump was facing a lawsuit from attorney Gloria Allred, who was representing a transgender contestant who had been disqualified from the pageant. According to Jezebel, he called TMZ and offered to show her his genitals, saying:

      I think Gloria would be very very impressed with [my penis].

      9. (a comment about his own daughter)  I don’t think Ivanka would do that [pose for Playboy], although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her.

      10.  His comment about Megan Kelly: “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes–blood coming out of her wherever.” As if the suggestion that her menstrual state was behind Kelly’s tough questioning wasn’t enough, Trump also retweeted a comment calling her a “bimbo” (later deleted) and called her a “lightweight.”

      Support the guy if you like. But, don't think the entire free world can't read his tweets, or his lips. They guy is a pig.

      1. 85
        Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        While i myself was appalled by trump's treatment of kelly for a very fair question, i do find it hypocritical for people to bring up him calling kelly a bimbo when no one on the left protested the same thing happening on twitter, FB, and even msnbc

  22. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago

    I wish sex did not come into the  business.

    Bill Clinton got impeached for a blow job, for his age some European would Pat him on the back.

    Would understand if Hillary locked him out of the house for cheating., yet to fire Bill, how is he supposed his alimony, in gay marriage palimony. Half the men at some time cheated, what, should we fire half the nations men.

    Now they accuse Bill of serial petaphyilia, Viagra today much be able to bring Frankenstein's back to life.

    1. wilderness profile image95
      wildernessposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Clinton was not impeached for having sex, he was impeached for lying to congress.  Something H might want to think about.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        The best liar gets elected and lying is America greatest pass time, and Bill did a good job because his heart was in it.

        1. ahorseback profile image47
          ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          How do liberals actually justify such an evil hypocrite ?

          http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13046900.jpg

        2. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Bill did a great job because he is a good actor in my opinion.  That may be the best thing I will ever have to say about him.  smile

          1. Castlepaloma profile image23
            Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            Bill did a great job because of results. Great economy, minimum suffering cost and physical suffering from war.

            1. 85
              Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              I'm sure the republican controlled congress had nothing to do with that. You know they shut down the government and such to force the work requirement on welfare and other measures

    2. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Bill's libido is what is going to stop Hillary's campaign. 

      There is quite a bit of evidence of Bill visiting pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Orgy Island.  But, he is being protected from it becoming a full blown story on MSM. Most likely it is the CIA protecting him and Hillary from what I have read, but someone bigger then the CIA is pulling their strings.  Hopefully, whoever pulls the strings will decide that Bill and Hillary have wondered off the reservation too many times and withdraw the protection.  I don't believe anyone should be above the law.

      1. Live to Learn profile image82
        Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        That is old news. If it didn't stop her rise back when it was news it won't now.

  23. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    Its a long way to November.

  24. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13046895.png

    1. ahorseback profile image47
      ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      Everybody's nailing Trump for being a sexist , How about the original enabler ,Hillary .

      Hypocrisy knows no bounds !

      1. Live to Learn profile image82
        Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Seriously?

        Yes, I have no respect for Hillary because she stayed with a jacka** of a husband, made excuses for his behavior when it was public and turned a blind eye when it was semi private.

        But, simply because a woman is married to a man who cheats on her we don't have to pretend that a man who has no respect for 50% of the population of this country is anything other than what he is. A big pig. Trump may have saving qualities which help some people overlook this fact but pretending that it doesn't exist doesn't cut it.

        1. ahorseback profile image47
          ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13047613_f1024.jpg

          Like I said before .

          Didn't hear this about Reagan or even Obama  ...........yet !

          1. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            This will be where the rubber hits the road, when the public hears Bill's victims talk about the sexual abuses, rapes, etc.  Then, they will need to get to hear Hillary speak.  People need to be given the chance to hear, see, and decide for themselves.  I believe those victims and I believe in the people to decide!

            1. PrettyPanther profile image86
              PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              The public has heard from Bil's accusors in great detail. How could you think otherwise when the allegations come up every time one of the Clintons is in the spotlight?

              1. ahorseback profile image47
                ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                It should speak loudly to character except for the blindness  and desperation of the left .   Funny thing , I saw this from the beginning ,  two empty  old farts with very little to offer except  old ,outdated ,  and failed  rhetoric , what I never expected was a such a  love affair from the left towards such emptiness in two old suits , the wrinkled  worn socialist and the outdated pant suits .

                Both without positive  political value .

                1. Live to Learn profile image82
                  Live to Learnposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  I agree. The problem I have is that the same can be said about Trump but the right does the same dance the left does; when viewing their choice of candidate. Both sides are a bunch of hypocrites whose hypocrisy has allowed these worthless excuses of non statesmen (or woman)ship to be what will be our choices this election year.

                  Thanks a lot. To all of you on both sides of the aisle. You've left those of us in the middle with a bit of a quandary.

                2. PrettyPanther profile image86
                  PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  "Love affair from the left." Did you read my post above?  Or, are simply ignoring it because it doesn't suit your stereotyping?

              2. colorfulone profile image86
                colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                Have Bill's accusers been given a platform on TV center stage to be able to tell the world in great detail what he did to them?  I don't watch TV, but I don't believe that has happened yet.

                1. PrettyPanther profile image86
                  PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  Some of them have done television interviews. Some have refused. Some value their privacy.

                  1. colorfulone profile image86
                    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                    Thank you! smile  I didn't know that some of the women had the chance to tell their story on TV.  Hopefully, they will get to do that again.

              3. ahorseback profile image47
                ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                Bill Clinton was not only impeached but disbarred ,   Doesn't THAT mean anything or is there a statute of limitations on  presidential criminality .  Hillary , your hero , not only  legally  and personally enabled that , but defends the abuses against women by him  in public , woman for woman that doesn't bother you in the least ?   If that were Trump or GWB , you guys on the extreme left would crucify them !

                Little double standard there  PP.? Why am  I not surprised .

                1. PrettyPanther profile image86
                  PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  http://hubpages.com/politics/forum/1363 … ost2818018

                  I refer you to my post above, which you have yet to respond to.  You continue to mischaracterize my positions and my beliefs to make it easy on yourself.  Everyone is a hypocrite about something, and you are no different.

      2. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

        Yep, and she laughed about getting the pedophile off.  I think I added a link to a video where she was being interviewed about that on this thread already.  She would seem to be interested in money and power and doesn't care if justice is served.

        1. Castlepaloma profile image23
          Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

          Hillary Clinton client got off of pedophilla charge yet did get charged with soliciting a prostitute. She waz just doing her job.


          For Bill Clinton pedophilla we need pictures of sexual evidence. Plenty of people will just accuse low life assumptions, just to ruin a person's life over politics.

          1. jonnycomelately profile image85
            jonnycomelatelyposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            ...and if they can't find something that's legitimate, they will make it up.  Never let facts get in the way of a good story, eh?

            1. ahorseback profile image47
              ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              This is exactly my point Castlepaloma , exactly !    Until you are a victim  of such a crime its all someone else's problem or issue .   Where are the feminists now ? Oh yea,  standing right behind Hillary and Bill  with a smirk on their hypocritical  faces !

          2. colorfulone profile image86
            colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            There is no evidence of the sexual abuse and rapes that Bill is accuse of.  That is why those women need to be heard by the public, then Hillary can have her say...and the people can decide for themselves who they believe. 

            Just watch, Hillary will try to fabricate evidence against those women to discredit them. She has as much as let the cat out of the bag as to what her move will be. Bill and Hillary are all about deception (darkness) and the best counter punch is the truth (light). 

            Sadly, you are right that plenty of people are deceptive and try to ruin someone's life with nothing to back it up. In a jury trial its all about who is believable when all they have is testimonies of real people.

            Hillary's numbers on being "honest" and "trustworthy" are very low.  Still some political liberal media outlets are trying to say she is honest and trustworthy.  I don't believe the propaganda in this political war.

          3. ahorseback profile image47
            ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

            Its funny to read this statement and then reconcile it with a feminist's opine about rape and  abuse of a twelve year  old by an adult  !  So much for  liberal hypocrisy, that's really the gist of  liberalism anyway ,   cry wolf  until the wolf turns out to be your son , your  daughter or  your candidate !

            1. Castlepaloma profile image23
              Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              Better lock up your kids so they can get really fat an unattractive so the pervert don't want fu*k them.

              1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                It's getting I Can't say hi to a kid, without parents getting up set and my Sandsculptures is like a web trap for kids.

                I wish people lighten up.

                1. ahorseback profile image47
                  ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  a grown man in a sandbox is a dead giveaway ........LOL

                  1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                    Castlepalomaposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                    If I gave away ice cream that would be enough evidence for sure.

            2. PrettyPanther profile image86
              PrettyPantherposted 6 months ago in reply to this

              Here's the thing, ahorseback.  I don't think you truly care about whether or not the women were raped.  You only care about smearing the Clintons.  I don't see you railing against the many injustices that have occurred against other raped women.  You focus only on these Clinton accusations that are now almost 30 years old.  And you wonder why so many people roll their eyes at you and colorfulone constantly bringing this stuff up. 

              Now, that said, I recently took some time to reacquaint myself with several of the stores surrounding Bill Clinton.  One in particular, the Juanita Broaddrick story, is believable and troubling.  It is unfortunate that in the case of rape, it is difficult to prove or disprove a story.  It is also unfortunate that the rich and powerful are more apt to avoid prosecution for any crime, including rape.  Both of these unfortunate circumstances apply to the Broaddrick case. 

              However, Bill Clinton is not running for president.  Hillary Clinton is.  You keep saying she harmed these women, but I find no evidence of that.  Sure, she defended her husband.  Many women defend their corrupt and vile husbands against these type of claims, sometimes because they believe their husbands to be innocent, and sometimes because they want to protect their family and their own interests.  Either way, it is not a crime to defend your husband.  I understand that her defense of her husband is personally hurtful to those women in an emotional sense, but truly, it has no effect on whether or not Bill "got away" with it. 

              So, now we are faced with a choice.  You think feminists are hypocritical if they choose Hillary over Donald.  Why?  Because of something you can't prove, and no one has been able to prove, after 30 years.  However, Donald's words and actions toward women are front and center right here, right now, for everyone to see.  He doesn't hide it, he wallows in it.  Yet, we women are supposed to dislike Hillary more than Donald, a man who belittles women for their looks, changes trophy wives every few years, and makes suggestive sexual comments about his infant daughter.  Sorry, I don't see how you can excoriate feminists for choosing Hillary over Donald.  Choosing Bill over Donald might be another story, but Bill is not running for president.

              I look forward to your future posts about the over 290,000 rapes of women and girls age 12 and over hat occur each year and the 97% of rapists who have raped and gotten away with it.  I expect every time a rape case makes national headlines, you will be here on these forums, supporting the women who have made accusations against their rapists and berating those who defend the rapists.  I'm sure you would like to post something about the rape culture that exists in many college campuses.  I really look forward to your crusade against rape.

              1. ahorseback profile image47
                ahorsebackposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                I guess I missed your  question ,As usual PP,  you do not get to pick and chose  my opinions   !   That is perhaps the best example of the psychotic  power mongering of liberals , If you , they ,cannot direct the whole conversation  then find an excuse to change the topic  !

                But just for you ,I will define my opinion of all rape , Not just Bill Clintons ,Rape is a horrible crime committed by men against women ! I truly believe that , This week I read that Harvard  University has the largest percentage of on campus rapes proportionately of all universities in America !   Now that probably should shock   our entire media  and public opinion . Does it ? doubt it .

                Campus rape is an public epidemic, what do we hear  about it from liberals ?..........Crickets !
                Rape , It's only a selective liberal  issue , would you vote for more stringent prosecution , no , Why ? Because you are a liberal first , voting for a liberal woman second and a woman third  ?

                The fact that you want to excuse Clinton  family history of abuses against women doesn't even surprise me ,  I expect that kind of reaction by liberals actually . To pick and chose the amount of offense  based upon agenda-ed political correctness .  You and those like you will not only excuse Bill Clinton of Rape , you will excuse the rabid defense of Him by Hillary !   

                To Liberals It's all just a right wing conspiracy ,apparently  when that rape is committed by  a charismatic leader of liberal voting people AND his wife ?  I say its too bad there is a statute of limitations in such charges , Because of that alone Bill walked !   

                And because of the statute of limitations in liberal voters sense of ethics and moral political memory , You will let the hypocrisy of  Hillary's defense of him walk  on  Bills rape allegations ,

                You might now answer for me now , who are  the  real hypocrites ?
                http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13055449.jpg


                http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13055455_f1024.jpg


                http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13055457.jpg

                So where is liberal outrage here ?
                Ivy leagues are known liberal ideological cesspools?
                Are rape charges only a selective cause for liberals ?

                1. colorfulone profile image86
                  colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

                  I agree. The psychopathic rapists and their enablers should not be let of the hook.  It should never be laid to rest, not when justice has not been served for violent criminal acts.  Hillary psychologically abused those women Bill violated. I believe the victims who have been put through a living hell by the Clinton Crime Family.  But, they are "The Clintons" and get to walk? 

                  Thankfully, it is not going to rest, not even if Hillary manages to cheat her way into the WH, again.  If people want to bury their head in the sand, they can...if they don't like this forum topic, they don't have to read it.  I don't like the topic of rape, but I hate how rapists and enablers destroy women's lives. It never goes away!

                  ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says
                  http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … -says.html

  25. Mel Carriere profile image90
    Mel Carriereposted 6 months ago

    Are you kidding?  She'll never drop out.  Everybody knows the crimes of the Clintons and nobody seems to care.  Oh well, people will get what deserve for their Hilary worship.

  26. IslandBites profile image86
    IslandBitesposted 6 months ago

    "Can you imagine how controversial I'd be? You think about him with the women — how about me with the women? Can you imagine?" he wondered aloud in a CNBC interview. "I really like this guy, but you really have to say, 'Where does it stop?" Trump asked, remarking that Clinton "had such bad advice" in handling the scandal.

    Clinton, Trump averred, would have found a "more forgiving" public "if he'd had an affair with a really beautiful woman of sophistication."

    Trump even attacked Linda Tripp, the Pentagon employee who taped her private conversations with Lewinsky in which they discussed her sexual encounters with Clinton, as "the personification of evil."
    In an October 2008 interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Trump tore into President George W. Bush for getting the U.S. into war "with lies," remarking that by comparison, his predecessor "got into with something that was totally unimportant." He added: "And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense."

    LOL

  27. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 6 months ago

    Funny stuff, and nonsense, bites.  lol

  28. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 6 months ago

    http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13056441.jpg

    Remember when democrats and republicans used to say  , "We've got to get the lawyers and crooks out of the white house ,    they are destroying our government and  our country "!

    1. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 6 months ago in reply to this

      That 12 year old girl was beaten so badly by her rapist, that she was in a coma for days.  Yet, Hillary accused the girl of it being her fault.  Evidence was mysteriously lost, and Hillary laughed about getting the rapist off.  She is a cold blooded psychopath in my opinion.

  29. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 5 months ago

    Kathleen Willey met Bill as a volunteer at the White House. She requested a paying job, but instead of Bill helping her he allegedly harassed her sexually. Later on that day, her husband Ed committed suicide. And she describes Hillary’s efforts to keep her silent as “mob like tactics.”

    Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/a-wo … z4BaGwr4Nf

    1. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      I can only quote from on review of that Website:   "Neo-conservative garbage site. Don't waste your time."
      How can we be sure your opinions gleaned from that site are more reliable than any other, Colorfulone?   I don't know one way or the other. But:.....
      You have used the term "alleged."  In other words, not proven, not necessarily true, unless one's enthusiasm for scandal exceeds the desire to read honest and fair reporting.
      I did not follow your link, because it might contain scam.

      1. 85
        Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        He did settle the charges to keep it out of court, so.....

        1. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          A  $800,000.00 settlement.

  30. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 5 months ago

    The long trail of dead bodies who knew too much ... Tied to the Clinton's continues to grow! The numbers and the MO are too great to be coincidental! I hope we'll soon have a DOJ that is not corrupt, is committed to truth & not wagging its tail for the POTUS and will demand justice be done! Way too many of the executive branch, the congress and the judicial branch appear to flaunt an "above the law" type confidence... When it's obvious to everyone they have trapped themselves in their own lies and broken the law! Hellary (that's how I spelled it!) has set a criminal example!

    "Top UN Official Set To Testify Against Hillary Found Dead" 
    http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-20 … found-dead

    1. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      http://michaelghurston.com/2014/10/list … nd-hoaxes/

      You like being sucked in, don't you, Susie?

    2. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Hillary and Trump, don't remember ever two more disappointimg candidate for President.

      On war, world war 111 will start faster if Trump is elected and slower with Hillary because Globalist need more time to bleed the public for all of their worth first.

      For the dollar collapses that will wait til after the election. Trump will force the collaspe faster and Hillary will bleed everbody before collaspe.

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        All you need to do is go to S&P and look at the economic bubble to see that it is going to POP!  Trump has nothing to do with that bubble and the collapse of the economy that is about to happen, not if, its just a matter of time.  (edited)  Trump has a lot to lose, Americans have a lot to lose, and Trump is willing to fight for himself, his family, and for America. 

        FEMA is predicting a 395% increase in food prices and "Social Unrest" because of it, scenario. The Globalists have created this, Trump is not a Globalist...they hate him, they are scared of Trump because he has been exposing them.  Would he expose himself if he were one of them?  No.

        I think you predicted Globalist Imama Obama would declare marshal law?  It sure is possible.  Create a crisis...

        1. Live to Learn profile image82
          Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          If it will make you feel better....your reference to a spike in food prices triggering social unrest is simply information you gleaned from the outcome of a simulation attempting to see how weather related disruptions in global food production would play out.

          It was a simulation. No one is anticipating a 395% rise in food prices.

  31. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 5 months ago

    FEMA was established in 1979 by Jimmy Carter. It set up 10 regional governments over the United States, and under continuity of government its able to suspend Congress. You can read the 'executive orders concerning fema and suspension of congress'...forced labor, work camps, commondering of factory workers, crops, ... everything.

    You have to understand history, postwar games, war games and so much more. 

    Perhaps you do not believe there will be a World War III?

    Have you noticed that Obama and the military have been bypassing Congress? 

    Added:  In every Pentagon war game with Russia, guess who wins. 
    Why does the Obama Adm. provoke Russia?
    It makes sense to keep Russia as an ally, they could be our savior.
    Wisely, Trump has respect for Putin.

  32. Sychophantastic profile image82
    Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago

    Your stupid opinion is rooted in sexism. You, and America really, simply don't like powerful women and actively and passively do everything you can to knock them down. It happens in the political world and in the business world.

    Politifact has shown that Hillary is, contrary to popular belief, the most honest of all the candidates. In other words, she tells the truth most of the time. Trump has been proven to be the most dishonest candidate by numerous organizations. That is, when he actually bothers to say anything of substance.

    Just take a look at the speech where he called Hillary a "world-class liar". Trump used several "facts" to prove this, all of which were lies. He lied about Hillary's response to Benghazi by saying she was asleep when, in fact, the call came to her at 3:45pm and she informed the White House. He accused her of taking $58,000 in jewelry, which is in fact true, except he left out the part about her not keeping it and following protocol and turning it over to the appropriate government agency. He then accused her of increasing the trade deficit with China. First, he had his figures wrong on the deficit number. Either that or he can't do math. Second, she was in charge of the State Department, not the Department of Commerce, so he doesn't even know how government works.

    Basically, if you support Trump, you're an idiot. At least vote for Gary Johnson if you don't like Hillary.

    1. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      The more politically correct word is misinformed. An idiot has a mind of a 3 year old.

      1. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Fair enough.

    2. ahorseback profile image47
      ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Well there you all have it , If you don't support Hillary , your a racist ,  gender-phobe , stupid  , misinformed moron .

      I suggest you take a look at trust-ability  of her against Trump ,   One sentence out of Hillary's mouth is an incredible exercise in  triple speak , no one can say more  in  one sentence  to include all sides of the excuse world , than  Mrs. Clinton .    If she ever gets near the  presidential chair the entire world is in for a lesson in  absolute  turmoil.

      http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13079717.jpg

      1. colorfulone profile image86
        colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Endgame

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho

        What a great history lesson on the NWO agenda which Hillary is a part of.

      2. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Well, if you support a racist, it's hard to argue that you're not a racist. Maybe you just support racism?

  33. Kathryn L Hill profile image85
    Kathryn L Hillposted 5 months ago

    School of hard knocks, here we come. sad

  34. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 5 months ago

    Clinton's are actual KKK apologists.
    http://hubpages.com/politics/forum/1354 … ologists--

    1. Sychophantastic profile image82
      Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Wow. You're not capable of much complex thought, are you? Really, that was an apology for the KKK? Okay, whatever.

      Here's the thing, Donald Trump could have found a bunch of legitimate ways to criticize Hillary Clinton in the "world-class liar" speech, but he instead chose to use lies, and not even complex lies. He chose simple, easy to verify as inaccurate lies. That's just really weird. So is he stupid, just a liar, or somebody who is trying to explore the depths of the gullibility of the American public? I mean, what reason would he have to fall back on blatant lies when there's some pretty easy things to go after Hillary on?

      1. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        And once again, real conservatives are voting for Gary Johnson.

        1. 85
          Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Much as they did four years ago. Hopefully, this year he actually get to own both of them on the debate stage since he has as much experience in government as both combined.

  35. TessSchlesinger profile image93
    TessSchlesingerposted 5 months ago

    No chance whatsoever that she will drop out. We have reached a point where those in power have so much power that the outrage of we-the-people means absolutely nothing to them, and despite Trump supporters thinking Trump will win, the fear of Trump is so great, that people will vote for Hillary.

    I'm a Bernie Bros supporter. Hate Hillary.

    1. 85
      Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      The problem we face is that neither party represents the constituents they claim to.

      True Republicans should vote Libertarian.
      True Democrats should vote Green. Hell, if Bernie was serious about his agenda, he should throw his support behind Dr. Jill Stein, the second woman to be nominated for President.  (The Green Party's last 3 candidates were all women, including Stein twice.)

      1. TessSchlesinger profile image93
        TessSchlesingerposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        I would agree. I was rather hoping that Bernie would agree to run for VP alongside Jill Stein. But then VP is a non-doing position, so not sure what would get done.

        It's a viable situation if the GOP split, but it's not viable if only one party offers another option.

        And I agree with your summation. Never understood why the Greens don't get more support.

        1. 85
          Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Likely because they used to emphasize the environment almost alone, making them a fringe group like the constitution party.

          They seem to have spread the umbrella a bit, and i saw a report that they, and a few other smaller progressive and socialist parties were going to join into one party to challenge the democrats stranglehold on the left

  36. 20
    peter565posted 5 months ago

    Old Bill is still a player smile

    1. jeffduff profile image83
      jeffduffposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      As you can read in the conservative Hot Air blog, our current Attorney General Lynch met with Bill C at the Phoenix airport a couple of days ago.  They met in her government jet - out on the tarmac ! - and when asked about this unannounced  meeting  with Bill, the AG said they talked for half an hour, "mostly about Bill's grandchildren". 

      If my wife was being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department, what are the chances that I could arrange a private meeting with the Attorney General of the U.S.A.?  (Answer:  Zero. None. Ain't gonna happen.)

      America used to be a nation of laws, laws that were meant to be supreme over every American, no matter what their power, influence, wealth or station in life.  Those days are gone, apparently.

      1. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        I'm on Hillary's side in most things and feel she's been unfairly vilified, but this is truly inexcusable. Why Lynch didn't immediately kick Bill off the plane, we'll never know. Obama now MUST appoint an independent prosecutor to finish up the email server investigation since Lynch has tainted herself.

  37. Sharlee01 profile image69
    Sharlee01posted 5 months ago

    I have lived through all of the scandal and other despicable things the Clinton's have done. It's not hard for me to say I won't vote for her. As I say I have lived through all of it. The facts are there, to bad more won't open up to doing a bit of real research. In regards to Bill Clinton. He came up on impeachment. He was very luck he was not impeached...  I totally believe each and every woman that said they were explored sexually by Bill. Monica stated " he used a cigar". I won't get any more graphic then that. However, he certainly did these things. I would never want to see him in Our white house again. Hillary commended the women, not Bill.

    1. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Yes, Hillary condemned the women that Bill sexually abused, raped, bit ...  I believe those women, not anything that Hillary has to say.  Those two cannot be in the WH again, they cannot be trusted as human beings, much less as leaders.  Hillary should not be allowed to run for president. 

      She knew beforehand about the terrorist attack on Benghazi, and she lied to cover for Obama's and her gun-running CIA operation to ISIS mercenaries in the Middle East, of which the al-Qaeda rebel group was affiliated with that attacked the Benghazi mission and massacred four Americans.

      1. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        You are so full of lies and conspiracy theories. You realize you're probably insane or psychologically damaged, right?

        Hillary did not know about the Benghazi attack before it happened. There's not a single shred of evidence to support that. That's like saying George W. Bush knew about the 9/11 attack before it happened, which is also absolute hogwash. What is true is that Republicans cut the funding for embassy security around the world. Does that make them directly responsible? Not exactly, but it certainly raised the probability that some embassy somewhere would be vulnerable.

        1. ahorseback profile image47
          ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          I think so many people need to do , even shallowly ,  a small amount of research  on the Clintons  and you'll find an enabler in Hillary and a  major womanizer in Bill  approaching the  reputation of JFK, Hillary   is an  defense attorney ,   what makes you think  she didn't vehemently defend his AND  her own future office holding potential  ?   Hillary is a brilliant political  statesman [woman ]  and a poor  political planner .  She knows how to dodge  eloquently any  truth whenever questioned .

          1. Sychophantastic profile image82
            Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            Last I knew, womanizing did not disqualify one from being in political office. If so, Donald Trump would be disqualified, wouldn't he? This sort of thing goes across the aisle and everyone seems to overlook it. Dems overlook Bill Clinton's behavior. Republicans overlook Dennis Hastert's behavior. Again, independent research agencies have looked at Hillary's statements and most of what she says is true. Donald Trump took your tack and called her a world-class liar and, in doing so, used 3 easily debunked lies to do it.

            1. 85
              Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              While I normally avoid joining in the side of conspiracy theorists and people misusing bible quotes....

              Politifact and such obly judge a statement based on how truthful that statement is, in and of itself, and how true. Hillary has a history of teistubg partially true statements, parsing words, and using double speak.

              Granted, this isn't unusual among politicians, but the clintons hsve made a career out of this and regularly "evolving" their views.

              Add to this the long democrat position of not being like republicans, while doing the exact same thing is a bit hypocritical to say the least.

              1. Sychophantastic profile image82
                Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                Every politician does this and people are justifiably sick of it. The Clintons are no worse than other politicians in this regard. Trump is just lying through his teeth and making stuff up.

                1. 85
                  Randy Childersposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                  Agreed. Hence why i choose neither. I hate political doublespeak.

                  1. Sychophantastic profile image82
                    Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                    While I'm not thrilled about my vote, one is clearly worse than the other. That said, if neither is acceptable, Gary Johnson is a pretty good alternative.

                2. colorfulone profile image86
                  colorfuloneposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                  Trump is revealing the truth, it is all documented.
                  http://www.infowars.com/trump-vs-the-gl … ok-corral/

                  1. Sychophantastic profile image82
                    Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                    What a joke your sources are. Might as well be quoting a book of preschool limericks. And the sun revolves around the earth, right? And there's no climate change? And vaccines cause autism? And the KKK is really a humanitarian organization.

            2. Sharlee01 profile image69
              Sharlee01posted 5 months ago in reply to this

              I suggest you visit this website. Yes, it  was created by the Trump camp. However, they have put together  a good production of the truth. It has the videos, and documents of Hillary Clinton's lies. No soundbites all complete. Have a look before you respond. If you still think she does not lie, oh well ?
              https://www.lyingcrookedhillary.com/

              1. Sychophantastic profile image82
                Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                It's hard for me to believe that anyone's critical thinking skills are this bad. This is your unbiased sourcing? A Trump campaign ad? Really? If lying is what has you all riled up about Hillary, how do you explain Trump's speech about her being a world-class liar in which he lied about her lies? I documented that above. And how do you reconcile his lie about building a wall and keeping all Muslims out of the country - both of which are impossible? How do you reconcile Trump University and Trump Institute, both con jobs where people were clearly ripped off? I mean, this is what stands for critical thinking in this country - a Trump campaign ad? What's your IQ? 90? Again, any self-respecting Republican is voting for Gary Johnson.

                1. jeffduff profile image83
                  jeffduffposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                  When Gary Johnson (Libertarian Party candidate) was asked - last week - if Hillary had any problems that he could point to.  He replied that he could not think of any criticism of her and refused to do so.  Gary Johnson is either in Hillary's pocket or he's a presidential candidate who models himself on the legacy of Mother Theresa of Calcutta!  Unfortunately, his unwillingness to point out Hillary's obvious faults will not endear him to Republicans.  But, you have to give him credit for trying to bring civility and  dignity back into the 2016 presidential campaign, heaven bless his kind pea-picking soul ...

                  1. Sychophantastic profile image82
                    Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                    Well, the Republican party used to be about less government. Now they're apparently about electing the loudest, most racist, sexist person they can find.

    2. Sychophantastic profile image82
      Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      So you've lived through all the horrible things the Clintons have done, you poor baby. Did any of your sons die because they were sent off to fight a war? Did you lose your life savings because they ran the economy into the ground? Get some perspective.

      1. Live to Learn profile image82
        Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        I lost a house during the savings and loan crisis Hillary and Bill helped along. While they got rich, our whole neighborhood turned into a ghost town.

        1. Sychophantastic profile image82
          Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          What year was that?

          1. Sychophantastic profile image82
            Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            S&L crisis was from 1986 to 1995, ushered in by Reagan and Bush. Just curious if you blame them.

            1. Live to Learn profile image82
              Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              They were involved in setting the stage for the problem. They do not bear the brunt of full responsibility. I don't see either party as particularly more concerned with the protection of the average citizen from unscrupulous banking practices. I see both as immersed in people who attempt to manipulate the system to their own financial advantage, or the advantage of their cronies. So Reagan and Bush are no more to blame than anyone.

          2. Live to Learn profile image82
            Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            Can't remember exactly. The eighties, i believe. But, it was around the time of Whitewater.

  38. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago

    Lying is Americas greatest pass time. There is only degrees of truth. We are comparing on what degrees of truths of Trump vs Hillary. What dose it all matter, because the best liar wins. Why dose anyone vote for both World class liars?

  39. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 5 months ago

    The Clintons are above our laws , they always have been ,   why not totally compromise ALL of the  Hillary investigations   , Lynch looks like a total fool !   ......."if I had it to do over again I wouldn't .........,  Don't think Bill and Hillary didn't consider that too   ,it  compromises not just  this  whole case perfectly ?   Clinton +  Lynch  knew exactly what they were compromising , though they didn't think they'd  get called out so early .

    Obama will  pardon  Hillary between November  and January , that has been their whole "out" until now !
    Don't think that won't happen . 
    Talk about a Mafia .

    1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
      wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13084573_f1024.jpg

      I believe  we are both drinking the same kind of coffee, but out of different cups. And it appears your cup is less than half full.  You refer to the Clinton/Obama Machine as a "Mafia". And I must agree. Of course that term is synonymous with evil, violence, and corruption. But if you can understand this is true, why is it you cannot see the corruption of the U.S. government from the very beginning? The lies began before the Declaration of Independence was signed.

      And if you don't care about the oppression of the African or the Indigenous , I can easily accept that, since the average white American feels the same way. But what about your own people? The white working class has been getting screwed since the beginning just as everyone else. The only difference being they've been getting it with the grease, which makes it a little more transparent, and a lot less uncomfortable. But your people  have been getting screwed nevertheless. Yet, in spite of this you are, overall, a cheerleader for America, and the status quo. Why? Why don't you take that extra step and fill your cup to the brim, until it is overflowing with truth and knowledge? Because if you do, beautiful women like the one in this picture will start paying attention to you. And you will realize an even greater joy, and fulfillment.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        I guess it's time for the rest of us to get Royally screwed too.

      2. ahorseback profile image47
        ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Ha! Wrenchbisket ,
        Now that is funny !   I've never had a woman that beautiful hardly smile at me , yet far more real women  , sometimes lesser for having that body seem to find me  one of those "nice guys ",  I fear though that a woman that beautiful is far shallower than I can imagine , So, Go for her !.........:-]

        Backstory of my Family heritage .   My ancestors fought under  George Washington and even before in the first Indian wars    , my great-great  Grandfather  was named after him , George Washington  F***** ,    one of my ancestors  was actually on GW. "s   honorable      " Life guards " , I won't say his name , it would reveal my last name  .  My relatives were in the original Boston uprising and  probably heard the first shot fired ,  are even listed by name in the  first battles of the  beginning Boston , revolution  .     In each and every  major war the U.S, has fought  , I have traced my family heritage .   American soldiers  ,  ministers , doctors , farmers , carpenters and even began  this American journey as indentured servants , Perhaps you might understand my undying love for country  . 

        My personal story is  weak comparable to my ancestors   ,  I am but a lover of my country ! That being said ,  at this point in history , I hate my government . Right , left  ,or independent , I truly believe nothing is going to change until it  finally gets violent  too, but I accept that  and  I almost welcome it and   Given that  ,   I do believe our two party's  ideological differences today will meld into that revolution as soldiers .  I stand vigilant with the honor and integrity of  ALL my ancestors . The coming revolution , although I hope for a peaceful one  , WILL  shape America for generations to come .
        No Wrenchbisket , I cannot stand my government today , but my country , my soldier family members and theirs  all deserve no less .

        As to my "white "  history , it's all imperfect  ! My people   have been the builders  , the warriors  , the farmers  , the clergymen  ,  nary   a rich man in the bunch  nor any where near rich  , But I look at America   as  any  healthy attitude  should , I helped to build it .  The blacks helped to build it  and so the red man .  But who today  more than you or I  own this country  ?    Our collective problem today   : WE HAVE TO RECLAIM IT .

        The sad condition of America today  and all of it's faults , belong directly to both and all of us as a whole.!  I will tell you this too   No man in America's past suffered more than my Father   .  A  gentle farm boy sent off to fight in WWII  and sent home a wounded ,broken  and twisted  and deranged veteran  . Given THAT ,  I will not stand for today's  professional victim-ology of Blacks  or the Native American either , No one is a victim of America's system more than the men or women who fought for it and , left their blood and body parts of distant shores

        As to your  wars , your heritage  , your love of your people ,  I commend you highly for your  love of your own heritage  ,  and as is mine ,  we are sometimes   blinded by a history written after the battles were fought ,  but  we also are nourished by the mixed bloods that flow through our veins , red , white , yellow  or ...........other .    We are one  ,  like it or not Wrenchbisket !   Have I missed where you may have  Hubbed your Native history ?   If so ,   write it out  , I'm sure it would be very interesting , I would love to read about it actually .   I hope this explains  a bit of who I am  ! If not , oh well , on we go with the debating .

        Peace ...........for today .

        1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
          wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13084825.jpg

          What happened to your father should have never happened. He is the victim of the same evil that nearly destroyed an entire race of people  on this continent. But when we strip away all of the rhetoric, from the Revolutionary War forward, what we find is that fundamentally, all of these wars that Americans have been fighting have not been about freedom for the common man, but about more money and more power for the rich. Even a cursory study of the historical record reveals this to be true. It was wealthy land owners, men like Washington and Jefferson, who had the most top gain from a war with the British. Your ancestors were simply used as pawns to get the job done.

          You'll notice that Washington, Jefferson,and many other wealthy landowners were still alive after the war. And of course, Thomas Paine the provocateur who fanned the flames of revolution, and the primary founding father of the U.S., was also alive and well.  Meanwhile, thousands of British soldiers, and poor European immigrants lay rotting on the battle fields. How can we take pride in such a thing? Yes, they were brave men, and yes they fought and died, but they were deceived and coerced by the rich and powerful. They fought and died to build a rich man's paradise; not to build a free world for the common man, but only to define and reinforce the walls of a perpetual servitude that has imprisoned us all.

          1. ahorseback profile image47
            ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            I've grown rather  tired of  pointing out the obvious wrongs of such pseudo-intellectual  victim-ology of historical revisionist's .   Buy a history book that tells real truths , buy several of them and open your to all historical possibility !   You should not just rely on those that feed the  general horse shyte  of Hollywood  historians .  Lesson one , Michel  Moore  is a brainless  over indulged  moron , Don't just rely on him for your history lessons !

            http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13086313.jpg

  40. Bill Yovino profile image90
    Bill Yovinoposted 5 months ago

    Your ignorance is startling.  The New York Times is one of the most respected newspapers in the world. You show your true colors and agenda by making ridiculously politicized statements.  This is something that I dislike about Hubpages discussions. It gives voice to people who would be better served not opening their mouth.

    1. Castlepaloma profile image23
      Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      I rather have men open their mouths and give their honest opinion. Then a secret society dictating and owning our lives.  For the greatest fear in America is public speaking.

      There is only two super power right now. The US military complex super power vs global public opinion super power.

      Who side are you on?

      I won't be in bed with a gun.

  41. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 5 months ago

    The rest of the world as well as all you  misguided Americans had better  pray for our capitalism's  ultimate survival . It IS the last bastion of economic liberty in the world !   Yours mine and  even all the unborn liberal children too .

    1. Live to Learn profile image82
      Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Capitalism is proving itself to be a failed system. I don't know what the answers are, but we have to be realistic about the world we live in.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Nothing wrong about making money like Capitalism where you don't harm other.

        Corporatism is different, it involves takeover of Governments, religions and delusion the vast majority of the people they are free.

        1. Live to Learn profile image82
          Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Agreed. And the capitalist system we are under at the moment is failing for that exact reason. International corporations have made a mockery of a system where hard work was supposed to equate to some semblance of success.

    2. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
      wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13086406.jpg
      You cheer for capitalism, but I can only wonder how much capital you have at your disposal. When I think of capitalists I am thinking of those who have the capital to actually participate in the system. Such as:  McDonalds, Walmart, BP, Exxon, Dow Chemicals, Sony etc.. Unless you have this kind of capital, or at least enough to move in that general direction, you can hardly consider yourself a capitalist. Yes the little girl selling lemonade made 5 dollars yesterday, but making chump change on the side, or a salary, or a wage, defines you as a member of the proletariat: a wage slave. You can call yourself a capitalist all you want, but that won't make it so.

      The majority of Americans are like the dog chasing the rabbit around the track. A very small percentage may get lucky and catch the rabbit, but the majority never will. And that is not how people should have to live their short, useless, miserable lives. I am an artist, and most people have a particular talent or trade. I would be happy to work simply for the basic necessities I need to survive and pursue my art, without monetary compensation. The only people who need a system of money are those who want to rule the world, or the lazy people: those with no talent or ambition who struggle to be rich so that they can live a life of leisure, whore mongering, and trivial pursuits. And I have no interest in any of these. Capitalism is dead. Now onhorseback,it is time to say a prayer, leave the past behind, and bury the dead.

      1. wilderness profile image95
        wildernessposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Can't speak for ahorseback, but I have a portion of all those companies.  It's called capitalism, whatever you wish to change it to.

        Mankind has tried and used the barter system to exchange goods, but it has never worked well and is worse now with the proliferation of products.  A system of money is thus imperative, again whatever you might wish to think.  Or do you exchange chickens for gasoline when you fill your car up?

        1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
          wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Thats quite remarkable. With the money you have made in stocks I'm sure you'll have enough to run for President next election cycle. In the meantime, I'll be looking forward to the opening of "WilderMart". An exchange of goods and services is a perfect system. You are in error. The greedy capitalists have recently designed an exclusive system that makes it impossible for any other system to operate within it. They have made the rules that everyone must play by. Of course under their oppressive hand no alternative system is going to fly, and the house always wins.

          That's why it has to be buried so deep it can never raise up again and spread it's cancerous evil throughout the world. And as far as automobiles are concerned: Where are you going that you must travel so fast and so far? I will tell you where you are going. You are going to work so that you can pay tribute to your overlords in the form of taxes. And what's left you will use to pay the monthly bills: payments that also find their way into your Masters pocket. If you want to be free you'll have to fight for it. Appeasing tyrants who are extorting money from you from every direction will only guarantee your perpetual servitude.

          1. wilderness profile image95
            wildernessposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            In that whole ridiculous tirade you missed the points entirely.  I'll repeat them:
            1. Owning a portion of a corporation (a company with many partners) makes me a capitalist.  Not rich, but a capitalist.

            2.  Barter will not work.  I did notice you didn't respond to taking 50 chickens to trade for gasoline, but went off on the evils of transportation instead - a clear indication that you know you're wrong but don't want to talk about it.

            As far as my personal life - I don't work.  I have saved enough (through capitalism) that my retirement is comfortable without holding a job, growing my own food or building my own home.  I don't drive to work.  No one extorts money from me; the few bills I have I entered into agreements quite voluntarily (that, too, is capitalism).

            1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
              wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13086881.jpg

              Your uneducated perspective has given new  and improved  meaning to the  word "ridiculous". Yes, and people who sing karaoke  consider themselves "singers", and people who attend church consider themselves "Christians".  But a person who can't carry a tune is not a singer,a hypocrite is not a Christian, and a wage slave who saves enough nickels and dimes to retire is not a capitalist. Having a share in a corporation, large or small, does not give you control of the means of production. If you own a dairy farm you must sell according to an economic system put in place by a criminal enterprise. If you own your own restaurant you must operate accordingly, and pay tribute in the form of various licenses and taxes.

              As an example, along with other means of extortion, bar owners are forced to pay  ASCAP for the right to have live music, or a Jukebox; the idea being that ASCAP pays songwriters royalties every time their songs are played on Jukeboxes and by cover bands throughout the United States. No one has challenged this obvious system of extortion simply because the individual bar owner is not powerful enough to do so. And bar owners overall clearly don't have the ambition to unite and challenge a corrupt system. Only a handful of top songwriters and artists benefit from this scheme, which is only window dressing, and no one benefits more than the "house".

              The notion that ASCAP would know what band is playing what song is ludicrous. I have worked as a professional musician for over 20 years. No one is standing in the corner taking note that I just played "Mustang Sally", "Brown Eyed Girl", or Johnny Cash's version of "Hurt", by Nine Inch Nails. Consequently,ASCAP is nothing more than a clever means of extortion sanctioned by the government that enriches a criminal enterprise. And this is only one means of extortion used by the government.

              If you are a retired individual then you are nothing more than a slave who has been given an "attaboy" and a gold watch for acquiescing to tyranny during the best years of your life. Now you can play golf, go fishing, beat your chest and say, "I'm Proud To Be An American": an American whose tax dollars have been used since his entry into the work force to fund a killing war machine that has cost the lives of  millions of foreigners and American citizens. Of course, from your uneducated perspective, the Imperialist aggression that enriches the ruling elite has made you "free". It is ironic and pathetic that the progeny of thieves, rapists, and murderers do not recognize when the gun is being pointed at them, and that they must answer to their own white, and Zionist masters.

              There are many things you say that do not warrant a response. "chicken for gasoline" is one of them. I am not going to attempt to explain an alternative economic system in a soundbyte ( which is impossible to do) to someone who only seeks to ridicule another who possesses a superior intellect, and a righteous conviction.

              1. wilderness profile image95
                wildernessposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                I'm sorry, but I support ownership of artistic material - I find it no different than my ownership (and sole legal user) of my hubs.  So much for paying royalties when playing songs written by someone else.

                And no, you don't get to make up a new definition for "capitalist".  It is what it is, whether two people trading chickens for gasoline or a partnership (no matter how large or how many members participate).  It has exactly zero to do with the amount of wealth that is accumulated via such actions.

                While I don't doubt your "righteous conviction", I find your "superior intellect" to be questionable.  The opinions and suggestions seem to come from that conviction of right and wrong rather than any intellectual ability.

      2. ahorseback profile image47
        ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        How backwards you actually  always look at capitalism .Wrench ,   I know for a fact that "artists " are  probably the laziest capitalists in the world , However , you too are still and  very much so , a capitalist !  You want us  all to believe that you play and sing for  what ........free smiles ?  At least you hold true to one thing though , the microphone in your hand .    Just as all the Michael Moore's do  ,  singing the praises of voluntary laziness and  self serving artistic genes while constantly decrying  the very system that pays your bills  and buys your drinks  ! Just who are you trying to Sh** wrench ?

        You SHOULD  sing praises  ," thank you George Washington , Ben Franklin , Thomas Paine  . Thank you for this  chance  to live free  while all around me  lesser artists  really have to work for a living , and thank you for all of the sacrifices  that others make".... , you know the ones ....................That those like you hypocritically squander away .

        1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
          wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13041986.jpg
          Then you clearly no very little about the life of an artist. The average artist lives in poverty and often dies penniless. The rich artists that you see throughout the media are a very small percentage of the whole. When you accept this lifestyle, you essentially are taking a vow of poverty. It is very hard work to toil everyday of your life on works of art with little or no compensation, while living in a capitalist system. The humility is at times whelming, and the struggle to make ends meet while chasing a muse can be physically and mentally debilitating.  For instance, Stephen Foster was the first great American songwriter. Everybody loved his songs all across the nation. But he died with barely a nickel in his pocket. No one stepped forward and said: "Gee Steve, you have made great contributions to this country, let us help you with your finances. No, the greedy Americans enjoyed his music and danced the night away as he suffered for his art, and died in poverty.

          A lazy person would rather dig ditches all day long than to live the life of an artist. I am an artist because I have no choice but to be what I am. I have often wished of late that I worked on an assembly line, drank beer after work everyday, had a fat horny wife, and three worthless kids. Over the years my romantic idealism concerning this lifestyle has faded considerably, I have come to understand that perhaps such married men who live the 9 to 5 are perhaps the lucky ones.

          1. Castlepaloma profile image23
            Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            I build eco villages and been a professional artist for 41 years. It is not easy being green. I gave up working for corperation because their products are toxic and their greed is the greatest mental illness I  know of today. When Thomas Edison made light bulb to last 110 year that is Capitism profit for the people.

            I perfer trade, it's more spiritual. It"s just we can't carry chickens or gold in our back pockets for it would pull our pants down.

            We just need to back paper money with value mentals. Then stop the greatest harm to earth Corporatism. Capitalism is for profit for the people and no harm is allowed at any cost.

            1. wilderness profile image95
              wildernessposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              Two brothers working together to build a business is a "corporation".  So is a husband and wife (or at least can be, according to the law).  Would you stop the evils of corporatism by starting there or simply outlaw any form of partnership?  Anything with more than 10, or maybe 5 partners?

              You don't hate corporatism - you dislike giant companies whether owned by partners or individuals.

              1. Castlepaloma profile image23
                Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                What I dislike about Corporatism is all the unethical loop wholes they can do without responsible. They can hide and steal other people's money too easy by offshore unaccountable Or go bankrupt by number Corporation and use like a person without a face or trace of responsibility. As a Capitist company I must obey laws. Police , the Governments and even Queen are corperations. Negative parasite to humanity, for most part.

          2. ahorseback profile image47
            ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

            And even now you are a victim as an artist !  Last time we talked  , you were a victim as a native American , and before that a victim that served in the military  , How sad to have to look at life through the eye's of a victim  .  Never the artist  that can find a way to make a living as in being the artist   but to be a victim BECAUSE of it , never to become a celebrity as an artist because you are that good ! 

            Talk about a professional - At least you should be proud to be a professional victim !
            Artist victims are still victims too , I think I'm beginning to see a pattern  ?

            1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
              wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

              http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13090174.jpg

              "Victim" is the strawman you have erected in order to appeal to a racist mentality. Systemic racism and capitalist oppression in the United States are as real as rain. Your vitriol and your denials will not make them any less real. Furthermore, I suggest that you enroll in a creative writing course, as well as a course in reading comprehension. Perhaps a local college will even give you a Senior Discount.

              1. Live to Learn profile image82
                Live to Learnposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                It isn't really a strawman. If his post is correct and you have lamented being a victim for multiple reasons then you can reasonably be seen as seeking out the label. It's a choice made. We can all find reason to claim being victim of something and the desire to be seen as a victim appears to be contagious and rapidly spreading in America.

                1. wrenchBiscuit profile image86
                  wrenchBiscuitposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                  http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13090682.jpg

                  If you choose to waste your life in selfish pursuits, support the status quo, or accept  perpetual servitude, that is your business. But I can assure you that you know nothing of my business, my purpose, or my destiny, as your commentary bears witness.

                  First of all, the term "victim" has been perverted by racists in order to discourage any criticism of systemic racism, or America in general. Many of you have either been fooled by this tactic or purposely use it as a weapon. Whether I am a victim or not, I do not think in such terms. I think of truth, and of freedom from oppression. Martin Luther King , Malcolm X, Medger Evers, John Brown, and millions of others fought this evil system and died because of it.  Goyathlay (Geronimo) and many great native leaders also fought and suffered as a result of Manifest Destiny.  And if you consider the definition of "victim" then they all fit the definition. Except for Goyathlay and John Brown, all of the men I mentioned were not only victims of systemic racism, but also murder victims. But nevertheless, they were all great and courageous men.

                  The word "victim", is properly defined as follows:

                  A. a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. B. a person who is tricked or duped.

                  As you can see, the definition reveals that "victim" is not synonymous with"weakness" as you and others seek to imply. It is simply a state of being. What fool can suggest that a dead man will ever cease to be a victim of terrorism? What idiot believes that a man who lost his legs in a car accident will ever cease to be the victim of an MVC? Once a victim, always a victim. Even a slave who frees himself will forever remain a victim of slavery. It is irrelevant whether or not we overcome a particular injurious event emotionally or physically, as these have nothing to do with the definition. Only when the definition is perverted and weaponzied does it suggest a flaw of character.

                  This perversion exists for a very good reason: If a man is duped into believing he is free, and that he is "not" a victim, when he most assuredly is, then he will not stand against his oppressor. On the contrary, as witnessed here with the apologist for capitalist oppression and tyranny, he will celebrate his oppression and embrace his oppressor. This pathetic and sickening display of mind control is acted out every 4th of July across the United States. Any educated man with at least half of a testicle will admit this to be true. George Carlin, a white man, and a very intelligent and gifted entertainer, was outspoken on this issue, as you can tell from the meme.

                  Many of you who post here are white and over the age of 55, and you grew up in the imaginary world of Ozzie and Harriet. That world never existed. And so, I and millions of others who are wide awake are in the process of de-programming the populace. We do not need weapons of mass destruction to dismantle a lie, a fiction, an American Dream. All that is required is courage, a relentless persistence, and  the ability to educate ourselves and others. Once a majority have been educated and can clearly see the yoke of oppression hanging about their necks, they will cast off the yoke, and this evil system will fall down of it's own accord, as it will no longer have the popular support of the people. But for as long as the government can keep the people singing patriotic songs, and celebrating death, genocide, and tyranny, then all working class Americans will remain in bondage.

                  I will not be folded back into the dust knowing that I said nothing; knowing that I did nothing; knowing that I was just another slothful coward; spending his days masturbating while collecting his acorns and counting his money. The word "victim" as it has been used against me can be seen as nothing but a strawman, as it clearly does not fit the definition. This word has  been used as a distraction to create a fiction, and to question the strength of my character.

                  Furthermore, my brief description of how the artist must work and struggle has absolutely nothing to do with a so-called "victim mentality". Once again we see a strawman, and a perversion of the definition. No man forced me to be an artist, or "made" me an artist. It is only God who made me what I am, for better or worse, and I gladly accept the gift of Sound and Vision that has been bestowed upon me. Without art, I would have no purpose, or reason for living. When I speak of the hardships that accompany such a lifestyle, I am only speaking less than half of the truth, as there are even more benefits. In other words , I am not a victim of God and Art. Yes, everyone has moments when they second guess the path they have chosen in life. But such second guessing has nothing to do with a victim mentality. It is simply part of the human condition.The vitriol and hate directed at me here only elevates, and makes me stronger.

                  1. ahorseback profile image47
                    ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                    Wrenchbisket ,  I actually hold no hatred of any single man nor group of mankind ,  Nor does America ,  but when hatred is directed at America as we know it's historical  past , when you attack  those who created this nation , fought  died and were maimed for its   future , yours and mine . I will attack with a  feeding frenzy .  Almost every rant that you've ever posted is a direct hatred against America and all her manifestations; when that happens  , I will defend  my country !

                    The definition of Victim -Hood  has been much altered in just the last seven and a half Obama years , He has made it his MAIN  mission to reopen the oldest wounds of America's very  colorful past ! The  racism against blacks had all but been healed , bias against women remains however interestingly unchanged , perhaps you can explain that  !  Anything against   Muslims - another Obama creation !     BLM- what a farce they have amounted to .     And You have made the Native Americans seem as victims  in almost every rant you  have ever posted .

                    What positive change will ever come of so much professed victimhood ?

                    My advice -Be the change you wish to see !

              2. ahorseback profile image47
                ahorsebackposted 5 months ago in reply to this

                Wrenchbisket ,I can't help it if you don't like the truth , Victims ?   Everyone below the level of the  graft and corruption  of congress is a victim , no one however is more or less than the next guy  !   That however ,  is exactly what  the self centeredness of  victim-ology  has earned you .

                I here Hillary's giving out free cell phones .
                http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13090502.jpg

      3. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Greed dose not equal Capitalism yet it dose corporatism. Financial is 1/5 of  my equation in life. Too bad for  most people financial is most of their equation in life, making it terrible unbalance.

        Capitalism can cooperate with some  Socialism. Corporatism can not and has a mental illness of greed

    3. jonnycomelately profile image85
      jonnycomelatelyposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      (Excuse my lateness -  6.20am, just got up).

      So which God do capitalist pray to?  And is "he" anti-Communist? (Or she?).  Does that God support selfishness, greed, judgemental attitudes towards the down-and-outs, who's' only crimes are that they have been let down by the money-grabbing system?
      I don't have any God to whom I can pray.... But how can I help?  Maybe the Rich need nothing that li'l Ol' Me can offer.

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        Corporatism would be the love of money and power over all the other groups and things.
        As ego maniac as you can get.


        Capitalism would be more for the individual, so worship yourself first and the Sun that grows everything.

  42. Sychophantastic profile image82
    Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago
  43. ahorseback profile image47
    ahorsebackposted 5 months ago

    The very reason it bothers liberals like you so much..........."...let's  talk about race in America , bring it on .......", [Obama ] he about made it his personal mission to visit every black man  and also made it an issue for those arrested by a cop for one thing or another . Each supposed  "racist "   shooting by a cop ,   most of them turning out to be nothing but thugs  turned lose on an innocent public,     He has set back the gains of race relations forty years or more . Otherwise he would have had  no  liberal accomplishment as a "leader ", if not for his race  baiting !

    1. Sychophantastic profile image82
      Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

      Do you know any black people or have any black friends? What a poor white person you are. Poor you. You wouldn't know race-baiting if it spit in your eye. Obama is guilty of being black, that's it. His race baiting comes from him being black because now people are facing the fact they have a black president. The whole birther movement, clearly constructed to question the legitimacy of his presidency, which was really just another way to use the n-word. You could fit the amount you know about race and race relations and the challenges faced by non-whites in this country into a thimble. Actually, that's a little big.

      1. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 5 months ago in reply to this

        I think it's fair to say that anybody who talks about the non-existence of racism is very likely to be a racist.

        1. PrettyPanther profile image86
          PrettyPantherposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          Yep.

        2. IslandBites profile image86
          IslandBitesposted 5 months ago in reply to this

          +1000000000000

  44. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 4 months ago

    In 1969 Bill Clinton was expelled from Oxford University for the rape of 19 year old Eileen Wellstone.  There have been many women who have come forward since who say Bill Clinton raped, sexually assaulted,  and even bit ... which is his signature.

    There are more rape victims of Bill's who will be coming forward soon, because they now fell safe to do so. 

    'What difference does' it make to Hillary supports?

    1. Sychophantastic profile image82
      Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

      And Trump has five children by three different women and is also an adulterer. Is it just a matter of degree that offends? Bill isn't running for President.

      1. Live to Learn profile image82
        Live to Learnposted 4 months ago in reply to this

        Just wanted to point out. She referenced rape, you referenced multiple marriages and philandering. Is rape, in your mind, synonymous with consensual sex?

        1. Sychophantastic profile image82
          Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

          Definitely not, but those are unproven accusations. That said, it is very disturbing. However, he's not running.

          1. Live to Learn profile image82
            Live to Learnposted 4 months ago in reply to this

            No he is not running for president. But, a woman who stayed with a man through much of this is and it doesn't say much good of her.

            1. Sychophantastic profile image82
              Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

              Try to deal with facts. Again, you're another one of these people who has a feeling about things. If you want to deal in rumor and innuendo, then there's no sense in having any sort of discussion. Sure, if all this about Bill is true, it reflects poorly on Hillary. What if very little of it is true?

  45. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 4 months ago

    Many guy's would give Bill a pat on the back, not a impeachment for a blow job.

    Bill was a good President, today not so impressive. Yet, he is not running for President.

    We don't pick on Trump's wife, although Trump dose pick many politicians wives.  Just not nice.

    1. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 4 months ago in reply to this

      Trump's wife gets picked on a lot by the libtards.
      Thankfully, we don't have any of them in the HubPages forum.
      Close call though.

      "Hillary for Prison 2016!"

      1. Castlepaloma profile image23
        Castlepalomaposted 4 months ago in reply to this

        For most part Trump's wife stays out of it and I don't think she can help him much.

        I would be a great wizard for a King. Because in real life I would be a world class strategist.

        I'm amazed by what Trump has gotten away with in racism and world trade offensive speeches.

        This time Trump is playing with too much fire on th is sexual offensive card. In which is the pot calling the kettle black using Bill as the escape goat.

        This will backfire because Hillary Clintons has only gotten sexual accusation on her. Wail Trump has a series of hard facts on a few of his sexual affairs, divorces and court case rape settlements. He has even raped his wife.

        Remember 7 out the top ten worst sins in America are sexually related. Adultery is number One sin in America. Where is the proof of Hillary's adultery?

        1. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 4 months ago in reply to this

          I may write you off...as
          Liberal brainwashing in Canada...
          My very near country / neighbors.

          1. Castlepaloma profile image23
            Castlepalomaposted 4 months ago in reply to this

            I'm not attached to any one group in order to send my love more freely to everyone as a world citizen. My only personally concern is getting out of  North America in time and chance with Trump Signing in makes it worst. As far as a long term President during this up coming falling  empire. Maybe Trump would be best, after the huge mess is clean up, who knows. Chance of selection gose, Hillary chances are better.

            1. jonnycomelately profile image85
              jonnycomelatelyposted 4 months ago in reply to this

              As I understand it, the definite actions a President can take, without approval of Congress are quite limited.

              So, maybe when Mr Trump says he is going to do this, going to do that, it's pure wishful thinking on his part.  If he does anything wrong that threatens economic, military or social upheaval, or "does the dirty" on the American People, then Congress would be equally to blame.

              Speaking as an outsider, of course, but very concerned for the effect your Presidential Election will have upon our world at large.

              1. colorfulone profile image86
                colorfuloneposted 4 months ago in reply to this

                You are correct.  However, presidents can make Executive Orders and over-ride Congress, much like Obama did with his illegal amnesty for illegal aliens, and much more.  There are several members of Congress none too happy with his EO's and are involved in law suits against Obama.

                If Trump screws up as president, and I don't believe he will, there are many people who would hold him accountable like they did with Reagan.  Reagan was never 100% after the attempted assassination and they got to him.

              2. Castlepaloma profile image23
                Castlepalomaposted 4 months ago in reply to this

                It will be the people who will be the knight and shining armour when chips are down. As it always has been throughout human history, You could say they are anarchist deep down.

                Like the tree represents the people and the Government is the fungus. It starts out fungas protects the tree from diseases and cool roots.
                Then the fungas grows than strangles and chocks the tree to cripple or kill the tree. As they may kill each other the vines grow over top of them and the cycle continues.

                1. colorfulone profile image86
                  colorfuloneposted 4 months ago in reply to this

                  +1

                  1. ahorseback profile image47
                    ahorsebackposted 4 months ago in reply to this

                    Castepaloma , I must say  , that impressed me !

      2. ahorseback profile image47
        ahorsebackposted 4 months ago in reply to this

        Trumps picking on people now !       

        What a  horrible offense  ,  How could he  !  I mean picking on people is like , wow  man !,The worse offense of a candidate . Please  , while the world is burning around us , the economy is flaring at the edges , the environment  is the dumping ground of the  corporate world   , China is building a land bridge and about to name the Pacific  after a Chinese  province ,  Russia is pirating  Europe again ,
        and ALL democrats came come up with ?

        Trump is picking on me again.........mommy !

        You gotta' love the naiveté of forum democrats !

        1. Sychophantastic profile image82
          Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

          When somebody says Trump is picking on people, they are trying not to engage in the same kind of name-calling that Trump does. However, if you insist, Trump is an anti-American fascist zealot who's more interested in being dictator than being president. He doesn't just pick on people. He defrauds them. He doesn't respect the Constitution, which makes him anti-American. He prefers world dictators to our president. He tries to inspire through fear rather than through hope. He hates America. He support ISOLATIONISM, you idiot, so all this worry about what's happening in the world isn't going to improve with Trump. He supports backing out of our NATO commitments.

          What world do you live in exactly? Oh, that's right, facts don't matter, but feelings do. The fact is crime is down under Obama, but you feel like it's up. The fact is unemployment is down under Obama, but you feel like it's up. The fact is Obama has done far more for the environment, but you feel like he hasn't. The fact is when Republicans left the White House, the country was spinning out of control and the economy was headed into the tank, but you apparently feel like those were our glory days. Go ahead, vote for Trump. You desperately need that strong, white father figure to lead us, to make you feel whole and complete.

        2. colorfulone profile image86
          colorfuloneposted 4 months ago in reply to this

          Gotta love it!  smile

          1. Sychophantastic profile image82
            Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

            You can't counter a single point made here:
            What world do you live in exactly? Oh, that's right, facts don't matter, but feelings do. The fact is crime is down under Obama, but you feel like it's up. The fact is unemployment is down under Obama, but you feel like it's up. The fact is Obama has done far more for the environment, but you feel like he hasn't. The fact is when Republicans left the White House, the country was spinning out of control and the economy was headed into the tank, but you apparently feel like those were our glory days. Go ahead, vote for Trump. You desperately need that strong, white father figure to lead us, to make you feel whole and complete.

      3. Sychophantastic profile image82
        Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

        Hillary for Prison? What a joke. When you start living in reality, give us a call. Meanwhile, go ahead and vote for Trump and push our country toward fascist statehood. You do realize you are fundamentally anti-American voting for him, right? Isolationism, anti-immigration (even though it's down), anti-equal rights...

        What exactly does Hillary deserve to go to prison for or to be executed? You're a real intellectual winner with that kind of rhetoric. Let's just kill the people we don't like. Hmmm, and we wonder why there's so much violence.

        1. Sychophantastic profile image82
          Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

          Another interesting piece of information that's coming out - Trump has a debt load of $650 million, most of which is owned by Russia. Interesting that Russia seems to prefer him as President - quite likely because they can influence his decisions? Why else would Trump not support Ukranian independence? That's the only thing he added to the RNC platform. It's quite possible a vote for Trump is a vote for Putin.

  46. Castlepaloma profile image23
    Castlepalomaposted 4 months ago

    I dose not matter who American elects, it 's a huge fairytale scam. It should have been clear to everyone after GW Bush the country and world is run by Corporatism, not Government.

    What positive change has Obama not lied about.
    1.Lets see... the Bail out, biggest scam ever
    2 Iraq and Middle East wars (he won a Nobel prize for that one)
    3.More than Double the national Debt. (Oowoch that will hurt basic cost of living forever future) 4.Unemployment 4.7 ( over age 16, 38℅ of American are out of work)
    5. Natural Environment, worst in all areas.
    I could go on and on...

    The only thing that is keeping America from bankruptcy is they are the only ones who can print money and US/NATO/UN military and policing (Justice system) world threat. In which are 1 and 2 most employed Corporatism in the World. Not everyone can work for McDonald's/Walmart and the killing machine.

  47. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 4 months ago

    "The Clinton's War On Women" by Roger Stone

    "Hillary Clinton is running for president as an “advocate of women and girls,” but there is another shocking side to her story that has been carefully covered up—until now. This stunning exposé reveals for the first time how Bill and Hillary Clinton systematically abused women and others—sexually, physically, and psychologically—in their scramble for power and wealth.

    In this groundbreaking book, New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone and researcher and alternative historian Robert Morrow map the arc of Bill and Hillary’s crimes and cover-ups. They reveal details about their actions in Arkansas, during Bill Clinton’s time in the White House, about who really ordered the deadly attack on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, during Hillary’s tenure as secretary of state, about their time at the Clinton Foundation, and during Hillary’s current campaign for president.

    This is the first book to shed light on the couple’s deeply personal violations of the people they crushed in their obsessive quest for power. Along the way, Stone and Morrow reveal the family’s darkest secrets, including a Clinton family member’s drug rehab treatment that was never reported by the press, Hillary Clinton’s unusually close relationship with a top female aide, and a stunning revelation of such impact that it could strip Bill Clinton of his current popularity and derail Hillary’s push to be the second Clinton in the White House.

    Anyone who cares about the future of the United States will want to read this tell-all, exposing the appalling, unvarnished, and ugly truth about the Clintons"

    1. Sychophantastic profile image82
      Sychophantasticposted 4 months ago in reply to this

      This is really what you read? Roger Stone is a hack and it's no secret. He thinks LBJ killed JFK. Stupid is as stupid does.

  48. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 4 months ago

    Dolly Kyle, former girl friend of Billy Clinton, wrote the book titled, "The Other Woman", which is Hillary Clinton.

    She says Hillary is addiction to power and money, that Bill is addicted to sex. No surprise!

    Dolly, tells from her personal perspective from the 90's, when she filed a law suit against Billy who was sitting president at the time, and nobody likely heard about because the national news networks didn't seem to think it was news-worthy that someone was suing the president of the USA.  -  It went to the Supreme Court and Dolly won...that should have been news worthy! 

    "Media Magic" how to make a story disappear...well, stories disappear in the Clinton News Network.

    You can find "jones vs clinton lawsuit deposition" is see that Dolly Kyle was questioned by Billy's lawyer that confirms her decades long relationship with Billy was consentual. BUT, Bill Clinton denied it under oath, except that he tried to be nice to her in high school. BUT, she has hand written letters to her from Billy that are attended to that deposition.

    For more, and Interesting interniew:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjuSKpuCvAc

  49. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 4 months ago

    Make sure Hillary Clinton never becomes president! America can't survive another term of Obama-era radical liberalist policies implemented by a Bill and Hillary Clinton team back in the White House. In 2016, it will be too late to stop Hillary. We've got to hold her accountable right now. Stop Hillary PAC was created for one reason only -- to save America from the destructive far-left, liberal cancer created by Bill and Hillary Clinton that's trying to corrupt America. Stand with Stop Hillary PAC today to take a stand for America's future and STOP Hillary dead in her tracks.

    See more at: http://www.stophillarypac.org/#sthash.ipwUzDEe.dpuf

    I had not seen this petition before, it is certainly worthy of mention to stop the Clinton Crime Family from getting into the White House again, IMHO.

  50. colorfulone profile image86
    colorfuloneposted 4 months ago

    Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department repeatedly declined to fully go after the terror group responsible for kidnapping hundreds of girls.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … rists.html

    1. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 3 months ago in reply to this

      "Clinton's War On Women" is truly a well documented book by Roger Stone, that I recommend highly for anyone opened minded enough to read it.  Righteous-indignation, is the effect that reading "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee" had on me also. 

      How would you like to have been raped by Bill, only to have Hillary publicly call you a bimbo? 

      http://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13156514.jpg

 
working