Apparently a lot of Republicans think so. Here are the results of an NBC News poll:
A recent NBC News Survey Monkey poll found that a whopping 72 percent of Republicans have doubts about Obama's citizenship and 41 percent are emphatic that he was foreign born. Meanwhile, 31 percent are unsure if he is an American, leaving 27 percent who acknowledge that their country's president was born in the U.S.
Do you think this poll paints an accurate picture of Republican beliefs?
Are we still beating a dead horse? Even Republicans are not that dumb....
My good-natured father (a deeply committed Republican) spent the final years of his life erupting into fury whenever the subject of Obama came up.
He was firmly convinced that Obama is not a U.S. citizen. He had all the proof he needed by watching Fox News all day (literally). His friends and neighbors in his retirement condo building all thought the same.
Yes, although it has been proven ad infinitum that President Obama was born in Hawaii & is a Christian, there are Republicans who against confirmed/substantiated conclusions, vehemently contend that President Obama wasn't born in America & he is a Muslim.
This hyperbole is getting very old..........This nonsensical conjecture has been continuing since Obama was elected to office in 2008. Time to put this to rest.
lol ~ Well, APPARENTLY He's MORE of an AMERICAN than Melania Trump, or perhaps even Donald ~
While I think the media has largely moved on from this issue, Republicans clearly have not. I think that if you think this is pure conspiracy, it's incumbent upon you to continue to raise the issue to out Republicans who still believe this nonsense because it shows how likely they are to believe other nonsense.
There are posters here who believe it. I guess they don't have the courage to post here on this thread. But one in particular likes to talk to herself on her own threads and ignore any efforts to question her "facts."
I have heard it said that tolerance is a virtue... We should all strive to live a virtuous life.
ps. A good strong properly sized hat can help.
I get your point, but these people vote and inflict similarly fact-challenged legislators and presidential candidates upon us. Should we sit back and "tolerate" that?
And I get your point too. It is not one I disagree with. But... would you criticize an ostrich because it has feathers?
Each time I reach for the keyboard to dispatch a blazing reply I am stopped by the understanding that I would be challenging a belief, not a factual assertion, (even though it can appear to be so). I will challenge facts I disagree with all day long, but I am hesitant to wear the necessary robes to challenge a belief.
I hope you don't view this too harshly, it is not meant to be so, I am just clutching at any straw available to participate in these forums. As I am not a Trump or Hillary supporter, the pickings for good discussions have been kinda slim lately.
No, I don't view this harshly at all and I have had the same doubts about whether I should be so hard on some people. At some point, you feel like you're bullying a half-wit. But, and it's a big "but," I keep coming back to the point that these people who believe that truth seeking involves copying and pasting long passages from fringe "news" sources are damaging our country. They, and the politicians and rich donors who tolerate them in order to keep them in their voting pool, have created the Donald Trump candidacy. Without these low-information voters, and the politicians who courted them, Trump would not have risen to level of presidential candidate. We can continue to "tolerate" them, but at what risk? Who suffers in the end? Shouldn't we hold everyone to at least a minimum standard?
I believe the Republican party finds itself at a critical point in its survival. If conservatives want to continue to have a voice in the running of this country, they need to disavow the bigots, the liars, the misogynists, and the religious nut jobs. And I mean truly disavow.
Just so you know, I long for a healthy, rational conservative voice to keep the liberals in check. We need good people on both sides to keep the proper balance in government, people who will work with the other side, not just stonewall and disrupt.
So, while I am at times conflicted about my need to correct the ridiculously uneducated posters on these forums, overall I feel we must not let this dangerously stupid segment of the population go unchecked. By the way, I have been known to correct crazy liberal rantings, too, as in when a certain someone said congress is guilty of treason for not passing a budget. Of course, since I am liberal, I am prone to finding more craziness from the right than the left.
Anyway, I feel like I'm rambling, but maybe I've said something useful.
Thanks everyone for this discussion. Some of the forums have been extremely demoralizing, but not this one. It restores my faith in the community.
Unfrotunately, yes. Both Trump and Cruz have brought it up repeatedly this year.
by Grace Marguerite Williams3 years ago
in light of the current sociopolitical and socioeconomic situation regarding the United States of America? Do you believe that President Obama is doing the best job he can under the circumstances? Do you maintain that...
by Grace Marguerite Williams2 years ago
the United States, are YOU happy with or regret the choice that you have made? Why? Why not?
by Susie Lehto6 days ago
“Let me be clear here. The president is not and has not been under investigation for obstruction." said Jay Sekulow, a member of the president’s legal team. I'm not sure everyone in the US or in these...
by ahorseback2 days ago
Jees ,........ This Trump obstructionism from the left couldn't show more ignorance of origin than the naked moral corruption OF the actual investigators ? From Mueller to his hired , high payed ...
by My Esoteric2 days ago
The Ds lost their fourth special election. Some say those are Big Wins for Rs and Disaster for Ds. Other optimistic souls say each was a Win for Ds because they were close. While I tend to agree with...
by My Esoteric2 months ago
Maybe. The 17th Century term High Crimes and Misdemeanors may not mean what you think it might be after seeing President Clinton impeached, but not convicted. A common interpretation is as follows:The...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.