Liberals -There is more to life than phony outrage

1. 0

   ahorsebackposted 7 years ago

   There is only one accomplishment from the Phony Outrage that is so common on the left today , The  Loss of total respect !   Its like knowing that ,  once again ,  Aunt Marg is showing up for Thanksgiving dinner  .  It's going to be another day of the same old boring  family  stories , the old and recurring off color jokes in front of your kids  , That certain  " old people smell "the fruitcake  that no one eats and gets thrown in the garbage after she leaves  And of course , who has to go get her and take her home after dinner .
   
   No wonder the left was SO politically  annihilated  in this election .
   
   
   

   replyreport
   1. 79

      Credence2posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Don't you worry, the disgust and activism that appears to be 'outrage' to you is quite real as the Trump Crew will learn about in detail during the coming months.
      
      I wouldn't want you to miss out on all of the fun....

      replyreport
      1. 61

         Live to Learnposted 7 years agoin reply to this

         

         replyreport
         1. 78

            Kathleen Cochranposted 7 years agoin reply to this

              No CNN didn't say she would win. 3 million more voters did.  This is the problem with having a person in the White House who didn't actually win.  Whatever he does, he's going to get pushback from the majority who didn't want him. The outrage is not phony.  It's all too real.

            replyreport
            1. 61

               Live to Learnposted 7 years agoin reply to this

               The 'majority' didn't want her any more than the 'majority' wanted him. A large percentage of eligible voters chose to stay home. Probably because the choices were so pathetic.
               
               My roll eyes was because the left and the right are just alike.

               replyreport
               1. 78

                  Kathleen Cochranposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  Actually 3 million more Americans wanted her.  But the 80 million who stayed home are more the reason we are stuck with him.  Hope they realize that in 2020.

                  replyreport
            2. 78

               colorfuloneposted 7 years agoin reply to this

               
               
               3 milliom non-citizens votes -  confirmed by VoteFraud.org and TrueTheVote.org
               
               1.8 million dead on voter rolls - confirmed by Pew Center on States
               
               3 million duplicate state registrations - confirmed by Pew Center on States
               
               5 states with 98% Clinton late votes - confirmed by Bev Harris - BlackBoxVoting.org

               replyreport
            3. 0

               ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

               Trump didn't win - only in sore loser liberal minds who apparently DON"T understand the election process !

               replyreport
               1. 61

                  Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  You are so right, and you know if the shoe was on the other foot Republicans would not be acting like the left, paying people to protest and cause violence. I guarantee you if Trump won the popular vote total (which neither candidate was trying to do) the left would be behaving the same way they are now - it really has nothing to do with anything they say, to them the popular vote, Russia, Trump's tweets, whatever, these are just excuses they use to behave like the thugs and anarchists that they are. People protesting an election they weren't even registered to vote in or didn't even vote in tells the whole story.

                  replyreport
                  1. 0

                     ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                     Todays NEW left totally reminds me of second  graders in a lunch line at desert time !     Run out of pudding - watch the melt down on their faces , kicking  , screaming and ranting on their backs .

                     replyreport
                     1. 61

                        Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                        Here you go - the second graders on display.
                        
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRGh9s_NBrg
                        
                        What is really sick is these phonies who cannot stand Trump hold Bill Clinton up to this day as someone to be admired and would likely do anything to spend time with him, a serial sexual assaulter and rapist of women.

                        replyreport
               2. 78

                  Kathleen Cochranposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  The shoe is never on the other foot. Twice in 16 years the EC vote has put a candidate with fewer votes in the White House and both times it put a Repubican there - with devastating consequences.  There is a difference in understanding the EC and taking exception with it.

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                     No matter how many times it occurs winning the total popular vote has nothing to do with winning the election or the resultant consequences of the administration that follows, which demonstrates how little you actually know of the EC or about history. No election has had more devastating consequences than presidential elections where the democrat won, a fact, something YOU totally ignore and replace with lies.

                     replyreport
                     1. 79

                        Credence2posted 7 years agoin reply to this

                        'No election has had more devastating consequences than presidential elections where the democrat won, a fact, something YOU totally ignore and replace with lies.'
                        
                        At best, this is just a tragic misreading of history, at worse it is just another crock of Rightwing bulls*it

                        replyreport
                        1. 61

                           Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                           Bulls*it? The only Bulls*it is your statement "it is just Rightwing Bulls*it" and the proof is you don't even give any evidence that it is  Bulls*it .. why? because it isn't Bulls*it . Is that all you liberals can do, make false statements with nothing to back it up and expect everyone to believe it - I'll back up what I say.
                           
                           There have been 15 democratic presidents in the U.S. While many of the democratic presidents accomplished amazing feats, a fair share also failed miserably in other parts of their presidency. FDR did a great job as the leader of our country on foreign policy, but his domestic policies were dismal. Looking at each democratic president’s full body of work, here’s the worst.  http://www.rantnow.com/2014/11/12/worst … ents-ever/

                           replyreport
                           1. 79

                              Credence2posted 7 years agoin reply to this

                              Yes, you've got it right Taze, bovine excrement.
                              
                              How about that phony site you put up as evidence? They couldn't even spell Martin van Buren's name correctly. It is one of those trashy sites one finds when departing from the information highway into the back alley.
                              
                              How about a list of the worse GOP Presidents? Believe me, I don't have to Google up a trashy site to know who they were.
                              
                              So let's BACK IT UP with a credible argument rather than skewed data from the start, shall we?
                              
                              By the way, you can move back down the road of being taken seriously as credible when you use reputable refence sources to support your claims.
                              
                              For example:
                              
                              https://www.usnews.com/news/special-rep … ts?slide=5

                              replyreport
                              1. 61

                                 Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                                 Right, the usual liberal tactic, ignore the facts and attack the messenger. So transparent! Then you pick an article that starts with Bush who didn't win the popular vote, I said presidents who won it. And it says Bush's speaking gaffes and the wars make him the worst but doesn't even mention Obama (won the popular vote) whose speaking gaffes are far worse and he continued the same wars and gave us ISIS as well as tramped on the constitution at every turn. lol yeah you aren't objective at all, of course you don't know how to be, you're a liberal. The only case you are capable of making is there is a typo in Van Buren's name? Yeah, typical liberal tactic. Any list of worst presidents that doesn't include Carter, Obama and the 2nd president in history to be impeached is not an honest or objective account.

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 79

                                    Credence2posted 7 years agoin reply to this

                                    Any list of worst presidents that doesn't include Carter, Obama and the 2nd president in history to be impeached is not an honest or objective account.
                                    ----------------------
                                    The fact that you can say this indicates that you know nothing about history, there were Presidents rated below either of those men in any credible(Carter-Obama) and scholarly evaluation, not just rightwing trash.
                                    
                                    Still, your claim is unproven and not substantiated with unbiased sources and, as such, remains 100 percent bullsh@t.

                                    replyreport
                                    1. 61

                                       Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                                       And what's more you took what I originally said out of context which is another typical liberal tactic - my whole point was "winning the total popular vote has nothing to do with winning the election or the resultant consequences of the administration that follows ..."  and what you responded to and quoted came after that but in reference to the popular vote. All you liberals know how to do is deceive and change the subject whenever you are put in your place.

                                       report
                  2. 0

                     ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                     So you believe then that the popular vote alone should elect .   So much for a democratic  republic , lets just call it a cities republic  ? In fact , let just call it ,  The United Cities of America .

                     replyreport
                     1. 61

                        Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                        What she believes is a fantasy world. No connection to reality as you can tell from anything she has ever commented about. Prove it to her and she disappears or changes the subject.

                        replyreport
   2. 61

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Hey, where is the outrage over the Clinton Foundation?
      
      
      
      The left freaks over something Trump said privately 11 years ago, nothing that he actually did, and yet not a word about the criminality of the former Secretary of state or the Clinton crime family.
      
      While everyone was protesting President Trump's inauguration the Clinton Foundation made a major announcement that went by with almost no notice: For all intents and purposes, it's closing its doors.
      
      In a tax filing, the Clinton Global Initiative said it's firing 22 staffers and closing its offices, a result of the gusher of foreign money that kept the foundation afloat suddenly drying up after Hillary Clinton failed to win the presidency.
      
      It proves what was said all along, the Clinton Foundation was little more than an influence-peddling scheme to enrich the Clintons, and had little if anything to do with "charity," either overseas or in the U.S. That sound you heard starting in November was checkbooks being snapped shut in offices around the world by people who had hoped their donations would buy access to the next president of the United States. Read all about it:
      
      http://www.investors.com/politics/edito … n-scandal/

      replyreport
      1. 0

         ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

         +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

         replyreport
         1. 61

            Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            I wonder, do you think you will hear from the hubbers who defended the Clinton Foundation now that it is obvious to all what it really was which had nothing to do with philanthropy? Where are they now with their uninformed twisted defense of these criminals? As is usual when they are unmistakably shown to be wrong they don't show up to admit it, they just disappear into the fog of the bubble of fog they dwell in.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

               Because Hilary honestly , symbolically , ideologically , however you want to compare and qualify  them ,  .........Hilary symbolizes  everything that the Left truly IS- IN AMERCA today ,  two to three  generations of total and complete selfishness !
               
               But  that selfishness cannot , never has , and never will be able to self finance . They are morally willing to beg , borrow and or steal it all  to acquire it !
               
               And there is no honesty or debating THAT point on their part.

               replyreport
      2. 78

         Kathleen Cochranposted 7 years agoin reply to this

         The Clinton Foundation does wonderful things in the world.  If you aren't familiar with their work, there is information readily available.

         replyreport
         1. 61

            Dont Taze Me Broposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            information readily available?   Yeah lies which is all you know to read. Hitler made the trains run on time, I suppose you think his "wonderful thing" made him wonderful?
            
            Read this: http://www.investors.com/politics/edito … n-scandal/
            In a tax filing, the Clinton Global Initiative said it's firing 22 staffers and closing its offices, a result of the gusher of foreign money that kept the foundation afloat suddenly drying up after Hillary Clinton failed to win the presidency.
            
            It proves what was said all along, the Clinton Foundation was little more than an influence-peddling scheme to enrich the Clintons, and had little if anything to do with "charity," either overseas or in the U.S. That sound you heard starting in November was checkbooks being snapped shut in offices around the world by people who had hoped their donations would buy access to the next president of the United States.
            
            Read all about it, oh sorry that's right, you never read the truth.

            replyreport
2. 69

   abwilliamsposted 7 years ago

   Wow an in-your-face threat, followed by excuses and denial of an Actual Win, with eye rolls thrown in for punctuation purposes.
   Sounds about Right for the Left! Predictable!!

   replyreport
3. 0

   ahorsebackposted 7 years ago

   Reality Check - Hilary  diddddnnnn't win .  Lot of confusion these days , must be something in the water .

   replyreport