jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (6 posts)

New York City's Minimum Cigarette Price

  1. RJ Schwartz profile image91
    RJ Schwartzposted 10 days ago

    The New York City Council voted this week (August 7th week) to raise the minimum price of a pack of cigarettes to $13.00 and banned all cigarette sales in pharmacies.  The current minimum is $10.50.  City officials believe this will lead to smoking cessation while opponents believe it will lead to more black market sales or residents leaving the state to spend their money elsewhere.  E-cigarettes are also being clamped down on by NYC, and an additional 10% tax on all non-cigarette tobacco products plus an increase in the cost to obtain a tobacco sellers license.

    What side of the debate are you on?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13653691.png

    1. Credence2 profile image87
      Credence2posted 10 days ago in reply to this

      This is an example of nanny government, that goes too far, even for me

      1. RJ Schwartz profile image91
        RJ Schwartzposted 10 days ago in reply to this

        Plus NYC is preying upon the poor for more tax revenue

      2. wilderness profile image95
        wildernessposted 10 days ago in reply to this

        Would you care to contribute to the funeral expenses of one "Wilderness"?  He expired on reading your post, so you are partly responsible, after all.

  2. abwilliams profile image83
    abwilliamsposted 10 days ago

    The latter, if people want to smoke they are going to smoke, they'll find a way, without it costing them the price of a tank of gas. Whatever it takes!
    Each time liberals intrude further into what should be private matters/ individual choices, such as this cigarette extortion tax, (and let's not forget about the big gulp tax) they do damage to Mom and Pop Establishments. Hurting small and mid-size business, hurts the City in the long run.

    1. wilderness profile image95
      wildernessposted 10 days ago in reply to this

      More than a few states/localities are finding that their income is dropping from such tactics.  Whereupon taxes must be raised on someone else.  Indicating it never was about "helping" (read: "forcing") people be healthy; it was always about the money, and smokers are a small, powerless group so hit 'em hard!

 
working