With ths slow withdrawel of troops slated for Iraq and the escalation of troops being called for in Afganistan how will the US define a victory in the Middle East?
If you define victory as stable, Western-friendly governments, forget it. Wait a few generations (at least).
My definition would be a withdrawal from the region--not likely to happen in my lifetime but hope springs eternal.
there will be no outright victor; just loss, some regret that goes away, and both sides lying saying they were just.
Just like Viet-Nam, Korea, Desert Storm- all of it in vein.
Small men- Majors, Kernels, and one-star Generals, all retiring as Major Generals from their holy little wars. While the poorer folks burying their enlisted dead.
and the Rest (walking wounded) are dumped on the VA hospital system,that can not take care of them. All honerd with a few token parades, now and then.
Then as time goes by the War stories in the bars will get bigger, as well as the waist lines.
Typical America; farting, belching and lying, while we dump down 4400 calorie meals, and boast of Gods country. Then vote in the same Old thives back in, over and over again. Nothing learned, nothing kept but memories that blur. No victors, just spoils.
Its a dam shame.
It will probably look like mushroom clouds.
Very good point. For those who think withdrawal would be defeat, the onus should be on them to determine what the costs are to stay and win victory (they should define that too) and why those costs are worth it rather than spending equal amounts on domestic programs like infrastructural investments.
I don't think 'victory' is really an appropiate objective. Stopping or forcing countries from supporting or harboring terrorist organizations is the best we can hope for. This area of the world suffers from a serious case of 'we haven't made it out of the middle ages' mentality. That, I believe, leads to an inability to be able to reason logically.
Don't you think that our very presence in the Middle East stirs the whole pot of hatred and animosity? What part did we play in creating this conflict? I think we had better rethink our objectives. Is this merely a war to secure the oil and support big oil? Is it a moral obligation to secure the region for Israel to exist? Or is it right for us to continue under such transparent objectives?
There is hope as long as we live and speak. How can we turn this around. The feelings of apathy are a dangerous place to live and as long as you have feelings about something you have hope.
by Billy Hicks4 years ago
For the last week now, the Internet has been going crazy with discussions/arguments/fights and other activities concerning the murder of a US Diplomat in Libya. Since then, there have been more protests in the Middle...
by Susan Reid4 years ago
We've seen a lot of threads on the uprisings in Egypt and Libya that have spread throughout the Middle East/Asian Muslim population.There has been speculation: Is all this violence really about some schlocky, tasteless...
by lesliebyars3 years ago
American soldiers need to come home to their families.
by Marwan Asmar5 years ago
Are the popular protests in the Middle East genuine, or is there a "foreign" hand involved in directing what is happening, as it is frequently claimed.
by Flightkeeper6 years ago
Christians are facing more discrimination in the Middle East. They don't get hired for jobs because they're Christian. As a religious minority they are not being accommodated. Muslims have more freedom...
by Marwan Asmar5 years ago
What do think US President Obama feels about the regional turbulance in the Middle East and should America be worried about the change of governments and the general protests sweeping the area?
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.