jump to last post 1-18 of 18 discussions (36 posts)

Disqualified from BootCamp because of a Tattoo

  1. caravalhophoto profile image60
    caravalhophotoposted 6 years ago

    A friend on facebook posted the following...his Son was disqualified from going to boot camp because of a tattoo...not what the tattoo was, but because it was on his Rt. arm...

    Are you kidding...the answer was No!

    Check out this from "Kevin Parker is in shock! The recruiter called Josh today and asked him to come down to have his tatoo checked out before he left today for boot camp. TODAY, they disqualified him because of a new policy regarding tatoo's that came down from the top last Wednesday. No tatoos on the right arm (saluting arm). He is now disqualified.

    How sad is this?

    1. MikeNV profile image74
      MikeNVposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      In my view anyone who volunteers to serve their country and is physically and mentally strong enough should be allowed to. This is ridiculous. It has zero effect on performance.

  2. 0
    abiscardiposted 6 years ago

    If that's true I think it's ridiculous.  So sad.

  3. dejajolie profile image61
    dejajolieposted 6 years ago

    that is ridiculous!!!!

  4. nadine_stowne profile image59
    nadine_stowneposted 6 years ago

    That is pretty ridiculous. I mean, how many commanding officers have tattoos themselves? Maybe they should also make a rule stating that if the commanding officer has a tattoo on his right arm he doesn't get to be saluted.

  5. 0
    Scott.Lifeposted 6 years ago

    There have been regulations regarding tattoos in the military for over 50 years. I had to pay a 600.00 fine for getting one without permission. My brother was demoted and also fined for having his on his forearms finished. There are various regulations regarding the size and placement of them in general nothing on the face neck or arms below the level of a rolled sleeve. They certainly are not allowed on the hands. However this young man should have been made aware of this long before his ship out date and given a chance to apply for a waiver. Most previous tattoos are allowed with exceptions but there are always those who are sticklers for the rules.

    Without knowing the size, placement, and color of the tattoo I really can't say whether or not this was an actual regulation violation or just a cop out to cover another dis-qualifier (yes it does happen, and often) If this was his only dis-qualifier the recruiter should have been hustling to get a waiver signed and filed. I do not understand what the issue is?

  6. 0
    Scott.Lifeposted 6 years ago

    The freedoms we take for granted as civilians are not equally given as a soldier. For instance a Non-rank must have permission to marry from his command and it can be denied. Expressing your opinion about the president is tricky at best and though unlikely can be prosecuted as treason and subverting the chain of command. You do not have freedom of speech or to gather or to petition for redress of grievances. In fact until you get up in rank being in the military is as close as some will ever come to being in prison, you do everything, including go to the bathroom on another's schedule. If you don't like it then your choices are limited and can involve a court martial and imprisonment if you voice your objections loud enough. To top it all off today chances are you will be sent to a combat zone for a year at a time or more and cycled back again every few months, despite your job specialty or expertise you most likely will be in some kind of combat.

    1. livewithrichard profile image87
      livewithrichardposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Pretty crazy isn't it.  When I was in, I had a buddy get an Article 15 because he shaved his head and then got a sunburn on it. He was told he damaged government property.

      I'm almost certain the Marines first initiated a new tattoo policy over a year ago and then it spread through the entire military. I think it was a PR stunt to give our military a better image since more than ever before in history have they been in front of live cameras for the entire world to see.

      For those that do not know, a waiver is an exception to the rule and often given to people who have a demonstrated skill that the military is in need of.

      1. 0
        Scott.Lifeposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I had forgotten about the head shaving thing. My first year in a bunch of guys in my platoon all shaved our heads down with a razor, because we saw some SF guys do it. We all got a month restricted duty and fined half our pay for 45 days, that sucked....once again, damaging government property, and abusing equipment.

  7. caravalhophoto profile image60
    caravalhophotoposted 6 years ago

    It's going to be discussed on the 11:00pm news...I'll update the details in the am.  Not sure of the placement of the tattoo or what it is of...very interesting.

  8. fishtiger58 profile image79
    fishtiger58posted 6 years ago

    Hmmmmm... so instead of burning draft cards in the 60's they should have gotten tattoos.Pretty weird.

    1. 0
      Scott.Lifeposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      On their faces or hands, would have worked like a charm, except they were being drafted, not volunteering, different scenario.

  9. 0
    Crazdwriterposted 6 years ago

    okay that is just stupid! wow!

  10. tksensei profile image60
    tksenseiposted 6 years ago

    Would it be 'ridiculous' and 'stupid' if a recruit had a gang tatoo on his neck, or a swastika on his forehead?

    1. caravalhophoto profile image60
      caravalhophotoposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Look'd up some info on tattoos and the military...here is an answer to your question...

      Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
      Tattoos can have nudity, guns, murder, death or gang affiliation. The catch is that there can't be any hate type of tattoos, so some gang tattoos may be in question. KKK & Aryan Nation would be good examples of this. Tattoos are not to cover more than 1/4 of the body part that they are on, but if it is covered by the uniform, who knows? We had a Master Sergeant with full sleeves. He just never wore short sleeve shirts to work.

      1. tksensei profile image60
        tksenseiposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        And is this a reasonable restriction, in your opinion?

        1. tksensei profile image60
          tksenseiposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          So we all agree this is a reasonable restriction then?

        2. caravalhophoto profile image60
          caravalhophotoposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          I don't make the restrictions dude, just reporting what I found out online in regards to the tattoo's and the military.  My opinion...love tattoos in good taste as these young men have...hate tattoos are not my thing nor do I enjoy looking at them...again that is my opinion, not the militarys or anyone elses.

          1. tksensei profile image60
            tksenseiposted 6 years ago in reply to this


            I did not intend to suggest you had.

          2. Mark Knowles profile image61
            Mark Knowlesposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            This one does not ask questions to elicit an answer or engage in dialogue - it is just to create animosity in the hope you will become annoyed enough to attack it verbally and then it will complain and get you banned.

            <snipped - no personal attacks in the Forums>

    2. Mark Knowles profile image61
      Mark Knowlesposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Do you ever have anything to say that is not attacking what some one else said?

      1. darkside profile image83
        darksideposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        What's ridiculous is that it's about WHERE it is, not WHAT it is.

        It's as if he really likes to scrape the bottom of the stupid question barrel.

        1. caravalhophoto profile image60
          caravalhophotoposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          lol lol ...it does get old, hopefully the barrel is completely empty today...one can hope.

          1. 0
            Crazdwriterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            lol I agree with you guys. the questions asked do get very annoying!

  11. caravalhophoto profile image60
    caravalhophotoposted 6 years ago

    Okay...back to the subject...they were joining the Air Force, tattoos are on the right arm above the elbow and it is a tattoo of their name in oriental writing.

    If they have the tattoos removed, they can join.  The tattoos are on two different recruits and both were told yesterday of their disqualification, the day they were to start boot camp.

    Hopefully it all works out for them, what I am getting from all of this is the Air Force is a lot harder than Marines, Navy and Army to join with tattoos, and as Scott has stated, nothing above collar or on hands.

    1. 0
      Crazdwriterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      I hope that things work out too caraval. Was talking to hubby about it and he was saying how it's because they want to be respectabe looking. I'm like it's still stupid because a shirt can easily cover it up.

  12. Hmrjmr1 profile image80
    Hmrjmr1posted 6 years ago

    Each of the services policies vary significantly, and in recent years the Army's has changed to become more liberal in allowing them but not on the neck, face, or below the wrist. For the troops it just is what it is, the Air Force has a long tradition of being most restrictive, especially at the point of enlistment.

    1. 0
      Crazdwriterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      ooooo thanks Hmrjmr1 for the info...I did woonder who was the most strict for military. I always thought it was the Marines!

  13. 59
    C.J. Wrightposted 6 years ago

    In the last 3 years the Navy and the Marine Corps have been refusing recruits with tats below the elbow.  What folks need to realize is that this is how you establish control of a large number of people. Its a necessity in the Military.....not society at large. Get used to the idea though. Its how most Federal regulation works....for the masses, not the individual.

  14. prettydarkhorse profile image62
    prettydarkhorseposted 6 years ago

    this is a crazy rule.....what is tattoo got to do with duties, obedience??

  15. K Partin profile image60
    K Partinposted 6 years ago

    NO FRIGGIN WAY! Unbelievable! Times have really changed sense I was in I guess. Geez.

  16. 0
    Scott.Lifeposted 6 years ago

    These young men and women today are not being drafted and volunteering is a loose term when you consider that what they are doing is in fact applying for a guaranteed Job for a period of 4 to 8 years. If you ask someone to hire you then you have to go by their conditions and regulations. People need to grow up and seriously stop whining. This boy was not kicked out and is still going ahead with his enlistment on the grounds that he remove the tattoo. Obviously he sees it as a non-issue and is willing to pay the price to enlist.

    Having served 8 years as a US Marine I can tell you that there are many regulations and rules that most civilians would find appalling. That's part of the package when you sign your life over to the military, YOU WILL DO AS YOU'RE TOLD. If you want to enlist then you have to abide by their rules. What so many consider trivial and non-sense has a purpose and a meaning the military called discipline and good order. That's what keeps people alive in combat and that's what is needed to control half a million hormonal teenagers fresh out of mom's house. Maybe if kids were taught that the world doesn't revolve around them at home it wouldn't be such a harsh wake-up call to reality when they enlist.

    1. tksensei profile image60
      tksenseiposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      That was very well said!

      1. Hmrjmr1 profile image80
        Hmrjmr1posted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Yep concur well said and proven to work.

  17. rhamson profile image76
    rhamsonposted 6 years ago

    I had two sons that served in the Navy. You would think that with the long history of seafarers getting tattoos that it would be a given for sailors.  Well yes and no.

    There was a long standing knowledge that if you want to be an officer you just don't get a tattoo that shows anywhere in a uniform. There are some cases such as mustangs that came into the USNA from the ranks that could skirt this but not often.

    Some sailors would get them on shore leave when they were drunk but advancement came very slowly for somebody looking for a carreer.

  18. cmlindblom profile image81
    cmlindblomposted 6 years ago

    Hmm Im already in and I can get sleeves if I want too and noone would even really notice specially now since its winter and our sleeves are down.