I hope the house can kill this version of it as it puts more people behind the eight ball with mandatory coverage. If you could not afford health insurance before how can you afford it any better with the IRS breathing down your neck in penalties and interest when you still can't afford it?
This is a bad bill and deserves to die. The most unfortunate part of it is that it took 15 years to revisit the issue till now. How much more time will it take and how many more will go uninsured due to the costs before it is brought up again?
i end up slogging through mounds of paperwork, filling it all out and basically doing their job for them and then they say they never got your paperwork and then when you go 'round and 'round with them after much aggravation they say "you're all set" but something tells you to follow up on it and sure enough two weeks later you're not even in our system or "we never got your check" even though the check cleared in your bank account, etc.
so these people are supposed to manage our health care system?
Oh man please do not let that horrible bill pass the senate - I put my hubb about it all over news channels this morning telling why NOT God I sure hope people start emailing and writing the senators , calling em also helps some pressure on em to vote NO
I don't hope so. I still hold hope that this garbage tax and spend legislation is discarded so a REAL Bill that actually benefits the American People can be put in place.
This bill does nothing but force people to buy insurance and insurance companies make more.
The only wording the media picks up on is "affordable". What does that mean?
Is forcing a family of four to buy a $1,200 a month policy because their employer does not provide insurance qualify as "affordable"?
And when employers are forced to buy coverage they can not afford they MUST either lay people off ... more people on the public payroll... more cost to society. OR they simply cut wages. Less money to be spent on other parts of the economy.
The solution is to regulate and level the playing field, not to mandate coverage.
The subsidies will cost Tax Payers Billions. It's just socialism. And the people who qualify for subsidies are not going to get a monthly check... they are going to be required to buy now and hopefully be reimbursed later. Can the poor afford to do that?
If you start looking into the bill you see how bloated and ridiculous it is.
Taxing Tanning Salons to pay for Health Care? Buying of the State of Louisiana for $300 million.
Cutting Medicare Payments to Doctors who are already bailing on the Medicare Program because the payouts are so ridiculously low.
This bill is so large (over 2,000) pages that the people who are supporting it have note even taken the time to read it.
Americans want Health Care reform, but this isn't it. Dig in and see for yourself.
This is just more Tax and Spend politics.
The TAXES kick in immediately, the "benefits"... if you can call them that do not even start for many parts of this terrible legislation for another 5 years.
Dude, so this family should just go without coverage. Is that what you're saying? Insurance is for the "just in case". Sure, everything would be fantastic if we could guarantee that we won't get sick, but this isn't the case. And if employers don't provide coverage, they should because employees serve the company and should be protected
I whish there was still hope that this bill was doomed. However, it is not "close" it's a done deal. When Obama makes his State of the Union Address in February it will be his centerpiece. Taxes will go up on nearly every front. Unemployment will also go up. This will be a new entitlement program to create political slaves of whats left of the working poor and the middle class. Next on the list is amnesty for illegal aliens and then on to cap and trade.
This started out about health care, but it turned into political defeat vs. political victory. Republicans said some stupid things, Democrats said and did some really stupid things, and the bill we have right now is a train wreck of paid-for votes and spiffs for special interests along with Constitutional violations thrown in for good measure. Politics as usual...
Primarily, the mandate to purchase insurance...that is what I am most strongly opposed to.
Let me get back to you on the rest as I'm trying to wade through the Senate version, since the administration has failed to uphold it's promise of transparency by not giving the public a chance to see what's in it. It is also what is NOT in the bill that bothers me; opening up state boundaries to encourage competition, tort reform, you know...the things that conservatives wanted...options that might have helped curb costs. It is not likely this bill will do anything to reduce costs.
Well, if you're going to be a beneficiary of a system, you have to pay into it. You can't avoid paying while you're healthy and the minute you fall down and break your hip, start paying into the system.
You might have noticed that even though you're too young to take advantage of Medicare, you're already paying into it. That's a mandate. If you don't pay it, that's tax evasion. Do you want to dismantle Medicare?
There have been dozens of versions circulated in the House and Senate. ALL of them are available for you to review. Here's a link: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3200/show When you complain about the lack of transparency, are you just parroting what FoxNews commentators say? (They've been known to lie. A lot.)
As for tort reform: it would make a small dent in health care costs. It's a red herring, something the GOP is very good at manufacturing these days.
Fair questions. My answer is no to both. But that's what compromise is about, right? When you have a far-right party that is solidly in the lobbyist's pocket, as are a handful of the Democrats, and the insurance industry spends $1.5 million a day on lobbying, then I'm afraid this is the best we probably come up with.
That remains to be seen. It's good that there's pressure to keep costs down. A pity the "conservatives" didn't give a crap about fiscal conservatism when $2 trillion was committed to the Iraq war and Medicare "reform." They only seem to care when they're the minority--as if we needed another reason to keep them out of government.
Soviets were the only ones to offer healthcare? (I'm learning so much today) I heard from a patriot news source that some other countries decided to tackle the healthcare mess and they did not turn to communism.
yes, we all have limited perspectives on what happened somewhere else...what is sad is that perspectives of some in the US are blind to the potentials...thank God there are those that see and act before the shit hits the fan
If you want to see one even funnier, look up Rod Parsley. He sells to the same rubes but with a different twist. He claims to clean up all of your debt through the power of God. Send him your unpaid bills, along with a sizeable donation and they will miraculously vanish.
Chicago-style politics was in full form as Reid used your tax dollars to payoff Sens. Landrieu, Lieberman and Nelson. These select "holdout" Senators stand to reap a bountiful harvest of YOUR tax dollars for their support of the healthcare plan!
As the seedy details of the bill begin to ooze to the surface, here are just a few of the "bribes" Reid used to gain Senate support...
--$100 million for an unnamed health care facility. --One state gets to expand Medicaid at no cost -- while taxpayers in the other 49 states foot the bill. --One insurance company, located in a swing Senator's
home state has special "untold" benefits from the bill.
10s of millions of people that are on fire for getting back to ehtical lives following the US Constitution.
I believe most of them were Republicans that have become sickened at where that party fell to...big business and wall street people losing their ethical business perspectives, elitists that are more concerned for their own pockets books than for the people...
Patriots are building a strong force through the Constitutional ideals and are from many quarters of current US life...Independents, Constitutionalists, Republicans, Federalists, militia minded, fiscal conservatives, etc..
their news sources are the organized groups that have been built in the last few years to address the issues and unite the people.
I edited that into the previous post...you know militias, as of old...like the early patriots in the US...ready to defend their lives from government abuses...non violent...but not off the table, just the last resort...hopefully they have come out of their foxholes to enlighten themselves to the force of uniting in communication and working through the Constitutional laws and not just shooting first, asking questions later
While good healthcare for all may have been a principle of communism - it doesn't mean that socialized healthcare is communism! In the UK we've had socialist and conservative governments fully committed to free healthcare for the last 60 years. I just don't get why Americans see this as such as bad thing - it works - it's great - it's what a civilized society is all about!
We have our system of government because we worked and died for it. If the rest of the world wants to "enjoy prosperity, low taxes and minimal governmental interference" they can work for it too. After all, isn't that what YOU want? For America to stop butting into the affairs of other countries?
And as for your weak attempt at disdain and insult - you make unwarranted assumptions, lump me into a group of which I am not a part, and then claim to know my "tastes".
When you can come up with a few facts, then we'll talk.
They all say that but for some reason they (both the leaders and countrymen) of some of these countries won't let us! Hell, in another thread one of our fine and respected fellow hubbers cannot put enough blame on Americans for something His own country's politicians done. What's up with that? I would love it if our country was an Isolationist state. I would thoroughly love it.
We have had it for forty years or so. It is fantastic! People have dignity, are kept active in advanced age, and continue to contribute to the community. The preventative approach to medicine works. If people can afford to go to the doctor, it saves our public purse millions as we do not have to do as much radical life saving surgeries on people who have not had treatment when they needed it. If you are ill or aged, you should not need to suffer medically.
I realize that parts of the health care system in the UK are excellent. Because of a relative with breast cancer, however, I did some research on the disease. US women with breast cancer have a much better survival rate. Why?
Things I like about the senate bill: - more people will be covered - insurance companies can't refuse policies because of pre-existing conditions
Things I don't like: - cuts in Medicare - BO selling us out to big pharma - the fact that votes had to be "bought." If it was such a great plan, it seems that every dem would be eager to support it. Now, we'll all be paying for Nebraska's expanded Medicaid FOREVER. No other state gets this perk - just Nebraska. How can anyone say that's fair???
I'm sorry. I'm originally from Nebraska. The politicians there are usually centrists. I know Nelson was on the table. I hadn't heard of this, however. Do you have a source for this information (pls. no Fox news...though I doubt you'd supply that, habee).
just do a search under "ben nelson on the issues" and choose your own perspective read about it...they are there...the fact still remains regardless of the perspecitves, he was bought and sold...which is against the Constitution...one more mark as proof that the ethics of washington are lost, of course they have been for a long time...
"The Democratic linchpin in a delicate Senate health care compromise said Sunday that special goodies for his constituents came at the behest of the state’s Republican governor.
Speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sen. Ben Nelson , D-Neb., said he “didn’t ask for a special favor here ... didn’t ask for a carve-out.”
"He’s said publicly he’s having trouble with the budget and this will add to the budget woes,” Nelson said of Republican Gov. Dave Heineman . “I said, look, we have to have this fixed.”
Nelson’s comments Sunday morning came as Republicans stepped up their criticisms of the “Cornhusker kickback” included in the Senate health care bill, which is expected to pass the Senate by Friday. The proposal would force the federal government to pay the entire insurance bill for poor Nebraskans. Critics decry the subsidy as a blatant political bribe intended to secure Nelson’s decisive 60th health care vote Saturday."
I didn't think it sounded like Nelson.
Anyway, I don't think anyone ever said it was a perfect or great plan. Just better than what we have now...although I don't foresee it changing anything much for me, it may help out my parents.
Nelson may not have asked for a "carve out" but he could have refused it. I haven't read the stories about him and this situation but either he could have refused or he was forced into it. Either way it's dirty politics. If this bill was so great they wouldn't have to "buy" votes to get it through.
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100308/ap_ … h_overhaul"President Barack Obama accused insurance companies of placing profits over people and said Republicans ignored long-festering problems when...
For eight years the Right has been fantacizing about how ACA came about in secret with nobody reading the massive bill. FALSE, but that is what the GOP is doing this week.The facts are that In considering the...
I read stories of small business people who could not buy health insurance. They had quit their day jobs where they had it. But they did not realize that insurance companies rarely sell to individuals and small...
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release … 303313.htmAn independent study of compliant and non- compliant insurance companies has found that compliance with the new health care reform laws could lead to bankruptcy...