Randy, I got in the pool for the first time today. It was great! You and Beth should come over tomorrow.
I am actually quite pleased when obnoxious trolls and pro-war conservatives disagree with my views. Guilty-until-proven- innocent advocates are not people I want supporting my opinions.
These same posters elected a man who used the same logic to devastate an already troubled country. Hitler used the same "we must invade them because they are a danger to us" excuse to invade countries as Dumbya did.
Just like Dumbya's supporters, many of Hitlers people still thought he was a good guy. So thanks guys!
It is really quite impressive the broad assumptions and accusations you make about those who disagree with you -- it is rather Dumbya in nature. Dumbya now being a coined word soon to be added to the dictionary for describing - political and rhetorical dumbness.
Your Hitler comments and pretty much everything you said as well, don't warrant addressing -- just the general dumbness of your assumptions and words.
I really appreciate it, JWC. If you or the troll agreed with me I would feel terrible.
So glad you appreciate it. And when you and the other ignorant paid trolls that do nothing but try to squash intelligent conversation and comment and debate actually get a real job that requires a little sweat more than a few hours a day, we'll all be glad for the silence of your rabid and ignorant and anonymous UN-American voice.
I actually have three jobs JWC. This is not including my writing. And I promise you, if you ever say anything intelligent I will not squash it.
It is funny when you call me a troll though. My profile name is actually mine. I am not afraid to post under my real name. What's your excuse?
And who made you the judge of who is un-American. Oh gee, I keep forgetting you know what most Americans think. How did you get these powers now? Let me guess. Self appointed? Of course, who else would choose you?
Fairly sure it is you who likes to use the word troll regularly in a weak attempt to denigrate those who disagree with you - so Own It.
And if you work three jobs, then you ought not be here, or is that three user names here at hubpages? Lots to juggle, I'd imagine.
And who made me the judge of Un-American? Of course, me, I would choose me. I don't throw out the view of liberals as baseless trolls, I agree with many liberal issues, but Un-Americans don't wish to have any other rigid viewpoint than their own -- in the interests of their own well-being, rather than the country as a whole. Can you grasp that?
I did grasp that if you didn't notice. There was no doubt you were self appointed. I call no one trolls but trolls. I did not call you a troll and wouldn't. The troll agrees with you, in case you can't tell the difference.
Hint: wears a nun habit and a hockey mask.
Boy, to be all-knowing you sure are wrong about things. I have only one account here. You sure do avoid questions like a troll though.
It is sad you think anyone who disagree with you is un-American. Let me guess again. Baptist? Fundamentalist surely? You know, those which believe the scripture "judge not lest ye be judged."
These cults are the worst at judging others. Right? Wrong? You tell me.
Wrong. You tap dance in your posts and come off middling sometimes, but when it comes down to it, your true stance comes through. You delicately make accusations, and think you can back up and play nice and no one will notice.
And No -- I didn't notice you grasped anything of an equivocal nature, and your own clear 'self-appointed' leanings we all can see, read, and grasp.
So, in your description of a troll you refer to Sab Oh's photo apparently, how interesting, and racist, and judgmental. Does it disturb you?
And no, I'm not a fundamental Baptist, but it is enlightening that you would judge me so....and apparently you think that Baptists are a cult? And so, presumably, all Christian religion? How interesting.
Right, Wrong, You tell all of us........
Apparently, you do not know all religious groups are cults. Not self appointed, as you so eagerly admit to being. I do not speak for "most of the people" as you seem to do often. I speak my own views on subjects.
So my "guess" was wrong about you being part of the religious right? I apologize if I wrongly guessed about you being part of that cult.
What racist remark are you referring to? Nun's habit? Hockey mask? You tell me!
"Apparently, you do not know all religious groups are cults. "
You should tell all of us what is racist. The liberals have the corner on just what is considered racist these days -- do they not? So do share. As for the rest, your comments fall flat and ineffective as a defense to your prior words -- as usual.
As for religious groups all being cults, I would suggest you back up, the Muslims might not be happy with your comment.
No, don't back out now! You inferred I said said something racist, so tell me what I said. Either that or admit you were wrong. I said nothing of a racial nature. Are you sure you aren't a church-goer?
Once again, all religions are considered to be cults. Apparently you consider the word "cult" to be something bad. With your political views, I am surprised you would be concerned with Muslims being happy or not.
Oh darn, how about we skip your racially masked and profiling description that pointed all your viewers to Sab Oh, and take it to your statement that all religions are cults -- racist and judgmental enough for you? Why don't you address any other issues raised by me? Afraid you cannot? Good to know.
As I said before:
You should tell all of us what is racist. The liberals have the corner on just what is considered racist these days -- do they not? So do share. As for the rest, your comments fall flat and ineffective as a defense to your prior words -- as usual.
As for religious groups all being cults, I would suggest you back up, the Muslims might not be happy with your comment.
Get the message?
No, how about you point out my racist remark. Calling me a racist is a personal attack. I abhor racism. I've lived deeply mired amongst many of them and to be accused of being racist in any form is repugnant to me in the extreme!
If you don't want to discuss subjects in a reasonable manner then say so. And you were admonishing someone earlier for what you took to be "twisting words."
If you like, I can contact HP staff and get their opinion on your accusation. Sure, a ban for a personal attack is only a few days the first time. Probably preferable to an apology in your case.
Or you can point out my racist remark and I will apologize to you. Fair enough?
My accusation, how cute........
Godwin: The troll agrees with you, in case you can't tell the difference.
Hint: wears a nun habit and a hockey mask.
Godwin: All religious groups are cults.
Sounds racist too me, and definitely profiling, and if you wish to have me banned, go for it, there are plenty of personal 'troll' attacks by you as counter for the HP staff. . .
. . . those would be personal 'troll' attacks against those who disagree with you -- folks like me who respond to your personal troll attacks in defense of what you denigrate.
Clear enough for you? Reasonable enough for you?
If the troll wishes to report me he will do so. Okay, have it your way. You either do not know what a racist remark is or you are too stubborn to admit it. Profiling? You haven't a clue!
I am done with you!
" Calling me a racist is a personal attack."
And personal attacks are something you would never engage in, right?
For the record, Sab Oh is referring to Randy Godwin's comment, rather than mine.
HP is funny Being called a racist is a personal attack but being called a "scrotum sucking (Teabagger) wingnut is not.
LOL
It would have to be untrue to be a personal attack - and Ron is not racist.
So every time someone is called a teabagger It must be TRUE!
Ahhh the hypocrisy!
Not hypocrisy - the words we use define what we are, if we do not talk like a racist then we define our position, if people talk like a teabagger the we have to assume they are ?
What does a teabagger sound like? I mean with their mouth full and all.
Where did you get your information on this, Arthur? I would like to see the list. Or is this just an assumption on your part?
Randy I was not directing the comment to you personally. The both of us have engaged in quiet respectful conversations together.
It is an observation. I do not know if someone being called a racist in the forums constitutes a personal attack.
I do know however that "you teabagger" is allowed and even seems to be encouraged in the forums.
How one would be a personal attack and the other not baffles me.
I think it has to do with a political bias on the moderators part.
Oh well nothing new.
I do not think it is political bias by the moderators, Arthur. A "teabagger" is not necessarily a bad thing if associated to the political group. Depends on your viewpoint. But being called a racist is insulting, especially when there is no evidence for the charge.
I agree with you about discussing subjects in a proper manner.
"A "teabagger" is not necessarily a bad thing if associated to the political group"
Of course it is an insult, as that is NOT the name of the political group but rather a childish and offensive play on the name of the group intended to insult.
Of course a person may or may not actually be a member of the political movement in question just as a person may or may not actually be a racist or anything else completely unrelated.
We interrupt this broadcast to tell you that his profile picture is No-Face from the Hayao Miyazaki movie, Spirited Away.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirited_Away
We now return to our regularly scheduled broadcast...
This is the thread that never ends;
It just goes on and on, my friends!
Some hubbers...started posting it,
Not knowing what it was,
Now we'll continue posting here forever
Just becuz!
2nd verse, same as the first!
Carry on - I'm heading out to the club with my gal pal!
Nice poetry, but not terribly distracting from the issues being discussed -- and the word 'discussed' is used with definite limitations, considering the nature of the posts.
Fox news is strictly a Republican show and they all think they have every single thing right that they broadcast that has to do with news. They don't look at everyones point of view. And as far as that show they have on late night at like three in the morning, that show is so for entertainment its not even funny. I think that is all that news station really is for strictly for the entertainment part of the news.
So, you really really like Bill Maher? Amusing.
The only news show I believe is bipartisan is Frontline on PBS. Although it is not a regular news show they tell both sides of a story.
saraallen25
CHECK THIS OUT
I doubt that you didn't see or hear from the major news medias
What I have seen on Beck's show is that he will state that if he reports something in error ,he will make an immediate correction.
The white house some time ago said that he was making erroneous statements about president Barack Obama and the administration. Many times he will comment that the red phone (telephone # )know only to the president has not rang as yet.
Glen Beck show is reporting explosive information that the main street press and media refuses to report to the public.
Silence by ABC, NBC CBS, CNN, MSNBC and others is typical of how they refuse to report any of the negatives of the Obama administration and the inner workings of Washington,
For example I wrote regarding finance reform and cap and trade
I caught Glen Beck on Fox News, he was exposing the questionable
relationships of Goldman Sachs( campaign funding to Barak
Obama and some Dem's $33 MILLION ),the unions ( SEIU
and the AFLCIO ),Frank Raines (took $90 million out of Fannie
Mae ),Joel Rodgers (the apollo alliance group, they wrote the
Healthcare Reform bill for congress ),Al Gore ( investments in
the Chicago Climate Exchange),Joyce foundation (connections
with Barak Obama and Valerie Jarrett) and president Barack Obama.
GLEN BECK USED OLD ACTUAL NEWS CLIPS TO
SUPPORT THE ACCUSATIONS
There are many reasons as to why certain groups or people would like to silence Glen Beck. Speak out and seek the truth from the government before we end up like Europe.
I doubt Randy is a paid troll...I have my suspicions about others though.
And I'm pretty sure Lita is not still posting on this site.
Maybe Randy's not, but Randy loves the word troll and throws it out at others who disagree with him readily. Perhaps it is time for a new modern dictionary definition of the word 'troll', perhaps it is in the works even now. Love how the English language has evolved over the centuries -- as well as the skew on history in our books and encyclopedias.
Gee, I leave you guys unattended for a few hours and look what happens! You sound like boys on a playground. What is it with men? Can't all of you debate without getting angry and using personal attacks? Is it a man vs man thing? Randy, you and I debate all the time without either of us acting like this. And how did religion get thrown into this conversation, anyway?
Tsk, tsk - I'm gonna have to get my switch!
PEACE out! And don't make me come back here! lol
"Jay Nordlinger at National Review admits, the term "teabagger" was introduced to the political lexicon by Tea Party movement leaders:
The first big day for this movement was Tax Day, April 15. And organizers had a gimmick. They asked people to send a tea bag to the Oval Office. One of the exhortations was “Tea Bag the Fools in D.C.” A protester was spotted with a sign saying, “Tea Bag the Liberal Dems Before They Tea Bag You.” So, conservatives started it: started with this terminology.
Tommy Christopher at Mediaite has it about right:
The Tea Partiers not only invented the term, they did so in order to inflict a similar double entendre onto the President, the Democrats, and liberals in general.
Now, they’re trying to re-cast the term as a slur, on a par with the “n-word,” hurtful to all the Tea Party members who are just ordinary moms, dads, sons, and daughters. The latter point has some resonance, but the former is ridiculous in the extreme.
In emails, protest signs, t-shirts, and online, early Tea Party literature urged protesters to “Tea Bag the White House,” and to “Tea-bag the liberal Dems before they tea-bag you.” The suggestion is that the metaphoric “tea-bags” be shoved in the mouths of the President, Democratic members of Congress, and even ordinary citizens who identify as liberal Democrats. The idea that they just didn’t know the term’s only (at that time) meaning is belied by the fact that they obviously knew it was negative (and non-consensual), since they didn’t want it done to them, and also because it only had one meaning.
It was only after MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and David Shuster, and CNN’s Anderson Cooper, turned the tables on the term that Tea Partiers objected. They were perfectly satisfied to advocate the metaphoric mouth-rape of liberal men, women, and children, but had the nerve to become indignant when the insult boomeranged on them."
Enough with the whining! 'Teabaggers' actually introduced the term they now claim is a slur
By David Neiwert Thursday May 06, 2010 8:00am
Well, maybe it's like the "n" word. It's okay when blacks use it with each other, but it's racist when someone else uses it. ??
One big difference is that the "tea bag" term was introduced to political discourse by the very people who are now stuck with it. Not so with the "n" word.
That might be true I am not a member of the Tea party.
My point with "teabagger" is in these forums.
When you have someone calling people "You Teabaggers" in the forums knowing full well the person does not represent the Tea Party. That is a personal attack or there is no definition of a personal attack.
The difference between a "teabagger" and a "c#^ksucker" would be inches. Yet I bet I would pull a ban for the latter in a New York second.
Sure, but it's simply a matter of cultural standards. Anderson Cooper can say "teabagger" on the air but not "c#^ksucker."
Then I guess it is fine in the forums? Ahh well, probably why I spend less and less time here.
That's baloney. You could say the same about people calling others "socialists" . They mean THAT as "anti-American out to destroy America" c*cksucker too!
Do you listen to Limbaugh? Ever hear how HE talks about the president, and "liberals"?
He's 50 times more offensive than Howard Stern, and he gets a pass.
Those tea-baggers chose the name as a way to put it to the Dems. "Shove this in your mouth you liberal swine".
They wanted it, they got it.
BTW, did it bother you that Cattle called someone unAmerican? Isn't that worse than tea-bagger?
We put up with that for 10 years, you know....un-American, anti-American, traitor. And they can't take being called a name THEY themselves made up.
Oh boohoo...cry me a river.
Socialist is not a derogatory word. That would be the same as calling someone a capitalist.
UnAmerican is not a vulgar term either.
I just asked my conservative, Republican fiance' which is more offensive to him: being called a "teabagger" or being called "unAmerican." Without hesitation, he chose "unAmerican."
On these forums, I've been called a socialist, and been told that I hate America and that I want to destroy America. Are these people "cads"?
A "cad" would say something along these lines. {Example} "You are a socialist whore." {Example}
What you are describing is someone who is unable to intelligently respond to your post.
BTW: I am sorry if others have offended you in the forums. I hope it was never me.
As to your BF IMO If someone were in a face to face conversation with me and called me unAmerican I would end the conversation.
If someone called me a "teabagger" to my face I would end his ability to continue speaking.
You always play fair, Arthur. No need to apologize for others.
In person, I've been called a traitor and unAmerican for opposing the Iraq War. I was also called a terrorist-lover (for opposing warrantless wiretapping) by a person who now belongs to the Tea Party. Oddly, I've never been called a traitor for disagreeing with President Obama and I still oppose warrantless wiretapping and both wars.
Some of us liberals just find it amusing that some conservatives are now whining about name calling after what we endured during the Bush presidency.
Well, what do you expect Habee? America represents the highest level of double standard to exist.....so why not. LOL!
What the heck is a crackerhead?? Should I report you for insulting me with a personal attack? Was it a personal attack?
Was it an insult? Do you like crackers? What's your favorite type of cracker? Mine is Triscuit. Do you like Triscuits? What's your favorite flavor? Why didn't you come get in the pool today? It was great - not a cloud in the sky! What did you get Beth for Mother's Day? What did you get your mom? What did you get Allie? How is Allie? Are you growing any Early girls this year? When will green peanuts be ready? I want some to boil. Do you still love me? You never tell me anymore...all I get is "crackerhead."
A simple term of affection, nothing more! Cheese Bits! Had to watch the TPC! Got Beth nothing, she's not my mother! Got my mom some good smellin' women bath stuff! Ally's my dog, she's not my mother either! Ally's doing better! Of course, I always grow Early Girl tomatoes! Green peanuts in September! I love all women, preferably two at a time! Going to sleep now! Nite, from one crackerhead to another!
FOX News
May be one like to access the followings:
http://bit.ly/dttFZB
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/ … lam-peace/
A press conference on FOX News with Mr.Nasim Mahdi, a Vice President of peaceful Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in America.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Exactly right. The same way as disagreeing with Bush was tantamount to aiding and abetting the enemy, and now disagreeing with Obama is somehow patriotic.
It's SUCH a load of bull, it's hard to walk around in America anymore.
All of a sudden, it's a good thing to have no respect for the president, or his wife or his kids.
And we're supposed to applaud their tea-bagger/party/group/protests while others were maligned for speaking out.
They really think they are special don't they? And then call other people "elites"...which is also used as an insult. Cause you know, none of those tea-people like Palin or Bachman of Armey are rich or anything................
And all of them served in the military....................
And all of them know better than any g d liberal (said while holding nose in contempt).
They have contempt for us yet want total sheepish adherance to their right to be heard.
They want what they never give in return!
Excuse me, but they wear hats with tea bags hanging from them.........that is a tea-bagger!
If you can't separate the derogatory from the obvious that's your problem.
No one tells Limbutt/Beckles. et al how to catagorize the president....and it's NEVER pretty.
If you see someone with teabags hanging from their hat feel free to call them "teabagger".
I do not think I have seen you call a fellow hubber a slur in that way. Am I correct?
No, just the nationally famous ones....but I don't see it as a slur! It's a name they gave themselves for crying out loud!
It was named after the Boston Tea-Party...Tea-Baggers...no slur.
Unless, as that article stated, they DID name it intentionally as a slur, but they meant it as a slur against democrats. In which case they deserve what they get.
Either way, it is their doing, so they can't play dumb now.
Either it was a noble idea taken from history,or
it was an insult to liberals that just got turned on them....thats poetic justice.
It's much worse to call someone un-American,America-Hater, traitor, aiding and abetting the enemy.
All of which were thrown around freely...by the same people who now demand respect, I would bet.
Here's what I'd be willing to do...anyone who supports Palin, Gingrich,Hannity and Armey I'll refer to as Tea-Baggers...anyone who shows respect to others will get respect back, and be called the Tea-Partiers.
But Call President Obama a muslim, socialist, marxist, terrorist...all those things he has denied, and them's fighting words!
That is my point although opinionated (nothing wrong with that) you are respectful to your fellow hubbers.
Even the ones that make rude comments to you do not get a response in the same manner from you.
Is it alright if I say That obama is a liberal compared to Clinton and Carter?
Well that was nice of you to say....I did think I have had words with one or two....but I'll believe you!
Anyway, it breaks my heart that Obama was so beaten up before he had a chance to do anything.
I'm still in shock at the complete lack of decency from the Right.
It's one thing to suffer it when they are in charge, but to still have to put up with it even when they've been defeated....it's giving me PTSD!!!
by savvydating 4 years ago
Fox News announced Friday that "Shepard Smith would be stepping down from his role as Chief News Anchor and Managing Editor of the network’s breaking news unit and anchor of Shepard Smith Reporting" as of October 11, 2019.Longtime news anchor, Smith, an outspoken critic of president...
by ga anderson 13 months ago
In its lawsuit against Fox News, Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) included very damaging text message excerpts from the top of the organization that seem to clearly show Fox was more concerned with ratings than the truth of their reporting and presentations.Here is what Google offers for details: Fox...
by James Smith 10 years ago
http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/special … landscape/Note for fans of Fox News that will almost certainly jump on this:Please stop watching it, it's still awful.This survey comprehensively analysed the changing landscape in television news reporting. They found that 55% of Fox News content...
by Mike Russo 13 months ago
A majority of the Grand Jury believes that perjury may have been committed by one or more of the witnesses testifying before itThe 26-member panel also rejected false claims from Mr Trump that the election had been rigged, saying it found "by a unanimous vote that no widespread fraud took...
by arizonataylor 6 years ago
Why do so many people hate Fox News?There are many biased channels that do not receive the negative statements Fox News receives. Whether you believe Fox News is biased or not, why does it receive so much negative attention?
by freddykrueger 13 years ago
If anyone thinks fox is fair and balanced then explain why is it that at least 20 folks working for then are fundraising for the GOP. I really want to know why is that going on?.You got glenn beck running his mouth like he got nazi turrets,sean hannity putting out false statements nightly like...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |