"George Alan Rekers, a prominent anti-gay activist who co-founded the conservative Family Research Council, was caught returning from a 10-day trip to Europe with a male escort he found on Rentboy.com, which is exactly what it sounds like.
[UPDATE: The escort now says Rekers is indeed gay, and that Rekers paid him to perform daily nude body rubs during their European jaunt. "It's a situation where he's going against homosexuality when he is a homosexual," the young man told the New Times, adding that Rekers -- who repeatedly asked for a move he dubbed "The Long Stroke" -- ought to divorce himself from his many anti-gay associations."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/0 … 65142.html
According to Craig Ferguson, the more outspoken they are the more chance they are gay. The gayer they act the more chance they are straight
yes - that crosses my mind from time to time when I hear some of the more outspoken ones because I wonder why the topic is taking up so much energy. (some)
I'm not sure about your second sentence, but I sure as heck believe the first one!
People who are secure in their sexuality do not care what other people do in the bedroom, and people who are happy themselves do not make it their goal in life to make sure everyone else suffers.
Sounds like reverse psychology, a sad and pathetic, as it is really.
The only reason citizen A has anything to do with citizen B's life or sexuality, is only for control. There are some people who push their own moral values onto other people, either because they are religious or claim to know what is in the best interest of citizen B.
It is absurd, foolish, demeaning, an infringement, moronic, destructive and should NOT be allowed or accepted.
Just my thoughts.
I am tired and bored with talk about gays and gay bashers. Mind if I change the subject? Now could we just talk about dominant-submissive types? I saw that movie "Secretary" which really was a good and kinda funny movie. But I know little about this kind of sexuality and would like to be enlightened. Not that I am one or anything like that! :
Dominant and Submissive are simply words to describe both sides of sexuality, in one aspect. One of the two people involved in the activity is one or the other, while the other is one of the other.
The likelihood two Dominants could engage in sexual activity, as well, as two submissive, would be negated by each other and not happen.
There are always going to be a Dominant and Submissive, with regards to sexual activity. One always gives in to another, in some aspect.
Just my thoughts on it.
But, let's try not to get too far off topic.
by Stacie L5 years ago
Why have some of the nation's most vehement anti-gay activists Ted Haggard, Larry Craig had gay sex scandals of their own? An op-ed in the New York Times' Sunday Review section tries to explain. The authors of the...
by Alem Belton6 years ago
The subject bar would not let me type in my whole question, so I chose the part of it that would get the most attention. Below is the entire question and an explanation of it:DOES HOLLYWOOD HAVE A 'GAY AGENDA' OR...
by Jason Menayan7 years ago
by Jason C Jean4 years ago
I've often said, the issue of being afraid to come out of the closet, is because you don't want to lose a loved one, a family member who might stop loving you because you are gay. I've also said, WHO CARES! Happiness is...
by theirishobserver.6 years ago
The US president received an enthusiastic reception from gay supporters at a New York fundraiser, but a few dozen gay rights protesters outside the hotel and a handful of hecklers inside the ballroom where he spoke...
by cdnbrat6 years ago
iPad sent An interesting concept on what causes homosexuality, An idea that has been brought forth is that homosexuality is caused by gender reversal of the child's parents, meaning a dominant...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.