jump to last post 1-17 of 17 discussions (93 posts)

Homosexuality and Pediphilia promoted in grade school in America.

  1. TMMason profile image72
    TMMasonposted 6 years ago

    This ought to explain the leant leftist's immoral objective for the future of our country...

    Caution: extremely gross and disgusting.  We debated posting this in unedited form; we did so because it was given to schoolchildren in a public school, written with public money. Unfortunately, it's necessary that the public see it.)

    "The Little Black Book - Queer in the 21st Century"
    Is this the future?  This booklet was distributed to hundreds of kids (middle school age and up) at Brookline High School, Brookline, MA, on April 30, 2005. It was written by the Boston-based AIDS Action Committee, with help with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Boston Public Health Commission.

    The event that day was designed for children and their teachers across Massachusetts, organized by the "Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network" (GLSEN).  This is the group that runs "Gay-Straight Alliance" clubs in public schools across the country. You must ask yourself: What kind of person would write this? What kind of person would give it to kids? Where is this movement headed?

    Click here for full report of event, including photos, news reports, Governor's statement, and more.

    We've posted parts of this book below, or you can

    <link snipped>


    This is just one of many pieces of suppossed literiture distributed throughout schools in this country.

    But hey... no one is trying to indoctrinate your children.

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Generalizing about any group of people is not a wise thing, and I think your post demonstrates a really good dose of generalizing.

      If the "black book" is true, it represents a tiny portion, not a generalized condition. I think the black book is also disgusting, but I don't believe such an approach is the general agenda.

      Such generalizations could all say that every teacher is a pedophile until proven innocent. And those pedophiles are homosexuals. However, we know differently don't we? Most pedophiles in the class room are women who prey on young boys. Not men. Let the facts speak.

      1. TMMason profile image72
        TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        It is in the schools daniel... look it up.

        So take it up with them.

        My pointing it out, is just the thing that irratates the left.

        God forbid anyone reveal thier immoral corrupt agenda for this country.

        1. profile image0
          Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Yeah, they want to expose young children to perversion, but they don't want to hear the truth themselves.
          Liberals keep asking what the homosexual agenda is, like they don't already know.  Typical ulterior manipulation hiding underneath the umbrella of counterracting the disease of Aids.

          P.S.
          You do know that agenda is being given license by the Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and his minion Kevin Jennings, right?
          And THEIR "license" came from Obama of course.

          1. Eaglekiwi profile image72
            Eaglekiwiposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            So where did they get their 'license' to promote Atheism before Obama was elected?

            And it astounds me how many so called Christians forget that God instructed us to obey our leaders, in fact to pray for them!

            Not critise or pull down through thought or inuendo.

            Anyway thats  all I got to say about that- Peace

    2. bigcat1967 profile image61
      bigcat1967posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      I'm not surprised to see where it's coming from...MA

  2. profile image0
    ryankettposted 6 years ago

    I find it very difficult to believe that this is genuine, I certainly cannot find reference to this event on any reputable established national (or local) news sources. It looks like just another successful propoganda hoax, which has subsequently been replicated by gullible people on cheap tacky blogs and on forums just like this.

    That said, in the unlikely event that it is true, it just makes me very glad that I do not have to raise a child in America.

    1. TMMason profile image72
      TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      it is true ryan... I was raised in MA. and this is just one of the many books they have on homosex.

      http://search.windstream.net/windstream … ceUrl=true

      There is a google page with alot of links, including salon .com and others. Google it... it is out there.

      This book is a fact, and it's implimentation into the school system is indeed a fact.

      The left can deny it all they want... it is for real...

      What is funny is that obama's man Kevin Jennings is the one at the center of this lil escapade.

      1. profile image0
        ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I'm not so sure that you can attribute that to being 'left', I would call it 'insane'. But then I can't be too strong in my opinion before the 'right' accuses me of America bashing by agreeing with their opinion, which is what normally happens.

        If it is true, then I suggest that parents in MA consider home schooling, before they start drilling gloryholes into the school bogs. Not that I am 'homophobic', this would be equally unacceptable if it was graphic descriptions of straight sex. A 13 year old does not need to know what fisting is, it should not be assumed that they are watching porn on their iMacs each night - even if most of them probably are.

        1. Daniel Carter profile image90
          Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          I agree with Ryan 100%. Porn is porn, and I'm against kids and porn. Nor would anyone in their right mind give a 6 year-old a drivers license and say "Keep in touch."

          Stupid from the get-go.

          There's a whole lot of stuff that is real, not real, and has some truth to it. If there really is a group trying to promote porn in schools then anyone in their right mind would have a lawsuit against ANY group trying to promote such crap in schools, because what is listed IS porn.

          You can say anything you want, you can bring in links and all kinds of "evidence" but it doesn't make it entirely true. While this "Black Book" may have some truth to it, the way that it's being presented by ultra-conservatives is still the same old dooms-day-jesus-hates-you-f**** stuff we've heard for such a long time.

          And while Ryan may actually lean left, I see him as very rationally minded and sane. And for the record, I'm not a liberal. If you contest that you may, but it would be no different than anyone contesting that you are actually Christians, TSMason and Brenda. It's quite arguable, isn't it.

          Even Chicken Little had a timer on his shinanigans. If this is real, it will be prosecuted as porn in no time. And if you're so concerned about it being real, I DARE you to start the lawsuit against it. Put your money where your mouth is.

          1. profile image0
            ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            Just to clear up any confusion, I actually consider myself to one of those 'middle ground' voters. I probably do generally tend to drift to the left in my opinions, but in the recent general elections in the UK I drifted a little more to the right with my vote. Only because of a complete failure of the left, they started off well.... before becoming dazed and confused about what it is they really stood for.

            Of course, in the UK the 'middle' is the majority group. The THREE major parties all retain their traditional 'left' or 'right' policies in some form or another, but they all compete in the middle ground. That is where the UK elections are won.

            The party in the 'middle' seem to be the 'Liberal Democrats', they seem to be neither left nor right, they have left wing policies and right wing policies. That is where my vote went. They subsequently formed a 'coalition' government with the Conservatives (right). The left wing 'Labour Party' of the past 13 years simply lost the plot, in fact I could see little between them and the right - other than the urge to spend more money than the country could afford in every single year of their reign.

            So for now I consider myself to be 'somewhere in the middle', an easy concept for a British person to understand but a very difficult one for Americans to understand - seeing as they have a very clear two party line.

            I happen to prefer the existance of a third party, their influence this year seems to present an opportunity to create a much more transparent and rational British politics.

            If the Labour party were to regroup, rediscover their identity, and find themselves a strong leader then maybe.... just maybe.... I would swing back to the left again.

            I am not a big fan of either The Republicans or The Democrats, although I simply feel like I live in a safer world with The Democrats in charge. I don't think that Obama is particularly good for your economic situation, I am struggling to see where his clear plan for economic recovery lies. Although just being confident that a nuclear bomb wont be fired in the next few years leaves me happy enough.

            The answer to a British person is 'middle'. The answer to the American right, as a result of simply not sharing most of their ideals, is to categorise me into the 'left'. The truth is that I am 'left of the right', and 'right of the left'.

            There you go, I am going to bookmark this post for future reference wink

            1. Daniel Carter profile image90
              Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              I suspected we are of similar mind, Ryan, and I can see it's plainly so. Thanks for the clarification.
              It's been 3 decades since spent time in London, talking British politics, and those days have changed dramatically. As well in the US.

              I tend to agree with your views of Obama. I think his ability to inspire is better than his agenda. And I think he feels incredible pressure to forge new ground as the US first Black President, therefore, often making very sweeping policies and decisions, whether or not they are truly best for the country. Thanks for the insights.

              1. profile image0
                ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                Thanks for the read smile I made a special effort, just didn't want it to go unnoticed wink

                I am going to run off and have a beer, publish a hub, and then go to sleep.

                I will leave you to be one of the voices of reason in the asylum. lol

  3. Mighty Mom profile image90
    Mighty Momposted 6 years ago

    I think the circumstances of this book being distributed in schools is a bit exaggerated. Here is a news report from Boston Globe:

    http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_ … at_school/

    1. profile image0
      ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Just as I had expected, the spin-fuelled propoganda machine. Again. *YAWNS*

    2. TMMason profile image72
      TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      The globe is so far left it isn't funny.

      That said...

      I am sure some of the situation may indeed be exageratted... but the fact that it was introduced into the schools at all is enough... isn't it? Exgerration happens in most all stories as they circulate... that doesn't mean we should simply conclude it isn't true.

      1. profile image0
        ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        But your version of events makes it sound like some sort of far left conspiracy to infiltrate and corrupt the minds of young people.

        'The Globe' version makes it sound like some dimwit with far too few brain cells didn't think long enough about precisely what they were taking to the latest event.

        In one version it is a government conspiracy to brainwash the innocent. In the other version the village idiot should be given a warning and not given the opportunity to help organise or attend High School events.

        There is one big difference between an innocent, albeit highly stupid, mistake and an organised agenda.

        I know which one sounds more believable to me.

        1. profile image0
          Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Who DOES want to believe it?
          But it is real.

        2. TMMason profile image72
          TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          you can think what you want, ryan.

          I have seen the propaganda in the MA school system in regards to homosex.

          It is everywhere, and they do not hide it.

          I was in my nephew's class a couple years ago and couldn't look anywhere without an AIDS, Obama, Or democrat supprt poster staring at me.

          I asked about the other sides support and posters and recieved an invitation to leave.

          Believe me... I know where the school's stand on homosex and other immoralities is,... also in regards to hating America and those who founded this great nation.

          We were told a long time ago by our enemies, that they would take us over from within... and they are well on thier way to doing it.

    3. profile image0
      Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Yeah sure.
      Your article says it was "a mistake". roll
      Typical attempt to defend the indefensible.

  4. Rafini profile image86
    Rafiniposted 6 years ago

    I had a similar situation with my youngest when he was in middle school.  The Gay Straight Alliance maintained a presence in the school and actively pursued members among pre-teens who hadn't even had their first crush yet.  Needless to say I wasn't happy when my son told me he joined the group.  I had a talk with him about my feelings & beliefs regarding homosexuality and what I thought of the GSA recruiting children who had no idea whether or not they were gay, yet.

    My son said the group intended to promote harmony among gay and straight people and to discourage harassment and bullying.  Yeah, right!!  If that were the case they would have come up with a better name for the group since bullying and harassment occurs everywhere for more reasons than sexual orientation.  I also told him my concerns of his earning the reputation of being gay before he knew himself whether or not it was true.  By the end of that particular school year my son dropped out of the group.

  5. Ron Montgomery profile image61
    Ron Montgomeryposted 6 years ago

    Look Brenda!  Source material for your first submission to:

    "The Liberal Agenda" Volume 1.

    1. profile image0
      Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      The info has been around for a long time, and was made known before Obama even appointed some of those people to positions of power.  Yet I can't think of one appointee of his who was properly vetted without being inserted into our governing society.  Very slick, Obama and the other liberals are.  Slicker'n'snot.

  6. Uninvited Writer profile image83
    Uninvited Writerposted 6 years ago

    http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z246/DeirdreDollieDarkling/My%20Liberal%20Agenda/annoyaconservative.jpg

  7. DeanKeaton259 profile image61
    DeanKeaton259posted 6 years ago

    It may sound insane, but I did in fact see an interview on foxnews with an education official from Maine. In the interview, the guy discussed a proposal that would allow gender confused students to use the bathroom of opposite sex children. For example, boys who thought they were girls would be allowed to use the girls' bathrooms.

    What's even more horrifying is that this proposal is not unique to Maine. I found a blog which discusses the issue at length here: http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php … -bathrooms . Within the article, there are links which discuss similar proposals in Tampa, Fla; Montgomery County, Md; and Colorado.

    I think it's sickening.

    1. Rafini profile image86
      Rafiniposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Ya know, I've heard some places in the world utilize unisex bathrooms...like...at home - do you have a mens room and a womens room at home?

      1. DeanKeaton259 profile image61
        DeanKeaton259posted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Ya, but unisex bathrooms are always single serving while gender specific bathrooms are communal... I guess you forgot that little detail.

        1. Rafini profile image86
          Rafiniposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Nope, didn't forget.  I've never visited a country with unisex bathrooms.

    2. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      But you are quite comfortable stealing photographs of almost-naked women and posting them as hubs to make money?

      And you are horrified and sickened at other people's behavior. How odd. And yes - I live in a country with unisex bathrooms. You shot this - right?

      http://s2.hubimg.com/u/2961061_f520.jpg

      1. Greek One profile image79
        Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        not sure what your point here is Mark (because I am to focussed on the pic to read)...

        but I agree 100% with you

  8. Ron Montgomery profile image61
    Ron Montgomeryposted 6 years ago

    Is "pediphilia" a sexual obsession involving feet, or did the OP mean something else?

    1. Uninvited Writer profile image83
      Uninvited Writerposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      lol

  9. lovemychris profile image79
    lovemychrisposted 6 years ago

    Well, being from Mass, I'm sure you heard about tea-bag party candidate Perry?
    When he was a cop, he covered up for his buddy who used his police power to ogle and pawn a 14 and 16 year old.
    Perry covered for him until the parents complained, and then it all came out.

    But people still defend him. Said he did nothing wrong.
    So, if you would like me to say the right wingers are trying to spurn a whole bunch of right wing sexual deviant peadophiles who like to pawn young girls, I will.

    But that would be silly, huh? ....Except that neither Scott Brown nor Mitt Romney have denounced him....

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Nice points. And please note the religious agenda of Mit Romney. All Mormons claim to be Christians whether any other Christians believe them or not. Ignore and sweep it under the carpet. Uh huh.

    2. TMMason profile image72
      TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      No i had not heard of him.

      What is your point?

      That the left wing homo-nazis should be allowed to indoctrinate the young because some right winger did something?

      duh...

      So your justification for the indoctrination of the young into homosexualtiy is... someone on the right did something.

      That is pathetic...

      1. Daniel Carter profile image90
        Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Right wingers are no more "right" than left wingers. In other words, there are as many perverts, thugs, crooks, murderers and pedophiles that are right wingers as there are left wingers. That's the point.

        Additionally, I think it's noteworthy to point out that there is a very fast rising GLBT following of right wing politics and the Tea Baggers. You don't have to believe, but not believing doesn't make it not true. Additionally, more and more GLBT people are going to church. They are holding true to their conservative Christian upbringing. So beware, you have an increasingly strong possibility of voting with, or sitting next to in church, a right winger GLBT person.

        Those are facts.

        1. profile image0
          Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Anyone who advocates gay "rights" is NOT Right-wing.
          They may (and do, I'm sure) try to infiltrate Right-wing groups, but it sure ain't because they're a legitimate part of any Right-wing group.

          1. Daniel Carter profile image90
            Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            There ARE right-wing gay, republican, conservative Christian, Bible-touting people out there, Brenda, and I'll bet you sit next to them occasionally in Church. It's just that they keep their private lives private.

            Your denial of anything otherwise is as comical and disappointing as TMMason's.

            Jeff, thanks for the facts, friend. Always a pleasure to read you.

            1. profile image0
              ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              Mr Carter, I wrote an essay for you!

              1. Daniel Carter profile image90
                Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                I shall investigate forthwith, my friend. Love reading anything you write, as well.

                1. profile image0
                  ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  Don't look too hard for it, and don't get too excited, it was only a reply on this thread about my political leanings!

      2. PrettyPanther profile image84
        PrettyPantherposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I think she's trying to say, why don't you get your panties in a wad over something real that actually has harmed children versus some exaggerated paranoia over indoctrination of schoolchildren.

  10. Uninvited Writer profile image83
    Uninvited Writerposted 6 years ago

    Still, what is the problem with unisex bathrooms? You do lock the stall from the inside.

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Lest we forget university dorms are mostly co-ed now. I suppose that's somehow more acceptable than "co-ed" bathrooms? So I agree with UW's observation.

    2. DeanKeaton259 profile image61
      DeanKeaton259posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      That's just how our culture operates. You may not see a problem with it, but the cultural norms in our country (I can only speak for the United States) dictate that men and women should not congregate in the same restrooms. People who break those norms are sanctioned by their peers or by the law depending on the location.

      1. Rafini profile image86
        Rafiniposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Just because it's the 'culture' of the US doesn't make it right or best, now does it?

      2. Jeff Berndt profile image90
        Jeff Berndtposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        What about those Family restrooms at the mall? The ones for dads with young daughters or moms with young sons who are learning how this whole potty thing works? Should we ban those? 'Cos going potty is clearly sinful....

  11. Uninvited Writer profile image83
    Uninvited Writerposted 6 years ago

    Telling people something exists is not indoctrinating them.

  12. Jeff Berndt profile image90
    Jeff Berndtposted 6 years ago

    Yeah, so I followed the links, read the reports and watched the news clip. And, I read the entire "Little Black Book," not just the bits that MassResistance (an anti-gay...I don't want to use the phrase "hate group," but I'm having trouble coming up with a neutral word for them after checking out their website) wanted us to see (and be outraged at).

    So, my thoughts, after having read all the info.

    First, the pamphlet is meant for people 18 and over, and should never have been available at an event for school-age kids. The organizers of the event said as much, and apologized for their mistake in having the book even be present.

    Second, only ten copies of the book were at the event, and none of them, as far as anybody knows, were taken by any kids. They were taken off the table as soon as the mistake was noticed.

    Third, the event wasn't during school hours; it happened on a Saturday, and it was open to the general public. So "The Schools" (tm) aren't giving these books out. Sorry, public ed haters, you lose on this one. The pamphlet may be a fact, but it's so not being "implemented in the school system."

    Fourth, the error occurred in the year 2005. That's five years ago. That's why some of you couldn't find articles about this when googling: it's ancient history in internet years, and apparently no similar mistake has been made since.

    Fifth, the language in the book is graphic, probably deliberately so, considering that the intended audience is 20-something guys. Definitely NC-17 or X-rated. But at the same time, word choice issues aside, the pamphlet covered topics that nobody wants to talk about in a frank and open way. In fact, the graphic language and frank tone used in talking about the effects of drugs and STDs will probably scare guys into abstaining, or at least being less promiscuous, which I'd call a Good Thing.

    Finally, selective quotes, half-truths and outright falsehoods only serve to make you look either lazy (for not fact-checking) or else dishonest (for repeating information you know to be false or not completely true).

    Of course, you will only look lazy or duplicitous to those who (like me) bother to follow and read the links. If someone already fears that two adult strangers consensually pleasuring each other somewhere will somehow destroy the world, ruin marriage as an institution, and curdle the milk in the fridge, they'll probably not bother to fact-check, since it fits their confirmation bias.

    Heck, even most people who realize that the sexual practices of consenting adult strangers have no impact on the larger world probably won't bother to fact-check. They'll chalk it up to a few extremist wankers and leave it.

    The best thing about the deception is that most moderate people will imagine that these pamphlets were deliberately handed to young boys in an attempt to convert them to the gay lifestyle when in fact the people who (accidentally) brought the (ten copies of) the pamphlet to the weekend event for the general public didn't even mean for that pamphlet to be there. It's meant for adults, not school kids.

    [edit]
    Oh, I almost forgot to mention this: the event took place (on a Saturday) at Brookline High School. Even the Mass Resistance website says so. Yet the person who started this discussion headlined it, "Homosexuality and Pediphilia [sic] promoted in grade school in America."
    So, TMMason, are you a lazy person with reading comprehension problems, or are you trying deliberately to deceive us?
    [/edit]

    1. PrettyPanther profile image84
      PrettyPantherposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      If I had a hat, I would take it off to you.  smile

    2. TMMason profile image72
      TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Yes... that is the left wing play down of this event.

      doesn't wash.... not on top of all the other propaganda they have pushed into the schools.

      1. Daniel Carter profile image90
        Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Even after all the evidence stacks against what you have said, you still maintain your position of utter denial.

        And yet, you presently have this avatar that is supposed to be social/political statement but you are only subconsciously aware of all the sexual connotation it also provides, and you're STILL in denial of facts!

        OMG!

        1. Jeff Berndt profile image90
          Jeff Berndtposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Well, TMMason, like all of us, is entitled to his own opinion.
          But none of us are entitled to our own facts.

        2. TMMason profile image72
          TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          your evidence doesn't impress me, dan... i have seen what is taught in the schools there. This is just more of the same.

      2. Jeff Berndt profile image90
        Jeff Berndtposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        And this, class, is a texbook example of Confirmation Bias. For extra credit for tomorrow, research the terms "False Witness" and "Cognitive Dissonance." Define them both, and explain how they relate to today's discussion.

        Dismissed. smile

    3. Rafini profile image86
      Rafiniposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      even most people who realize that the sexual practices of consenting adult strangers have no impact on the larger world


      I have to disagree with this statement.  Have you ever heard the term "legalize Gay Marriage'?

      1. Jeff Berndt profile image90
        Jeff Berndtposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Please explain how two men marrying each other will affect the larger world?

        1. luvpassion profile image59
          luvpassionposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          There are several possibilities as far as social security, income taxes, adoption any of the ways married couples affect society...plus the problems passed on to the children by their peers...children can be cruel.

        2. Rafini profile image86
          Rafiniposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Purely by changing the definition of the Religious word of:  Marriage.

          1. profile image0
            ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            Please explain how changing a definition changes the world hmm Wikipedia has changed enough of them without major problem.

            1. Rafini profile image86
              Rafiniposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              lol  Don't you get it?  Marriage is more than a word.  More, even, than a Religious word.  Marriage is the concept of life everlasting.  What does gay marriage signify?  Destruction of life everlasting - because the definition would have been changed.

  13. TMMason profile image72
    TMMasonposted 6 years ago

    Leant leftist liberal progressive denial... your worlds are full of it.

    I think I smell something?...

    And if you all think sex when you look at my avatar... then you are sicker than the people who wrote and circulated that book to kids.

    1. profile image0
      ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Well it looks like it could quite easily be a small white dog attempting to hump the leg of a much larger brown dog.

      I will let you know when I write a book about f****** hmm

    2. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      I feel perfectly well. I'm not alone in my observations. They feel as well as I do.

    3. luvpassion profile image59
      luvpassionposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      I was curious about that statement myself...I must be missing something.

      Teri

  14. Greek One profile image79
    Greek Oneposted 6 years ago

    I remember a simpler time in America...

    Where you didn't have to worry about homosexuals because they were suppressed and fearful of coming out...

    Where you didn’t have to worry about homosexual pedophiles, because there were plenty of heterosexuals pedophiles around

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      ...and black people, too, in the 60's. Until they got angry.

      Isn't it interesting that it takes decades of civil unrest for some groups to gain equality. And even then, it's really only sporadic. However, I do believe it's better over all. There is more equality for more groups now than there ever was in my early youth.

      1. Greek One profile image79
        Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I bet somehow that black homosexual child molesters (probably linked to Obama) are somehow keeping my AdSense revenue down!!

        1. Ron Montgomery profile image61
          Ron Montgomeryposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Are you getting much Kenyan traffic?

          1. Greek One profile image79
            Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            is 'traffic' a synonym for something naughty?

            1. Daniel Carter profile image90
              Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              No, Homer, just "avatar." You can blame it on me. I started that one.
              lol

            2. Ron Montgomery profile image61
              Ron Montgomeryposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              Of course.  Haven't you read Brenda's latest piece in "The Agenda" ?

        2. Daniel Carter profile image90
          Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Write to Pennsylvania Ave.
          I'm sure there is a TARP program that will cover Adsense drop as well. I think you'd be classified as a minority since your Greek/Canadian. You should get tons of payout, my friend.
          wink

        3. profile image0
          ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Funny, because I came to that conclusion too! Although I narrowed it down to left-wing black homosexual child molesters with non-military family backgrounds. The Mexicans too, those damn Mexicans. And women, who can forget women? Execute them all I say! I also heard that no Palistinian companies are paying for Adsense ads eight now either, nuke them too!

          Amen! Praise the lord!

          1. Greek One profile image79
            Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            you forgot the French

            1. Daniel Carter profile image90
              Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              Brits and Americans don't forget the French. We ignore them. Canadians, however, are stuck with the language and much more....

              1. profile image0
                ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                lol

                1. Daniel Carter profile image90
                  Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  I thought you were having a pint, writing a hub and going to bed??
                  (Liar)
                  But glad you're still haunting around...

                  1. profile image0
                    ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    Well I am having a pint, 1 out of 3 aint bad!

              2. profile image0
                ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                In fairness, they do produce some beautiful women....

                1. Daniel Carter profile image90
                  Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  True that. Okay, French women not included.

              3. Greek One profile image79
                Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                bastards!.. all of you!!

                1. Daniel Carter profile image90
                  Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  It's tough being an expatriot twice removed, I get that, Homer.
                  But it's your choice to live there!!!
                  wink

  15. TMMason profile image72
    TMMasonposted 6 years ago

    you peple are funny.

    Defend the defenseless... then turn it all into racist bigoted hate.

    How about just not indoctrinating children into an abomination of a life-style choice.

    And yes, it is a CHOICE.

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      You peple  r 2.

      We should have a block party some time. We might die of laughter over each other.

      I'm just trying to lighten it up. No offense intended, TM.

      1. TMMason profile image72
        TMMasonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I do not take offense to you, dan... I enjoy our debates more than many of the others.

        I am an American White male... there is nothing I can be called that offends me. I have been called everything the left can think of... and I am still here.

        1. Daniel Carter profile image90
          Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          I'm glad we can agree to disagree.

  16. Greek One profile image79
    Greek Oneposted 6 years ago

    The family pic below of my friends the Duggars represents good old fashioned heterosexual family values.... 

    they role models for us all!! (even if they are using her uterus as a turnstile at Disneyworld)

    http://candidchatter.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/2-duggar-family_nc_new.jpg

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      They are probably either Catholic, Mormon, or he has more wives on the side.

      Nice pic. They probably are that wholesome.

  17. Greek One profile image79
    Greek Oneposted 6 years ago

    I have a dream...

    one day.. in the not too distant future...

    white males will no longer suffer discrimination and hate by the rest of society...

    it might take some hard work for this dream to come true..

    but with God's help, our pain will FINALLY be eased

    1. Daniel Carter profile image90
      Daniel Carterposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      What is your dream for Greek Canadians?
      wink

      1. Greek One profile image79
        Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Adsense revenue over $3 a year would be a nice start

Closed to reply
 
working