Three Firemen discuss what happened to them
The failure of the following meeting to gain a pipeline for Halliburton gave Cheney motive for 911. Also, Cheney was a member of PNAC and in 2000 they said they needed a new Pearl Harbor to establish US presence in the middle east. Cold Blooded Murderer Cheney had both motive and knowledge of 911.
From the article:
A senior delegation from the Taleban movement in Afghanistan is in the United States for talks with an international energy company that wants to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan.
A spokesman for the company, Unocal, said the Taleban were expected to spend several days at the company's headquarters in Sugarland, Texas.
Unocal says it has agreements both with Turkmenistan to sell its gas and with Pakistan to buy it.
In May, Taleban-controlled radio in Kabul said a visiting delegation from an Argentinian company had announced that pipeline construction would start "soon".
The radio has reported several visits to Kabul by Unocal and Bridas company officials over the past few months.
A BBC regional correspondent says the proposal to build a pipeline across Afghanistan is part of an international scramble to profit from developing the rich energy resources of the Caspian Sea.
Here is the link to the article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/west_asia/37021.stm
BTW Shin, there was a gag order for years on this fireman testimony. I am surprised that the guilt of the NIST allowed for this release. This makes Cheney guilty of murder and Bush as well. Look at this Bush OJ type guilty meltdown: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeoeGb47olU
I'm no fan of Bush and Cheney, but your suggestion that either or both of them had anything to do with 9-11 is B.S.
Wrong Ralph. Did you look at the videos? In Shin's video there were explosions. You are aware that Marvin Bush, youngest brother of George Bush, was in charge of security up until the day of 911. On 911, his successor, on his first day on the job, died.
Marvin Bush had control of the cameras. There were explosives in the building Ralph. Watch the video. You have to watch the video or you don't get it.
Motive came from what I submitted above. Again, no major American media reported this visit of the Taliban to Texas.
Yes, I watched the video and didn't observa anything suspicious. Explosions could have been caused by natural gas leaks resulting from the plane hitting the building or other reasons. I may be naive but I believe the published reports on the causes of the tragedy, to wit, a coordinated attack planned by al Qaida and executed by it's agents.
Marvin Bush's security company which had a contract to provide security for the WTC could not have prevented the planes crashing into the towers and their collapse. If memory serves the FBI ignored it's own agents' eports about Arabs taking flight training but showing little interest in learning to land.
NO Ralph, squibbs were observed coming out way below the devastation. These were timed. Squibbs can only be caused by explosive charges. There are videos with the squibbs clearly visible. You also have seen the implosions in Las Vegas. Here is a side by side of WTC7, not struck by a plane and a Las Vegas type explosion. Sorry, Ralph, our government is evil.
And Ralph, why would there be a gas explosion below all the action? It makes no sense. Marvin Bush planted the explosives. I don't care about his role about the planes. That is irrelevant.
Also, don't forget all the evidence of Cali versus Enron was in WTC7. Funny isn't it?
The unofficial theories of 9-11 don't interest me. I don't feel compelled to refute other people's wild theories. I'm not a fan of the Bush family but I can't bring myself to believe the theory you are propounding. When a huge building has been hit by an airliner full of jet fuel all kinds of things can happen. I'm satisfied with the government's explanation. (Not happy about the FBI's dropping the ball.)
You aren't looking at the facts looking you in the face Ralph?
If you are satisfied with the government's explanation of WTC7 that side by side video is a lie.
Come on Ralph, what is your answer to the side by side video?? Don't walk away now.
And Obama was part of the coverup after the Iranian guy spilled the beans. The only issue I have with the Iranian president is that from my above post the primary movers of 911 were the oil men, not Israel.
Ralph, you aren't interested in a side by side video between a building laced with explosives and wtc7 collapsing which looks IDENTICAL?
If you can't refute the side by side you have to accept that 911 was a conspiracy. You have no other choice.
What's more, I believe Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK without any prompting by the CIA or LBJ. And I don't believe a 100 mpg car has been suppressed by the oil and car companies.
sad. I don't think we, the public will ever know the truth about 9-11. they release what they want us to believe.
did you see the smoking gun video? talking about WTC7?
there's also a site about WTC 7 controversy. http://www.wtc7.net/index.html
I don't really get into it much, but I have listened to and read various articles. there was also a PBS special about it.
Here is an easy explanation of WTC7 Rebekah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
A video is worth ten thousand words.
it's interesting also the tenants that were in WTC7.. many financial institutions along with secret service and cia.
There is a very good hub by Micky Dee about this subject; all we need to know to understand what happened and WHY is in there
There is little incontrovertible evidence in most conspiracy theory.
The same mentality seems to apply among religionists all pressing their own views.
Where's the HARD evidence? The stuff that would stand up in a court room?
Where is the hard evidence that ponzi lenders planned liar loans to steal from mainstreet? Just enough circumstantial evidence to burn a wet mule Daniel. Same here. There is enough circumstantial evidence and I would say the side by side is empirical proof.
Here is another circumstance, Daniel. Warren Buffet had a party on 911 at Strategic Command of all places. One of his guests watched as her entire company was destroyed in a tower. She was spared. Well, wonder why? It so happens that her director became head investigator for 911. How convenient isn't it?
These people were gods, but not the Almighty, which they will one day learn the hard way.
And Buffet's Netjet followed flight 93, no military aircraft. Berkshire mentioned it once and refuses to talk about it again. I wish this were my website but it isn't: http://killtown.911review.org/buffett.html
by Rod Martin Jr4 years ago
What's behind the thousands of tons of iron microspheres found in the 9/11 concrete dust?There were 780,000 metric tons of concrete in the 2 WTC towers. I did not include the third building which collapsed that day...
by Jim Hunter6 years ago
Achmedinadinnerjacket says 9/11 was an inside job.Was it? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09 … s-hateful/
by DJ Funktual8 years ago
I just saw a disturbing video on youtube where a caller mentioned that G.W Bush has passed a law that makes it illegal to protest a war and that if caught doing so, you will find yourself arrested and all of your assets...
by Ruben Rivera6 years ago
by Mike Russo2 months ago
Trump is not your normal candidate nor is he running a normal campaign. I know the word normal is relative, but in the world of campaigns, it is based on previous campaigns that had some sense of being normal with...
by Mister Veritis5 years ago
Uh, well. Oh, Hmmm.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uyJSXCZRpc&NR=1
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.