Could this be? Is he a viable candidate? Was this the plan all along?
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/sen … or-senate-
Oh, please, please.....this would only be slightly less entertaining than watching Screamin Howie Dean run for President.....
Minnesota elected one moron, Al Franken, I guess Olbermann could go there and run. Then they'd have 2 morons.
Why not? Would he be any worse then the rest of the democtat fools there now?
Hey or it might be as entertaining as Sarah Palin, Sharron Angle, Meg Whitman, or Ken " Buyers Remorse" Buck.
Oh wait how about Carl Bestiality Palladino.
even though i dissagree with him on a few issues, i enjoyed listening to kieth on msnbc and will miss his voice there,... olberman in the senate? oh hell yea, i'd pay my wiskey money to see him rant on the senate floor,... full sentances containing propper grammer? why the hell not!
That would be great. Someone not afraid to speak his mind.
I doubt he'd do it though....
But SOMEONE needs to offset the lunatics of the tea-party brigade. Insane is too nice a word for them.
Did you know that slavery was not an issue after the pilgrims came here? Didja? Why all that silly talk about Jim Crowe and hanging people from trees was just made up. Yeah, see.......*TwilightZone Music*......We were all free and equal!! The whole durn time of America!!!! --Michelle "I have 5 kids on tax-payer healthcare, but not for you!" Bachmann.
This is not dumbing down, it is dimming down....dimming out the lights so that truth no longer exists anymore.
Welcome to the shadow world of Tea-Party truth, which is one huge lie.
He'd be a damned sight better than Joe "Turncoat" Liebermann!
I read his non-compete with MSNBC bars him from returning to TV in a similar capacity for quite awhile AND baseball nerd blog simply isn't enough brain stimulation for Keith SO... could be some truth to the rumor.
He's a smart guy.
Plays well with others? Not so much.
Haha I forgot I bout him. Lieberman is going senile in his own age. Calling women "honey" and whatnot when he is question about his insistance that there were WMD's.
Even the republicans won't say that aloud.
I know a lot people don't like him but I like Sanders. Too bad they got all over him about his newsletter. Wasn't the way the media painted it either since I get it every month in my in box.
He speaks his mind.
You know he is a pretty darn good sports caster....
Liberman, I kinda liked him. Of course you have to be some what suspicious of any politician that changes their stripes.
Couldn't resist posting this. I LOVE Stephen Colbert!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ … rmann.html
Oh boy! Go on, make Keith Olbermann a democratic senator. Between him and Al Franken, the pomposity of these two can't be contained. Showing videos of these two would be all that the Republicans would need to raise money!
Oh, Don't worry about those pubbies raising $$:
"Corporate contributions have surged for new Republican leaders in House"
By Dan Eggen and T.W. Farnam
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, January 22, 2011; 12:00 AM
"The new Republican leaders in the House have received millions of dollars in contributions from banks, health insurers and other major business interests, which are pressing for broad reversals of Democratic policies that affect corporations, according to disclosure records and interviews."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 03187.html
Hey we should do a montage of Boehner crying, I bet we could get like a half hour of sniffles. Both sides have there share a wackos.
Have you every seen anyone as ugly as Mitch McConnell? LOL What is up with his chin and nose.
Hey, if you think Boehner crying and Mitchnell's ugly mug is going to raise money for the dems, go right ahead. I just don't think it'll be as effective as Olbermann and Franken.
What raises the most money is the people who are the most business friendly in who cares if we devaste everything else way.
Hands down the republicans.
Really? Is that why Shining Handsome Obama raised $750 million last election cycle(compared to McCain's $370 million) and is expected to raise $1 billion this election cycle? Perhaps you should do some research on where the money comes from and how much is donated to which candidates before regurgitating the same old hackney drivel. You will find that those evil rich and those evil and contemptible big business people gave to Shining Handsome in some pretty big numbers and are expected to do so again.
They really are blind to the truth aren't they?
Blind to what truth flightkeeper? I think both sides are corrupt and tethically challeged so how is that blind. People who think it is one side is blind. People who think that kind of money doesn't affect our government is blind.
That's not me.
I did enjoy this one though as well.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/01 … tions.html
You assumed that Republicans at the last election got the most funding from corporations and claimed that they "devastate everything else away". uncorrected vision just pointed out your fat mistake and wrong assumption -- it's actually Obama and the democrats who devastate everything".
Did I say Obama wasn't? I say republicans win. I didn't say democrats don't get any.
I have no wool over my eyes whereas if you think republicans don't you just might.
In fact my biggest contention with Obama is his relationship with Monsanto. Don't assume to know me.
Am I the only one that thinks this article is complete schlock? Liberals is not an organization. Simply saying that "liberals" want him to do this or that doesn't qualify who, or at what extent (if any) it's being considered.
Also, the story says that the whole suggestion was brought up by some activists. Shouldn't the article title then read "Activists Trying To Draft Keith Olbermann," or better yet, "I'm Not A Real Journalist"?
Yeah, those dumb companies finally realized how anti-business Obama was after bankrolling the democrat party for so many years.
Colbert is making fun of anyone who gets in his path!
His character is a pretend right-winger but actuall he makes more fun of GOP and rightie stances than he does Dems.
"Early this month, when John Boehner was sworn in as the new speaker of the House of Representatives, he tipped his hat to the teabag activists across the country who had fueled the Republican takeover of the chamber last fall. He almost choked up as he promised to "give the government back to the American people."
Boehner was not choking back tears, however, he literally was choking on the flagrant hypocrisy of his words. You see, the people he's giving the government back to are not tea partiers, but the rapacious corporate lobbyists who ran the Congress during the years when former Majority Leader Tom DeLay ran the show. Apparently, the name "Boehner" is derived from an ancient Teutonic word meaning: business as usual."
I'm surprised no one calls Boehner out for being a baby girly man
Nah..it's Abramoff who did time, and Delay who's heading there. Mr. "I AM the federal gvt" himself.
You got Clinton for sex......
Hands down, the worst of the worst are the Thuglicans, in my book.
Righty's book is another story.
But don't come around here acting superior.
You know them by their fruits.
No matter how people get in charge, when it's a Democrat, the people win.
When it's a Republican, Business wins. Simple as that.
And as usual your perception is not close to reality. Didn't GM and Chrysler win when Obama bailed them out? Didn't the banks win when Obama and the dems passed TARP and injected money directly to banks. You're another example where your hate blinds you to the truth.
Sorry flighty..the hate I see comes from you.
People won with GM...lots of jobs there that were saved. Pride for Michigan, Motor City! It was a win win.
And speaking of truth....
TARP was Bush and Paulson....already was LAW when Obama took over.
But--according to many, that TARP helped save the economy. So give yer boy Bush credit.
And give Obama credit for not simply destroying it because it was his predecessors' plan. As a lot of people say about Obama, "He's the only grown-up in the room."
Oh so your assumptions ARE wrong when you say 1) when Republicans AND business wins that people don't benefit. TARP which you credited to Bush saved the economy which helped people and 2) that people don't benefit when Democrats work with business.
Thank you, I'm glad you see the light. Finally.
Maybe the GM bailout could have been a win. However when they sold shares last year at 33 a share they missed the break even point by 15 bucks a share. That means that the taxpayer will likely NEVER get THEIR money back. So a win win? Well see, it doesn't look promising though. By the way, have you been to detroit lately?
by Mike Russo3 years ago
Read this article from the NY Times. It's about a well planned, highly funded conspiracy to shutdown the government if Obama Care is not defunded. Please share this with everybody you know. The...
by My Esoteric9 days ago
I'll let you answer that but provide this insight from a recent CNN poll. Q16. If you had to choose, would you rather see Donald Trump and the Republicans in Congress mostlyimplement Republican policies and pay...
by Charles James4 years ago
I am not an American, but what goes on in the USA is important to the world.Lincoln was a Republican and freed the slaves. One would expect black Americans to generally vote Republican. But they don't.How did this come...
by Mike Russo3 years ago
In your opinion, what has the republican congress done to create or pass legislation since Obama has been president?
by LucidDreams3 years ago
I am not saying ALL Republicans are, I am just wondering why anyone would actually stay with a party that is clearly not on the same page as most of America? Most (not all) but most who are die hard right Republicans...
by American View3 years ago
Republicans have been claiming James Carville is nuts for years now. Are they right or is what James Carville said right? He is what he said:“Ideologies aren't all that important. What's important is psychology. The...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.