I feel that what our form of government promotes isn't the best candidate willing to make tough, unpopular decisions, but rather to elect the most charismatic likable person that would die before they purposely do something unpopular without being compensated. The people we elect into congress today seem to just fall into groups of people that put us at ease, we elect young, attractive people, or older, grandpa/grandma looking people, and of course to get elected, they have to completely model all of their likes and dislikes after the party they're in, even if they don't support it. So what are we left with? A handsome government, no doubt, but are these people really the ones we can trust for any major or lasting change?
It's not our entire form of government that's flawed, it's the vetting process within that framework that has become flawed.
And...I think we're a Republic, not a democracy anyway.
Is it realy the "form" of government that pomotes this? Isn't it more likely that media promotes this?
you both make good points that it's not the government itself that's flawed, it's the execution, but that's the same as the argument that communism is good in theory and is only ruined by greed. What really matters is what happens during the execution, and even if the reason that our voting system is flawed is because of the media putting an unfair tint towards those that are good on camera, then that must be taken into account and considered as a flaw in the system, even if it wasn't an issue when the government was adopted, it has recently become one with the growth of tv and constantly monitoring government officials; it makes the politicians scared to make the real decisions we need, and so instead they do little and use their charisma to pacify us.
Don't forget, a candidates chances of winning are often couched in terms of how much money they have raised. It's not just looks, it's the appearance of popularity and success.
Oh no doubt that money is heavily involved. There needs to be some reform to get the real patriots into office, but how can reform happen with people like this in charge?
by Holle Abee6 years ago
I've been reading some of the polls on support for the healthcare bill. Support is at a new low, with only 38% supporting the bill. 56% oppose the bill. My question is this: Should representatives vote the way their...
by sannyasinman2 years ago
This report says” American democracy is a sham, no matter how much it’s pumped by the oligarchs who run the country (and who control the nation’s “news” media). The U.S., in other words, is...
by pburger6 years ago
If a representative is an advocate for another person's policy or purpose, and non-independent members of a parliament represent a political party, do they in fact represent their constituents?If the majority of...
by Kathryn L Hill34 hours ago
From Debate III:WALLACE to Mrs. Clinton: You have been quoted as saying that the fetus has no constitutional rights. You also voted against a ban on late-term, partial-birth abortions. Why?CLINTON: Because Roe v. Wade...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.