With the election of Rahm Emanuel to mayor in Chicago and Hillary Clinton not too long ago is it becomming more commonplace for the parties to dictate the election rather than leave it up to the local electorate while the electorate follow like cattle?
Indeed. Name recognition and money collected seems to be what the electorate follows more than the stance on the issues or content of character.
I agree. Sometimes I feel like I am the only rat in a sea of lemmings.
I'm not sure I completely understand your question. Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State and was appointed to that position by PresidentObama. Rahm Emmanuel was elected with 55 percent of the vote, and as far as everything I've read, the election was fair.
I don't think there's anything we can do to stop name recognition giving candidates a boost, though.
I agree with CJ Wright on unlimited campaign money being bad. It's bad for democracy and bad for America.
The question is how did Rahm Emanuel qualify as a resident so that he could run? The elections board originally stated he did not qualify because of the 1-1/2 years he spent in Washington working for Obama. This situation miraculously changed because why? The situation with Hillary was even more ludicrous as prior to her election she was never a resident of New York.
I am not trying to split hairs with this but I thought the system we operate under is supposed to be representative and would require that you had at least some relationship with the electorate and thereby an understanding of your constituency before you could adequately represent them.
Instead you had a party bulldoze a candidate through for thier own means and to hell with the electorate.
A lot of us haven't agreed to it.
But somehow they get their way anyway.
by chigoiyke6 years ago
....soonest it will be; why did they kick out the British PM - what's his name again? Gordon Brown. I have been following the British election with some amount of attention but I still don't get why a serving PM is...
by Deforest2 years ago
As Iraq descends into chaos again, more than a decade after "Mission Accomplished," media commentators and politicians have mostly agreed upon calling the war a "mistake." But the "mistake"...
by Cranston8 years ago
a) Play Golf b) Be US Ambassador to the UN c) Go Hunting With Dick Cheney d) Stay Home On The Ranch e) Go to Cosmetology school and learn how to put lipstick on a pig
by spiritactor7 years ago
I believe that, ultimately, Democracy is a gift we continually give OURSELVES. But, as a society, a nation, are we ACCEPTING and USING it?
by Justin Earick2 years ago
While a 28th Amendment stating that corporations are not people and money is not speech would be ideal - how about compulsory voting? What if we used the carrot approach - say increasing tax-credits for voting in...
by AnnCee6 years ago
NEVER HAS THERE BEEN SO LITTLE DIVERSITY WITHIN AMERICA'S UPPER CRUST. Always, in America as elsewhere, some people have been wealthier and more powerful than others. But until our own time America's upper crust was a...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.