jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (37 posts)

Obama America's Version Of Hu Jintao

  1. lady_love158 profile image60
    lady_love158posted 6 years ago

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/03/ … r_667.html

    Wealth inequality is a fact of life its human nature some people are just more ambitious.  The idea that government can redistribute wealth and create fairness and social justice is a fallacy! This is how democrats play on the emotions of their herd and establish their base for power which is really their goal!

    1. IzzyM profile image87
      IzzyMposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      lady_love, are you a paid poster?
      Does someone pay you to post and to stir political opinion on this forum?

      1. DTR0005 profile image86
        DTR0005posted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Guarantee it

      2. AnnCee profile image77
        AnnCeeposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        This is getting so boring.  Don't you libs have another game plan?   Ought to go consult Alinsky play book or something.

        1. IzzyM profile image87
          IzzyMposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          You've lost me Sweetheart smile
          No idea what you are talking about. So are you and lady_love one and the same?

          1. AnnCee profile image77
            AnnCeeposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            Oh yeah, sockpuppet.  Geez.

        2. DTR0005 profile image86
          DTR0005posted 6 years ago in reply to this

          "Don't you libs have another game plan?" lolllll That is a bit like calling the kettle black isn't it? I was doing a quick inventory on Lady Love's forum topics over the last four months.

          I have yet to find ONE that didn't start out with an Obama bash and/or the term "socialist" associated with Democrats, and not one that didn't have an exclamation mark - if not several lmao. She has officially surpassed Senator McCarthy of the 1950's in her use of the term "socialist" associated with Democrats. And McCarthy was head of the batsh1t crazy department during the Eisenhower years.  Ironically there are almost NO forum topics posted by liberals that "slam" Republicans specifically or sing Obama's praises.

          Lady Love and sometimes you, albiet to a smaller extent, are little Energizer Bunnies for the GOP and the Tea Party.

          So who REALLY has the same old, boring game plan on here? lollll And you really wonder why more than a dozen posters on these forum have come to the conclusion that Lady Love is on someone's payroll?????

      3. pisean282311 profile image58
        pisean282311posted 6 years ago in reply to this

        @izzy i guess most hubbers out here do believe that...

    2. Cagsil profile image60
      Cagsilposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      You see, there you go again, spouting off against Democrats, when it is already obvious that is comes from both sides.

      So you're argument against Democrats does nothing for you. It just shows how hypocritical both sides are.

    3. livelonger profile image89
      livelongerposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      How much did you get paid for this post?

    4. dutchman1951 profile image59
      dutchman1951posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Your argument here is about as usefull as a screen door on a submarine!

      Sense when is the retraction of people's rights to bargan for their own wage, the removal of a  right to toil and endevor;  The re-distribution of wealth?

      You could drive whats left of Kadafi's army through the hole in your statement. You need to re-write that Republican Bible you spout... No way
      - I think even Neut would be smart enough to stay away from that one!

  2. profile image60
    ShortStoryposted 6 years ago

    Is this the new thing now? Anyone you disagree with is "a paid poster"? Seems to be the topic of every thread lately.

    1. lady_love158 profile image60
      lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      It's the strategy of the left, distract, dinigrate, and deflect to avoid any discussion of the real issue.
      @Ann yes it is getting old! Maddow, Beck, Limbaugh, and even president Obama get paid for sharing their views, does that mean they really don't believe what they say? It's a moot point, answering the question doesn't serve my interest in any way, and besides where does it say I'm obligated to answer any question? These lefties have to get over themselves and start addressing the logic of their foolish and failed philosophies.

  3. pisean282311 profile image58
    pisean282311posted 6 years ago

    @ts i for a change agree to you...even if wealth is redistributed few years down the line , things would be back to same position...it is nature ...what communist or socialist think is paramount of human thought and humans are not mature to that level which makes their theory impractical is current times...may be another 5k years down the line , yes but as of now...No...

  4. John Holden profile image60
    John Holdenposted 6 years ago

    Assuming that money always moves towards itself, ie, give £100 to a poor man he will immediately spend it and put it back in the hands of the rich, taxes for benefits  do no harm, they stop money stagnating.

    Consider it not as redistribution but as a loan!

    The rich objecting to taxation is not rational and is based purely on the need to hoard and hoard only for the sake of hoarding.

    1. lady_love158 profile image60
      lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Lol! Yes the rich take money put it in a room and take it out of circulation.

      1. John Holden profile image60
        John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Glad you've finally sussed that one out, though maybe not in a room, but invested in China or similar where it won't help the economy one iota.

        1. pisean282311 profile image58
          pisean282311posted 6 years ago in reply to this

          hey but Hu Jintao did make his country as most powerful country in the world and being biggest creditor of the world ...guess obama is taking steps in right direction smile visionary..indeed

          1. John Holden profile image60
            John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            Yes indeedy. He could do worse.

            1. pisean282311 profile image58
              pisean282311posted 6 years ago in reply to this

              lol

          2. lady_love158 profile image60
            lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

            Yes of course all you socialists would see the comparison as a positive.

            1. pisean282311 profile image58
              pisean282311posted 6 years ago in reply to this

              lets compare...one is country with 4.5 times population of usa and had 60% poverty in 60s...now that same country has 10% poverty ...it is fastest growing economy ...it is second largest economy...it is biggest creditor...on other hand we have super power usa known for its innovations which is now biggest debtor with 3 trillion taken from china alone...it has slipped from being most powerful country to no 2 position in last decade with bush being its president... its unemployment had risen ...obama has two options to see there is problem and continue the bush way or see how china rose ..now in comparison to bush and  Jintao , obviously jintao is far more successful and coming to human rights ...bush cannot be rated to be good in that too...Guiana , iraq speak louder...so jinato scores well and being president of usa and christian and totally patriot american...obama is infact heading to correct path...

              1. DannyMaio profile image61
                DannyMaioposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                so i guess the child labor thing and no unions is OK again? that is how they are creating wealth! people get paid crap there and the reason they sell cheaply! wow how the socialist turn so quick when they hear take more.

                1. DTR0005 profile image86
                  DTR0005posted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  Yeah.. great points Danny - but you know what you mentioned is exactly what Conservatives are pushing for. And I realize you aren't a hardcore Conservative.
                  But the point is this: for all the bashing about controlled and centrally-managed economies (socialist and communists) they do have a way of advancing quickly. When I was a kid in the late 1960's and 70's, China was a peasant society - not even recognized by the US until Nixon went on a state visit. Within the course of thirty years, China has risen to a point that, sadly, could never be realized in a free-market society. I am not defending managed economies and the "downside" on human rights and would never want that for our nation, but you have to give some credit to China. The Soviet Union was able, in the space of thirty years, to bring itself from an agrarian, serf-based economy to a major world power - second only to the US.
                  The question is this: what have we done on any real significance in the last 30 years? In the last ten years, we have done nothing but fight endless and extremely expensive "scrub wars".

                  1. DannyMaio profile image61
                    DannyMaioposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    I truly do not think the right wants the same as that. I think you are exaggerating a bit. plus nobody would ever let child labor or Mistreatment. This is 2011 not the 40's or 50's. also I guess we are both the same age or pretty close as I was also a kid in the late 60's. I think we have grown from there and much too advanced to let that happen. In my Personal opinion we have been going downhill since BUSH! that Iraq war was the most stupidest thing he done! since then it has been a real free-fall

                  2. profile image60
                    ShortStoryposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    You've got it completely backwards with regards to China. Mao's centrally planned nonsense resulted in the unnecessary deaths of tens of millions of people. It was only after Deng Xiaoping began the process of letting China's economy become more market-driven that China began to really develop. Over  time, the more they moved away from communist economics toward a free market system the faster they developed, unleashing the great creative and competitive potential of her people.

                    As for the USSR, they developed into a military, not economic power. In fact, the inherent weakness of their economic system is what Reagan was able to exploit to hasten the demise of that evil empire.

        2. lady_love158 profile image60
          lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

          So money invested doesn't help the economy? Hmmm... no wonder no one takes youlibs seriously!

          1. John Holden profile image60
            John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            It depends on how it is invested, invested in foreign countries assists the economy very little, invested in the poor of a country helps a great deal.

            I know you republicans don't do common sense but think about it a little.
            You know it makes sense.

    2. profile image60
      ShortStoryposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Do you harbor such irrational hatred and concoct such illogical theories about other groups of people you don't like (envy), or just the rich?

      1. John Holden profile image60
        John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        And what precisely is illogical about it? Money spent in the domestic economy benefits the domestic economy, money invested in the foreign economy benefits the investor and the country that the money is invested in!

        And why does realising that involve hating anybody?

        You may not agree with me but your accusations of illogical and irrational thought say rather more about you than they do about me.

        1. profile image60
          ShortStoryposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          What happens to the money that the investor makes? What are the larger-scale consequences of this foreign investment?

          Just come out and say you envy and hate the rich and be done with it.

          1. Cagsil profile image60
            Cagsilposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            roll

          2. John Holden profile image60
            John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            What happens to the money that the investor makes! He reinvests it in yet another foreign business! The larger scale consequences of this foreign investment is fewer jobs at home and less tax revenue to support those unemployed workers, amongst others!

            Why should I come out and lie? I neither envy or hate the rich, I don't worship them like you do and I can see their feet of clay, but hate and envy, no.

            1. DannyMaio profile image61
              DannyMaioposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              so either way by your explanation he is helping someone...NO? so stop complaining, your just mad because you want free shit! so the rich person is actually helping another country which has people that your concerned about, Is that correct? so maybe it is not coming here but that rich person is helping somewhere even with the profits from other countries! thanks for clearing that up! I always knew they were helping someway besides paying most of the taxes.

          3. DTR0005 profile image86
            DTR0005posted 6 years ago in reply to this

            If that investor is part of the ultra-wealthy class, it goes off-shore into a tax shelter. John is 100% correct - if the money doesn't "stay" here in the domestic market, it doesn't benefit the domestic market.

 
working