jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (22 posts)

Obama Supports Unions Or Education?

  1. lady_love158 profile image61
    lady_love158posted 6 years ago

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/29/obama … portunity/

    In spite of the outstanding success of the school voucher program and in spite of bipartisan support for continuing the program Obama will NOT pass this bill. He's on record opposing vouchers and disputing the facts of success if the program. Obama, as always, is gauging the political winds and isn't willing to do what everyone else knows us right and risk losing support of teacher's unions!

    Open your eyes libs... it's all about power!

    1. DonDWest profile image89
      DonDWestposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      So lady_love, what is an ideal education? Instead of spamming other people's work, why don't you try coming up with your own? Or is it too hard?

  2. recommend1 profile image73
    recommend1posted 6 years ago

    This is political spam and it is using the forums against the TOS because you are promoting your almost hubless self - for profit.

    The sooner the mods shut you and the other spammers down the better.

    1. lady_love158 profile image61
      lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      The "spam" is responses like yours.

      1. recommend1 profile image73
        recommend1posted 6 years ago in reply to this

        No - the  spam is definately you getting paid to flood our forums with your sewage.

        1. lady_love158 profile image61
          lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Your posts as well as mine speak for themselves.

          1. recommend1 profile image73
            recommend1posted 6 years ago in reply to this

            My posts speak for me - not for some person who is paying me to make a continuous stream of posts on the same issue dressed up with different headings.

            You are just a forum spammer who should quit making forum litter.

  3. kirstenblog profile image79
    kirstenblogposted 6 years ago

    More hate mongering from our resident Obama basher? To bad Obama isn't a member of the site cause threads like this could easily be seen as personal attacks....

    1. pisean282311 profile image57
      pisean282311posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      never mind...i guess hubbers are considering 'pay angle' is such posts too and if people are doing their job of posting 'anti obama' stuffs....well it is their work...

    2. lady_love158 profile image61
      lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Really how so? Please explain how this qualifes as hate or a personal attack? I think your post is a personal attack on me and an attack on free speech!

      1. dingdondingdon profile image61
        dingdondingdonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I don't monitor individual user posts that closely so I can't say I've ever seen you launch a personal attack on Obama himself (just his policies and politics), but I have seen some rather personal insults launched at liberals, denouncing them as "evil", "sneaky", "hate-filled" and so on. As there are obviously liberal users on the Hubpages forums I wonder if this is within the TOS.

        (Of course, I wonder the same about users who insult conservatives, rather than simply conservative policies.)

        1. lady_love158 profile image61
          lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Fair point. But calling liberalism evil is hardly a personal attack,  more of an opinion though I could see how someone might take it personally.

          1. dingdondingdon profile image61
            dingdondingdonposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            No, I don't think calling liberalism itself evil is a personal attack. I might disagree with it but people will disagree on politics and belief systems, it's inevitable. It's only when it degenerates into saying "anyone who believes ____ is evil" or "anyone who is a ____ is bad" that I consider it personal.

          2. John Holden profile image60
            John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            But think about it, you firstly label anyone who disagrees with you as a liberal, whether they are or not, and then you proclaim liberals to be evil!!

            It doesn't get much more personal than that.

            1. lady_love158 profile image61
              lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

              Sorry, when someone works to take.my property and my liberty I get angry and yes I believe people that espouse such ideas are evil. Still I have hope that they can be redeemed.

              1. John Holden profile image60
                John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                And what has that got to do with you claiming not to personally attack people?

                I think you'll find that shouting at people that they are evil is counter productive! Try explaining why you think somebody is wrong and present a compelling argument for your POV.

                1. lady_love158 profile image61
                  lady_love158posted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  In every case I have but its been ignored and the subject changed. Take this post for example its about Obama supporting unions to the detriment of childrens education... but what has it become another attack on me. Let's try to keep this one on point!
                  Do you not think it evil to put ones political ambition above the needs of children getting a good education? Can you not see how that is evil?

                  1. John Holden profile image60
                    John Holdenposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    Really! The article does not say anything about supporting the unions to the detriment of children's education and neither does it attribute the move to political ambition!

                    Again, it is another example of copy and paste without bothering to understand what you are copying. How do you expect that to generate serious debate when you insult us with trash?

 
working