A US Department of Justice test of the CelleBrite UFED used by Michigan police found the device could grab all of the photos and video off of an iPhone within one-and-a-half minutes. The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.
"Complete extraction of existing, hidden, and deleted phone data, including call history, text messages, contacts, images, and geotags," a CelleBrite brochure explains regarding the device's capabilities. "The Physical Analyzer allows visualization of both existing and deleted locations on Google Earth. In addition, location information from GPS devices and image geotags can be mapped on Google Maps."
No! Especially not without a search warrant.
NO! Not without just and probable cause and a required search warrent, determined by a Judge.
No - it's definitely an invasion of a person's privacy. I know in some states they have the law where you cannot speak on your phone while driving, but that still does not give them right to search your phone which contains private information. There's no way they could have probable cause to do so with just a traffic violation.
* Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
We already know the constitution and the bill of rights no longer apply to the people anymore ,,why are you surprised?
The Patriot act and The TSA microwaves or groping if you prefer are good examples.
if there is a reason to obtain evidence because of criminal activity and with a seach warrant - why not?...they do it now in Canada; as a matter of fact a couple of teens who brutally raped and murdered another young teen were caught and convicted with the aid of old text messages wherein they were bragging and planning the horrendous murder and planning to rape and murder another teen right too - that evidence as well as dna, etc. have hopefully put those monsters away for ever.
With justifiable cause, yes, but in accordance with the 4th Ammendment. Criminal activity is usually justifiable. Traffic tickets are not.
Otherwise, absolutely not. In fact, those who misuse this technology, including governments, should be prosecuted.
by Susie Lehto70 minutes ago
It seems apparent from reading reports after the terrorist attack in the UK that most of their officers don't have guns.
by Paul Wingert5 years ago
I crossed into Iowa from Illinois last week on Interstate 80 and I was confronted with orange signs posted by the sheriff department (I think it was the Sherriff or higway patrol) stating they were searching for drugs...
by Jennifer Kessner10 months ago
If you haven't kept up to date on the issues in Ferguson, here is a drastically simplified version of events:1. On August 9th, a St. Louis County police officer shot an unarmed 18-year-old young black man. 2. The...
by ahorseback18 months ago
Most of Americans support you , trust the job that you do and support the process in which you do it ! Up to about eighty percent of us, [ 80%,] depending on race , economics , ...
by Wesman Todd Shaw5 years ago
Ever since Rodney King was seen nearly beaten to death by police officers - police and governments have sought to prevent you or I from video taping the corporate bodyguards...your local police departments.How is...
by Mike Russo2 years ago
I know this is going to be controversial, but I'm deeply concerned about racism in this country. There seems to be many more shootings of unarmed black men by white police in the last few months. This latest...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.