The editorial “The Peace Process,” (April 26) states that “It is time for Mr. Obama ... to put a map and a deal on the table.” As if that act itself would induce the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to cease his defiance of the Obama administration’s interference — or any other country’s interference — in how he treats with the Palestinians in the so-called peace process.
If President Obama is to achieve his goal of a two-state solution before the end of the year, he must first demonstrate to the highly influential Israeli political lobbies in the United States that his peace plan is overwhelmingly in Israel’s best interest. If the president can achieve this, Congress will support his plan over whatever Mr. Netanyahu presents to Congress during his planned visit in May.
James Stuart, Le Paradou, France
Despite the hope expressed by the editorial, the United States can no longer act as a credible and impartial chief negotiator of an Israeli-Palestinian peace. The United States has since 1979 — and most recently in February — too often sided with Israel on its relentless expansion of settlements on the West Bank in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 446. And the diplomatic Quartet of the United Nations, the European Union, Russia and the United States has apparently lost the momentum.
The offer by President Abdullah Gul of Turkey to help Israel in concluding a peace agreement with the Palestinians (“The revolution’s missing peace,” Vuews, April 22) sounds more promising, especially since Turkey is well-positioned to draw on the earlier work of the members of the Quartet.
Jasmine Kealoha, Honolulu
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/opini … ntemail1=y
"I think if we go somewhere, we should start getting paid for it??"
The we - as US government and corporations, are getting paid for it, and you are paying the bill.
by TheWorldNow3 months ago
Something that really bothers me is when people don't have respect for the Office of the President of the United States.It doesn't matter if you disagree with or hate the occupant of the Office, you still need to show...
by John Wilson9 days ago
Clinton's popular vote win was basically her win in California - by 4 million + votes. Take California away from Clinton, and Trump wins by a landslide. The Electoral College prevented this bias of one state forcing...
by Deforest2 years ago
Your opinions?The United States and the Israeli regime are the major criminal elements in the global arena and the international community must boycott them, says a political commentator writes for Press TV.Paul Craig...
by Wesman Todd Shaw5 years ago
I've got some insane ad saying "tell Obama don't betray Israel - sign the petition."I'm not sorry, but I live in the United States Of America - and I have absolutely ZERO allegiance to any other foreign...
by Marwan Asmar4 years ago
Many say Ronald Regan, former US President in the 1980s, knew how to look into the camera and please everyone. Do you agree.
by Deforest2 years ago
When Canadian professor Michel Chossudovsky titled his "The terrorists are us. The islamist state "big lie"" do you agree/disagree and why? You'll find his article below."Under the auspices of...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.