Okay, quick question. Would terrorism still exist if world peace was achieved?
Of course not. If terrorism existed then there would not be peace.
Right, you need to define "peace". If peace is tranquility or the absense of conflict, than a terrorist attack would mark the end of that peace. That is the key. Peace is a relative term to describe a condition at a moment in time, a condition that is ever changing. Peace is not a permanent static condition but one that is constantly strived for.
Only you cagsil would turn a legitimate question into a joke. You must be so proud.
Okay. Maybe it would help if I told you folks why I'm bringing this up. As some may know, I like to watch and read various film reviews to not only learn from other's mistakes, but I try to incorporate different styles into my own. Anyway, I was watching a funny review on youtube where a critic was making fun of the movie, "Lost In Space." Apparently, the film mentions at the beginning how the world is at peace in the future, yet it immediately says afterwards that there was a terrorist attack. I repeat. The world is allegedly at peace, but there's a terrorist attack. Needless to say, I laughed when the critic made fun of that scenario, but I decided to open up this forum merely out of curiosity to see what others would have to say about that. Nothing more, or less. Cagsil, I would've thought YOU of all people would know me well enough to know that I do open these forums up merely out of curiosity purposes to see what other's say. After all, I thought everyone on hubpages knew about my inquisitive nature, but I guess not. Anyway, that is the primary reason for this thread, as I merely wish to assess what other's have to say on the matter and nothing more. Anyway, I hope that clears up any confusion.
"The world is allegedly at peace, but there's a terrorist attack." Key word here is ALLEGEDLY.
If there is terrorism, that would not be World Peace. An act of terrorism would be the end of any World Peace, since peace is the absence or war, strife, or agression.
"...peace is the absence or war, strife, or agression", yes, but terrorism is a random attack and is and always will be present at least as a possibility. Among 10 mil. people we might have one crazy dangerous warrior-to-be!
Give "Whirled Peas" a chance! It would take 100% cooperation to achieve total World Peace...otherwise by definition...it would not be "World Peace". That is a pretty tall order. I wish mankind had it in him to achieve this goal. So far, mankind's track record is Abysmal!
Aye, MPM, Whirled Peas would only result in a green gloopy soup!!!
As for your question Steven, you must have one to have the other. Ying and yang. Evil and good. Love and hate.
After all, how would we know it's world peace if we haven't experienced world war? And if we haven't experienced world war, how would we know that we need peace?
"If world peace was achieved, would terrorism exist?"
I'd say yes. There will always be whack jobs and born-again Hitler's.
Also, just because world peace is achieved doesn't mean it will stay achieved.
by deecoleworld2 years ago
Is world peace possible? What ways can we achieve peace in the world? What does world peace mean to you?
by The stallion5 months ago
People all over the world think that we Pakistanis are all terrorists. I beg to differ! I know that recently there have been quite a few terrorist activities around the world which were supposedly associated with...
by Steven Escareno6 years ago
Although I wrote a poem about this topic a while back, depicting my critique on current modern day society about war and how we tend to favor celebrities over soldiers, that put their lives on the line everyday for...
by Paper Moon7 years ago
I think we could use more peace and understanding, less tolerating of governments, political and religious extremists and news media pushing us farther apart. I am suggesting a peace ring where people from around...
by Reality Bytes4 years ago
No, not another Libya based thread. Let us discuss the incident at Fort Hood that the administration has still failed to call a "terrorist attack"!Why is this important, why is it relevant?Fort Hood...
by Deforest4 years ago
The US officially removed the MKO (people's Mujahedin of Iran) from its blacklist of terrorist organizations. The same ones who recently killed Iranian scientists. The same organization that was trained, that is funded...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.