WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Here’s a news flash for anyone who hasn’t been paying attention: Big banks have cozy relationships with top governmental officials.
That’s the conclusion of a new report from the Government Accountability Office on conflicts of interest at the Federal Reserve during the chaotic months in late 2008 when financial panic gripped Wall Street and the banks received trillions of dollars of emergency loans from the Fed as a life-saving transfusion. Read our coverage of the GAO report
THE FED | Expanded Fed coverage
Click to Play
Bernanke urges Congress to do more
Ben Bernanke urged U.S. lawmakers to do more to help the economy; however, he was careful to not send any new signals about a possible QE program, WSJ economics editor David Wessel reports on Markets Hub.
• Fed minutes show doubts economy will improve
• Bernanke downbeat about job outlook
• Fisher slams Twist move as ineffective
• Fed is 'never' out of ammunition: Bullard
• It's The Twist - $400 billion bond swap
• NY Fed outlines what maturities it will buy
• Text of Federal Reserve rate decision
CALENDARS AND COLUMNS
• U.S. economic calendar | Global calendar
• Market Snapshot | Bond Report | Currencies
• Sign up for breaking-news alerts by email /conga/story/misc/fed.html 172502
In one sense, the GAO report is no surprise. The Fed has been run as an exclusive club of, by and for bankers since its inception nearly 100 years ago. The world of high finance is a relatively small one: Not only does everyone know everyone else, they also know the name of their maid.
They grow up together, they go to school together, they intermarry, they entertain together, they make deals with each other, and so of course they’d get together when the world needs saving.
When Bear Stearns is about to go under over a spring weekend, who do you think Tim Geithner is going to call? An investment banker or a bus driver from Bushwick? Jamie Dimon or Ralph Kramden?
The financial crisis of 2008 opened a window into this secretive world, a window that can never be closed. Read the GAO report here.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont Socialist who commissioned the GAO report, rightfully notes that the 12 regional Federal Reserve banks (which are actually owned by the banking industry) are also run by the bankers, even though they are supposed to serve the public good. The fact that Stephen Friedman of Goldman Sachs was chairman of the New York Fed’s board in 2008 was not unusual.
Congress has attempted to broaden the pool of candidates from which the banks choose their board of directors to include representatives of labor, consumer, agriculture and other groups. But banks and large corporations still dominate the boards, giving them an outsized influence at the Fed.
Of 108 current board members, 82 are either president or chairman of their company, the GAO found. In the past five years, about 5% of directors represented labor or consumer interests.
Does it matter? Perhaps. By law, the Fed is supposed to give equal weight to its two goals: Stable prices and maximum employment. But in practice, fighting inflation is Job #1, #2 and #3, just as you would expect from an institution that’s been captured by wealthy elites.
It’s no coincidence that at the last meeting of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee, three of the five members chosen by these regional Fed boards voted against taking further action to boost employment, while all five of the members chosen by the president and confirmed by the Senate voted to take the full-employment mandate seriously.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/news-f … atest_news
That's about right Olyhooh! The deck has been stacked against the American people. But they are messing with the wrong people. The American people are tired of the double talk from both side and are demanding a strip and search!
Now see, we could have saved them countless manhours pondering that. The American people already knew about the cozy relationship. I wonder how that slipped the notice of the government?
"It’s no coincidence that at the last meeting of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee, three of the five members chosen by these regional Fed boards voted against taking further action to boost employment, while all five of the members chosen by the president and confirmed by the Senate voted to take the full-employment mandate seriously."
So, the Prez and Senate are for full-employment!
That's good to know. Now, we just have to get the House on board....if it doesn't screw up their destroy-Obama plans, that is
by Evan G Rogers5 years ago
I've been told numerous times that "creating money out of thin air" is a good thing. And when I argued against it, the "conscience of the liberal" told me I was ignorant.Then, when I pointed out that...
by Moderndayslave5 years ago
This is just One reason we need to end the Fed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … dd4selSYE0
by Jack Lee12 days ago
Equal odds that the GDP will be better or worst...than projected...in the future.Thanks for that forward guidance.Spoken like a true politician.Where does she get her training? In Vegas?Is she qualified to run the Fed?
by SparklingJewel7 years ago
I have patched together from a letter i received in e-mail, the information about Audit the Federal Reserve by several congressional representatives. Some thought the FED was on its way out, but now Senator Dodd's new...
by rakuba6 years ago
Does Existence of the Federal Reserve Contradict Free Market?
by atomswifey7 years ago
I had nothing to do with this ryan guy getting banned and if I did in an inadvertent way as in him saying a personal attack and someone ELSE reporting him, than I am still not to blame now am I? I knew nothing of the...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.