Hubpages Poll : Obama For Second term : yes or no?

Jump to Last Post 1-45 of 45 discussions (156 posts)

64
pisean282311posted 12 years ago
Barack obama must get second term.yes or no?
reply report
1. 81
  manlypoetrymanposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Why do you feel the need to generate...yet another poll on this topic...if you are concerned about all things "India" according to your profile?
  reply report
  64
  pisean282311posted 12 years agoin reply to this
  @manly good question...because obama is president of only super power of the world....his election matters not just to usa but to the world..
  reply report
  0
  Phoebe Pikeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Everyone should get to know political leaders. Not just the ones in their country and area, but the world. It's only good to expand your knowledge of the world. It leads to better understanding and can only benefit you in the long run.
  
  Romney or Obama... I think I'll stick with a write-in of Audrey Dyment. But odds are, Obama will win because of his popularity. Romney doesn't have that strong of a fan base.
  reply report
  59
  beverleejbposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Hello, I voted for O'bama and I will again
  He does the job and we all should appreciate that!
  reply report
  75
  910chrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, we should get to know more about politics period. We should get to know more about our political leaders first, then worry about everyone else. We are in such bad shape here in America that we all need to wake up and use the freedoms we have, while we still have them.
  
  Will I vote for Barack Hussein Obama, hell no, he is just another puppet.
  reply report
  75
  910chrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I will not be voting for Mittens as well. There are just one in the same.
  reply report
  60
  Michelle Keiperposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's just a waste of a vote. Pick a side and support it. Need to help President Obama to stand up, go around or under to get it done. Show your support and vote Obama then tell him to fight.
  reply report
2. 64
  SparklingJewelposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  NO
  reply report
3. 70
  Karen Nposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  No!
  reply report
4. 60
  Paul Wingertposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes!
  reply report
5. 65
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes. Romney's values (money, multiple McMansions and Cadillacs) aren't what the country needs.
  reply report
  68
  Bob Zermopposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  +1 all the way.
  reply report
6. 61
  Moshkaposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Not a chance. He has done nothing to better the country, he constantly casts blame for his own short comings, he has hired incompetent czars, (some were even communists), he has no plan to stop the debt crisis, all of his economics proposals have been unanimously shot down by congress, and to top it off he wants to impose socialized medicine on us to add more problems to our crushing debt.
  
  He goes around the world apologizing and bowing to foreign leaders, job growth in America is at an all time low, and all he seems to be doing is promoting class warfare. The list of failures is stupendous, NDAA, the patriot act, Solyndra, etc.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  lol...boy are you misinformed. You may want to do some research before making many of those statements. And may I suggest, watch less fox news and more of the other news channels to come to your own conclusions.
  reply report
  61
  Moshkaposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  So none of that stuff happened huh. Perhaps you should switch over to something other than MSNBC.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Actually I watch all the news stations and come to my own conclusions, not brainswashed by any one or more news channels. So you're comfortable voting for Romneh, knowing he will most likely impliment the Ryan Plan? I keep hearing how's he's going to create jobs, but his track record as governor was terrible at best. If you believe in Trickle down, by all means vote Romney.
  reply report
  61
  Moshkaposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I would prefer to see the job go to a guy who doesn't plan on sinking the nation into deeper more crushing debt.
  And although his job creation record wasn't stupendous he did add two jobs for every person who migrated into the state, and the unemployment rate went down from 5.6 to 4.7 percent, whereas Obama is officially the welfare president.
  
  The philosophies of the current administrations policies are racking up trillions of unfunded and unfundable obligations to the nanny state that can never be paid off. And instead of providing a savings and payment plan they, along with congress, provide an orgy of additional spending that will be looked on by historians as the equivalent of a drunken orgy by desperately terrified, gutless libertens in the back room of a ship sinking in dark and icy waters.
  
  I'm sorry but I am unwilling to give up my freedom to a group of elitist, race baiting, dependency mongering, liberal hacks who guilted the country into voting for them using identity politics.
  
  "Stand firm, you boys from Maine. For not once in a century are men permitted to bear such responsibilities for Freedom and Justice; for God and Humanity as now placed upon you."
  
  Col. Chamberlain said this the day his regiment faced a force ten times their size, and today's battle for freedom against the radical left parallels the very same fight.
  reply report
7. 59
  Courtney_CollinsDposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No but he's the lesser if the two evils. Personally I'd love to see Ron Paul in office.
  reply report
8. 60
  American Viewposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Nope
  reply report
92
habeeposted 12 years ago
I'm voting for Romney.
reply report
1. 58
  Ron Montgomeryposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Since you're voting for Romney and I'm voting for Obama, why don't we just go get a beer and not waste time cancelling each other's vote. In fact, why don't we start a club where every Obama supporter pairs up with a Romney supporter on election day. The two can do whatever they want as long as they stay away from the polls.
  reply report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  DON'T DO IT RON! She'll slip you a mickey and run vote for the Mormon while you are passed out! But if you can get her to drink a few Shirley Temples, there's a very good chance she'll change her mind and both of you can go vote for Barack! Why do you think they call them "Cons"?
  
  reply report
  58
  Ron Montgomeryposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Her beerophobic remarks have settled the issue for me. The Grape Only Party is going down!!
  reply report
  59
  DannyMaioposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The true Racist feelings come out and I guess it is OK with you saying VOTE for the MORMON. Why so prejudice? Then you screen like a little girl when someone says something about Obama.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Will cupcakes be involved?? I don't drink beer. How 'bout a glass of wine?
  reply report
  58
  Ron Montgomeryposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't realize you were a beer hater. I'm not talking to you anymore.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  But Ron - think about it. That means more brews for you!
  reply report
  59
  beverleejbposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Hi Ron, Me too
  I believe in Obama
  It seems like some love to blame someone but I still believe in President Obama
  reply report
76
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
I think Romney would win in a landslide on Hub Pages.

I've never seen people defend highway robbery so much in my life.
It's actually looked on as fine when a guy makes 54 million dollars a year + stock options, etc....

And then say if prices go up on delivering services...the customers must bear the brunt! Never do they consider--maybe the CEO could take a cut in pay. Mind-Boggling to me!!

HP would go Right Wing all the way.
reply report
60
tobey100posted 12 years ago
No. Forget all the crap thrown by politicians and the media. The man has failed miserably by any measure other then charm which ain't working anymore. I'm for anyone else Dem or Rep. Couldn't do any worse.
reply report
1. 61
  Randy Godwinposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  And after you went and voted for him too! I don't blame you for feeling betrayed!! Just think, if McCain and Palin had won the election, there is a possibility Sarah could be running things now. You betcha!
  
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Um, I think McCain is still alive??
  reply report
2. 59
  beverleejbposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  We all have to vote and its not that easy
  We try to make sense of their comments about each other
  reply report
96
incomeguruposted 12 years ago
Although, a lot of people are criticising Obama administration, but with the power of incumbency to his advantage Obama will win.
reply report
58
Ron Montgomeryposted 12 years ago
reply report
1. 59
  beverleejbposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Great picture
  At least he is STILL smiling!!!
  reply report
58
Ron Montgomeryposted 12 years ago
reply report
1. 61
  ylime120posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I love that! and its totally expresses my opinion of him!
  reply report
64
maxoxam41posted 12 years ago
It is better to elect a puppet from the corporations versus a man of the corporations. Saddam Hussein was a puppet then he rebelled. A man born with a silver spoon never will! Roosevelt was the exception and will remain the exception.
reply report
0
idratherbeposted 12 years ago
Not knowing what Romney's stand is on anything, after all these months of ruining my tv schedule and annoying me by phone. I would vote for President Obama.
reply report
1. 64
  pisean282311posted 12 years agoin reply to this
  @idratherbe annoying u on phone
  reply report
61
mikelongposted 12 years ago
Don't worry...he'll find someone to drink with..

reply report
58
Ron Montgomeryposted 12 years ago
You're right...somehow I ALWAYS find someone to drink beer with.

GOOOOOOOOOOD BLESS A MERR IKA....
reply report
76
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
4 to 2 ---Romney winning. well, add me for Obama....4 to 3: Romney winning.
reply report
66
innersmiffposted 12 years ago
*raises hand* Ron Paul?
reply report
1. 59
  Courtney_CollinsDposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Amen to that.
  reply report
59
mocrowposted 12 years ago
Obama had his chance and I'm voting for Romney. I'm a college graduate and have been unable to find a job in this wonderful Obama economy. Healthcare careers are increasingly more difficult to obtain even with the appropriate education.

Go Romney! And Go..... Away Obama!
reply report
1. 0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  So you're in favor of the Ryan Plan? And your inability to find a job perhaps because the wealthy aren't investing in new businesses, just overseas. How is that President Obamas fault? When the Republicans seem to be only looking out for the interests of the wealthy.
  reply report
  60
  dzephaniahposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I want Obama out, Romney in. I had enough with socialism. It just doesn’t work. We will not go forward with higher taxes. I want to reduce the spending and the taxes. Why would any TAX PAYING citizen would want Obama? If you believe the stupid notion that Republicans care only for the wealthy, than you can believe anything.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Dzephaniah, so your're completely familiar with Romneys going with the Ryan Plan. I would suggest reading it.
  reply report
  59
  DannyMaioposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  When you tax the companies too much and put a lot of regulations, No body wants to start or grow a company! It truly is very simple. If you had had to work harder and risk your capital to make little or less...would you? If you were a business owner then you would realize what is happening.
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's not "simple" it's simplistic and based on Fox News propaganda and what business wants you to believe.
  
  Here are the facts . . .
  
  reply report
  59
  DannyMaioposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Economy 101. Very simple, sorry you need your MSNBC talking points. By the way I'm a registered Democrat. Most Democrats today have turned Socialist. I'm all for helping people who truly need it, not enabling people to depend on Government!
  
  Facts. Our poor today have Cars, Cell phones, Air condition, Video games, 2 Televisions with cable just to name a few, our poor today lives better than kings did a century ago!
  
  America has always been the land of opportunity! anyone ANYONE who truly wants to be successful can! too many people today want everything handed to them! this is not Europe! You want that move!
  reply report
  78
  Mighty Momposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Move to Europe, really?
  Any country in mind?
  Cuz the ones who have been struggling and went on austerity budgets are now worse off than before the austerity measures.
  And the ones that are steaming ahead are ... the socialist governments.
  
  So when you suggest to those who are incapable of achieving their American Dream in their home country, where exactly is it you would have us move to??
  Oh and do you happen to know the immigration requirements for said countries?
  We're not the only country that don't have an open border 'come on in the water's fine' policy. Or are you propose our citizens engage in illegal immigration into other people's countries? I'm sure they will just love that...
  reply report
  60
  Hollie Thomasposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Anyone would have to be insane to want to come to Europe in the present climate, truly. And as for Obama, his economic policies are being looked upon as a model for growth by sensible European politicians. They've tried austerity, which of course always goes hand in hand with a tax break for the richest and look what happens; stagnant economy, no growth and more austerity, then a bit more austerity...wait a minute, we need more austerity. It's like a permanent ground hog day scenario. If I was an American I'd definitely vote for Obama. If you people end up with Romney you'll be trying to survive in the US version of Greece.
  reply report
  59
  DannyMaioposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Really Socialist Europe is thriving??? I guess you have not heard of the crisis they are going through. Our treasury secretary just flew to Europe to see what can be done, most of Europe was down graded by the rating agencies...even France!
  
  Why are all major companies not in Europe? Is it because they tax too much? why India or China? can it be because they let the companies keep more of what they earn? Yes it is because in most of Europe they take 70% of your earning! the same reason many companies are leaving here for India and China also Mexico. Regulations are also another reason for leaving or not starting a business.
  
  If regulations and taxes were lower more jobs would be available and less people would be on assistance and more taxes would be collected but greedy politicians have to put more regulations and taxes and drive everyone away!
  
  In NY they just raised the taxes again another .50 cents on a pack of cigarettes! they claim it is for your health, which everyone knows is Bullshit! they need more money for their socialist policies!
  reply report
  60
  Hollie Thomasposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Uhumm..France has only just elected a socialist leader, the first one in years. Nobody in their right mind could refer to Sarkozy as a socialist, he is a conservative. Right wing coalition in the UK too. But that's irrelevant, everyone knows that it was JP Morgan, a few bent politicians and the Germans that have screwed Europe over, not socialists.
  reply report
  61
  Josakposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Well let's deal with this logically firstly it is necessary for my conscience to point out that there are no socialist countries in Europe and only one communist one (Belarus) France just elected a socialist president but France is not yet socialist and probably won't actually be in his term (socialism being defined as the government owning the means of production) however the most leftist countries in Europe are yes the ones doing best. Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Iceland etc. The only currently successful major European country that does not fit into that is Germany that is not quite as far to the left but certainly miles further to the left than Obama.
  
  So if you wish to define the leftist governments as socialist yes they are thriving compared to the US and the rest of Europe.
  
  Also as a business owner I disagree with all your assertions.
  reply report
  61
  Josakposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  By the INTERNATIONAL UN poverty line 15.5% of Americans live below the poverty line, poverty is defined as not being able to regularly afford food and or housing.
  reply report
61
Randy Godwinposted 12 years ago
Obama, of course! Mitt is a sh*t!

reply report
1. 59
  mocrowposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I still like mine better
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I like yours better, too, dear. Hey, you stole my avatar idea! I was using that pic of Brookalina just a few days ago!
  reply report
2. 92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  A thoughtful, reasoned response from the left.
  reply report
60
dzephaniahposted 12 years ago
I say: Obama out, Romney in.
Obama and the Democrats stand for noisy special interest groups, small minorities and socialism. Their policy is NOT the way to go for the country.
Romney and Republicans stand for prosperity and conservatism. Once we have prosperity, we will be able to help the other causes better. Not by taxing more. Conservatism will stop, or at list slow down, the downward road to lack of morality and corruption.
reply report
0
PrettyPantherposted 12 years ago
I'll be voting for Obama, but it won't make much difference unless we vote out the rigid ideologues in Congress.
reply report
1. 64
  pisean282311posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  @pretty hmmm
  reply report
2. 77
  Greekgeekposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  We are the Greek chorus and we agree.
  
  (I'm voting for Obama, but I'd also like a congress that didn't spend inauguration day drawing up an action plan which consisted of -- literally -- "Our job is not to govern, but to obstruct the president at every turn." There was actually a dinner among the GOP's top leadership where they mapped out this plan, and they've carried it out fairly effectively. It's a miracle anything got done at all.)
  reply report
59
janesixposted 12 years ago
Voting for president is a laughable waste of time.
reply report
66
innersmiffposted 11 years ago
A vote for Obama or Romney is a vote for Wall Street, perpetual war and the continued destruction of our liberties.
reply report
59
PhiMaths ATBposted 11 years ago
I would vote for Obama over Romney, but it strikes me as a bit mad that I may have to vote against the candidate I like less, rather than for a candidate who I actually support. That said, I will probably vote for a third party candidate just on principle. In answer to the main question though: Yes, Obama for a second term, but only because I hate him less...
reply report
78
Mighty Momposted 11 years ago
Is Alzheimers this widespread in America already? Or are they putting LSD in the water supply?
Do we really forget what it was like under Bush?
It wasn't that long ago.

Does anyone really think American companies are altruistic in nature, just waiting for their boy to be installed and they will flood our country with factories and well paying jobs with benefits?

Hallucinate on, my friends.
reply report
1. 60
  Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I remember it was pretty good under Bush, that is until the democrats took over the senate then a slow spiral to what we have now. Obama is a waste of time.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You'd have to go back further then that. It started the downward spiral with President Reagan.
  reply report
  60
  Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  80's were great for me, sorry bout your luck.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  President Reagan started the deregulations and the downward spin. Followed by more, with President Bush Sr, followed by President Clinton with NAFTA, President Bush jr more of the same, and now President Obama expected to fix it all in one term. Can't be done. Took decades to get us to this point. Romney will apply the Ryan Plan and we won't spiral down, we will crash land!
  reply report
  60
  Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I don't expect Obama to fix anything he's a moron.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  How can that be? A moron is a name and location in the book of mormon. He's a Christian. Sure you're not referring to Romney?
  reply report
  60
  Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Nope, talking about the moron AKA Barrack Hussein Obama.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No as I mentioned above, he's Christian not mormom. And his true title is President Barrack Hussein Obama. First President to attempt to undo the messes created by the previous Presidents, starting with President Reagan up to and including President Bush jr. Both parties are responsible for this mess.
  reply report
  60
  Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  How is spending more money than all previous Presidents combined fixing the problem? In four years he has just put us deeper in debt, I guess to some credit rating company using their goofy ass formulas we may be better off, in the real world we're just screwed. Keep on with the party line.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The middle class income has declined since Reagan. Meaning it flatlined while the income level of the wealthy increased beyond belief. And you want someone who says he will impliment the Ryan Plan? Read the Ryan Plan and get back with me about Romneys plan. Romney claims to be the business man with a plan? His track record back when running for governor was 10,000 jobs created, 47th in the country. Now using his same math it went from 10,000 to 100,000 or so Romney says. He's not a job creator he's a job destroyer with one direction in mind, make more money for the investors at the expense of the worker and the taxpayer picking up the tab for all those jobs lost.
  reply report
2. 85
  gmwilliamsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  A resounding applause! At least, President Obama cares and is making reforms. Romney has his head up his $%$!#^%! and just doesn't gave a good #$%!#!#~@#$~! about the American people! Bush was the worst milennial president thus far. He used the issue of terrorism as a subterfuge to invade Iraq. He escalated wars to divert the American people from social and economic issues. He started the unemployment crisis, surreptitiously giving leeway to big corporations. He also "fudged" the votes in his favor! To conclude, he created massive debt need I say more! President Obama is cleaning the mess that Bush created!
  reply report
59
Druid Dudeposted 11 years ago
Re-elect Obama. It is very risky to change horses in the middle of the river.
reply report
1. 78
  Mighty Momposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  But... didn't we hear that same argument in 2004?
  reply report
  59
  Druid Dudeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Uhhh...isn't Romney a republican? Seen one, seen 'em all. Not a democrat either. We got a choice between bad and worse. If Romney would promise to return all native american antiquities last in the possesion of the Mormons, maybe I could change my mind.
  reply report
  78
  Mighty Momposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes. He sure is.
  Romney has been described by one of our illustrious hubbers as "Bush on steroids."
  I believe one of his platform agenda items is to return the golden plates.
  reply report
60
Repairguy47posted 11 years ago
By the way, the Book of Moron?
reply report
60
Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years ago
What fiction and propaganda these right-wing fabricators spew.

Here are the facts rather than the falsehoods you need to know.

It's either Obama or the death of our American democracy and the middle-class.

reply report
1. 60
  American Viewposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If there is anyone alive during Carters term and thinks GDP was almot 12%, I got a great bridge for you to purchase
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Changes in debt by political affiliation [source: Wikipedia]
  
  The President proposes the budget for the government to the US Congress. Congress may change the budget, but it rarely appropriates more than what the President requests.
  
  Economist Mike Kimel notes that the five former Democratic Presidents (Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Lyndon B. Johnson, John F. Kennedy, and Harry S. Truman) all reduced public debt as a share of GDP, while the last four Republican Presidents (George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Gerald Ford) all oversaw an increase in the country's indebtedness.
  
  Economic historian J. Bradford DeLong, former Clinton Treasury Department official, observes a contrast not so much between Republicans and Democrats, but between Democrats and "old-style Republicans (Eisenhower and Nixon)" on one hand (decreasing debt), and "new-style Republicans" on the other (increasing debt).
  
  David Stockman, director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan, as op-ed contributor to the New York Times, blamed the "ideological tax-cutters" of the Reagan administration for the increase of national debt during the 1980s.
  
  Bruce Bartlett, former domestic policy adviser to President Ronald Reagan and Treasury official under President George H.W. Bush, attributes the increase in the national debt since the 1980s to the policy of "starve the beast".
  
  While noting that that George H.W. Bush's budget deal was one of the main reasons for improvement in fiscal situation in 1990s and ultimately for budget surplus, Bartlett is highly critical of George W. Bush for creating budget deficits by reducing taxes and increasing spending.
  
  AV, take particular note of "Federal spending, federal debt, and GDP"
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of … ublic_debt
  reply report
  60
  American Viewposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Again wiz, find someone who lived and paid their bills during Carter will tell you GDP was not 12%
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I lived during that period and paid taxes and I was trained for my job by the federal CETA program and you, sir, are being devious with the facts.
  reply report
  60
  American Viewposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Everyone knows that Stagflation was occurring under the Carter term, Right Wiz.
  
  "In economics, stagflation is a situation in which the inflation rate is high and the economic growth rate slows down and unemployment remains steadily high".
  
  Economic slow growth means low GDP, not 12%
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  More deviousness and phony misniformation about history through your blinkered eyes of trickle-down.
  
  You got nuttin' but a Darwinian belief in Greed!
  
  The facts:
  
  reply report
60
logic,commonsenseposted 11 years ago
None so blind as those who will not see.
obama will take this country to it's depths if he is reelected. He doesn't know any better and he will not listen to anything but the ka-ching of campaign contributions. He will attack and attack and attack because he has very little to show for all his massive spending and lack of leadership. He is owned by the chicago mob and he fights just as dirty as they do. He has no real character, he is truly just another empty suit. Look at his record. Look at what he promised when he was running for his first term. If you have your eyes open and are willing to see him for what he really is, you will not walk, you will run to your polling booth and vote against him. Doesn't matter who else you vote for, this country will be severely damaged by another obama term.
reply report
1. 0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  None so blind as those Republicans who will not see that Romney will bring them back to trickle down economics that hasn't worked in the past and will bring this country down. Romney would be a 1 percent president for the wealthy. Read the Ryan Plan, that's Romney's answer. Some wanted President Obama out since day one, before he had a chance, maybe because he was black? Oh, no some say, I not racist, I even have a black friend! lmao Yeah Right!lol
  reply report
76
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Redicky.

I'm today reminded of a John and Yoko song: War is over if you want it......

No more war in Afghanistan either. No more war in Iraq.

And unless you want war with Iran....you'd better vote Obama!
reply report
0
Longhunterposted 11 years ago
No. We can't take another four years of Barack Hussein Obama.

I'll be voting for Romney.
reply report
41
Cleancloverposted 11 years ago
Barack Obama' s policy favours India a lot. Hopefully the American citizens would elect him for the second term.
reply report
62
prettydarkhorseposted 11 years ago
Obama - yes for second term!!
reply report
59
DannyMaioposted 11 years ago
NO Obama Is worthless! Socialism doesn't work!
reply report
1. 61
  ylime120posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No matte how worthless he is, we must also look at our other option, a guy who was head of Massachusetts while employment rates dropped them to last in the nation (info via Mighty Mom)
  reply report
0
Apology4Wolvesposted 11 years ago
Yes. Maybe he's learned a thing or two by now.
reply report
65
Ralph Deedsposted 11 years ago
Electing a businessman president is actually a lousy idea, according to Timothy Eagan:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/20 … y_20120601
reply report
1. 60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
60
Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years ago
Romney's Massachusetts Record . . .

http://youtu.be/PlnaYOv0DZY
reply report
76
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
FeeFee and ChopChop.....all so the very rich will not be touched.

It's deranged elitism.

A gvt of the corp, for the corp and by the corp.....a complete reversal of the ideals we stand for.

"Give me your tired, your poor, your hungry......

I'll spit on em" (Lou Reed)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z3TPwOT … re=related

For you Mittens: with Love, lmc:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsKwqr2S … re=related
reply report
58
lj gonyaposted 11 years ago
Politics aside, the bottom line is that the U.S. is a major corporation and we are all the shareholders. If the CEO is not doing a good job, using the position for self promotion, throwing away the company money, and failing to represent the company around the world in a positive light, he (or she) needs replaced.
reply report
1. 60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's utterly simplistic and rash thinking.
  
  It's like blaming a new sea captain who has been given a neglected ship after it's been capsized by a Tsunami—the boat is still afloat and he's given orders to a mutinous crew to make repairs in a becalmed sea. The crew needs to be thrown over the side and a better one voted in come Fall!
  
  Besides, a country isn't a corporation— a corporation is a business and a country is not a business.
  
  No wonder America is going to hell in a hand-basket—its citizens are no longer capable of critical thinking—they can only criticize because they're afraid, angry and unaware of the facts!
  reply report
  58
  lj gonyaposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, it is simplistic. Those in power are given the enormous responsibility of taking the taxpayer's money and investing it for the common good, something that this administration is totally ignorant of. There are a lot of us doing a hell or a lot of critical thinking, unfortunately, those who are locked into the promises and unrealistic expectations brought on by liberal hogwash are locked out of any intelligent conversation on the subject.
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Sadly, gonya, you prove my point. Obama has indeed tried to invest in our country with all kinds of infrastructure bills that a Tea Party Congress has blocked for the last two years.
  
  Instead of epithets and opinions that parrot Fox Propaganda, why don't you come up with some factual rebuttals that disprove the fact that we have an obstructionist bunch of Republicans who are out to demonize a hardworking president who is trying to do what many past and honest Republican's once agreed to.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  @Wizard of Whimsy, you are speaking on deaf Fox News ears. When people have on blinders, no matter what you say, they can only see what's in front of them. They hate to admit the economy and jobs is on an upswing. But is it blinders and fox news? Or hatred for an African American President, since the day he was elected? The Republicans since the day of his inaugaration have plotted to get rid of him at any cost!
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  58
  lj gonyaposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Wow - Obama supporters talking about Republicans wearing blinders. Do you hear how pathetic you sound. Same old, same old. Poor hard working President is a victim of the mean conservatives, Fox News, and those who are against him because of his skin color. Your needle's stuck. And by the way, he inherited a damaged ship and burned it to the water line.
  reply report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I know gonya, it's tough to deal with the facts, but where are your facts? All you can do is parrot Rush and expect people to believe the lies.
  
  The Republicans obstructed, blocked and even boasted that they would to do everything they could to defeat Obama the very first week he was elected.
  
  Now you're in denial but you aren't kidding anyone; you are the ones with the stuck needle.
  
  Trickle-Down Mitty is sellin' the same snake-oil that GWB was pushing.
  
  reply report
  61
  Glammorgrammyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's what I say. From day one.
  reply report
  65
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Remarkable likeness of the Mittster.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Gonya, I'm sorry you must not have listened close enough. Rush and Fox News didn't say President Obama inherited a damaged ship. They said a shipwreck laying on the bottom of the ocean! lol
  reply report
  61
  Glammorgrammyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Growing Barnacles, it had already been down there a long time. If Rep's get it back, it will be a train wreck this time.
  reply report
  58
  lj gonyaposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If you want facts, you don't need to watch the news. Look around you. I could, and have researched facts, but the right already knows them and the left couldn't care less. All Americans want what's best for the country. And, if I wasn't one of the those scary conservatives I'd complete the old expression as to what opinions are like, and that everyone has one. Proud that in this country we can still feel free to voice those opinions, and in the long run, that is what we are all fighting for, (well, that and some good old fashioned common courtesy and decency). Good luck with your fight. God bless.
  reply report
  65
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Here's a clear explanation of where we are now and how we got there from a Nobel Prize economist.
  
  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/04/opini … ef=opinion
  reply report
  75
  910chrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I saw NYtimes and already knew how biased it would be in Obama's favor. Then I decided I could be wrong as I just displayed my own form of bias right away towards the NYtimes.
  
  Low and behold when I do read the article, it turns out to be exactly what I thought it would be. To be fair, I don't like CupCakes either, but try another source instead of such a legendary pro Democrat paper.
  reply report
  78
  Uninvited Writerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I guess you would rather rely on The Blaze or Fox News? The New York Times while it is editorially connected to the Democratic party is still one of the most respected newspapers in the world. A paper does not show it's fairness by only having negative stories about the president, and the New York Times has. Funny when some conservatives complain about the bias of the New York Times but link to articles that are not positive from the same paper.
  
  It is an interview with a Nobel Prize winning economist...they don't give those out for no reason.
  reply report
  59
  DannyMaioposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  NY times Respected????? That is almost as bad as a Nancy Pelosi speech! Too funny
  
  That paper will close very shortly! I live in NY and even the liberals know that paper is full of $hit! I rather read the enquirer!
  report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  
  report
  78
  Uninvited Writerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I thought you already did...
  report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  LOL!
  report
  59
  DannyMaioposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  so when something is the truth you try to bash people? Very classy! just what I expected!
  report
  60
  Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Biased opinion isn't "truth" Danny.
  report
  65
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I wonder if Danny can actually read!
  report
  62
  prettydarkhorseposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  
  report
  61
  Glammorgrammyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Is that what you call damaged? I would hate to be in the boat that you are the captain of.
  reply report
2. 74
  Reality Bytesposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You will have a difficult time getting the majority of individuals to accept this truth!
  reply report
60
Michelle Keiperposted 11 years ago
1st. I think it is sad that Obama is getting the bad rep when none of it was his fault to begin with. 2nd. You can not make things better without cooperation. No one wanted to cooperate just because they didn't want Obama to be Pres. For no other reason than that. Who suffers? Us. I'll be voting Yes.
reply report
1. 0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I will be voting yes for the exact same reason! Hate, biogatry, and racism is running rampant in this country. I feel like it's the 60's all over again. Instead of forging ahead, we're going backwards.
  reply report
  61
  Glammorgrammyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You know when sights are set to destroy a person from day one there is more going on than meets the eye. I fully agree with your comment.
  reply report
  75
  910chrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  We are the first "white" country to elect a "black president". So no, this is not the "60's all over again". Do you really think at any other time we would have elected a black president? There has always been hate and racism, not just in this country, but the world as a whole.
  reply report
  60
  tobey100posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Nothing to do with hate, bigotry or race. Even if the guy was Chinese he'd still be incompetent.
  reply report
  0
  screamingposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, just the opposite! It is hate, bigotry and race. New, younger voters got President Obama voted. The young are color blind, unlike most voters my age and older.
  reply report
  60
  tobey100posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Is this the same younger voters that can't find Utah on a map of the U.S.? Thought so.
  reply report
  75
  910chrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I was going to write a response, but after looking at what screaming wrote, I just started screaming at the walls, I think they get it.
  reply report
60
Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years ago
This is a humorous and informative bipartisan look at just how bad the toxic political environment and governmental dysfunction has gotten . . .

Part 1

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-j … share_copy

Part 2

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-j … share_copy
reply report
53
knowingispowerposted 11 years ago
To anyone that doesn't appreciate Obama:

We'll trade you Harper for Obama. We'll even throw in McGinty-two for one but you're really getting the raw end of the deal. I really wish that we had a politician like Obama here in Canada. We already have the healthcare-making his job a little easier. Harper and McGinty are in the process of undermining our unions and they're all for the wealthy. When Harper came into power our country had a surplus. Now that he's created a deficit, he wants the average citizen to pay for it and some of his ways for accomplishing this is by eliminating jobs, attacking the teaching profession and special education programs, etc. When Obama came into power, Bush had created a mess for your country. Obama has worked hard for the average citizen-he's tried to give you healthcare (read some of the stats for the life expectancy, etc. for the people of your country compared to other countries-it's a crime considering the fact that you're one of the richest countries in the world). Obama also wants the rich in your country to give a little back in order to create jobs for the poor and the middle classes. As stated, (in Canada) Harper is doing the opposite-he wants to take from the poor and middle classes in order to keep the rich in tack. If you elect Romney, you'll be in the same boat as we are with Harper. Then again, perhaps we could persuade Obama to come to Canada and run for office.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  There are a growing number of Americans who would gladly and willingly give you Obama in a New York Minute. However, you must understand, Obama's ideology and style of governing is more suited for places like Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea where they have dictators rather than elected presidents or prime ministers.
  
  That being said, I'm one American who would be happy to let you have Barack Hussein Obama ASAP.
  
  Please note I didn't mention leadership as the man couldn't lead a thirsty horse to a full water trough.
  reply report
  78
  Uninvited Writerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Ridiculous
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, Barack Hussein Obama's presidency is ridiculous.
  reply report
2. 65
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You got it right.
  reply report
60
Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years ago
reply report
61
JSChamsposted 11 years ago
Hey why not? i mean he is so good with foriegn affairs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNRXGRFJ … plpp_video
reply report
60
spbarton21posted 11 years ago
Two letters N - O. He domestic and foreign policy has driven this country so far into debt so quickly that we will never be able to pay the debt off to a point where it is manageable. He has done nothing but place this country in a downward spiral in the world
reply report
60
Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years ago

reply report
59
Brie Hoffmanposted 11 years ago
NO
reply report
60
Wizard Of Whimsyposted 11 years ago
reply report
0
screamingposted 11 years ago
Some are either misinformed or in denial! Here's a few examples of why you "Should like what you call Obamacare!"
1. You will have coverage regardless of pre-existing conditions.
2. Your insuror can't drop you if you get sick.
3. Your policy WILL NOT have a "Lifetime Cap."
4. Children can stay on their parents plan until age 26.
5. You will get a rebate if your insurance company doesn't spend at least 80% of your premiums on actual care.

I can go on and on about additional medicare and medicaid and the like benefits, but hopefully you get the idea now!
reply report
1. 65
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Good information. The Affordable Care Act isn't perfect, but it's a big step forward. Obama deserves a lot of credit for accomplishing a major health care reform bill which Truman and every subsequent Democratic president tried but was unable to accomplish.
  reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Hubpages Poll : Obama For Second term : yes or no?

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Hubpages Poll : Obama For Second term : yes or no?

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies