jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (14 posts)

This IS an Act of TREASON!

  1. Cagsil profile image61
    Cagsilposted 4 years ago
    1. Josak profile image61
      Josakposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Actually I think it's great, there is nothing wrong with becoming signatories to international treaties and regulations and they do not supersede the constitution nor the legislature that article is alarmist nonsense as a quick look through will easily show.

      "if we were to allow ourselves to be disarmed by these international soviet socialists, the next step would be to eliminate everyone who refuses to acquiesce to collective slavery."

      totally rational people

      1. Cagsil profile image61
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Coming from someone who apparently isn't rational. Thank you for your input.

        1. colpolbear profile image89
          colpolbearposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          ^Don't take Josak's comment personally.  He wasn't saying that you're irrational, but merely defending those he thought to be in the right.  If anything, you're the one being hostile.

          Furthermore, the article was extremely biased.  Right from the start, opinion spewed every sentence.

          1. Cagsil profile image61
            Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Oh okay. Good to know.

            1. TomBlalock profile image83
              TomBlalockposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              Yep. I agree with Colpolbear and Josak. That article was rubbish. No sourcing, citations, or explanations, just fearmongering and rhetoric. Mind you, I dislike what Obama is doing, and he is attempting to use treaty law to effect changes on our own laws, but that article isn't going to give you a factual look at what he is really doing.

              1. Cagsil profile image61
                Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                Oh okay.

    2. psycheskinner profile image80
      psycheskinnerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Perhaps you could link to a story that actually says what the treaty does or the actual text of the treaty.  Because I can't think of a single potential way for international treaties to trump a nations own laws.

    3. paradigmsearch profile image89
      paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Hey, Cags. I know what you mean as to our concern about subordinating ourselves to the United Nations. I went and read the actual executive order. Fortunately, this latest order still does not do that. It says, in part:

      "Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;"

      and

      "(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person."

      .

      In other words, we can still tell another country to go f*ck themselves whenever we want.

      1. Josak profile image61
        Josakposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Precisely but of course you won't find the article mentioning that, as far as it's concerned we are all about to be exterminated for not not saluting the supreme overlord , it's the archetype of stupid journalism and we should know better than to take it as anything more than a joke.

      2. Cagsil profile image61
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Oh okay.

    4. Pollyannalana profile image79
      Pollyannalanaposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Please do a hub on this, I will help keep it circulating. We have to stop this man!

      1. Cagsil profile image61
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Hey Polly, an article is already being devised as a petition to remove Congress and the President. There will obviously be stipulations for how it occurs, but that will be ironed out at a later time.

  2. Dame Scribe profile image61
    Dame Scribeposted 4 years ago

    I can understand the need to reduce conflicts with jurisdictions and laws since FN's run into lots of that lol but this article tongue sorry, not enough truth but a lot of ranting hmm

Closed to reply
 
working