jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (10 posts)

how long before justice roberts is called a socialist?

  1. wetbaknproud profile image75
    wetbaknproudposted 4 years ago

    the right wing nut talking heads are stunned by the supreme court ruling and by justice roberts' position in particular. How long before they start calling him a traitor and a socialist?

    1. PrettyPanther profile image85
      PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      It didn't take long. 

      “And Roberts? Really? I expect this of Kennedy but him? Yet another stealth socialist/statist as other contributors have pointed out,” added a commenter at Michelle Malkin’s blog.

      http://www.politico.com/news/stories/06 … z1z8h37E13

      Edited to add: That is a commenter, not a talking head, but one of them will do it soon, if they haven't already.

      1. mio cid profile image61
        mio cidposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        wow so michelle malwebkin spearheaded the attack, limbaugh ,hannity, and levin contained themselves today they stopped just short of calling him a socialist but i guess they'll make up for it tomorrow.

        1. wetbaknproud profile image75
          wetbaknproudposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          michael savage said justice roberts  was impaired by  anti epilepsy medication thats why he sided with the majority

          1. Ron Montgomery profile image61
            Ron Montgomeryposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Will his meds still be covered?

            1. mio cid profile image61
              mio cidposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              both these guys have no worries about affording their meds

  2. JBrumett profile image61
    JBrumettposted 4 years ago

    I'm pretty sure some people called him a socialist after his nomination didn't they?

    1. wetbaknproud profile image75
      wetbaknproudposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      No, he was supposed to be along with the other conservative justices the backbone of a supreme court that would rule 5 to 4 in  lockstep with whichever was the  republican position on any given matter.

      1. JBrumett profile image61
        JBrumettposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        I don't know what books you read, but Justices don't rule based on party affiliations.  =-P  Thanks for the reply.

        1. wetbaknproud profile image75
          wetbaknproudposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          they shouldn't ,but the mindset in the head of the right wing nuts was , these are our guys they can't possibly rule against us.

 
working