Does Sex Differ in Circumcised and Uncircumcised Men

For a woman, I think that sex with an uncircumcised man is better.

There is movement of the foreskin against the outer labia which for me, is evident.

Also, having just one uncircumcised partner in my life makes the appearance of his penis more exciting to me. He is unlike the other men that I have been with.

I found that the glans without sheath can be painful. Perhaps it is actual, perhaps it is imaginary. Matters not to me: I am thrilled with my partner and his organ. I say no genital mutilation!

As a female there is no difference during sex if he is circumcised or not, we wouldn't feel any difference. We can only tell they are different when we look at it, but the performance has the same feeling for both for a woman.

THEORITICAL ANSWER:

Circumcised men advantages:

1) Less sensitive prepuce, hence longer duration of sex

2) Cleaner & less smelly prepuce.

3) Greater friction due to "ring-like" edge of the glans

Uncircumcised men advantages:

1) Extra "skin" rich in nerve endings , hence extra "orgasmic delight"

2) No Genetic mutilation ( no associated trauma)

3) Better Shape of the organ due to the sheath ( Debatable)

Maybe ladies who have experienced both can answer better.

Hi dear shinujohn...

Yes, it differs. To experience the difference, you need to do it (that is do it before and after circumcised) :LOL:

I can not speak for all men. But i will say yes if you were uncircumcised then as time went on you decided to get circumcised. Then you will know the difference. This is possible the better answer until a man who has done that tells you.