Are future generations going to look back on those against marriage between gay people....
the same way we now look back on those against interracial marriage years ago? Isn't it exactly the same thing? So will it likely result in the same type of view 40 years from now, or is something special about this time that makes it different?
Truly a marvelous question. Perhaps it will cause reflection that is very healthy. I can already look back at myself. I was never against two folks of the same sex being together as a couple. But I chaffed against calling it marriage. Hey that was for us heterosexuals to destroy, make mockery of and generally disrespect ;-)
But through time me, myself and I came to realize that it was more a matter about that damned piece of paper. Sure I thought it was inconsequential and really a contract with the state and not each other. It became obvious that "white privilege" was little different than "marriage privilege". I am glad I am no longer an ignorant pig when it comes to this subject.
But I already hold my old self with ignorance based bias in ridicule. A lesson earned. So I sure hope that folk look back on us as a society with some head wagging and disdain. I hope they view us as idiots in this regard. I just am glad that it won't be my face in the picture when they read about it in texts.
Yes, I think it will be like that. I look at how things were when I went to high school: there wasn't a single student who was openly gay, even though now, almost 40 years later, many of my former classmates are out and proud. Students in that same high school now are more open about their sexual orientation, and being gay just isn't that big a deal. Those kids are going to be parents in a few years, and their children will wonder what the heck their grandparents were thinking, making such a fuss over something that seems so boring to them. They'll live in a word where nobody gets turned away at the county clerk's office, simply because of ignorance and fear.
I see that the current headline is that a Judge ordered her locked up. The County Clerk, that is.
Yes, Ms. Davis is in jail until she decides to do her job. Instead of grandstanding and pretending to be persecuted, why doesn't she just resign and get a job more along lines that fit her religious beliefs?
Happy so many are able to be open now, but there is a long way to go. I hope my children see a generation of kinder people. Happy to see the clerk, and maybe her son will be going to jail! They are there to do the people's work, no place for religion
Hmmm, I'm not keeping up w/ this story! Her son? He works there too? Ah, I see It's a family affair. Maybe she divorced 3 men because they wouldn't go to church wi/ her? #4 should probably be the Pastor.
I read her son is also employed there and while the other people who work there said they would issue the licenses while clerk was in jail, son said he would not. Don't take my word, story was in FB feed, unsure of accuracy.
The future generations would probably wonder of many past generations' reasonings; they even might think " what a weird people those before us, they even admitted that " gay " people could compose a " marriage.'' Or the future generation might not even like it when "gay" begin '' making babies" , and they might have be much different then " we are.'' Or perhaps the future generation would be witnessing a great interference of the Creator who always " rewarding " submissive to His principles as well those who go against His universal principles... It happened before and the results were not so nice for some...
None of what you just said makes any sense to me at all.
I read your comment 3 x's...slowly. I'm gonna have to agree with Austin. I kept repeating, "HUH????" That's not good.
To summarize:
Blah blah gay marriage is a sin blah blah gay people can't have babies blah blah marriage belongs between a man and a woman because God said so blah blah blah
The damning/rewarding threats never worked for me. Also Leviticus is not followed by Christians unless it is the part said to be about gays. If anyone should be using it I would think it would be Jews. I really don't understand picking and choosing.
Thank you Austinstar, you might be right...--PAULA, Your sincerity is much appreciated. Bless you....-- ALME, very interesting respond isn't it ?
It was in 1967 the Supreme Court invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage in "Loving v. Virginia"; which pitted an interracial couple – 17-year-old Mildred Jeter, who was black, and her childhood sweetheart, 23-year-old white construction worker, Richard Loving – against Virginia's "miscegenation" laws banning marriage between black and whites.
After marrying in Washington, D.C. and returning to their home state in 1958, the couple was charged with (unlawful cohabitation) and jailed.
It's now 2015 with passage of 48 years it now seems almost impossible to believe in the United States it was ever {against the law} for blacks and white couples to marry let alone cohabitate!
Yes I believe that 40 or 50 years from now children living today will wonder why it was ever against the law for two adults to marry the person they loved. Especially when they learn it was not against the law to be gay or for them to love and cohabitate with each other.
With all the pressing issues taking place in the country it's hard to imagine why the government would want to tell Sue she can't marry Tammy in a country that espouses (separation of church and state).
Laws forbidding interracial and same sex marriage are discriminatory.
It really isn't logical is it? The fact that being gay or cohabitation was never illegal, yet people doing something completely legal were/are discriminated against when it comes to marriage. I agree, more important issues they could be working on.
Aww go ahead peeples, you can hit my age. In fact pretty girl, one day you WILL hit it!! LMAO! Yes, poor Kim is behind bars & this is far from the end of her troubles. She needs to understand a whole LOT!
peeples.....My generation (boomers) need only go back as far as our teens......which for most of us is a bit more than 40 years (we have our 50th. HS reunion coming up....gasp!)
I will not repeat some of the terrible, gruesome names & attitudes toward gays at that time.
In addition to that bias, a "pregnancy" was literally HORRIFYING, DISGRACEFUL, SINFUL....OH LORD, FOR SHAME! The poor young woman was sent away, hidden and made to feel like a complete harlot! SHAME ON THAT ATTITUDE.
Gosh...only one generation later, a bride & groom included their children in their wedding party!
Straying from or worse, changing the Religion of your family & upbringing made you a nasty rebel with a possible mental defect. This actually meant that children from that era were denied their freedom of religion choice at birth! (I suppose a lot of that still remains, but the stigma has long since been ignored.)
A divorce was the wearing of a sad label. You were failures, damaged goods, selfish & unfit for re-marriage.....
An inter-racial marriage got one literally kicked out of their family, shunned and possibly ridiculed out of town on the next coach leaving for the other side of the Country.
Foolish? To say the very least. We grow, we change, live & learn. As Maya Angelieu is quoted continually for having said it so beautifully,
"When we KNOW better....we DO better." That applies to just about anything we can discuss, wouldn't you say? Peace, Paula
I think some people are a little more critical of out of wedlock babies and mixed marriages, and divorce, than you might think after all this time, but otherwise I'm with you all the way. Agree.
As usual Au fait, no argument from me on UR "exceptions." Just seems to me that "those" people have become much less VOCAL and/or publicly judgmental in terms of their criticism ( for simple self protection! LOL) Then there are the unflinching, yes!
Wow, I don't believe I could have said it better. I am glad you are a generation ahead of me and have the views you do (no hit on your age I promise). Progress happens, it's amazing! Learning, and changing. 2 good things! Happy about the clerk BTW.
Paula, those people tend to hang together like birds of a feather, so anyone not of same mind might think they had gone away, and yes, in general their voices are more muted, but not amongst themselves.
LOL, Au fait...I just happen to KNOW a few of them. Rest my Mom's soul, she was a DOOZY! She had hard core opinions & beliefs and if U were in earshot...you KNEW what they were!! Never changing, but it was all good!
I sure hope so! It would mean that it's truly considered to be normal and the outdated, unfair bias against gay people will be (mostly) a thing of that past. That would be pretty amazing.
by Brad 8 years ago
What actual problems were resolved by the SC decision on Gay Marriage?Be specific, as to the problem and the solution.Equal rights is just to vague as an answer to this question.
by Grace Marguerite Williams 8 years ago
How do you feel about marriage equality? For? Against? Why?
by paarsurrey 12 years ago
Messenger Prophets like Noah, Jonah, Jesus had a Message from the Creator-God for the mankind. If they have been in our times; what methods they would have adopted so that the Message reaches to every person of the world.Jesus moved in different localities and villages; and in those times; people...
by andrew savage 11 years ago
Is it appropriate to call it interfaith marriage or interracial marriage when it is outer?Is it appropriate to call it interfaith marriage or interracial marriage when such marriages are between two individuals with different backgrounds? This also brings up the question: Why is there a...
by Dot 7 years ago
Is gay slowly becoming the new straight ??It seems like views are being shoved down the throats of today's adolescent.
by David Zephaniah 11 years ago
Democrats and media claim that most of the people in America support gay marriage. I believe that it is the other way around, and most of the people do not agree with that, including me.I believe that this insults the marriage institution, which is only between man and woman. Do you agree or...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |