Can a Buddhist Monk Be President?

Strange things are happening. I just read - at

http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=43,8748,0,0,1,0

- that a Buddhist monk in Sri Lanka, Battaramulle Seelaratana Thera, intends to run for president in the country next January.

It's the first time in the country this has happened, and there are very good reasons it hasn't happened before, if you consider how a Buddhist monk is supposed to behave, and the example of the Buddha himself.

According to tradition, the Buddha had been born a prince and destined to inherit the throne from his father; but had actually run away from home to avoid this "honour", as he thought power and wisdom can't be combined.

The Venerable Battaramulle Seelaratana Thera seems to do exactly the opposite.

When the Buddha organized the first Buddhist community, he did it in such a way that the monks should concentrate at their training in ethics, concentration and wisdom. For their physical survival, they should be completely dependent on the laity, who could give them alms if they thought the monks deserved it, nothing if they didn't.

So all economical matters were to be the business of the laymen.

Which means a Buddhist monk can't sit in a political body deciding about economical matters.

At least if he respects the code of his own behaviour.

Not all do. A group of monks have actually managed to join the Sri Lankan parliament. I don't know if this is against the letter of their rules, the Vinaya, but it certainly is against its spirit.

Now, a Buddhist monk does not need to remain a monk for life. He can revert to lay life whenever he wishes to, and then he won't be bound by the monks' rules any more, and there is no pope whose permission he must ask for.

But he must be either or; he can't both keep the rice and curry and eat it. If a monk first disrobes and then candidates for parliament or the presidency, this is all right; but if he tries to become an MP or a President while still a monk, that is very wrong.

In the Tibetan tradition, this principle has been forgotten long ago, as witnessed by the institution of the Dalai Lama, who - with all respect for the personality of the present DL - is actually not quite a monk as long as he is leading a government, even if it is just a government in exile.

But the Theravada tradition of South and South East Asia takes a pride in being more orthodox than the Tibetans, Chinese and Japanese.

So perhaps the Lankans should try to understand there own tradition a little better.

And not vote for people who dress like monks while behaving like laymen.

See also my earlier hubs

http://hubpages.com/hub/Buddhist-king-is-violating-Buddhist-ethics
http://hubpages.com/hub/Progressive-Buddhists-in-Trouble
http://hubpages.com/hub/More-About-Religious-Policy-in-Vietnam
http://hubpages.com/hub/Still-More-About-Religious-Policy-in-Vietnam
http://hubpages.com/hub/Buddhist-Imprimatur
http://hubpages.com/hub/What-Is-a-Buddhist-King

Comments 8 comments

vrajavala profile image

vrajavala 6 years ago from Port St. Lucie

A president of any country is responsible for the national security of his country at any time, and, therefore, must be ready to make war at any time. Obviously, that is incompatible with the vows of a monk.

Basically, what this person is doing is falling down from their once elevated position.


Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor 6 years ago from Oxford

Personally I look forward to the day when the Dalai Lama becomes the spiritual head of China ! Now that would be a turn up for the books :-)


vrajavala profile image

vrajavala 6 years ago from Port St. Lucie

A president of any country must have as one of his/her foremost priorities, the national security of the country. That means the possibility of going to war at any time. If he gives up his monkhood, then he is descending to a lower platform.


Gunnar Gällmo profile image

Gunnar Gällmo 6 years ago from Stockholm Author

If the Dalai Lama became "spiritual head" of China, would that mostly change China, or would it mostly change him? Perhaps he understands this problem himself - he doesn't seem to be in a hurry to get back to Potala...


Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor 6 years ago from Oxford

I don't know Gunnar, I just like to amuse myself with the thought - the world is a strange place and often you end up getting the exact opposite of what you planned, so I think the Chinese should be careful what they wish for.


Gunnar Gällmo profile image

Gunnar Gällmo 6 years ago from Stockholm Author

So should we all - there are some funny folk tales about this.


Morgan 6 years ago

Why shouldnt they try to help change their country for the better? Who are you to say that its wrong? Every person must find their own path to enlightenment, there is no set way. Unless you are in their own skin, their own mind, you cannot judge them, or their motives. I would applaud someone to step up and take the responsibility to run a country WELL. Perhaps sacrificing himself in this life for the betterment of others is in fact the RIGHT thing to do.


SGsingapore 4 years ago

a monk also means to show empathy to all living things. maybe he think he can do more good to other ppl if he become president? nothing is stopping him to do good while being president... he might just give away his earning and solely devote his time in making the country a better place

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working