Daniel's Chronological Clutter
Skeptics often recognize the numerous contradictions, inconsistencies, redundancies and factual inaccuracies in the Bible. But criticizing the Bible's sloppy and confusing literary composition is much more subjective, and more problematic. Still, there are useful examples with which it can be demonstrated.
The Old Testament book of Daniel is one such instance. It contains the usual sort of factual problems, like dubious 'prophecies' and questionable historic references, but even in a purely literary sense, the chronology (and thus, the narrative flow) of its chapters is all over the place. Trying to read and follow it can be a hair-pulling experience -- even for a believer!
The chronological anomalies appear almost from the beginning. Chapter One begins well enough, with the story of the siege of Jerusalem by Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar, in the third year of Judean king Jehoiakim's reign (in 597 BCE). It also explains how Daniel, given the name Belteshazzar, came into Nebuchadnezzar's favor.
The first problem arises in chapter Two, with the story of Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream of four kingdoms. The episode is dated to the "second year" of Nebuchadnezzar's reign, in 604 BCE -- long BEFORE he attacked Jerusalem and became acquainted with Daniel. Obviously, Daniel couldn't have interpreted Nebuchadnezzar's dream for him in person seven years before he ever met him!
Reconciling this discrepancy requires a bit of interpretive license with Daniel's reference to the "second year." If we perceive it as the "second year" of Nebuchadnezzar's reign IN JERUSALEM, the sequential problem is resolved. We can then date the story to 595 BCE, and the chronology is back in synch.
Chapter Three tells the story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego thrown into a fiery pit by Nebuchadnezzar. Chapter Four tells the story of how Nebuchadnezzar is driven mad by God, then returns to his senses and his kingdom. Though there is nothing in either chapter that can be correlated to an actual historical event, they both occur during Nebuchadnezzar's reign, so we can reasonably assume that the chronological order is maintained.
It is in chapter Five when the historical sequence becomes more strained. It relates the story of Daniel's translation of the mysterious writing on the wall during king Belshazzar's banquet in the city of Babylon the night before it is conquered by Darius the Mede. This event moves the narrative decades into the future, to 539 BCE.
Chapter Six continues with the reign of Darius in Babylon, telling the story of his reluctantly throwing Daniel into the lions' den. In this chapter as well, there is nothing correlating to any specific historical events, but the chronology can be assumed to be consistent.
In chapter Seven the historical sequence begins to dramatically unravel. It returns to the FIRST year of Belshazzar's reign, in 549 BCE, going back a decade to tell of Daniel's vision regarding the coming Jewish messiah (popularly known as the "son of man" prophecy).
Chapter Eight continues this new, earlier chronology, relating the story of Daniel's "ram and goat" 'prophecy' in the third year of Belshazzar's reign, in 546 BCE.
Chapter Nine poses another chronological problem. It tells of the archangel Michael's "seventy weeks" messiah 'prophecy' to Daniel, dating the episode in the "first year" of Darius' reign. But, given the earlier anomaly, it is uncertain whether this refers to Darius' "first year" reigning in Persia (in 550 BCE) or his "first year" reigning in Babylon (in 539 BCE). To maintain some sense of sequence, it's reasonable to assume the latter.
Chapter Ten is the most confusing of all. It continues Daniel's "great river" 'prophecy' regarding the messiah and the end times, and is dated to the "third year" of Cyrus' reign. But Cyrus was co-regent with Darius for years before finally ruling on his own.
Chronologically, this means the narrative either moves BACK even further in time, to the third year of Cyrus' co-regency with Darius, in 556 BCE, or jumps far AHEAD in time, to the third year of Cyrus' solitary reign, in 532 BCE.
Unfortunately, there is a problem with either conclusion, as the end of chapter One states that Daniel "...continued even unto the first year of king Cyrus." If Daniel lived only into the FIRST year of Cyrus' reign, he could not have possibly had his vision in Cyrus' THIRD year!
The only way to reconcile this discrepancy is with yet another assumption. We must presume that the chapter One citation refers to the "first year" of Cyrus' solitary reign, in 535 BCE, and that the Chapter Ten citation refers to the "third year" of Cyrus' co-regency, back in 556 BCE.
This accommodation is possible because chapter Ten doesn't specify that Daniel's vision occurred in the personal presence of Cyrus. So it could have occurred back in 556 BCE, before the king knew Daniel. Of course, this moves the narrative even further back in time.
Chapter Eleven relates the story of Daniel's "battle of the kingdoms" 'prophecy' during the first year of the reign (presumably in Babylon) of Darius the Mede, returning the narrative far forward once again, to 539 BCE. Chapter Twelve continues this story, finishing the book.
The Chapters Of Daniel, In Proper Chronological Order:
1 --- Nebuchadnezzar captures king Jehoiakim -- 597 BCE
2 --- Daniel interprets Nebuchadnezzar's dream -- 596 BCE
3 --- Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in fiery pit -- undated
4 --- God temporarily turns Nebuchadnezzar mad -- undated
10 - "Great river" 'prophecy' -- 556 BCE
7 --- "Son of man" 'prophecy' -- 549 BCE
8 --- "Ram and goat" 'prophecy' -- 546 BCE
5 --- "Writing on the wall" interpretation -- 539 BCE
6 --- Daniel in lions' den -- undated
9 --- Michael's "70 weeks" messiah prophecy -- 539 BCE
11 - "Battle of the kingdoms" 'prophecy -- 539 BCE
12 - A continuation of the 'prophecy,' in same year -- 539 BCE
More thoughts on biblical 'prophets' from Paladin:
More by this Author
In debates over the historicity of Jesus, one name that invariably appears is that of Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian who made references to him in his writing (decades after Jesus supposedly died). What is NOT...
When it comes to defending the Bible, nothing is more appealing to believers than prophecies, and one of the most widely quoted is Isaiah chapter 7, verse 14: "...Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son,...
Just as there is no way to definitively prove that God exists, there is no way to prove that he doesn't.* Interpretations of the available physical evidence will always be subject to personal bias. Critical examination...