The Key Question in Primordial Soup Theory
Evolutionists believe in the Primordial Soup Theory, as their best argument regarding the origin of life. According to the PST; millions of years ago; all the 17 Amino Acids required to make protein, were present in water somewhere in the world and a magical spark poured life into it, resulting in the creation of a tiny single celled organism, the First Primordial Life Form. And they say that since there is no God, it all happened by accident. This single celled organism underwent the process of Evolution comprising millions and millions of years until complex creatures like animals and man came out. Though it is not clear whether; it was just an isolated pocket of stagnant water or the entire ocean was primordial soup. But since the process of how non-living chemicals transformed into a living organism is absent in their theory, it cannot be termed as a valid Scientific Theory.
This theory is buy-able to the extent that the 'primordial life form' was created. The problem arises when we try to imagine who taught it to reproduce. A single celled organism may have a very small life span of hardly a few hours or days. My question is; " who taught that organism to multiply in that short span of time?" It just can't be evolution, which requires millions of years. Reproduction is one of the most complex systems in living things, which the evolution could not have taught in that small life span unless; it was programmed already in its genes.
One has to accept that such information had to be already programmed in the Primordial Life Form, to carry out so quickly. So, who could have programmed it - The Evolutioner?
Evolutionists are also very devoted in their beliefs, like the believers and they don't like to question the basic assumptions, upon which their belief system rests. Some even went to the extent and said that; there was another magical spark which taught the Primordial Life Form to reproduce. Now that brings another instance of magic into a theory that is strictly considered as Scientific. It even makes one wonder; if the Evolution vs Creationism debate is all about; "was it God or Magic"? I am sure that the Harry Potter fans would choose magic over God.
More by this Author
The article proves against the common belief that the religious way of slaughtering animals is painful to animals. It discusses the benefits of religious slaughter, being less painful to the animal on one hand and...
The article explains that Islamic Laws of Riba/Interest were actually meant for Gold currency which does not depreciates. Using them on Paper Money is not fair or logical.
The article discusses immediate line of action in case of acute lumbar back pain as well as changes in life-style to coupe with back problem.