Genesis Bible Commentary: God's Reason for the Flood

===========================

Note:

This is part 6 of a series of 6 articles on the Bible's book of Genesis.

Click here for the series overview.

===========================

by Rod Martin, Jr.

(I recommend you read the series of 6 articles in sequence for the greatest understanding.)


What is Important to God?

Again, the purpose of the Bible seems to be one of awakening the spiritual component of man. Perhaps this is the return of man's viewpoint from a focus on physical instrumentality toward a reliance on spirit-based control.

If, as I suspect, we were each in the Garden (not our physical bodies, mind you), then we are each fallen angels of the most high. And our memories of it all have been shot to smithereens. We inhabit these Homo sapiens bodies with a purpose. And that purpose is one of reawakening the former angels—now "dead" asleep (our true selves or souls).

The founder of Christianity. A painting of the Sermon on the Mount, by nineteenth century artist,
The founder of Christianity. A painting of the Sermon on the Mount, by nineteenth century artist, | Source

Okay, now picture your ability to solve complex problems while you sleep. Not easy, is it? In fact, dreams are the only place for contemplation while you sleep, and they are too unsettled for us to develop any solutions to a complex problem. This could well be the description of these sleeping immortals when they are without a body or when they are attached to an animal body. There is insufficient clarity of consciousness to plot their escape from physical entrapment.

These immortals need some form of stable consciousness in order to plan such an escape. Homo sapiens was that instrument of stable consciousness. And civilization was the stable environment which would allow for such pursuits. Hunter-gatherers would have had almost no time for such things.

My hypothesis is that God's plan included the development of Homo sapiens and its intelligent speech toward the development of civilization and the reawakening of His spiritual children.

My hypothesis includes the idea that something threatened that development. This threat was the target of the Flood.

(See, What was Noah's Flood Supposed to Solve).

A skeleton of Homo neanderthalensis on display at the American Museum of Natural History. Was this the target of Noah's Flood?
A skeleton of Homo neanderthalensis on display at the American Museum of Natural History. Was this the target of Noah's Flood? | Source

The Threat

We now have evidence that Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis mated. Was this the corruption of flesh which prompted the Flood? Certainly, if Homo neanderthalensis ceased to exist after the Flood, then one could say that humans could never again do that crime, if indeed it was a crime.

I've read that scientists suggest that Homo neanderthalensis had the ability to speak, but that it was inferior to the ability of Homo sapiens. Could the offspring of humans and Neanderthals have been incapable of superior reasoning? Could they have been more prone to violence than to negotiation or even forgiveness? Could they have been incapable of building civilization?

Genesis 6 talks of a threat to "God's way." The Flood removed that threat. All of the violence and wickedness that man has perpetrated since then has been insufficient reason to warrant another Flood. And yet Genesis suggests that a certain kind of wickedness and violence was all the reason God needed for the Flood. It seems clear that the reason for the Flood had been cured.

It is my hypothesis that Homo neanderthalensis were the "daughters of man." The species looked enough like man to be called man, and Neanderthal females were attractive enough to result in mating with humans.

No other reason that I can find makes sense for Noah's Flood. No other reason offers sufficient threat to God's mission for the rescue of His children. Humanity has been cured of the Neanderthal threat to their gene pool. The corruption of flesh has been sufficiently removed.

The book is done and now available. Click on the link below for more information.
The book is done and now available. Click on the link below for more information. | Source

Final Thoughts

Could this new Genesis timeline provide some much-needed humility for Christians? Could the answers revealed for Noah's Flood allow believers to realize that there may be more answers which elude them because they have not used humility (what Jesus referred to as meekness)?

Is the new Genesis timeline valid? Is this revelation concerning the purpose of Noah's Flood correct? Perhaps only time and further research and discovery will give us the answers to these questions.

But perhaps a more important idea, here, is that much more humility is needed. What if the secrets to salvation have remained hidden? What if "following Christ" means not only accepting his teachings, but using the humility he recommended to find new answers to questions we need to be asking ourselves? Let the fear of God guide you. Salvation may not be as simple as you think. After all, Jesus compared it to a very narrow path. And too many fundamentalists are looking for an easy path -- one they call biblical literalism.

Read the Book that Changes Everything

The Bible's Hidden Wisdom: God's Reason for Noah's Flood (Volume 1)
The Bible's Hidden Wisdom: God's Reason for Noah's Flood (Volume 1)

This book is from years of my own research into a biblical timeline compatible with those of mainstream science. I wasn't surprised that God's holy book would match his own creation (reality), but there were many surprises, including discovering through science the target of Noah's Flood -- a species which went extinct at that time.

 

More by this Author


Comments 6 comments

Ella Quirk profile image

Ella Quirk 4 years ago

God created the flood so mankind wouldn't breed with mentally challenged Neanderthals and could thus spend more time developing spiritually? Seems like a long bow to draw....

I don't think Biblical literalism is such an easy path. Far easier to be fanciful and creatively manipulate the inconsistencies, scientific impossibilities and absurdities of the Bible until they loosely make sense within your personal worldview, as you have here.


lone77star profile image

lone77star 4 years ago from Cebu, Philippines Author

Thanks, @Ella Quirk, for your input, but I have to ask if you read the other 5 parts, first. If not, then yes, I can see that it would be a long bow to draw.

Contrary to your conclusion, though. I didn't have a personal worldview on this until after I had put all the pieces together. Read parts 1-5 of the 6 for more on this.


drbillfannin profile image

drbillfannin 4 years ago from Atlanta

It is easy for one to dismiss your views if one believes they already have all the answers. Since you are introducing this as an analysis for discussion and not as a finalized doctrine, I would hope that readers will at least consider that the main stream churches these days are spreading lies and a false doctrine just as Jesus predicted. My thinking is that when Jesus foretold the whole world would be deceived into believing a false gospel we can expect exactly that. So is it any surprise that we have no understanding of the truth. Fortunately Jesus also stated that the elect would know the truth and could not be deceived.


lone77star profile image

lone77star 4 years ago from Cebu, Philippines Author

Thanks, @DrBill. I hope I can increase my humility to be included amongst those who allow the truth to come within. Ego seems to be a never-ending challenge.

Thanks for all your wonderful comments. I hope we can discuss these topics more.


ignugent17 profile image

ignugent17 4 years ago

Thanks for sharing your interesting ideas.

I will try to read your other hubs.


lone77star profile image

lone77star 4 years ago from Cebu, Philippines Author

Thanks, @ignugent17. If you haven't read the others in this series, I suggest starting at the Overview (link at the top).

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working