The Biblical Canon

TheBiblical Canon

The word “canon” comes from the Greek Word kanon which is a straight rod used to measure a carpenter’s rule. A Biblical canon is a list of books considered as authoritative as Scripture by a particular religious community. It is used to describe the books that are divinely inspired and therefore belong in the Bible.

Determining the canon was a process, first by Jewish rabbis and scholars then leter by early Christians. Ultimately it was God who decided what books belonged in the Biblical canon. A book of Scripture belonged in the canon from the moment God inspired its writing. It was simply a matter of God convincing and guiding His human followers which books should be included in the Bible.


The Challenge of the Disqualified Books.

There were two groups of writings that were not included in the canon.

Gnostic Gospels.

These writings were written by false Christians or referred as early Christian Gnostics. These Gnostic Christians held doctrines which are erroneous or heretic in nature. They held a distinctively different view of the Bible, of JesusChrist, of salvation, of every major Christian doctrine. These writings did not contain the writings of the Apostles to give legitimacy to theirbeliefs.

Apocryphal writings.

Fake texts which unlike the Gnostic gospels are known since ancient times and that the early jewish and Christian leaders regarded as tales hatched in fertile imaginations. History shows that legends always develop around some famous figures. We should not be surprised that some people would attach superstitions to Jesus that have no basis in fact.There were dozens of writings in circulation when the New Testament was assembled, many of them asserting to be alternate stories about Jesus. A few even vie for a position in the canon.

Some of these books disqualified from the Bible canon teach that :

When Jesus was a boy, he killed a child by pushing him off a roof, and when accused, responded by using his power to raise him from the dead.It teaches here Jesus apparently used his power for mischievous personal reasons until he grew up and only then used his divine powers to accomplish good.

After the Fall, Adam devised a plan for Eve and him to return to the Garden of Eden by standing in different rivers. He stood in the River Jordan for 40 days and Eve being weaker , was supposed to stand in the Tigris Riverfor 34 days. But the devil appeared to her again, and she came out of the water on the 18th day, ruining the plan and incurring Adam’s deep displeasure.

In hell blasphemous are hung up by their tonques and fornicators by their genitals. But if people ask God for deliverance, all of hell will be emptied. However no one is to know this, because if they do, they will sin even more.


Old Testament Canon

When God authorized the writing of a manuscript and the people of God recognize it as such, it was preserved. As it is written in Exodus 24:4,’ Moses then wrote down everything the Lord had said.’The number of books increased through time and subsequent generation honored them as the Word of God.In Daniel 9:2, the Book of Jeremiah was acknowledged as Word of God. In Nehemiah 9:14,26-30, the Law of Mosesand the Book of the Prophets were acknowledged as Word of God. Not all Jewish literature was considered part of the list of inspired books. These books did not survive so we are not familiar with their content.

As the canon grew in size, it often was described with the phrase “Moses and the Prophets. Later it was referred to as “the Law, Prophets, and the Writings or the Psalms.” Jesus Himself alluded to this threefold division of the Old Testament canon.

At one time or another, the canonicity of five old testament books was questioned by some. These books are Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, Esther. Proverbs, Ezekiel. However, most of the Jewishscholars did not doubt these books. They were regarded as canonical soon after they were written, and when properly interpreted are in complete harmony with the rest of the Old Testament. The centuries have proven the wisdom of keeping them within the bIblical canon.

The Jews agreed that the Old Testament Canon is closed in about 400 BC with the prophecy of Malachi. The period between the Old Testament and the New Testament is often regarded as the 400 Silent Years. During this period of time, God was not speaking directly to His people, and no words of His were written.

The Christian Old Testament is the same Hebrew Old Testament accepted by the Jews. This is the same canon that Christ ratifiedby His frequent references to the Old Testament as the unbreakableWord of God. Because of His approval of these books, we can believe that the Old Testament Canon is authoritative and closed. As read in Matthew 5 :17 – 18, Jesus had a high regard to the Laws and prophecies.

In this process,we see the providence of God as He worked among His peopleand through history in giving and preserving His Word. A council met in Jamnia in AD 90and the canon of the Old Testament was on its agenda, but it only ratified the books that the Jews had accepted five centuries earlier.


The New Testament Canon

The same authority that was noted in the Old Testament is ascribed to the writers of the New Testament. Jesus commissioned the disciples to pass the truth He taught them. The authority of the New Testament writers is not founded in human brilliance but is rooted in the character of God, Letters from the Apostles were written and received in the churches. Copies were made and circulated. A growing group of books developed that were recognized as inspired. From the earliest times the church had a function canon. Some books were accepted as authoritative even when others were not yet written.

By the end of the first century all 27 books in our present New Testament canon had been written and received bythe churches. Some of the canonical lists are incomplete but this should notbe interpreted that some books were rejected. It only means that some books have not reached certain areas due to geographical diversity of its destination and origins.

As indication of both agreement and widespread acceptance of the New Testament books, we should note that a generation after the end of the apostolic age, every book of the Old Testament had been cited as authoritative by some church fathers.

A heretic named Marcion, in opposition to the Christian writings, came out with his own version of the Scriptures in 135 AD.Being anti-Jewish and against Biblical Law, he eliminated the Old Testament and chose only the New Testament books that suited his beliefs. The church responded and declared what books are authoritative. A document called Muratorian Fragment, dating back to 175 AD evaluates the canonical books along with those that were rejected. However some parts of this aged document were damaged. Neverthelss, scholars can still identify a list of 23 out of ourpresent 27 books. It also identified fake documents that were ascribed to the Apostle Paul.

Remaining doubts or debates over certain books continued into the fourth century. As far as historians know, the first time the list of 27 books appeared is in an Easter letter by Athanasius,an outstanding leader of the church in 367 AD.The 27 books of the New Testament were ratified by the council of Hippo in 393 ADand the Third Council of Carthage in 367 AD. The various books were not accepted or rejectedby a councilor committee.The process was not what the Da Vinci Code described as power grab. Councils only endorsed what the church had already done centuries before. No council or pope imposed upon the churches books that the people of God had rejected.



The Criteria For Acceptance

Authority.

The book is written by prophets, apostles and other men of God or by those who were closely associated with them, thus bearing their approval and authority.

Agreement.

The book’s teachings were canonizedwith the rule of faith as embodi edin the Old testament prophets and the New Testament apostles.

Acceptance.

The document had to be widespread and continuously received . There should be general concernsamong the community of believers that is is inspired and authoritative.


The Credibilty of the Canon

Could the church have erred in choosing what books to be included in the canon ?

We believe that it was a fallible church that chose what we believe to be an infallible list of books that comprise the New Testament.We have a basis for this :

No other books have made a convincing claim for inclusion in the New Testament Canon. The Gnostic Gospels and Apocryphal Writings simply fail the test.

Circumstancial evidence shows that God guides the process of selecting those books that the church agreed were canonical. Given the geographical distances, the limitation of communications and the diverse background of the churches, such agreement is remarkable.

God can guide a fallible church to make infallible list of booksin the same way God can use fallible men to write the infallible Scripture.


SoURCE :

How We Got Our Bible from the MacArthur Study Bible by John MacArthur


More by this Author


Comments 17 comments

PoweroftheCross profile image

PoweroftheCross 5 years ago from Above and Beyond...

My favorite line is: God can guide a fallible church to make an infallible list of books the same way God can use fallible men to write the infallible Scripture. Love this! Great article and history my friend.


Dave Mathews profile image

Dave Mathews 5 years ago from NORTH YORK,ONTARIO,CANADA

Ate Cristina: I love this article as it helps others to better understand how the Holy Bible came to be the book it is today.

The one thing that I find upsetting especially about the "Dead Sea Scrolls" which are considered Gnostic writings, is the fact that authors/writers such as the Apostle Thomas and the Gospel of Thomas, The Apostle Judas Iscariot,and the Gospel according to Judas, The Apostle Mary Magdeline, and the Gospel of Mary, and even Jesus himself were discovered amongst these scrolls, and they have not been given any consideration or mention in Christian Canon anywhere. These writing once translated, I feel deserve a place in the Christian Canon, and should be incorporated.


CMCastro profile image

CMCastro 5 years ago from Baltimore,MD USA

I only rely on One Source for my Biblical Teaching. By The Holy Spirit through the gifts of teaching of my Apostle and the Pastors of the Ministry that God has led me to be with will I learn from. Thanks for sharing.


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi PoweroftheCross I am glad to read your comment for this hub. Thank you for appreciating it. Your visit and comments are much appreciated. God also guided the early church leaders in selecting the books to be included in the canon. Remain blessed always. Best regards.


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi Dave Matthews I am glad to hear from you again. Thank you for dropping by and appreciating this hub. Your visit and comments are much appreciated. The writers of these gnostic writings fraudulently forged the sign of the Apostles to make it appear that Jesus and the Apostles actually wrote these writings. Many teachings of these gnostic writings are a deviation from the original Christian doctrines. That is why they are not included in the New Testament Canon. Hope this help you a lot. Remain blessed always. Best regards.


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi CMCastro I am glad to hear from you again. Thanks for taking time to read this hub. Your visit is much appreciated. Remain blessed always. Best regards.


Patrick Teng 5 years ago

Thanks for the kind information!


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Thanks Patrick for taling time to visit this hub. Blessings to you and regards.


Tamarajo profile image

Tamarajo 5 years ago from Southern Minnesota

Thank you for this most useful information. A Bible study teacher once showed me how God placed a test within the scriptures itself that we may know that the books that are in there are correct.

The book of Isaiah contains the test with its 66 chapters representing the 66 books of the Bible. The first 39 chapters of course are reflective of the Old Testament and Isiah chapter 40 begins with "the voice of one crying in the wilderness representing that the next 27 chapters reflect the New.

I agree that the books of His Word are divinely inspired.

I found interesting as well the selections you shared from the books that were obviously not included. You would think that would be obvious as it is so inconsistent with the rest of the scriptures.


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi Tamarajo I am glad to read your comment for this hub. Thank you for visiting and appreciating this hub. Your visit and additional inputs are much appreciated. I will review again the Book of Isaiah as you mentioned, never see it that way before. Thank you for mentioning about it. All the 66 books of the Bible canon are the inspired Word of God and its selection are guided by the Holy Spirit. These 66 books are in perfectly agreement and harmony. Remain blessed always. Have a great day today. Best regards.


MickeySr profile image

MickeySr 5 years ago from Hershey, Pa.

cristina327,

I very much appreciate the research behind this and your orderly presentation . . . there is no need for Christians to imagine that we are only about faith (and blind, ill-informed faith at that) while skeptics and unbelievers stand on the ground of reason and evidence - our relationship with God is based on faith rather than on works (we are united to God through faith, not because we are good enough or perform all the proper rituals, etc), however, Christianity stands on sound reason and solid evidence, because it is the truth.

MickeySr


Eddie-Perkins 5 years ago

Cristina, Vote up and very useful. Thank you for writing. I appreciate your work. Sorry it has taken me so long to visit your new hub – unexpected issues to resolve.


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi MickeySr thank you for taking time to read this hub. Your visit and comments are much appreciated. Thank you also for sharing additional inputs. Yes Chistianity is standing on firm and solid evidence. The truths of christianity is anchored on firm foundation. No gnostics can dispel it from its roots. Remain blessed always. Best regards.


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi Eddie Perkins I am glad to hear from you again. Thank you for gracing this hub and voting for it as useful.Your visit is always a great encouragement to me. Blessings always to you and your family. Best regards.


James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins 5 years ago from Chicago

Thank you for this excellent article on the Biblical Canon. Oddly enough, a couple weeks ago I wrote an article about this same subject but hadn't gotten around to publishing it yet. What do you know: you've done it for me! :-)

Maybe I will put mine out later, when folks need another reminder about the Truth.

Well done! God Bless!


cristina327 profile image

cristina327 5 years ago from Manila Author

Hi James A. Watkins I am glad to hear from you again. Thank you for dropping by and appreciating this hub. Your visit is always a great encouragement to me. It is much appreciated. Hope you will also post your write up about biblical canon. Remain blessed always. Best regards.


karla hope 4 years ago

How does diversity in the canon function as its self-corrective feature? How does the book of Jonah complement Nahum, Obadiah, and Zephaniah?

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working