The Origins of the Word "Church"
Billions of people around the world go in through the doors of the man-driven institution called “church.” Since the term “church” is found within their Bibles, it is accepted as a “divinely” inspired word given to man from God. Buildings are erected on every other street corner to represent the term “church.” When people ask each other what “church” they go to, they can give a particular address and point to a sign where the sheeple herd in through her doors to worship “God.”
People who go to “church” call themselves “Christians” partaking in a conjured service based on a spiritual man-driven agenda conforming to the many denominational templates. They look to salaried officiates to make something happen for them in their spiritual lives within the four walls they call “church.”
What many don’t realize is that in Scripture the body of Christ was not given a name, but identified in a metaphorical sense. It was never about erecting buildings with bigs signs on the front designating and segregating themselves in different denominations. The early ekklesia in the New Testament did not grow into thousands of different sects and denominations, each having their own separate visions and doctrines in the name of their “church.”
A deeper study into the word “church” will reveal a counterfeit word that has been replaced by corrupted men to promote a religious man-made agenda instead of one that is to solely led by the Holy Spirit. Many will contend that “church” is just a word, but when one looks closer at its origins, it reveals an entity that is foreign to the meaning of ekklesia (ecclesia).
There is quite a distinction between the two terms. I believe that it is vital, imperative and important to know because it is the difference between seeking first the Kingdom of God, or seeking first the kingdoms of men. It is the difference between walking on the narrow path that leads to life, or the wide road that leads to destruction.
The man-made term “church” is about structures built with man’s hands with names they have given to themselves. Scripture does not attest to body of Christ (the ekklesia) being associated with temples built with man’s hands. The local early ekklesia were identified by the different localities (cities) they resided in. Everyone (the ekklesia) in a particular city were in unity being spiritually built by their Savior; they were not separated in four-walled denominational structures run by salaried clergy.
The word “church” is a tradition of man, and the institutional “church” system has been built upon them. This man-made term cannot be reconciled with the word “ekklesia.” Many attempt to do it, but it just creates confusion and double-mindedness as many define it out of both sides of their mouth.
How is “ekklesia” distinct from “church?”
The purpose of this article will take a deeper look into the origins of the term “church.” I believe that following the history of the word will make it glaringly obvious that it is a counterfeit.
A Tradition of Man
The body of Christ is not a congregation established under the authority of ecclesiastical men. It is not a hierarchical system of government run by them either. The problem with the word “church” is that it creates a misconception of what the body of Christ truly is. When the corrupt modern understanding is discarded and the indoctrinated lenses taken off and replaced with the intended divine meaning, the physical and spiritual manifestation will be quite different. Unfortunately, many have not taken a deeper look for themselves, and many don’t even want to know because it would require a complete re-evaluation of their belief system (indoctrination).
Those who attend buildings called “church” have conformed to the traditions of man and are clueless to what the word “church” actually means and where it came from. It did not even originate in Scripture, but rather deemed a replacement of “ekklesia” with a word that means something completely different.
Jesus Christ, or the Apostles did not use the word “church.” King James ordered the counterfeit word to replace the intended word. He instructed his translators of 1611 to not translate it, but replace it. Many believe that “church” is a translation of “ekklesia” (ecclesia), but this is a great error and deception.
The word “church” neither originates form the Greek, or Hebrew. The word was already in existence when it was put into the English Bible translations, but used as a pagan word.
Ekklesia means, “called out ones” who are a congregation, group or assembly. It has absolutely nothing to do with religious man-made denominational buildings, but followers of Jesus Christ who have been spiritually joined together by him.
What you may find interesting is that word “ekklesia” (ecclesia) is in the English dictionary is there along with “church." It is very telling when comparing their definitions. Here are the two definitions to contrast from dictionary.com:
Church - Noun
- a BUILDING for public Christian worship.
- public worship of God or a religious service in such A BUILDING: to attend church regularly.
- (sometimes initial capital letter) the whole body of Christian believers; Christendom.
- (sometimes initial capital letter) any division of this body professing the same creed and acknowledging the same ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY; a CHRISTIAN DENOMINATION the Methodist Church.
- that part of the whole Christian body, or of PARTICULAR DENOMINATION, belonging to the same city, country, nation, etc.
- a body of Christians worshipping in A PARTICULAR BUILDING or constituting one congregation: She is a member of this church.
- ECCLESIASTICAL ORGANIZATION, POWER, and affairs, as distinguished from the state: separation of church and state; the missionary went wherever the church sent him.— Dictionary.com
Ecclesia - Noun
AN ASSEMBLY, especially the popular assembly of ancient Athens.
A CONGREGATION; church.— Dictionary.com
It’s quite easy to establish a striking dissimilarity between the two terms based on an English dictionary's definition.
Why wouldn’t later prints of the Bible correct this error and use the actual word that is meant to be in there?
- The Tabernacle, the Temple, the Synagogue and the Church
Is there any evidence in the Bible that man-made tabernacles, temples, synagogues and churches that are known as places of worship were actually used for the same purposes today?
Modern Bible scholars have a deceptive way of getting around this by using the Greek definition for “church” (kyriakon), meaning “the Lord’s house.” Left simply to this explanation, many look no further and nod their heads to their trusted “church” Bible scholars, but if we keep digging deeper and pressing further, other problems arise. Put simply, “kyriakon” is not used in the Bible, but “ekklesia” is. Many just assume the derivation, or the Geek etymology of “kyriakon” and “kurious oikos,” meaning “house of God” is the status quo. After all that’s what the salaried clergy tell them as they sit passively in pews in what they call "the house of God."
Digging a bit deeper reveals that the word “kyriakon” existed in all Celtic dialects as “cirice” (kee-ree-ke) long before the word was introduced into the Greek. “Kiriakos” was used in Old English form as “cirice” then “kerke” (churche) and then evolved to what we know today as “church.”
“Cirice” means circles that were the many places of pagan worship of the Celtic and German nations. The ancient stone megaliths that still stand today, such as Stonehenge and Avebury attest to the pagan worship practices of that time.
The Oxford English Dictionary gives that many derivations of “church” as:
(a) cirice, cyrice, chiriche, churiche, chereche
(b) circe, cyrce, chyrce, cirke, etc…
The Trail of Evidence
The source of the origin of “church” can be established as an ulterior derivation that does NOT come from the divine inspiration of the Holy Spirit. The evidence trail reveals that “church” comes from the Old English form of “cirice” and the Middle English form “circe.” From there, we can move even deeper down the rabbit hole to see where we end up.
“Circe” as a dialect is found in the Greek as “kirke.” Etymologists agree that the Dutch word for “church” is “kerk,” and in German is “kirche.” The Scottish form is “kirk” and Old Saxon is “kirika” having the same linguistic derivation, connection or relation to “kirke,” or “circe.”
If you have followed with me thus far, the next trail of evidence to follow is finding out what is behind the origins of the term “kirke,” or “circe.” From here, this is where things get even more interesting.
What is deemed “church” (kirke, or circe) today in English can be traced to the name of a Greek goddess Pharmakeia who was a witch, or sorceress who lived on an island called Aiaia. The ancient form of “Aiaia” is derived from the name “Gaia” who was a pagan goddess of fertility. She was the daughter of Helios, the Sun “God” who had the power to transform men into wolves, lions and even swine. Although she changed men into animals, they still retained their human senses being trapped in the physical bodies of the particular animal.
This is where the word “circus” comes from. It is attributed to honoring Gaia’s father, the Sun “God,” hence where the term “Cirque de Soleil” in French comes from, or in English, “Church of the Sun.”
“Being entered, she placed them in chairs of State, and set before them meal and honey, and Smyrna wine, mixed with baneful drugs of powerful enchantment. When they had eaten of these, and drunk of her cup, she touched them with her charming rod, and straight they were transformed into swine, having bodies of swine, the bristles, and snout, and grunting noise of that animal; only they still retained the minds of men, which made them the more to lament their brutish transformation.”— Adventures of Ulysses by Charles Lamb
The Greeks pictured their goddess as a woman with a golden cup in her hand.
Does this picture ring a bell?
If you are familiar with the book of Revelation, there is a striking resemblance of a woman with a golden cup filled with wine mixed with drugs. Upon drinking her wine, kings were seduced and controlled by transforming them into “animals” with man-like characteristics.
This sounds a lot like John’s vision as written in the book of Revelation while he was on the island of Patmos.
“Come, I will show you the judgment of the great prostitute who is seated on many waters, with whom the KINGS of the earth have committed sexual immorality, and with the WINE of whose sexual immorality the dwellers on earth have become DRUNK.” And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was full of blasphemous names, and it had seven heads and ten horns.
The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and jewels and pearls, holding in her hand a GOLDEN CUP full of abominations and the impurities of her sexual immorality. And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: “Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth’s abominations.” – Revelation 17:1-6
For your merchants were the great ones of the earth, and all nations were DECEIVED by your SORCERY. – Revelation 18:23
Could the manifestation of the word “church” be the conjuring of sorceries?
According to some Greek accounts when Pharmacia died, she was buried in the Pharmacussi island group that can be seen from the Isle of Patmos where John was imprisoned.
The words “pharmacy” and “pharmaceuticals” are both derived from “pharmakaeia,” meaning “medicine.”
Are we seeing the spiritual manifestation of “church” happening today where the institutional system entices people within her doors with feel good doctrines getting them to drinking from her cup of “drugs" (religious indoctrination) glossing people’s eyes over so they have “visions” and hallucinations” falling under the "Great Harlot's" spells and power?
“Kirke” is also known as a “hawk,” or an “unclean” bird by Old Testament standards as a bird of prey. There was a mythological witch whom the Greeks called "Kirke" (hawk lady) who became Circe of Roman poets.
You shall therefore separate the clean beast from the unclean, and THE UNCLEAN BIRD from the clean. You shall not make yourselves detestable by beast or by bird or by anything with which the ground crawls, which I have set apart for you to hold unclean. – Leviticus 20:25
And he called out with a mighty voice, “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great! She has become a dwelling place for demons, a haunt for every unclean spirit, a haunt for every UNCLEAN BIRD, a haunt for every UNCLEAN AND DETESTABLE BEAST. – Revelation 18:2
The History of the Institutional "Church"
It is pretty obvious today that the institution called “church” has fornicated with the world’s leaders captivating them with her “sorceries.” History attests to the blood that has been spilled and all those who have been slain because of her. Men like Constantine received visions from her to conquer in the sign of the cross. Many deemed as “witches” and "heretics" were tortured and burned at the stake to appease the “church.” Many people naively believed the doctrine of “church” while many innocent people were killed and slaughtered in her name. Slavery was defended and rape, lynching and murder was justified all in the name of “church.” This did not bother harlot daughters of the “mother of all prostitutes” one bit.
All those who partake of “church” conveniently ignore their institutional history and vehemently defend her traditions.
“Church” is the religion of “Mystery Babylon” and Scripture states that we are to “come out of her.” The system of the “Mother of Harlots” has bred many “harlot’s daughters.” The fact is there are more than 38,000 of them. They have many names written above her doors, but they still share their mother’s maiden name.
If "church" is a counterfeit word, then that would mean a complete evaluation of the foundation of the religious system that the word is built upon would be of vital importance.
And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my EKKLESIA [1577 (e)], and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. - Matthew 16:18
Do you believe that Jesus Christ is building four-walled denominational structures called "church" run by salaried officiates?See results without voting
- A Closer Look at the Greek word Ekklesia under the Microscope
The "church" and home "church" movements basically believe and define ekklesia the same way, but go about it different ways, but Scripture has something different to say about what many call “church.
- Comparing the Man-Made Religion of Church with the Spiritual Organism of the Ekklesia
The Early Ekklesia, as attested in the New Testament reveals how the body of Jesus Christ organized, which is strikingly different to the practiced counterfeit organized religion of the Church system.
- God does not like Men with Professional Titles in Churches
The modern “church” is full of men with titles, but these professional titles that are pinned upon these men do not come from God, but men themselves.
- Ekklesia, or Church?
The word “church” is a very deceptive word that has corrupted the whole world and has been and continues to be the catalyst of perpetuating the dark agenda of Satan.
More by this Author
When the church institution is weighed and tested with the blueprint of the New Testament, it fails miserably. Their system is completely contrary to the record of the Apostles and Jesus Christ.
The modern church has been promising another great “revival” with claims that there are, and will be manifestations of great signs and wonders signs and wonders. Is there any truth to it?
The modern “church” promotes a cesspool of false doctrines; it is no longer a safe place to attend any man-made building that has been erected on every other street corner.