searchinsany profile image 84

If John wrote after AD 90, why did he not mention the destruction of the temple in AD 70?

If John wrote after AD 90 as many Bible commentators claim, why did he never mention the fulfilment of Jesus’ prophecy about the destruction of the temple, Jerusalem, and the dispersion of the Jews in AD 70?

This question is closed to new answers.

sort by best latest

Bishop J L Hayes profile image82

Jerry Lynn Hayes Sr (Bishop J L Hayes) says

2 years ago
  • searchinsany profile image

    Alexander Gibb (searchinsany) 2 years ago


    I didn’t mention The Book of Revelation in my question. My point is that all John’s writings are after AD 90 according to most commentators. If so why did he not mention the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in AD 70.

searchinsany profile image84

Alexander Gibb (searchinsany) says

2 years ago
  • lone77star profile image

    Rod Martin Jr (lone77star) 2 years ago

    Nowhere on your page did you mention Moses parting the sea. Why? Could it be because it was not relevant? There were millions of things John of Patmos did not mention in Revelation. That lack does nothing to date his writings.