getitrite profile image 79

Why should a book that throws in random acts of magic be considered "Historically Accurate" ??


sort by best latest

lone77star profile image92

Rod Martin Jr (lone77star) says

2 years ago
 |  Comment
Hendrika profile image72

Hendrika says

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Link10103 profile image

    Link10103 2 years ago

    One has to wonder why that is, especially since there are very little if any other sources to cross reference its validity.

0

christiananrkist says

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Link10103 profile image

    Link10103 2 years ago

    I dont disagree with that, but when people claim the magical parts are true but then say stuff like Harry Potter is fiction...you kind of have to scratch your head a bit.


  • See all 13 comments

1 answer hidden due to negative feedback. Show

working