"OPEN TO DOUBT. To accept a belief simply because it
is customary implies that one is dishonest, cowardly, and
lazy. Must dishonesty, cowardice, and laziness, therefore, be
the primary conditions of morality?" - Friedrich Nietzsche, The Dawn of Day
This is a wonderful summary of how many people form their beliefs about the world, even if you don't necessarily agree with his characterization of morality. How many of us are bound by custom, without even realizing it? I bet if we were all truly honest with ourselves, there would be a plethora of beliefs that were not logically justified, yet that we all subscribe to.
Agreed. This is typically the case when we are "brought up" believing something. Belief then simply becomes a habit and not something we consciously chose.
Also, when everyone else is acting the same way we are, we don't want to stand out or be different. Social pressure contorts and twists our shapeless souls into a straight line of conformity.
In my case (because I've been through this), it was simply fear that caused me to stick to my beliefs. It's what I grew up believing. So even if I didn't have a legitimate reason for believing it, I stuck to it because it was my "safe zone." Whenever I tried to logically reason that just because I'd always been taught something didn't make it true, my brain would automatically shut out the thought as "blasphemy." alot of it was just plain old fear of hell and brimstone. lol.
The psychological shackles that are imposed upon us are extremely hard to break; some people never break them at all.
To this day, I still feel the pull of Christianity, even after I have completely disavowed the supernatural elements. If I were to walk into a church, I would feel guilty if I were to cuss or say anything "blasphemous," even though I have no allegiance to the belief system at all! It's quite irksome.
There's also keeping the peace, and not being unnecessarily mean to people who you happen to disagree with. If a nice old lady tells me about God, I'll just listen to her and smile so I don't ruin her day. If a person my age talks about it, it's easier to be open about my disagreement.
No. I don't think I have the epistemological (how do we know what we know) position to say that I KNOW all about the universe.
However, I'm skeptical of the current conception of God, and by contemporary usage, I would be considered an atheist.
I am of the opinion that the moment you say, "I have truth!" you are no longer looking for truth but are then on a path of defending the truth you declare to have found. There was a time when I declared myself and agnostic but then one day grew tired of defending my agnosticism.
So what do you declare yourself to be now?
I don't declare. I find it difficult to deny that spirituality is a integral part of the human experience, so in that vein I fondly ponder a line of thinking that causes me to feel hopeful, energized, and generally content with my life.
Some of these thoughts are likely to be recurrent to the point of having become beliefs but I am always open to a new idea. I find my personal thoughts to be a place of tranquility into which I can retreat from the cacophony of humanity arguing over ideologies that they have weaved into their personal identities.
I like your mentality. It's very difficult to find people who are open-minded about the world they live in and willing to be open to new ideas and philosophies.
I am happy you feel that way. From what I have seen of you in the forums, you appear to be quite open minded yourself.
(I am working online right now and I'm responding to HP email notifications. If I'm slow in answering your posts it's because some of those notifications don't get to me in real time..)
That is a very astute observation. I like it.
was just checking in before bed and just gotta say that, "regardless of the subject matter, .............We Are All Prisoners of our own mind".
And regardless of what we might think ... we never truly escape from it.
All that we can do is to modify it to suit our own comfort.
This is what has happened in religion ... the origional story has been modified to suit confort levels with each passing generation. Most of the words may be the same, yet our interpretations have changed due to those few words that WERE changed.
see Ya in a few hours
I suppose Nietzsche is referring to conformism. Yes, it may be lazy, cowardly and dishonest, and it annoys the hell out of me, but in our ancestral past it would have been an adaptive learning mechanism. It takes a lot of time and resources to investigate every proposition through trial and error; sometimes it's easy just to conform. However, I do believe the adaptive function of conformism is needed less in this day and age (hence the annoyance!), and this is probably what Nietzsche was noticing. We have far more time to consider the veracity of our beliefs now.
The most annoying thing about conformism is its vulnerability to the words and propaganda of oppressors. Every day the media feeds us information that we are inclined to believe. Even today the headlines condemning only one side in the Syrian civil war make me sick. Most people probably don't even know about the atrocities committed by the "rebels".
Am not sure which is worse of three:
People who use biblical sound bites, political/satirical sound bites or those who use philosophical sound bites to make egregious judgmental sound bites against their inescapable, fellow human beings. To fully grasp what 'Freddie' was explaining, one must read thoroughly his words and then look at the society he lived in, which influenced his writings. For years, people have misquoted him as saying, "God is dead.", when he never actually meant god is dead. Furthermore, it was a question he posed NOT a summary. Sigh. Belief systems themselves are not formed by moral, amoral or immoral attachments, they are enforced by them.
James.
He specifically called Christianity a "disease." He didn't believe in God, and he attacked the conception of God that Christianity holds to.
There is no soundbite. You should probably practice the "close reading" Nietzsche calls for in "The Dawn of Day." That way, you won't come off like you didn't even read what I quoted, or the fact that I said it didn't necessarily have to apply to morality, WHICH WAS THE CONTEXT of what he was talking about in the quote (sorry for the caps, there's no bold or italics that can be used for emphasis).
And, as anyone who has read the least bit of Nietzsche knows, he loved to use aphorisms, and his writing isn't the traditional essay style of one paragraph to another in most cases. Citing what directly came before, and what directly came after, isn't likely to provide any "missing context."
He never said he did not believe in Creator. He said he despised the Judeo-Christian idea of God -a disease, yes- {more so the presentation of the Judeo-Christian doctrine} and above everything despised his preceding philosophers for being so gullible as to fall in line, like good little soldiers, with Judeo-Christian practices. That they had abandoned pure thinking for good living under the golden fist of tyranny {the Church}. His one work, a very aphoristic at that, titled Beyond Good-Evil, sites this numerous times, and what I also agree upon: The formation, the very consideration of the good-evil paradox is what creates all religion {science & sensation}. He believed it was irrational to argue good-evil, which creates the Morality Scenario. Morality {the three collectively} would imply bastardization of the priori itself. He further sites that in the future -our time- self consciousness, sophism, etc would excel to exceedingly great heights, yet was not convinced it was the solution to the issues of humanism. In fact, he makes strong notations about science and religion all being of our doing, a compulsion to destroy, and completely out of order with nature, our surroundings. Most can argue he was an agnostic but no one can argue he firmly believed there was no Creator. And his mentions of the natural world lean strongly to his believing in one, rather than not...
James.
Just read a book; The Power Of A Habit. It takes a while to develop a habit and no thought to continue it as shown by brain scans. I think Neitzsche gives too much credit to the human. The book is scary.
I predict that you will find much less scary a book by T.D. Jakes, "The Power Of A Thought." Humans have the capacity to replace any habit they feel is inhibiting their shot at a successful life.
I like TD Jakes, I will track this down.
Yet otherwise intelligent people will question vociferously in one area of their life but blindly accept other things in other areas of their life.
That's the really crazy thing!
Well, the herd mentality is effective for many animal species.
Sheeple are just doing what comes naturally.
Not unlike lemmings.
I just finished reading a book by a moral phsycologist. The book is called "Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion." He uses six Moral Foundations to describe the difference between liberals and conservative thinking and behavior. These six moral foundations are like taste buds on our tongue. Taste buds allow us to taste sweet, salty, sour, and bitter. Some people have more sensitivity to different tastes than others. The six Moral Foundations are:
•Care
•Liberty
•Fairness
•Loyalty
•Authority
•Sanctity
He says when these various needs are fulfilled, certain genes trigger nuerotransmitters that give us pleasure. Without going into a lot of detail, he says it's different for liberals than it is for conservatives.
That sounds like something Haidt would write. Perhaps he's developed his arguments since I read them (there were 5 foundations the last time), but he tends to give some rather flimsy arguments for why these particular traits are `moral' while others are not. He draws on evolutionary arguments that are little more than "this would have been adaptive therefore it evolved". It could have evolved this way, that doesn't mean it did. There could be more learning involved than he believes.
Also, by applying his arguments to "liberals and conservatives" and calling one of his moral traits "liberty", he appears to be pandering to the American book markets, which I understand are quite receptive to anything referring to this political dichotomy (Ann Coulter? yikes).
You are right, he is the author. He also uses two other metaphors. One is the elephant and the rider. The giant elephant is our first emotional, intuitive response that we want to make, followed by the rider, which is our rational reasoning taking over to keep the elephant on track. The other metaphor is the chimp and the bee hive. We are like the chimp, when comes to independence of solving problems and as and as behive when it comes to working together as groups to solve problems.
He also asserts that conservatives are better at political situations because they are more attuned to all six of the moral foundations , while liberals are more attuned to four. I'm paraphrasing this, so if it doesn't come out right, I wrote a book review hub if you want to read it. I feel that what he has written is consistent with the way I experience myself behaving and others when in political discourse. He says there are actually three divisions: liberals, libertarians, and conservatives.
I think the main problem with his Haidt's arguments was put forward by someone called Hauser, who said: “Neither I nor any other feeling creature can just have an emotion: something in the brain must recognize that this is an emotion-worthy situation". So in other words there must be some level of reasoning that occurs before an emotion takes place. Now this could be automatic or intuitive like Haidt suggests, or it could be conscious. The common term to describe this pre-reasoning is appraisal. There is a great article available online by someone called Ellsworth, entitled Appraisal processes in emotion. Your hub was a good read, thanks. Haidt is a leading academic when it comes to understanding morality, so you certainly have good sense to have read his book.
Thank you for reading my hub and sharing your knowledge on the subject.
by Kitty Fields 6 years ago
Why is it that Christians believe that Buddhists, Hindus, Pagans, Native Americans, etc. are all wrong in their beliefs and that they'll all go somewhere horrible when they die? Why can't we just accept that other people have different lives and different experiences, and let them believe how they...
by Fairbear 14 years ago
Speaking only for myself here. I can't see inside other people's minds, so I don't if it's the same for them. When a person tells me about God and Jesus and the whole nine yards, my first natural inclination is that there is no real truth in it. This non-belief just occurs naturally without any...
by College politico 13 years ago
Recently I wrote a hub on faith and imagination. Since I was interested in hearing others opinions on how we should use faith in our imagination I started a thread on this forum. Unfortunately it was high-jacked and the topic at hand was not able to be discussed. So this is basically my second...
by Pauline C Stark 6 years ago
Why Do Religious People Get So Angry At Atheists?When it comes to Atheism, most religious people get angry and even combative when it comes to this subject. I wonder why, especially in this day and age, one would feel anger towards another human being with a different perception/outlook/belief....
by Beth Perry 10 years ago
When does a particular belief go from being considered a "cult" to being accepted as a "religion"?Historically, practically every "religion" started out being seen as a cult, whether it was the belief that Jesus is the son of God, that Zoroaster was a witness for the...
by cjhunsinger 9 years ago
Central to Christian belief is the claim of a Blessed Trinity or the Trinitarian theology. This is, essentially, the belief that from one god, two other divinities (deities) emerge and co-exist or in theological terms, they are a, One that is All and All that is One, a consubstantial existence of...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |