"The debate among contemporary philosophers has therefore moved beyond the facile presumption of atheism to a discussion of the so-called "Hiddenness of God"- in effect, a discussion of the probability or expectation that God, if He existed, would leave more evidence of His existence than what we have. Unsatisfied with the evidence we have, some atheists have argued that God, if He existed, would have prevented the world's unbelief by making His existence starkly apparent. But why should God want to do such a thing? On the Christian view it is actually a matter of relative indifference to God whether people believe that He exists or not. For what God is interested in is building a love relationship with us, not just getting us to believe that He exists. There is no reason at all to think that if God were to make His existence more manifest, more people would come into a saving relationship with Him. In fact, we have no way of knowing that in a world of free persons in which God's existence is as obvious as the nose on one's face that more people would come to love Him and know His salvation than in the actual world. But then the claim that if God existed, He would make His existence more evident than it is has little or no warrant, thereby undermining the claim that the absence of such evidence is itself positive evidence that God does not exist." -William Lane Craig (my emphasis on the bold words).
This contradicts every type of Christianity, liberal or conservative. All flavors of Christianity would ultimately teach that God does want us to believe he exists. It isn't a "matter of indifference." Theists are always asserting that God desires a relationship with his children. It seems as though Craig will say almost anything to avoid the divine hiddenness charge he is addressing. It's also difficult to understand how we could have a relationship with someone without believing in that person's existence, which seems to be implied by Craig's subordination of belief in existence to having the relationship.
Furthermore, Craig claims that if God's existence was "as obvious as the nose on one's face," people would not necessarily love God or desire that saving relationship. I don't see how that is even possible! If God's existence was more self-evident, why would a petty human being NOT desire to communicate with the divine creator of the cosmos? It's an absurd leap of logic to suggest anything otherwise.
Now, Craig does have a point with regards to the "love and salvation" part of God. There would be some who would question God on various aspects of the universe, and may not necessarily want to "love" him. However...even in these cases, people would still believe God existed, and if someone believes God exists, the person is closer to salvation than one who denies his existence.
On a side note, I only used he when referring to God because of the convention and there has been no consensus on a better way to express a pronoun when it comes to God, at least that I have seen.
I also apologize for misspelling the word. I rarely type it. The correct spelling is snafu.
What say you?
What if God is already plain as the light of day...
but since men insist of recreating Him in their own shades,
the illusion that He is illusive dominates.
This is the basis of all the confusion that is not God but ascribe to Him and as Him.
by Mahaveer Sanglikar2 weeks ago
Many believers like to say that Atheists should prove that there is no God. Believers should know that existence has to be proved, not the non-existence. If a thing exists, it is possible to prove its existence. So...
by Julie McFarland4 years ago
I was a missionary in the christian faith for years. I went to a bible college. I've read the bible - at least a dozen times, cover to cover. I've studied the dogmas, the doctrines and the theology -...
by Alexander A. Villarasa3 years ago
The Copernican Principle as a philosophical notion posits that humans occupy NO privileged or exceptional position in the universe. This has been the prevailing/reigning paradigm of scientific and societal...
by Alan24 months ago
In other words, does the existence of "God" depend upon the mind of Man to support that existence?
by Sean Thomas Gartland5 years ago
If you have any evidence please present it.
by amine sehibi2 years ago
can anyone, show me the evidence that enables the modern science to disprove the existence of God.Of course if the modern science is able to disprove his existences .
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.