Article in my local paper - in a rare report on what the TSA is actually accomplishing, they found another loaded weapon in carry on luggage in the little Boise, Idaho airport. The weapon had 10 rounds loaded , including one in the chamber. Boise police were notified, who confiscated the weapon and cited the passenger. He will have to pay a penalty to the TSA, possibly several thousand dollars.
This is the fifth incident this year, and the second this week. Ten loaded weapons were found in 2013.
The moral? Don't complain when you are searched. Don't complain when a wheelchair, child's bag or bulky clothing (Depends) is searched. Loaded weapons are still coming into the airports with the intent of carrying them onto the plane - perhaps the one you are seated in.
Communist trash! I'll take my gun onto a plane if I want to! Because this is 'Murica! And in 'Murica, I take my guns wherever I want!
Then I will too! It will be the OK corral in the sky!
Brilliant Zelkiiro...Lets hope one day you don't forget your coveted weapon and you piss someone off that hasn't forgot theirs....
This is a somewhat public school mentality. Intent to harm goes a long way in determining if an action is dangerous. Finding that some idiot attempted to circumvent the rules is not tantamount to proving that we are somehow safer because the idiot wasn't thinking through how his actions might be perceived.
I haven't heard anything about the case. Was he, indeed, a terrorist? Was there evidence of intent to remove the gun from the carry on during the flight?
I'm not arguing against the value of TSA regulations. Just attempting to point out that every infraction documented is not evidence of a disaster thwarted.
When every one of those trying to sneak weapons on board claim innocence of intentional wrongdoing, how can you tell which is a terrorist?
As far as intent to remove the gun from the carry on during the flight - who knows? It never got on board, which was probably a good thing. There isn't a person in this country that thinks it is still legal to carry a weapon on board a plane, so it was an obvious attempt to circumvent the law.
I don't want a civilian with a gun on the plane with me. I don't care if they are technically "a terrorist" or not.
by Credence24 years ago
Somewhere within the tapestry of recent history a determination was made that fully automatic sub machine guns like the Thompson could not be obtained by the private citizen for self defense. These were the weapons of...
by Mike Russo3 years ago
Today marks six months since the Sandy Hook shootings. Over 5,000 people have been killed by guns since then. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ … oting.htmlWhat are your thoughts?
by rhamson7 years ago
With Irans new revelations that they have a secret site for the nuclear capabilities is this the latest step in the path to a nuclear war?
by GA Anderson2 years ago
Whether we want to or not?Pres, Obama's announcement - we will engage ISSA!Hold on folks, before you jump...If I had my druthers, the Iraq war would not have happened - I think it was a dumb move.When we left Iraq...
by Mike15 months ago
If one does a search on information regarding banning Police Departments from having Military Type equipment and weapons, You will come up with pages of info on this topic.https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=co...
by rhamson4 years ago
We have several technologies that might be an alternative to new gun sales in th US. One solution is for the gun to be fail safed to the owner only. This would discourage stolen weapons due to the inability of anybody...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.