jump to last post 1-50 of 202 discussions (770 posts)

Evolutionism the greatest story ever told

  1. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy.
       If want to continue to believe you come from a rocky soup. You can stop reading and leave now, but if you seek the truth you are most welcome to read on: BTW Please note the dates on these quotes then ask yourself “If they knew that evolution was wrong. How did this lie get into the schools?” Good question read on.

    “Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Professor  Jean Rostand, a much more famous French biologist (he was a member of the Academy of Sciences of the French Academy)Jean Rostand was ... an atheist 8 March 1984. updated March 5, 1995*

    What do Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao Tse-tung, Kip Kinkle, have in common? Evolution!

       A lot of atheist would have you believe that Hilter was a Catholic(it makes them feel good and dull the conscience). True, he went to a catholic church since he was young, but later in life he left the faith, and soon drop the Holy Bible and got a copy of the evolutionary bible(be sure to read the entire title) "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. That last part is too often left out for obvious reasons. Do you know why the people above killed almost 1 billion people(or more) combined? Because they believed we were all animals and human life is worth nothing and only the strong should survive.

    “Racism. This is the ugly secret that evolutionists don't want to discuss; that Darwin, Huxley and many of the early advocates of evolution stated publicly that Asians, Africans, Australian Aborigines and other non-white, non-European groups were evolutionary throwbacks. Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton, was a pioneer in the early field of eugenics which was the study of skills by ethnic groups. While Galton's work was relatively harmless, Hitler's to synthesize natural selection by exterminating a race of people was not. You are not as evolved as us so you must killed off. If we forget this past we are doomed to repeat it.

    “I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it has been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future.“ Malcolm Muggeridge (British philosopher), The Advocate, March 8 1984.

    “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.” Dr. T. N. Tahmisian (Atomic Energy Commission), The Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959.


        Most people(evolutionist included) think the theory of evolution was first proposed by Charles Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and experiments. Wrong! The truth is that Darwin was not its originator, and neither does the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory consists of an adaptation to nature of the ancient dogma of materialist philosophy. Although it is not backed up by scientific discoveries, the theory is blindly supported in the name of materialist philosophy. Not every evolutionist is atheist, but every atheist is an evolutionists. Why? Because that’s all they got, and if they admit their fairy tale is a lie, it would only leave one other option, Intelligent Design ie GOD! And atheist can’t stand the idea of being held accountable for their actions. Last chance if you want to stay and evolutionary atheist. Okay here we go:

       People who believe in evolution have been brainwashed. Even though they are quick to say the same about Creationists, but let’s do the math(evolutionist hate math) students spend 12 years in public schools that roughly 2280 days not including college, If the child goes to church they go 1 day a week that 52 times a years that roughly 624 days in 12 years, which has more time brainwash. So it would seem that Christians are thinking outside box. Some Christians I know never went to church as children there parents were agnostic and they believed evolution, went to college and were further indoctrinated with evolution, but when they did their homework on what they were taught they couldn’t believe the BULL they were taught as fact. The field of evolutionary study is fraught with scandal and deception. Unfortunately, those who question evolution are subjected to criticism and censorship. Thus, evolution, disguised as science, is forced upon students by means that intimidates questioning and stifles reasoning. In effect, students are brainwashed to accept evolution without question. Don’t believe me ? You should watch the movie “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” It will you think twice. “We have no acceptable theory of evolution at the present time. There is none; and I cannot accept the theory that I teach to my students each year. Let me explain. I teach the synthetic theory known as the neo-Darwinian one, for one reason only; not because it’s good, we know it is bad, but because there isn’t any other. Whilst waiting to find something better you are taught something which is known to be inexact, which is a first approximation.“ Professor Jerome Lejeune, in a lecture given in Paris on March 17, 1985, translated by Peter Wilders.
    “Children believe the Theory of Evolution because they have been brainwashed by the education system. Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support. They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense. These government-educated kids actually believe this nonsense. Just ask atheist. Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly. What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible. Don't believe that nonsense.
    The main problem with atheist and evolutionist is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring themselves to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God. Humans have a big mental fault. They are not able to admit they were wrong. Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision to reject God.
    If you speak with an Evolutionist you will find that two rarely agree on what evolution is, because it’s a lie and it too often changes, and when you have them in a corner they used one of these escape sayings, “you’re just religionist nut“, “You (enter swear words here)”, Sarcastic/with smiles remarks the void or intelligence response, or my fav “You’re just afraid of Science.” I find this one particularity funny, because evolution is anything, but science.

    "In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to `bend' their observations to fit in with it" (H. Lipson, 1980, "A Physicist Looks at Evolution," Physics Bulletin, 31, p. 138).

    For years Christian and Creationist have been offering money for proof of Evolution some up to 250,000 dollars til this day no one has step forward, let’s find out why:

    Breaking Down The Evolutionism Fairy Tale

    Natural Selection/Random Genetic Drift

      Kent R. Rieske, B.Sc., and Bible Life Ministries a Creation Science wrote an article on the lengths Evolutionary atheist will go to avoid acknowledging a creator. Warning: This is funny. He wrote
    “The body and soul of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution was his idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations. Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates between the old species and the new.
    The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many laughable flaws. One of the best examples of evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary theory of natural selection, which states that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations to improve a wing stub that is useless? The Theory of Evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the opposite of natural selection. According to natural selection, the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny.
    We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing, so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense."
       The theory of "natural selection" is the basis and foundation for the Theory of Evolution. The existence of birds literally destroys the theory of natural selection. The rest of this page stomps and grinds into dust the failed Theory of Evolution. Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-term plan to the millions of generations in order to keep the lighter bone plan progressing? The idea that birds or anything else has million-generation evolutionary plans is childish. The evolutionary concept of growing a wing over millions of generations violates the very foundation of evolution, natural selection.
      Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or another. Take fish for example. We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things at times. Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs? That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story. The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of drowning in the water. One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard. If you believe this evolutionary nonsense, you need psychiatric help.
      Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene during the Triassic period. The fossil record (petrified bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs? They do not exist, because the dinosaurs did not evolve.”
    Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending upright eating from the treetops. They claimed natural selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long neck. This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder that other species could not reach. One day during the assembly of a skeleton for a museum display someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that the neck could not be lifted higher than stretched horizontally in front of them. The natural selection theory was proven to be a big lie. The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an undergrowth eater. The long neck actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in his environment, just the opposite from the natural Theory of Natural Selection. Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side of the river. This is typical of the stupid logic of an evolutionist.”
    “One could argue at this point that such minor changes extrapolated over millions of years could result in macroevolutionary change. But the evidence will not support this argument Thus, the changes observed in the laboratory are not analogous to the sort of changes needed for macroevolution. Those who argue from microevolution to macroevolution may be guilty, then, of employing a false analogy, especially when one considers that microevolution may be a force of stasis, not transformation . For those who must describe history of life as a purely natural phenomenon, the winnowing action of natural selection is truly a difficult problem to overcome. For scientists who are content to describe accurately those processes and phenomena which occur in nature (in particular, stasis) natural selection acts to prevent major evolutionary change(Michael Thomas, “Stasis Considered, Origins Research, Vol. 12, 1989, p.11).
      After this broke out and Natural Selection was ruled an EPIC failure and many jumped ship. But rather than admitting they were wrong some diehard evolutionary atheist “scientist” came up with new term Random Genetic Drift which is the random change in the genetic composition of a population due to chance events causing unequal participation of individuals in producing succeeding generations. Along with natural selection, genetic drift is a principal force in evolution. Seriously? Yea Read on. “Modern experimental work indicates that variations in organisms appear in consequence of 1) the duplication or multiplication of the chromosomes that occur in the cell nucleus, 2) in the translocation or displacement of parts of chromosomes, 3) the loss of chromosomes or parts of chromosomes, 4) gene mutations, which appear to be the result of the rearrangement of the molecules that make up the gene, or the action of inhibitors or stimulators of the genes, 5) loss of genes, 6) cross-breeding varieties.
    All the above causes are simply a shuffling or rearrangement of parts of the chromosomes or of genes. Such rearrangements may be expected to yield a considerable amount of variation, but clearly must be within the type...
    ...If a species be defined as a freely interbreeding community, no new animal. Pause wait a minute this sounds familiar (Gen 1:25) Okay moving on..
    This explains why all breeds of dogs, pigeons, etc., despite their great diversity are still dogs, pigeons, etc. That it is impossible to change a dog or a pigeon into anything else but a dog or a pigeon is evident from such facts as the following which are taken from the work of Dr. Hurst, already quoted: "1) The gene is the sole basis of hereditary transmissions. 2) In every case that has been investigated more than one pair of genes are concerned in the development of each character...Genetical experiments show that in the simplest case, at least four pairs of genes are concerned in the organization and development of the wild agouti coat colour of rabbits, and many other genes are also concerned." The rearrangement of the molecules that make up one or more of the genes that regulate the colour of the rabbits' fur is likely to effect some change in that colour, but even if there be a simultaneous arrangement of the molecules of all such genes, the effect on the animal's coat is confined to the colour; all such changes are necessarily within narrow limits, and this applies equally to the genes that regulate other parts of the rabbit, and those of all other animals Take a simple one-called organism, such as the amoeba - shuffle ad infinitum the constituent molecules of all the genes that control organization of the amoeba, and what can the result be other than a modified amoeba?
    In view of the discoveries in genetics made during the past 35 years, those who have a legal training marvel how any geneticist can believe that the great variety of animals that now exist are offspring of some ancestor far more simple than an amoeba.

    This is very remarkable in view of the fact that breeding experiments lasting over some 30 years have been made with the vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster. This produces about 25 generations in a year, hence some 900 successive generations of this species have been bred in the laboratory in the unsuccessful attempt to convert it into another type. This corresponds to about 30,000 years of human existence. There appears to exist no mechanism whereby a new type of organism can arise from an existing one. This explains why all breeds of dogs, pigeons, etc., despite their great diversity are still dogs, pigeons, etc.
    Evolutionists insist that many unlimited, little changes over long periods of time amount to major changes. They cite as facts for evolution: mutation and natural selection. However, these are mere mechanisms for change. They do not indicate evidence of any kind for the amount of change that can occur.
    With regard to the mechanisms of mutation and natural selection, Roger Lewin sums the conclusion of the Macroevolution Conference in Chicago writing, “The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. At the risk of doing violence to the positions of some of the people at the meeting, the answer can be given as a clear, “ (Roger Lewin, Evolution Theory under Fire, Science, vol 210, 21 November 1980, p.883).


    Radiometric dating

    “Radiometric dating is a very plausible and understandable premise. In fact many good dates can come from it if the data is interpreted correctly. But with some technical issues and the evolution world view pressure radiometric dating is part of the propaganda of the evolutionists that is not friendly to evolution.
    Radiometric dating is based on the premise that there are radioactive isotopes in nature that decay at a regular rate from the parent element to the daughter element. If we know three things we can use them to date items that contain those isotopes.”
    The original concentration of the parent isotope.
    The concentration of the daughter element or isotope
    The beta decay rate

    Arthur Keith (1866 -1955) Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons
    “Evolution is unproved and improvable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” This is the creed of evolution is “They seek any possible explanation to remove the Creator and His rule from their lives. They are assailants of God.” Anything, but God

    Carbon Dating

    Carbon dating fares a little better but is still not very accurate. In 1984 Hansruedi Stutz found some sandstone with fossilized mussels in it and with fragments of coalified wood. The sandstone described as coming from Magenwil, Switzerland is said to be 20 million years old and thus the coalified wood found in the sandstone along side the mussels could be at the approximate same age. Mr. Stutz sent samples to the Physikalisches Institute of the University of Bern, Switzerland. This is a very prestigious laboratory and could be counted on in processing the samples with utmost care to eliminate any contamination. Given the assumed date of the sandstone the 14C reading in the wood, assuming it was the same age, should read as an infinite age as all perceptible 14C would have been converted to 12C in around 100,000 years.
    Instead the laboratory gave the date of 36,440 years +/- 330 years. That all the 14C is not gone shows that the sandstone is probably not near the assumed either.
    Few the many errors of Carbon that were kicked out, because it would discredit evolution http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/carbondating.html
    Are Decay Rates Constant?
    The decay rate is limited by the light constant c and if c has changed over the years as Barry Setterfield says then past decay rate could have been much substantially faster.
    But some recent experiments in beta decay of ionized atoms have been accelerated up to a billion fold. During experimentation 163Dy, a stable nuclide under normal earth conditions would found to decay to 163Ho in 47 days when the conditions were bare nucleus of the completely ionized state. That is 1400 times the normal half life in the 163Dy - 163Ho decay rate. In the rhenium  osmium dating system, which is an isotopic clock used by evolutionists, the 187Re decays to 187Os with a half life of only 33 years. The experiment involved the fully ionized 187Re in a storage ring which were found to decay at a rate of almost a billion times faster than normal decay. The normal 187Re  187Ho half life is 42 billion years.

    Geologic Column

    “Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column in order to illustrate the supposed progression of "primitive" life forms to "more complex" systems we observe today. Yet, "since only a small percentage of the earth's surface obeys even a  portion of the geologic column ¦the claim of their having taken place to form a continuum of rock/life/time over the earth is therefore a fantastic and imaginative contrivance.1" "The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled."2 This supposed column is actually saturated with "polystrate fossils" (fossils extending from one geologic layer to another) that tie all the layers to one time-frame. "To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation." Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the definitive work in this field.4 According to this column humans and tobacco are twins.



    The fossil record

    “Lacking laboratory evidence for natural origins of the universe, of life, and species, evolutionists argue that fossils in the earth's crust show natural origin of species. But once again, evidence is lacking or at best is circumstantial and debatable.“ Harvard Professor Gould claims that “Evolution occurs in spurts, not gradually.” But according to Kent R. Rieske, B.Sc that’s a scientist, not a professor. “This theory attempts to explain the lack of continuity in the fossil record. However, this theory is more troublesome than the gradual change theory. Large jumps or spurts in the fossil record don't prove evolution at all. In fact, they disprove evolution. The theory that evolution can occur in spurts, because the fossil record shows it did not occur gradually, is a wild stretch of the imagination. Species have some characteristics similar to other species, but similarity doesn't prove any evolutionary link whatsoever. There are more than missing links in biology. There are entire missing chains in 100% of the branches of the false evolutionary tree.
    Harvard paleontologist Dr. Gould wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils. All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups are characteristically abrupt (Gould, Stephen, The Pandas Thumb, New York: Norton, 1980, pp 181, 189).
    Francis Hitching: “When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren’t there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either they don’t exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about whether a particular fossil is, or isn’t, or might be, transitional between this group and that (Hitching, Francis, The Neck of the Giraffe: where Darwin went wrong, New Haven, Conn.: Ticknor and Fields, 1982, pp 56-57;.p. 19).
    Mark Ridley of Oxford University wrote, “... no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation.”
    “The gradual change of fossil species has never been part of the evidence for evolution. In the chapters on the fossil record in the Origin of Species, Darwin showed that the record was useless for testing between evolution and special creation because it has gaps in it. The same argument still applies.” (Ridley, Mark, 1981). What Darwin really said of the fossil record was that, this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory.”
    Phillip E. Johnson of the Berkeley Writes. “Darwinism is not so much an inference from the facts as a deduction from naturalistic philosophy” (Johnson, Phillip. The evolution backlash: Debunking Darwin. World, March 1997 p. 13). John Weister, chairman of the Science Education Commission of the American Scientific Affiliation, states more bluntly that “Darwinism is naturalism masquerading as science” (World 1997, p. 14).
       In fact, many evolutionists are now espousing the theory of Punctuated Equilibrium to explain why the missing links are missing in the fossil record. They are admitting that the fossil record shows that populations of organisms resist change for millions of years. This period of time allows opportunity for organisms to be fossilized. When populations evolve, the time period is so short (as in one to two million years) that too few opportunities exist for organisms to be fossilized. Thus, transitional fossils documenting evolution from one kind of organism into another are missing because the change took place so quickly. This interpretation of the fossil record is not evidence. It is an excuse for the absence of evidence.
    The creation model correctly predicted that the fossil record would show fully functional, "isolated" populations of organisms that resist change. Fossil evidence confirms the laboratory observations and predictions. The evidence supports the supernatural explanation for species.

    Age of the Earth/Current Population

    Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the definitive work in this field.4 Scientific observations since 1829 have shown that the earth's magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate, demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1,400 years. In practical application its strength 20,000 years ago would approximate that of a magnetic star. Under those conditions many of the atoms necessary for life processes could not form. These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is young, within a few thousand of years. This fact also how even more why carbon dating is wrong. There is more carbon now in our atmosphere then there ever could have been “Billions” of years ago. World population growth rate in recent times is about 2% per year. Practicable application of growth rate throughout human history would be about half that number. Wars, disease, famine, etc. have wiped out approximately one third of the population on average every 82 years. Starting with eight people, and applying these growth rates since the Flood of Noah's day (about 4500 years ago) would give a total human population at just under six billion people. However, application on an evolutionary time scale runs into major difficulties. Starting with one "couple" just 41,000 years ago would give us a total population of 2 x 1089. 9The universe does not have space to hold so many bodies


    Are you seeing a pattern for evolutionism story “Time is the god of evolutionists. The evolutionists' claim their time-god is very slow but infinitely powerful. The time-god is credited with the ability to accomplish anything and everything given enough time. It simply takes the time-god millions or billions of years to accomplish it. Scientifically impossible events are credited to the time-god. Evolutionists keep their time-god close at hand where they can watch their god's hands move around slowly, slowly, slowly trying to evolve new species but never succeeding.”
    Please Read the following carefully More math “The complexity of life is just too great for it to fall into place by itself; and even if all the parts could be assembled, the result would be a dead "thing." Now I could accept that since a complex system is being created, that there is some guiding force, but definitely not if you say the whole assembly has to come about by a series of coincidental accidents, which just happened to occur in the precise order to create life. Do you understand what it means to make the statement that it all came about "by itself?" Most don't understand that idea, and how hard it would be in reality. I would sooner believe that if you left open paint in the back of a truck with canvass, and you drove around long enough, the paint would eventually splash around and create the Mona Lisa. Or a tornado swirling through a junk yard and assembling a 747! If indeed life did begin through sheer probability of reactions, it did not do so under ordinary laws of probability. The probability to produce a simple DNA molecule by chance would be 1 in 1.0 X 1040. In other words - impossible. This mathematical evidence against spontaneous origins of life is largely ignored. Perhaps it is time to rethink your beliefs.”


    Last be not least, If evolution is fact why all the frauds and lies and cover ups let’s see Here are a few(I encourage you look these up and get big laugh)
    Neanderthal Man
    Piltdown Man
    Lucy
    Peking man
    Peppered moths
    Pithecanthropus Erectus
    Nebraska man
    Peppered Moths
    Archaeoraptor
    The Pig-tooth Man
    And whatever happen to Ida
    Here are more complex frauds
    A similar bone structures in a bat's wing, a porpoise's flipper, a horse's leg, and a human hand that indicate their evolutionary origin in a common ancestor;

    Archaeopteryx, a fossil bird with teeth in its jaws and claws on its wings, the missing link between ancient reptiles and modern birds;

    Peppered moths on tree trunks, showing how camouflage and predatory birds produced the most famous example of evolution by natural selection; but the pictures were fraudulent and the moth were simply pinned on the trees.

    Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands, thirteen separate species that diverged from one when natural selection produced differences in their beaks, and that inspired Darwin to formulate his theory of evolution;

    fruit flies with an extra pair of wings, showing that genetic mutations can provide the raw materials for evolution;

    a branching-tree pattern of horse fossils that refutes the old-fashioned idea that evolution was directed;

    drawings of ape-like creatures evolving into humans, showing that we are just animals and that our existence is merely a by-product of purposeless natural causes.

    My personal Fav Haeckel's Fraud

    In 1866, guided by the bias of evolution and atheism, German embryologist and philosopher Ernst Haeckel, concluded that evolutionary the stages of species from single cells to humans (phylogeny) were repeated in embryological development (ontogeny) of each species. He surmised that, being highest on the evolutionary tree, human embryos should pass through the stages of the lower or more primitive species, namely single cell, to fish, to amphibian, to reptile, to mammal, to human. So convinced that he was right, he self-proclaimed the "Biogenetic Law": Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny. However, it was neither a law nor correct. It was fraud.
    Haeckel supplied drawings as evidence of his “scientific law,” which can still be found in textbooks to convince students that evolution is a fact. The truth is, Haeckel’s drawings are wrong. Worse yet, they were intentionally created to mislead viewers to “see” what Haeckel believed to be true.
    During the trial, Haeckel confessed that he had altered his drawings, but excused himself by saying: :I should feel utterly condemned and annihilated by the admission, were it not that hundreds of the best observers and biologists lie under the same charge. The great majority of all morphological, anatomical, histological, and embryological diagrams are not true to nature, but are more or less doctored, schematized and reconstructed“(Bowden, Malcolm (1977), Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy? (Bromley, England: Sovereign Publications), p. 128).


    “Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a fantasy.” Charles Darwin, Life and Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229

    Hitler himself said “Let me control the textbooks and I will control the state. The state will take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing. Your child belongs to us already“ .what are you?"


    I’m an unashamed bible-thumbing Christian(YEC) and a parent, who likes science. I wrote this not scare you, but wake you up to what is really going on in the schools and the world. If you are truly a seeker of the truth and want to know more(no trolls please this simply to the thinker not the brainwashed) send me a message, all be more than happy to share my faith with you and the peace God offers through Jesus Christ. I’ll also try to answer any questions, I don’t know everything, but I’ll do my best to help you. I’ll also accept any prayer request.


    The Scientific Case Against Evolution
    A Review of Michael Denton's Evolution: A Theory in Crisis & Michael J. Behe’s Darwin’s Black Box

    http://www.ichthus.info/Evolution/DOCS/ … istsAd.pdf

    http://www.biblelife.org/evolution.htm

    http://www.bible.ca/tracks/b-darwin-was-wrong.htm

    http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter17.php

    http://www.uark.edu/~cdm/creation/presentation.htm

    http://www.drdino.com/

    http://protestantism.suite101.com/artic … z0O1VvfZIm

    And finally if you think it's just Christians who know evolution is a Lie check out this link

    http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB … amp;id=660

    *Since the Revised Quote Book stated that "Prof. Bounoure" had served as the "Director of Research" at the "French National Centre of Scientific Research" I wrote the Center [The Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique = The National Center for Scientific Research]. I asked them about the exact origin of the quotation and received the following reply, dated March 3, 1995 (translated by professional French translator, Jacques Benbassat, with some minor editing and paragraphs re-arranged in an easier to follow order):

    1. MontyApollo profile image60
      MontyApolloposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Not a good start when your first quote is just a lie...

      http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index … 922AATdW6c

      1. 0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Thank for the correction.

        1. MontyApollo profile image60
          MontyApolloposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I see that you edited the quotation, but you left out this part from the source I gave you:

          But Rostand has also written that "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses [questions - ED.] the fact of evolution." (L'Evolution des Especes [i.e., The Evolution of the Species], Hachette, p. 190). Jean Rostand was ... an atheist.

          1. 0
            thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

            That was no accident he "may" proving it is not a fact! I said no straw

            1. White Teeth profile image61
              White Teethposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              It is fucking funny that people with no science education think this can all be "debated" like some high school class in argumentative writing, but even with such an easy threshold you have to keep lying and misquoting to "prove" your point...

              1. 0
                thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Please no swearing. Are you evolutionist? Did you read the entire thing or did you stop when cards started to fall.

                1. White Teeth profile image61
                  White Teethposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  Yes, I stopped reading when the cards fell. Your first quote was lie, and then you tried to edit it with another lie...GAME OVER...like I said, it never reached the point of science, your points were simply unworthy of a debate among children...

                  1. 0
                    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    A lie? Funny words, coming from an evolutionist, Someone caught my error and I admitted it and corrected it and can't say for your evolutionism.

              2. 0
                cosetteposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                yes...i wouldn't even begin to attempt to explain it...even if i Googled supporting narratives, i don't have time to try to justify it all. the fact reamins though that the theory of evolution is lucid, heavily supported by time, fossil records, carbon dating, natural selection, etc.

                and just because something is a "theory" doesn't mean it is worthless. if you know anything about the scientific method you will understand that it takes a tremendous amount of intense study, research, deliberation and experimentation for something to become a theory.

                the creation fairy tale is supported by one book - a book loaded with inconsistencies, inaccuracies and evolving meanings of scripture to support creationists' assertion that God created Man from dust and woman from his rib, then somehow every animal on Earth was hunted and loaded onto a big man-made boat (even dinosaurs, now) with enough food and water to survive for forty days and forty nights then when the flood was over, the Grand Canyon was formed in a matter or weeks from the rushing water. if that is not absurd i don't know what is. but they are teaching this to their children. my son learned that man evolved AND he was also exposed to the creation myth and guess what? evolution made more sense to his young, keen analytical mind....

                1. spiderpam profile image58
                  spiderpamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  Could you give me an example of ONE inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the bible?  Do you realize how big Noah ark was and how long it took to build it and he didn't build it alone? You can see why the grand canyon was form quickly not slowly because there are no erosion marks and the polystarte. Obviously you don't know about creation science and there for could not tell your child the real account of creation and the flood. I did research and the creation account is the thing that make sense. And people all over the USA and beyond are waking up to this truth, and it’s about time.

                  1. Evolution Guy profile image59
                    Evolution Guyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    Oh... My ,,,, Good ... Grief!

                    lol

                    mad creation science? mad

                    What "research" did you do exactly? Which scientific journal were the results published  in?

                  2. 0
                    cosetteposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    big_smile really?

                    i already did that one time but it was PAGES long and scrolled forever...it's in one of those religious threads if you feel like digging.

                    Noah's Ark was approximately 450 feet long, if you translate "cubits". modern cruise ships are 300 feet long and if they were made of wood, as Noah's ark was, it would break from the pressure of the wind and waves, which is why they are also reinforced with steel throughout. there are over 100,000 species of animals on the planet (including insects like butterflies etc.) and the great beasts like rhinos and hippos eat 50 to 100 pounds every day. honestly how could 8 people feed all those animals? and what about their waste? what did the dinosaurs eat? do you seriously think ANY wooden structure could contain a T-rex? now where did Noah get all those trees? you couldn't just go to Home Depot and buy lumber and nails etc. you would have had to fell, chop and hew thousands of trees. what about nails? did he make those? how did he waterprood the ark?!!!!!!!!

                    i could go on but seriously it is ridiculous.

    2. goodfriendiam profile image60
      goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      thetruthhurts2009 wrote:

      Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy.
         If want to continue to believe you come from a rocky soup. You can stop reading and leave now, but if you seek the truth you are most welcome to read on: BTW Please note the dates on these quotes then ask yourself “If they knew that evolution was wrong. How did this lie get into the schools?” Good question read on.

      “Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Professor  Jean Rostand, a much more famous French biologist (he was a member of the Academy of Sciences of the French Academy) 8 March 1984.



      I am going to tell you something, and I mean this with sincerity. What would God say to you, if he was standing right in front of you? I believe he would say " how different are you from them? You say they are inhumane? But I have found you the same my child. For are not these my children also? Pointing fingers, is no different then killing someone. And because I am a good father, I have had to correct you on this" I believe this is exactly what he would say to you. For this is not the way, nor is it love. The God that I worship, is kind, yet firm, is gentle, yet correcting like a good father should, and lastly, he needs not our help, in his story, for it is his after all. peace

    3. James Agbogun profile image79
      James Agbogunposted 7 years ago in reply to this
    4. desmondcross profile image59
      desmondcrossposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Wow. What a convoluted unscientific diatribe. I think the author is brainwashed and has no notion of the Nature of Science which, at its essence, is to try and falsify its theories. Who knows where the science of evolution will go as new evidence becomes available, but if I compare what evidence was available during my school years compared to the present. The evidence for evolution is building up, partuculalry that of DNA, so much so that the confused relisious right had to come up with the crazy notion of "intelligent design". Wow, it is breathtaking because they actually accept a lot of the evidence for evolution. You cannot try and produce religious evidence against evolution because there is none. In the same way, scientists cannot ever investigate and disprove religion. It is a belief in the minds of most of mankind. So stick to that. I think he doth protest too much!

    5. video lost profile image61
      video lostposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Wow man

      1. Drop Bear profile image60
        Drop Bearposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Wow. I'm only a dumb bear, but I learned how to cut and paste today, just like everyone else here.
        Did I do good ?


        .sǝıɔǝds ɹoɟ uoıʇɐuɐ1dxǝ 1ɐɹnʇɐuɹǝdns ǝɥʇ sʇɹoddns ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ǝɥʇ .suoıʇɔıpǝɹd puɐ suoıʇɐʌɹǝsqo ʎɹoʇɐɹoqɐ1 ǝɥʇ sɯɹıɟuoɔ ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ 1ıssoɟ .ǝbuɐɥɔ ʇsısǝɹ ʇɐɥʇ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɟo suoıʇɐ1ndod "pǝʇɐ1osı" '1ɐuoıʇɔunɟ ʎ11nɟ ʍoɥs p1noʍ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ pǝʇɔıpǝɹd ʎ1ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ 1ǝpoɯ uoıʇɐǝɹɔ ǝɥʇ
        .ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ɟo ǝɔuǝsqɐ ǝɥʇ ɹoɟ ǝsnɔxǝ uɐ sı ʇı .ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ʇou sı pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıʇɐʇǝɹdɹǝʇuı sıɥʇ .ʎ1ʞɔınb os ǝɔɐ1d ʞooʇ ǝbuɐɥɔ ǝɥʇ ǝsnɐɔǝq buıssıɯ ǝɹɐ ɹǝɥʇouɐ oʇuı ɯsıuɐbɹo ɟo puıʞ ǝuo ɯoɹɟ uoıʇn1oʌǝ buıʇuǝɯnɔop s1ıssoɟ 1ɐuoıʇısuɐɹʇ 'snɥʇ .pǝzı1ıssoɟ ǝq oʇ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɹoɟ ʇsıxǝ sǝıʇıunʇɹoddo ʍǝɟ ooʇ ʇɐɥʇ (sɹɐǝʎ uoı11ıɯ oʍʇ oʇ ǝuo uı sɐ) ʇɹoɥs os sı poıɹǝd ǝɯıʇ ǝɥʇ 'ǝʌ1oʌǝ suoıʇɐ1ndod uǝɥʍ .pǝzı1ıssoɟ ǝq oʇ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɹoɟ ʎʇıunʇɹoddo sʍo11ɐ ǝɯıʇ ɟo poıɹǝd sıɥʇ .sɹɐǝʎ ɟo suoı11ıɯ ɹoɟ ǝbuɐɥɔ ʇsısǝɹ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɟo suoıʇɐ1ndod ʇɐɥʇ sʍoɥs pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ buıʇʇıɯpɐ ǝɹɐ ʎǝɥʇ .pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uı buıssıɯ ǝɹɐ sʞuı1 buıssıɯ ǝɥʇ ʎɥʍ uıɐ1dxǝ oʇ ɯnıɹqı1ınbǝ pǝʇɐnʇɔund ɟo ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ buısnodsǝ ʍou ǝɹɐ sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ʎuɐɯ 'ʇɔɐɟ uı   
        .(41 .d '7991 p1ɹoʍ) ”ǝɔuǝıɔs sɐ buıpɐɹǝnbsɐɯ ɯsı1ɐɹnʇɐu sı ɯsıuıʍɹɐp“ ʇɐɥʇ ʎ1ʇun1q ǝɹoɯ sǝʇɐʇs 'uoıʇɐı1ıɟɟɐ ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs uɐɔıɹǝɯɐ ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıssıɯɯoɔ uoıʇɐɔnpǝ ǝɔuǝıɔs ǝɥʇ ɟo uɐɯɹıɐɥɔ 'ɹǝʇsıǝʍ uɥoظ .(31 .d 7991 ɥɔɹɐɯ 'p1ɹoʍ .uıʍɹɐp buıʞunqǝp :ɥsɐ1ʞɔɐq uoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ .dı11ıɥd 'uosuɥoظ) ”ʎɥdoso1ıɥd ɔıʇsı1ɐɹnʇɐu ɯoɹɟ uoıʇɔnpǝp ɐ sɐ sʇɔɐɟ ǝɥʇ ɯoɹɟ ǝɔuǝɹǝɟuı uɐ ɥɔnɯ os ʇou sı ɯsıuıʍɹɐp“ .sǝʇıɹʍ ʎǝ1ǝʞɹǝq ǝɥʇ ɟo uosuɥoظ .ǝ dı11ıɥd
        ”.ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ ʇsuıɐbɐ pǝbɹn ǝq uɐɔ ɥɔıɥʍ uoıʇɔǝظqo snoıɹǝs puɐ snoıʌqo ʇsoɯ ǝɥʇ sı 'sdɐɥɹǝd 'sıɥʇ 'ʇɐɥʇ sɐʍ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ɟo pıɐs ʎ11ɐǝɹ uıʍɹɐp ʇɐɥʍ .(1891 'ʞɹɐɯ 'ʎǝ1pıɹ) ”.sǝı1ddɐ 11ıʇs ʇuǝɯnbɹɐ ǝɯɐs ǝɥʇ .ʇı uı sdɐb sɐɥ ʇı ǝsnɐɔǝq uoıʇɐǝɹɔ 1ɐıɔǝds puɐ uoıʇn1oʌǝ uǝǝʍʇǝq buıʇsǝʇ ɹoɟ ssǝ1ǝsn sɐʍ pɹoɔǝɹ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ pǝʍoɥs uıʍɹɐp 'sǝıɔǝds ɟo uıbıɹo ǝɥʇ uı pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uo sɹǝʇdɐɥɔ ǝɥʇ uı .uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɹoɟ ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ǝɥʇ ɟo ʇɹɐd uǝǝq ɹǝʌǝu sɐɥ sǝıɔǝds 1ıssoɟ ɟo ǝbuɐɥɔ 1ɐnpɐɹb ǝɥʇ“
        ”.uoıʇɐǝɹɔ 1ɐıɔǝds oʇ pǝsoddo sɐ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ ɟo ɹoʌɐɟ uı ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ sɐ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ sǝsn 'ʇsıuoıʇɐnʇɔund ɹo ʇsı1ɐnpɐɹb ɹǝɥʇǝɥʍ 'ʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ 1ɐǝɹ ou ...“ 'ǝʇoɹʍ ʎʇısɹǝʌıun pɹoɟxo ɟo ʎǝ1pıɹ ʞɹɐɯ
        .(91 .d.;75-65 dd '2891 'sp1ǝıɟ puɐ ɹouʞɔıʇ :.uuoɔ 'uǝʌɐɥ ʍǝu 'buoɹʍ ʇuǝʍ uıʍɹɐp ǝɹǝɥʍ :ǝɟɟɐɹıb ǝɥʇ ɟo ʞɔǝu ǝɥʇ 'sıɔuɐɹɟ 'buıɥɔʇıɥ) ʇɐɥʇ puɐ dnoɹb sıɥʇ uǝǝʍʇǝq 1ɐuoıʇısuɐɹʇ 'ǝq ʇɥbıɯ ɹo 'ʇ’usı ɹo 'sı 1ıssoɟ ɹɐ1nɔıʇɹɐd ɐ ɹǝɥʇǝɥʍ ʇnoqɐ uo sǝob ʇuǝɯnbɹɐ ssǝ1puǝ ʇɐɥʇ ǝɹɐɹ os ǝɹɐ ʎǝɥʇ ɹo '11ɐ ʇɐ ʇsıxǝ ʇ’uop ʎǝɥʇ ɹǝɥʇıǝ .ʇqnop puoʎǝq snʇɐʇs ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd oʇ sɹǝqɯnu ɥbnouǝ uı ʇou 'ʇsɐǝ1 ʇɐ ;ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇ’uǝɹɐ ʎ1dɯıs ʎǝɥʇ 's1ɐɯıuɐ ɟo sdnoɹb ɹoظɐɯ uǝǝʍʇǝq sʞuı1 ɹoɟ ʞoo1 noʎ uǝɥʍ“ :buıɥɔʇıɥ sıɔuɐɹɟ
        .(981 '181 dd '0891 'uoʇɹou :ʞɹoʎ ʍǝu 'qɯnɥʇ sɐpuɐd ǝɥʇ 'uǝɥdǝʇs 'p1nob) ʇdnɹqɐ ʎ11ɐɔıʇsıɹǝʇɔɐɹɐɥɔ ǝɹɐ sdnoɹb ɹoظɐɯ uǝǝʍʇǝq suoıʇısuɐɹʇ ;sɯɹoɟ ǝʇɐıpǝɯɹǝʇuı ɟo ʎɐʍ ǝɥʇ uı ǝ1ʇʇı1 snoıɔǝɹd suıɐʇuoɔ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ ʍouʞ sʇsıbo1oʇuoǝ1ɐd 11ɐ .s1ıssoɟ ɟo ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ǝɥʇ ʇou 'ǝ1qɐuosɐǝɹ ɹǝʌǝʍoɥ 'ǝɔuǝɹǝɟuı sı ʇsǝɹ ǝɥʇ ;sǝɥɔuɐɹq ɹıǝɥʇ ɟo sǝpou puɐ sdıʇ ǝɥʇ ʇɐ ʎ1uo ɐʇɐp ǝʌɐɥ sʞooqʇxǝʇ ɹno uɹopɐ ʇɐɥʇ sǝǝɹʇ ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ .ʎbo1oʇuoǝ1ɐd ɟo ʇǝɹɔǝs ǝpɐɹʇ ǝɥʇ sɐ sʇsısɹǝd pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uı sɯɹoɟ 1ɐuoıʇısuɐɹʇ ɟo ʎʇıɹɐɹ ǝɯǝɹʇxǝ ǝɥʇ“ 'ǝʇoɹʍ p1nob .ɹp ʇsıbo1oʇuoǝ1ɐd pɹɐʌɹɐɥ
        .ǝǝɹʇ ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝs1ɐɟ ǝɥʇ ɟo sǝɥɔuɐɹq ǝɥʇ ɟo %001 uı suıɐɥɔ buıssıɯ ǝɹıʇuǝ ǝɹɐ ǝɹǝɥʇ .ʎbo1oıq uı sʞuı1 buıssıɯ uɐɥʇ ǝɹoɯ ǝɹɐ ǝɹǝɥʇ .ɹǝʌǝosʇɐɥʍ ʞuı1 ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ ʎuɐ ǝʌoɹd ʇ,usǝop ʎʇıɹɐ1ıɯıs ʇnq 'sǝıɔǝds ɹǝɥʇo oʇ ɹɐ1ıɯıs sɔıʇsıɹǝʇɔɐɹɐɥɔ ǝɯos ǝʌɐɥ sǝıɔǝds .uoıʇɐuıbɐɯı ǝɥʇ ɟo ɥɔʇǝɹʇs p1ıʍ ɐ sı 'ʎ11ɐnpɐɹb ɹnɔɔo ʇou pıp ʇı sʍoɥs pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ǝsnɐɔǝq 'sʇɹnds uı ɹnɔɔo uɐɔ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ʇɐɥʇ ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ .uoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝʌoɹdsıp ʎǝɥʇ 'ʇɔɐɟ uı .11ɐ ʇɐ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝʌoɹd ʇ,uop pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uı sʇɹnds ɹo sdɯnظ ǝbɹɐ1 .ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝbuɐɥɔ 1ɐnpɐɹb ǝɥʇ uɐɥʇ ǝɯosǝ1qnoɹʇ ǝɹoɯ sı ʎɹoǝɥʇ sıɥʇ 'ɹǝʌǝʍoɥ .pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uı ʎʇınuıʇuoɔ ɟo ʞɔɐ1 ǝɥʇ uıɐ1dxǝ oʇ sʇdɯǝʇʇɐ ʎɹoǝɥʇ sıɥʇ“ .ɹossǝɟoɹd ɐ ʇou 'ʇsıʇuǝıɔs ɐ s’ʇɐɥʇ ɔs.q 'ǝʞsǝıɹ .ɹ ʇuǝʞ oʇ buıpɹoɔɔɐ ʇnq ”.ʎ11ɐnpɐɹb ʇou 'sʇɹnds uı sɹnɔɔo uoıʇn1oʌǝ“ ʇɐɥʇ sɯıɐ1ɔ p1nob ɹossǝɟoɹd pɹɐʌɹɐɥ “.ǝ1qɐʇɐqǝp puɐ 1ɐıʇuɐʇsɯnɔɹıɔ sı ʇsǝq ʇɐ ɹo buıʞɔɐ1 sı ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ 'uıɐbɐ ǝɔuo ʇnq .sǝıɔǝds ɟo uıbıɹo 1ɐɹnʇɐu ʍoɥs ʇsnɹɔ s,ɥʇɹɐǝ ǝɥʇ uı s1ıssoɟ ʇɐɥʇ ǝnbɹɐ sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ 'sǝıɔǝds puɐ 'ǝɟı1 ɟo 'ǝsɹǝʌıun ǝɥʇ ɟo suıbıɹo 1ɐɹnʇɐu ɹoɟ ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ʎɹoʇɐɹoqɐ1 buıʞɔɐ1“

        pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ



        .suıʍʇ ǝɹɐ oɔɔɐqoʇ puɐ suɐɯnɥ uɯn1oɔ sıɥʇ oʇ buıpɹoɔɔɐ 4.p1ǝıɟ sıɥʇ uı ʞɹoʍ ǝʌıʇıuıɟǝp ǝɥʇ pǝɥsı1qnd sɐɥ 'osɐd 1ǝ ʇɐ sɐxǝʇ ɟo ʎʇısɹǝʌıun ǝɥʇ ʇɐ sɔısʎɥd ɟo ɹossǝɟoɹd snʇıɹǝɯǝ 'sǝuɹɐq sɐɯoɥʇ .ɹp ".uoıʇɐǝɹɔ 1ɐıɔǝds ɟo ɹoʌɐɟ uı sı sʇuɐ1d ɟo pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ 'pǝɔıpnظǝɹdun ǝɥʇ oʇ" .ǝɯɐɹɟ-ǝɯıʇ ǝuo oʇ sɹǝʎɐ1 ǝɥʇ 11ɐ ǝıʇ ʇɐɥʇ (ɹǝɥʇouɐ oʇ ɹǝʎɐ1 ɔıbo1oǝb ǝuo ɯoɹɟ buıpuǝʇxǝ s1ıssoɟ) "s1ıssoɟ ǝʇɐɹʇsʎ1od" ɥʇıʍ pǝʇɐɹnʇɐs ʎ11ɐnʇɔɐ sı uɯn1oɔ pǝsoddns sıɥʇ 2".pǝ11ıɟ ǝq ɹǝʌǝu 11ıʍ ʎǝɥʇ '1ɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ sǝıɔuǝıɔıɟǝp ǝɥʇ .1ɐıɹǝʇɐɯ ɟo ʎʇıɔɹɐɔs ǝɥʇ oʇ ǝnp buıǝq sɐ pǝuıɐ1dxǝ ǝq ʇouuɐɔ sǝıɹǝs 1ɐuoıʇısuɐɹʇ ɟo ʞɔɐ1 ǝɥʇ" "1.ǝɔuɐʌıɹʇuoɔ ǝʌıʇɐuıbɐɯı puɐ ɔıʇsɐʇuɐɟ ɐ ǝɹoɟǝɹǝɥʇ sı ɥʇɹɐǝ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo ǝɯıʇ/ǝɟı1/ʞɔoɹ ɟo ɯnnuıʇuoɔ ɐ ɯɹoɟ oʇ ǝɔɐ1d uǝʞɐʇ buıʌɐɥ ɹıǝɥʇ ɟo ɯıɐ1ɔ ǝɥʇ¦ uɯn1oɔ ɔıbo1oǝb ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıʇɹod  ɐ uǝʌǝ sʎǝqo ǝɔɐɟɹns s,ɥʇɹɐǝ ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝbɐʇuǝɔɹǝd 11ɐɯs ɐ ʎ1uo ǝɔuıs" 'ʇǝʎ .ʎɐpoʇ ǝʌɹǝsqo ǝʍ sɯǝʇsʎs "xǝ1dɯoɔ ǝɹoɯ" oʇ sɯɹoɟ ǝɟı1 "ǝʌıʇıɯıɹd" ɟo uoıssǝɹboɹd pǝsoddns ǝɥʇ ǝʇɐɹʇsn11ı oʇ ɹǝpɹo uı uɯn1oɔ ɔıbo1oǝb ǝɥʇ pǝʇɔnɹʇsuoɔ ǝʌɐɥ sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ“

        uɯn1oɔ ɔıbo1oǝb

        .sɹɐǝʎ uoı11ıq 24 sı ǝɟı1 ɟ1ɐɥ oɥ781  ǝɹ781 1ɐɯɹou ǝɥʇ .ʎɐɔǝp 1ɐɯɹou uɐɥʇ ɹǝʇsɐɟ sǝɯıʇ uoı11ıq ɐ ʇsoɯ1ɐ ɟo ǝʇɐɹ ɐ ʇɐ ʎɐɔǝp oʇ punoɟ ǝɹǝʍ ɥɔıɥʍ buıɹ ǝbɐɹoʇs ɐ uı ǝɹ781 pǝzıuoı ʎ11nɟ ǝɥʇ pǝʌ1oʌuı ʇuǝɯıɹǝdxǝ ǝɥʇ .sɹɐǝʎ 33 ʎ1uo ɟo ǝɟı1 ɟ1ɐɥ ɐ ɥʇıʍ so781 oʇ sʎɐɔǝp ǝɹ781 ǝɥʇ 'sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ʎq pǝsn ʞɔo1ɔ ɔıdoʇosı uɐ sı ɥɔıɥʍ 'ɯǝʇsʎs buıʇɐp ɯnıɯso  ɯnıuǝɥɹ ǝɥʇ uı .ǝʇɐɹ ʎɐɔǝp oɥ361 - ʎp361 ǝɥʇ uı ǝɟı1 ɟ1ɐɥ 1ɐɯɹou ǝɥʇ sǝɯıʇ 0041 sı ʇɐɥʇ .ǝʇɐʇs pǝzıuoı ʎ1ǝʇǝ1dɯoɔ ǝɥʇ ɟo snǝ1ɔnu ǝɹɐq ǝɹǝʍ suoıʇıpuoɔ ǝɥʇ uǝɥʍ sʎɐp 74 uı oɥ361 oʇ ʎɐɔǝp oʇ punoɟ p1noʍ suoıʇıpuoɔ ɥʇɹɐǝ 1ɐɯɹou ɹǝpun ǝpı1ɔnu ǝ1qɐʇs ɐ 'ʎp361 uoıʇɐʇuǝɯıɹǝdxǝ buıɹnp .p1oɟ uoı11ıq ɐ oʇ dn pǝʇɐɹǝ1ǝɔɔɐ uǝǝq ǝʌɐɥ sɯoʇɐ pǝzıuoı ɟo ʎɐɔǝp ɐʇǝq uı sʇuǝɯıɹǝdxǝ ʇuǝɔǝɹ ǝɯos ʇnq
        .ɹǝʇsɐɟ ʎ11ɐıʇuɐʇsqns ɥɔnɯ uǝǝq ǝʌɐɥ p1noɔ ǝʇɐɹ ʎɐɔǝp ʇsɐd uǝɥʇ sʎɐs p1ǝıɟɹǝʇʇǝs ʎɹɹɐq sɐ sɹɐǝʎ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo pǝbuɐɥɔ sɐɥ ɔ ɟı puɐ ɔ ʇuɐʇsuoɔ ʇɥbı1 ǝɥʇ ʎq pǝʇıɯı1 sı ǝʇɐɹ ʎɐɔǝp ǝɥʇ
        ¿ʇuɐʇsuoɔ sǝʇɐɹ ʎɐɔǝp ǝɹɐ
        1ɯʇɥ.buıʇɐpuoqɹɐɔ/sɹnɐsouıp/ıɯ/ɯoɔ.ǝɹıɟ1ǝbuɐ.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ʇıpǝɹɔsıp p1noʍ ʇı ǝsnɐɔǝq 'ʇno pǝʞɔıʞ ǝɹǝʍ ʇɐɥʇ uoqɹɐɔ ɟo sɹoɹɹǝ ʎuɐɯ ǝɥʇ ʍǝɟ
        .ɹǝɥʇıǝ pǝɯnssɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝu ʇou ʎ1qɐqoɹd sı ǝuoʇspuɐs ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ sʍoɥs ǝuob ʇou sı ɔ41 ǝɥʇ 11ɐ ʇɐɥʇ .sɹɐǝʎ 033 -/+ sɹɐǝʎ 044'63 ɟo ǝʇɐp ǝɥʇ ǝʌɐb ʎɹoʇɐɹoqɐ1 ǝɥʇ pɐǝʇsuı
        .sɹɐǝʎ 000'001 punoɹɐ uı ɔ21 oʇ pǝʇɹǝʌuoɔ uǝǝq ǝʌɐɥ p1noʍ ɔ41 ǝ1qıʇdǝɔɹǝd 11ɐ sɐ ǝbɐ ǝʇıuıɟuı uɐ sɐ pɐǝɹ p1noɥs 'ǝbɐ ǝɯɐs ǝɥʇ sɐʍ ʇı buıɯnssɐ 'pooʍ ǝɥʇ uı buıpɐǝɹ ɔ41 ǝɥʇ ǝuoʇspuɐs ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝʇɐp pǝɯnssɐ ǝɥʇ uǝʌıb .uoıʇɐuıɯɐʇuoɔ ʎuɐ ǝʇɐuıɯı1ǝ oʇ ǝɹɐɔ ʇsoɯʇn ɥʇıʍ sǝ1dɯɐs ǝɥʇ buıssǝɔoɹd uı uo pǝʇunoɔ ǝq p1noɔ puɐ ʎɹoʇɐɹoqɐ1 snoıbıʇsǝɹd ʎɹǝʌ ɐ sı sıɥʇ .puɐ1ɹǝzʇıʍs 'uɹǝq ɟo ʎʇısɹǝʌıun ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝʇnʇıʇsuı sǝɥɔsı1ɐʞısʎɥd ǝɥʇ oʇ sǝ1dɯɐs ʇuǝs zʇnʇs .ɹɯ .ǝbɐ ǝɯɐs ǝʇɐɯıxoɹddɐ ǝɥʇ ʇɐ ǝq p1noɔ s1ǝssnɯ ǝɥʇ ǝpıs buo1ɐ ǝuoʇspuɐs ǝɥʇ uı punoɟ pooʍ pǝıɟı1ɐoɔ ǝɥʇ snɥʇ puɐ p1o sɹɐǝʎ uoı11ıɯ 02 ǝq oʇ pıɐs sı puɐ1ɹǝzʇıʍs '1ıʍuǝbɐɯ ɯoɹɟ buıɯoɔ sɐ pǝqıɹɔsǝp ǝuoʇspuɐs ǝɥʇ .pooʍ pǝıɟı1ɐoɔ ɟo sʇuǝɯbɐɹɟ ɥʇıʍ puɐ ʇı uı s1ǝssnɯ pǝzı1ıssoɟ ɥʇıʍ ǝuoʇspuɐs ǝɯos punoɟ zʇnʇs ıpǝnɹsuɐɥ 4891 uı .ǝʇɐɹnɔɔɐ ʎɹǝʌ ʇou 11ıʇs sı ʇnq ɹǝʇʇǝq ǝ1ʇʇı1 ɐ sǝɹɐɟ buıʇɐp uoqɹɐɔ

        buıʇɐp uoqɹɐɔ

        pob ʇnq 'buıɥʇʎuɐ ”.pob ɟo sʇuɐ1ıɐssɐ ǝɹɐ ʎǝɥʇ .sǝʌı1 ɹıǝɥʇ ɯoɹɟ ǝ1nɹ sıɥ puɐ ɹoʇɐǝɹɔ ǝɥʇ ǝʌoɯǝɹ oʇ uoıʇɐuɐ1dxǝ ǝ1qıssod ʎuɐ ʞǝǝs ʎǝɥʇ“ sı uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo pǝǝɹɔ ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ ”.ǝ1qɐʞuıɥʇun sı ʇɐɥʇ puɐ 'uoıʇɐǝɹɔ 1ɐıɔǝds sı ǝʌıʇɐuɹǝʇ1ɐ ʎ1uo ǝɥʇ ǝsnɐɔǝq ʎ1uo ʇı ǝʌǝı1ǝq ǝʍ .ǝ1qɐʌoɹdɯı puɐ pǝʌoɹdun sı uoıʇn1oʌǝ“
        suoǝbɹns ɟo ǝbǝ11oɔ 1ɐʎoɹ ǝɥʇ ɟo ʍo11ǝɟ (5591- 6681) ɥʇıǝʞ ɹnɥʇɹɐ

        ǝʇɐɹ ʎɐɔǝp ɐʇǝq ǝɥʇ
        ǝdoʇosı ɹo ʇuǝɯǝ1ǝ ɹǝʇɥbnɐp ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıʇɐɹʇuǝɔuoɔ ǝɥʇ
        .ǝdoʇosı ʇuǝɹɐd ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıʇɐɹʇuǝɔuoɔ 1ɐuıbıɹo ǝɥʇ
        ”.sǝdoʇosı ǝsoɥʇ uıɐʇuoɔ ʇɐɥʇ sɯǝʇı ǝʇɐp oʇ ɯǝɥʇ ǝsn uɐɔ ǝʍ sbuıɥʇ ǝǝɹɥʇ ʍouʞ ǝʍ ɟı .ʇuǝɯǝ1ǝ ɹǝʇɥbnɐp ǝɥʇ oʇ ʇuǝɯǝ1ǝ ʇuǝɹɐd ǝɥʇ ɯoɹɟ ǝʇɐɹ ɹɐ1nbǝɹ ɐ ʇɐ ʎɐɔǝp ʇɐɥʇ ǝɹnʇɐu uı sǝdoʇosı ǝʌıʇɔɐoıpɐɹ ǝɹɐ ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ ǝsıɯǝɹd ǝɥʇ uo pǝsɐq sı buıʇɐp ɔıɹʇǝɯoıpɐɹ
        .uoıʇn1oʌǝ oʇ ʎ1puǝıɹɟ ʇou sı ʇɐɥʇ sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ ɟo ɐpuɐbɐdoɹd ǝɥʇ ɟo ʇɹɐd sı buıʇɐp ɔıɹʇǝɯoıpɐɹ ǝɹnssǝɹd ʍǝıʌ p1ɹoʍ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ puɐ sǝnssı 1ɐɔıuɥɔǝʇ ǝɯos ɥʇıʍ ʇnq .ʎ1ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ pǝʇǝɹdɹǝʇuı sı ɐʇɐp ǝɥʇ ɟı ʇı ɯoɹɟ ǝɯoɔ uɐɔ sǝʇɐp poob ʎuɐɯ ʇɔɐɟ uı .ǝsıɯǝɹd ǝ1qɐpuɐʇsɹǝpun puɐ ǝ1qısnɐ1d ʎɹǝʌ ɐ sı buıʇɐp ɔıɹʇǝɯoıpɐɹ“

        buıʇɐp ɔıɹʇǝɯoıpɐɹ


        sadɹǝpɹo ʍo11oɟ oʇ ɹǝısɐǝ uɐ uı pǝbuɐɹɹɐ-ǝɹ sɥdɐɹbɐɹɐd puɐ buıʇıpǝ ɹouıɯ ǝɯos ɥʇıʍ 'ʇɐssɐquǝq sǝnbɔɐظ 'ɹoʇɐ1suɐɹʇ ɥɔuǝɹɟ 1ɐuoıssǝɟoɹd ʎq pǝʇɐ1suɐɹʇ) 5991 '3 ɥɔɹɐɯ pǝʇɐp 'ʎ1dǝɹ buıʍo11oɟ ǝɥʇ pǝʌıǝɔǝɹ puɐ uoıʇɐʇonb ǝɥʇ ɟo uıbıɹo ʇɔɐxǝ ǝɥʇ ʇnoqɐ ɯǝɥʇ pǝʞsɐ ı .[ɥɔɹɐǝsǝɹ ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs ɹoɟ ɹǝʇuǝɔ 1ɐuoıʇɐu ǝɥʇ = ǝnbıɟıʇuǝıɔs ǝɥɔɹǝɥɔǝɹ ɐ1 ǝp 1ɐuoıʇɐu ǝɹʇuǝɔ ǝɥʇ] ɹǝʇuǝɔ ǝɥʇ ǝʇoɹʍ ı "ɥɔɹɐǝsǝɹ ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs ɟo ǝɹʇuǝɔ 1ɐuoıʇɐu ɥɔuǝɹɟ" ǝɥʇ ʇɐ "ɥɔɹɐǝsǝɹ ɟo ɹoʇɔǝɹıp" ǝɥʇ sɐ pǝʌɹǝs pɐɥ "ǝɹnounoq .ɟoɹd" ʇɐɥʇ pǝʇɐʇs ʞooq ǝʇonb pǝsıʌǝɹ ǝɥʇ ǝɔuıs*

        066=pı;dɯɐ … qpʍǝıʌ/sʇdıɹɔs/bɹo.ʎɹǝʌoɔsıp.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        ʞuı1 sıɥʇ ʇno ʞɔǝɥɔ ǝı1 ɐ sı uoıʇn1oʌǝ ʍouʞ oɥʍ suɐıʇsıɹɥɔ ʇsnظ s,ʇı ʞuıɥʇ noʎ ɟı ʎ11ɐuıɟ puɐ

        ɯızɟʌʌ1o0z … ɔıʇɹɐ/ɯoɔ.101ǝʇıns.ɯsıʇuɐʇsǝʇoɹd//:dʇʇɥ

        /ɯoɔ.ouıpɹp.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        ɯʇɥ.uoıʇɐʇuǝsǝɹd/uoıʇɐǝɹɔ/ɯpɔ~/npǝ.ʞɹɐn.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        dɥd.71ɹǝʇdɐɥɔ/ɯoɔ.ʇıǝɔǝpuoıʇn1oʌǝ.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        ɯʇɥ.buoɹʍ-sɐʍ-uıʍɹɐp-q/sʞɔɐɹʇ/ɐɔ.ǝ1qıq.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        ɯʇɥ.uoıʇn1oʌǝ/bɹo.ǝɟı1ǝ1qıq.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        ɟpd.pɐsʇsı … /sɔop/uoıʇn1oʌǝ/oɟuı.snɥʇɥɔı.ʍʍʍ//:dʇʇɥ

        xoq ʞɔɐ1q s’uıʍɹɐp s’ǝɥǝq .ظ 1ǝɐɥɔıɯ & sısıɹɔ uı ʎɹoǝɥʇ ɐ :uoıʇn1oʌǝ s,uoʇuǝp 1ǝɐɥɔıɯ ɟo ʍǝıʌǝɹ ɐ
        uoıʇn1oʌǝ ʇsuıɐbɐ ǝsɐɔ ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs ǝɥʇ


        .ʇsǝnbǝɹ ɹǝʎɐɹd ʎuɐ ʇdǝɔɔɐ os1ɐ 11’ı .noʎ d1ǝɥ oʇ ʇsǝq ʎɯ op 11’ı ʇnq 'buıɥʇʎɹǝʌǝ ʍouʞ ʇ’uop ı 'suoıʇsǝnb ʎuɐ ɹǝʍsuɐ oʇ ʎɹʇ os1ɐ 11’ı .ʇsıɹɥɔ snsǝظ ɥbnoɹɥʇ sɹǝɟɟo pob ǝɔɐǝd ǝɥʇ puɐ noʎ ɥʇıʍ ɥʇıɐɟ ʎɯ ǝɹɐɥs oʇ ʎddɐɥ uɐɥʇ ǝɹoɯ ǝq 11ɐ 'ǝbɐssǝɯ ɐ ǝɯ puǝs (pǝɥsɐʍuıɐɹq ǝɥʇ ʇou ɹǝʞuıɥʇ ǝɥʇ oʇ ʎ1dɯıs sıɥʇ ǝsɐǝ1d s11oɹʇ ou)ǝɹoɯ ʍouʞ oʇ ʇuɐʍ puɐ ɥʇnɹʇ ǝɥʇ ɟo ɹǝʞǝǝs ɐ ʎ1nɹʇ ǝɹɐ noʎ ɟı .p1ɹoʍ ǝɥʇ puɐ s1ooɥɔs ǝɥʇ uı uo buıob ʎ11ɐǝɹ sı ʇɐɥʍ oʇ dn noʎ ǝʞɐʍ ʇnq 'noʎ ǝɹɐɔs ʇou sıɥʇ ǝʇoɹʍ ı .ǝɔuǝıɔs sǝʞı1 oɥʍ 'ʇuǝɹɐd ɐ puɐ (ɔǝʎ)uɐıʇsıɹɥɔ buıqɯnɥʇ-ǝ1qıq pǝɯɐɥsɐun uɐ ɯ’ı


        "¿noʎ ǝɹɐ ʇɐɥʍ. “ʎpɐǝɹ1ɐ sn oʇ sbuo1ǝq p1ıɥɔ ɹnoʎ .buıbuıɹqdn uʍo sʇı puɐ uoıʇɐɔnpǝ uʍo sʇı ɥʇnoʎ oʇ ǝʌıb puɐ ɥʇnoʎ ǝʞɐʇ 11ıʍ ǝʇɐʇs ǝɥʇ .ǝʇɐʇs ǝɥʇ 1oɹʇuoɔ 11ıʍ ı puɐ sʞooqʇxǝʇ ǝɥʇ 1oɹʇuoɔ ǝɯ ʇǝ1“ pıɐs ɟ1ǝsɯıɥ ɹǝ1ʇıɥ

        922 .d '2 .1oʌ '7881 'sɹǝʇʇǝ1 puɐ ǝɟı1 'uıʍɹɐp sǝ1ɹɐɥɔ ”.ʎsɐʇuɐɟ ɐ oʇ ɟ1ǝsʎɯ pǝʇoʌǝp ʇou ǝʌɐɥ ʎɐɯ ı ɹǝɥʇǝɥʍ ɟ1ǝsʎɯ pǝʞsɐ ǝʌɐɥ ı puɐ 'ǝɯ ɥbnoɹɥʇ unɹ sɐɥ ɹǝppnɥs p1oɔ ɐ uǝʇɟo“


        .(821 .d '(suoıʇɐɔı1qnd ubıǝɹǝʌos :puɐ1buǝ 'ʎǝ1ɯoɹq) ¿ʎɔɐ11ɐɟ ɹo ʇɔɐɟ :uǝɯ-ǝdɐ '(7791) ɯ1oɔ1ɐɯ 'uǝpʍoq)“pǝʇɔnɹʇsuoɔǝɹ puɐ pǝzıʇɐɯǝɥɔs 'pǝɹoʇɔop ssǝ1 ɹo ǝɹoɯ ǝɹɐ ʇnq 'ǝɹnʇɐu oʇ ǝnɹʇ ʇou ǝɹɐ sɯɐɹbɐıp 1ɐɔıbo1oʎɹqɯǝ puɐ '1ɐɔıbo1oʇsıɥ '1ɐɔıɯoʇɐuɐ '1ɐɔıbo1oɥdɹoɯ 11ɐ ɟo ʎʇıɹoظɐɯ ʇɐǝɹb ǝɥʇ .ǝbɹɐɥɔ ǝɯɐs ǝɥʇ ɹǝpun ǝı1 sʇsıbo1oıq puɐ sɹǝʌɹǝsqo ʇsǝq ǝɥʇ ɟo spǝɹpunɥ ʇɐɥʇ ʇou ʇı ǝɹǝʍ 'uoıssıɯpɐ ǝɥʇ ʎq pǝʇɐ1ıɥıuuɐ puɐ pǝuɯǝpuoɔ ʎ1ɹǝʇʇn 1ǝǝɟ p1noɥs ı: :buıʎɐs ʎq ɟ1ǝsɯıɥ pǝsnɔxǝ ʇnq 'sbuıʍɐɹp sıɥ pǝɹǝʇ1ɐ pɐɥ ǝɥ ʇɐɥʇ pǝssǝɟuoɔ 1ǝʞɔǝɐɥ '1ɐıɹʇ ǝɥʇ buıɹnp
        .ǝnɹʇ ǝq oʇ pǝʌǝı1ǝq 1ǝʞɔǝɐɥ ʇɐɥʍ ”ǝǝs“ oʇ sɹǝʍǝıʌ pɐǝ1sıɯ oʇ pǝʇɐǝɹɔ ʎ11ɐuoıʇuǝʇuı ǝɹǝʍ ʎǝɥʇ 'ʇǝʎ ǝsɹoʍ .buoɹʍ ǝɹɐ sbuıʍɐɹp s’1ǝʞɔǝɐɥ 'sı ɥʇnɹʇ ǝɥʇ .ʇɔɐɟ ɐ sı uoıʇn1oʌǝ ʇɐɥʇ sʇuǝpnʇs ǝɔuıʌuoɔ oʇ sʞooqʇxǝʇ uı punoɟ ǝq 11ıʇs uɐɔ ɥɔıɥʍ ”'ʍɐ1 ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs“ sıɥ ɟo ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ sɐ sbuıʍɐɹp pǝı1ddns 1ǝʞɔǝɐɥ
        .pnɐɹɟ sɐʍ ʇı .ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ ɹou ʍɐ1 ɐ ɹǝɥʇıǝu sɐʍ ʇı 'ɹǝʌǝʍoɥ .ʎuǝbo1ʎɥd sǝʇɐ1nʇıdɐɔǝɹ ʎuǝboʇuo :"ʍɐ1 ɔıʇǝuǝboıq" ǝɥʇ pǝɯıɐ1ɔoɹd-ɟ1ǝs ǝɥ 'ʇɥbıɹ sɐʍ ǝɥ ʇɐɥʇ pǝɔuıʌuoɔ os .uɐɯnɥ oʇ '1ɐɯɯɐɯ oʇ 'ǝ1ıʇdǝɹ oʇ 'uɐıqıɥdɯɐ oʇ 'ɥsıɟ oʇ '11ǝɔ ǝ1buıs ʎ1ǝɯɐu 'sǝıɔǝds ǝʌıʇıɯıɹd ǝɹoɯ ɹo ɹǝʍo1 ǝɥʇ ɟo sǝbɐʇs ǝɥʇ ɥbnoɹɥʇ ssɐd p1noɥs soʎɹqɯǝ uɐɯnɥ 'ǝǝɹʇ ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ uo ʇsǝɥbıɥ buıǝq 'ʇɐɥʇ pǝsıɯɹns ǝɥ .sǝıɔǝds ɥɔɐǝ ɟo (ʎuǝboʇuo) ʇuǝɯdo1ǝʌǝp 1ɐɔıbo1oʎɹqɯǝ uı pǝʇɐǝdǝɹ ǝɹǝʍ (ʎuǝbo1ʎɥd) suɐɯnɥ oʇ s11ǝɔ ǝ1buıs ɯoɹɟ sǝıɔǝds ɟo sǝbɐʇs ǝɥʇ ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ ʇɐɥʇ pǝpn1ɔuoɔ '1ǝʞɔǝɐɥ ʇsuɹǝ ɹǝɥdoso1ıɥd puɐ ʇsıbo1oʎɹqɯǝ uɐɯɹǝb 'ɯsıǝɥʇɐ puɐ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo sɐıq ǝɥʇ ʎq pǝpınb '6681 uı

        pnɐɹɟ s,1ǝʞɔǝɐɥ ʌɐɟ 1ɐuosɹǝd ʎɯ

        .sǝsnɐɔ 1ɐɹnʇɐu ssǝ1ǝsodɹnd ɟo ʇɔnpoɹd-ʎq ɐ ʎ1ǝɹǝɯ sı ǝɔuǝʇsıxǝ ɹno ʇɐɥʇ puɐ s1ɐɯıuɐ ʇsnظ ǝɹɐ ǝʍ ʇɐɥʇ buıʍoɥs 'suɐɯnɥ oʇuı buıʌ1oʌǝ sǝɹnʇɐǝɹɔ ǝʞı1-ǝdɐ ɟo sbuıʍɐɹp

        ;pǝʇɔǝɹıp sɐʍ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ʇɐɥʇ ɐǝpı pǝuoıɥsɐɟ-p1o ǝɥʇ sǝʇnɟǝɹ ʇɐɥʇ s1ıssoɟ ǝsɹoɥ ɟo uɹǝʇʇɐd ǝǝɹʇ-buıɥɔuɐɹq ɐ

        ;uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɹoɟ s1ɐıɹǝʇɐɯ ʍɐɹ ǝɥʇ ǝpıʌoɹd uɐɔ suoıʇɐʇnɯ ɔıʇǝuǝb ʇɐɥʇ buıʍoɥs 'sbuıʍ ɟo ɹıɐd ɐɹʇxǝ uɐ ɥʇıʍ sǝı1ɟ ʇınɹɟ

        ;uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo ʎɹoǝɥʇ sıɥ ǝʇɐ1nɯɹoɟ oʇ uıʍɹɐp pǝɹıdsuı ʇɐɥʇ puɐ 'sʞɐǝq ɹıǝɥʇ uı sǝɔuǝɹǝɟɟıp pǝɔnpoɹd uoıʇɔǝ1ǝs 1ɐɹnʇɐu uǝɥʍ ǝuo ɯoɹɟ pǝbɹǝʌıp ʇɐɥʇ sǝıɔǝds ǝʇɐɹɐdǝs uǝǝʇɹıɥʇ 'spuɐ1sı sobɐdɐ1ɐb ǝɥʇ uo sǝɥɔuıɟ s,uıʍɹɐp

        .sǝǝɹʇ ǝɥʇ uo pǝuuıd ʎ1dɯıs ǝɹǝʍ ɥʇoɯ ǝɥʇ puɐ ʇuǝ1npnɐɹɟ ǝɹǝʍ sǝɹnʇɔıd ǝɥʇ ʇnq ;uoıʇɔǝ1ǝs 1ɐɹnʇɐu ʎq uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo ǝ1dɯɐxǝ snoɯɐɟ ʇsoɯ ǝɥʇ pǝɔnpoɹd spɹıq ʎɹoʇɐpǝɹd puɐ ǝbɐ1ɟnoɯɐɔ ʍoɥ buıʍoɥs 'sʞunɹʇ ǝǝɹʇ uo sɥʇoɯ pǝɹǝddǝd

        ;spɹıq uɹǝpoɯ puɐ sǝ1ıʇdǝɹ ʇuǝıɔuɐ uǝǝʍʇǝq ʞuı1 buıssıɯ ǝɥʇ 'sbuıʍ sʇı uo sʍɐ1ɔ puɐ sʍɐظ sʇı uı ɥʇǝǝʇ ɥʇıʍ pɹıq 1ıssoɟ ɐ 'xʎɹǝʇdoǝɐɥɔɹɐ

        ;ɹoʇsǝɔuɐ uoɯɯoɔ ɐ uı uıbıɹo ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ ɹıǝɥʇ ǝʇɐɔıpuı ʇɐɥʇ puɐɥ uɐɯnɥ ɐ puɐ 'bǝ1 s,ǝsɹoɥ ɐ 'ɹǝddı1ɟ s,ǝsıodɹod ɐ 'buıʍ s,ʇɐq ɐ uı sǝɹnʇɔnɹʇs ǝuoq ɹɐ1ıɯıs ɐ
        spnɐɹɟ xǝ1dɯoɔ ǝɹoɯ ǝɹɐ ǝɹǝɥ
        ɐpı oʇ uǝddɐɥ ɹǝʌǝʇɐɥʍ puɐ
        uɐɯ ɥʇooʇ-bıd ǝɥʇ
        ɹoʇdɐɹoǝɐɥɔɹɐ
        sɥʇoɯ pǝɹǝddǝd
        uɐɯ ɐʞsɐɹqǝu
        snʇɔǝɹǝ sndoɹɥʇuɐɔǝɥʇıd
        sɥʇoɯ pǝɹǝddǝd
        uɐɯ buıʞǝd
        ʎɔn1
        uɐɯ uʍopʇ1ıd
        uɐɯ 1ɐɥʇɹǝpuɐǝu
        (ɥbnɐ1 bıq ʇǝb puɐ dn ǝsǝɥʇ ʞoo1 noʎ ǝbɐɹnoɔuǝ ı)ʍǝɟ ɐ ǝɹɐ ǝɹǝɥ ǝǝs s’ʇǝ1 sdn ɹǝʌoɔ puɐ sǝı1 puɐ spnɐɹɟ ǝɥʇ 11ɐ ʎɥʍ ʇɔɐɟ sı uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟı 'ʇsɐǝ1 ʇou ǝq ʇsɐ1


        ”.sɟǝı1ǝq ɹnoʎ ʞuıɥʇǝɹ oʇ ǝɯıʇ sı ʇı sdɐɥɹǝd .pǝɹoubı ʎ1ǝbɹɐ1 sı ǝɟı1 ɟo suıbıɹo snoǝuɐʇuods ʇsuıɐbɐ ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ 1ɐɔıʇɐɯǝɥʇɐɯ sıɥʇ .ǝ1qıssodɯı - spɹoʍ ɹǝɥʇo uı .0401 x 0.1 uı 1 ǝq p1noʍ ǝɔuɐɥɔ ʎq ǝ1nɔǝ1oɯ ɐup ǝ1dɯıs ɐ ǝɔnpoɹd oʇ ʎʇı1ıqɐqoɹd ǝɥʇ .ʎʇı1ıqɐqoɹd ɟo sʍɐ1 ʎɹɐuıpɹo ɹǝpun os op ʇou pıp ʇı 'suoıʇɔɐǝɹ ɟo ʎʇı1ıqɐqoɹd ɹǝǝɥs ɥbnoɹɥʇ uıbǝq pıp ǝɟı1 pǝǝpuı ɟı ¡747 ɐ buı1qɯǝssɐ puɐ pɹɐʎ ʞunظ ɐ ɥbnoɹɥʇ buı1ɹıʍs opɐuɹoʇ ɐ ɹo .ɐsı1 ɐuoɯ ǝɥʇ ǝʇɐǝɹɔ puɐ punoɹɐ ɥsɐ1ds ʎ11ɐnʇuǝʌǝ p1noʍ ʇuıɐd ǝɥʇ 'ɥbnouǝ buo1 punoɹɐ ǝʌoɹp noʎ puɐ 'ssɐʌuɐɔ ɥʇıʍ ʞɔnɹʇ ɐ ɟo ʞɔɐq ǝɥʇ uı ʇuıɐd uǝdo ʇɟǝ1 noʎ ɟı ʇɐɥʇ ǝʌǝı1ǝq ɹǝuoos p1noʍ ı .ʎʇı1ɐǝɹ uı ǝq p1noʍ ʇı pɹɐɥ ʍoɥ puɐ 'ɐǝpı ʇɐɥʇ puɐʇsɹǝpun ʇ,uop ʇsoɯ "¿ɟ1ǝsʇı ʎq" ʇnoqɐ ǝɯɐɔ 11ɐ ʇı ʇɐɥʇ ʇuǝɯǝʇɐʇs ǝɥʇ ǝʞɐɯ oʇ suɐǝɯ ʇı ʇɐɥʍ puɐʇsɹǝpun noʎ op .ǝɟı1 ǝʇɐǝɹɔ oʇ ɹǝpɹo ǝsıɔǝɹd ǝɥʇ uı ɹnɔɔo oʇ pǝuǝddɐɥ ʇsnظ ɥɔıɥʍ 'sʇuǝpıɔɔɐ 1ɐʇuǝpıɔuıoɔ ɟo sǝıɹǝs ɐ ʎq ʇnoqɐ ǝɯoɔ oʇ sɐɥ ʎ1qɯǝssɐ ǝ1oɥʍ ǝɥʇ ʎɐs noʎ ɟı ʇou ʎ1ǝʇıuıɟǝp ʇnq 'ǝɔɹoɟ buıpınb ǝɯos sı ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ 'pǝʇɐǝɹɔ buıǝq sı ɯǝʇsʎs xǝ1dɯoɔ ɐ ǝɔuıs ʇɐɥʇ ʇdǝɔɔɐ p1noɔ ı ʍou ".buıɥʇ" pɐǝp ɐ ǝq p1noʍ ʇ1nsǝɹ ǝɥʇ 'pǝ1qɯǝssɐ ǝq p1noɔ sʇɹɐd ǝɥʇ 11ɐ ɟı uǝʌǝ puɐ ;ɟ1ǝsʇı ʎq ǝɔɐ1d oʇuı 11ɐɟ oʇ ʇı ɹoɟ ʇɐǝɹb ooʇ ʇsnظ sı ǝɟı1 ɟo ʎʇıxǝ1dɯoɔ ǝɥʇ“ ɥʇɐɯ ǝɹoɯ ʎ11nɟǝɹɐɔ buıʍo11oɟ ǝɥʇ pɐǝɹ ǝsɐǝ1d
        ”.buıpǝǝɔɔns ɹǝʌǝu ʇnq sǝıɔǝds ʍǝu ǝʌ1oʌǝ oʇ buıʎɹʇ ʎ1ʍo1s 'ʎ1ʍo1s 'ʎ1ʍo1s punoɹɐ ǝʌoɯ spuɐɥ s,pob ɹıǝɥʇ ɥɔʇɐʍ uɐɔ ʎǝɥʇ ǝɹǝɥʍ puɐɥ ʇɐ ǝso1ɔ pob-ǝɯıʇ ɹıǝɥʇ dǝǝʞ sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ .pob-ǝɯıʇ ǝɥʇ oʇ pǝʇıpǝɹɔ ǝɹɐ sʇuǝʌǝ ǝ1qıssodɯı ʎ11ɐɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs .ʇı ɥsı1dɯoɔɔɐ oʇ sɹɐǝʎ ɟo suoı11ıq ɹo suoı11ıɯ pob-ǝɯıʇ ǝɥʇ sǝʞɐʇ ʎ1dɯıs ʇı .ǝɯıʇ ɥbnouǝ uǝʌıb buıɥʇʎɹǝʌǝ puɐ buıɥʇʎuɐ ɥsı1dɯoɔɔɐ oʇ ʎʇı1ıqɐ ǝɥʇ ɥʇıʍ pǝʇıpǝɹɔ sı pob-ǝɯıʇ ǝɥʇ .1nɟɹǝʍod ʎ1ǝʇıuıɟuı ʇnq ʍo1s ʎɹǝʌ sı pob-ǝɯıʇ ɹıǝɥʇ ɯıɐ1ɔ ,sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ .sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo pob ǝɥʇ sı ǝɯıʇ“ ʎɹoʇs ɯsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ɹoɟ uɹǝʇʇɐd ɐ buıǝǝs noʎ ǝɹɐ


        sǝıpoq ʎuɐɯ os p1oɥ oʇ ǝɔɐds ǝʌɐɥ ʇou sǝop ǝsɹǝʌıun ǝɥʇ9 .9801 x 2 ɟo uoıʇɐ1ndod 1ɐʇoʇ ɐ sn ǝʌıb p1noʍ obɐ sɹɐǝʎ 000'14 ʇsnظ "ǝ1dnoɔ" ǝuo ɥʇıʍ buıʇɹɐʇs .sǝıʇ1nɔıɟɟıp ɹoظɐɯ oʇuı sunɹ ǝ1ɐɔs ǝɯıʇ ʎɹɐuoıʇn1oʌǝ uɐ uo uoıʇɐɔı1ddɐ 'ɹǝʌǝʍoɥ .ǝ1doǝd uoı11ıq xıs ɹǝpun ʇsnظ ʇɐ uoıʇɐ1ndod uɐɯnɥ 1ɐʇoʇ ɐ ǝʌıb p1noʍ (obɐ sɹɐǝʎ 0054 ʇnoqɐ) ʎɐp s,ɥɐou ɟo poo1ɟ ǝɥʇ ǝɔuıs sǝʇɐɹ ɥʇʍoɹb ǝsǝɥʇ buıʎ1ddɐ puɐ 'ǝ1doǝd ʇɥbıǝ ɥʇıʍ buıʇɹɐʇs .sɹɐǝʎ 28 ʎɹǝʌǝ ǝbɐɹǝʌɐ uo uoıʇɐ1ndod ǝɥʇ ɟo pɹıɥʇ ǝuo ʎ1ǝʇɐɯıxoɹddɐ ʇno pǝdıʍ ǝʌɐɥ .ɔʇǝ 'ǝuıɯɐɟ 'ǝsɐǝsıp 'sɹɐʍ .ɹǝqɯnu ʇɐɥʇ ɟ1ɐɥ ʇnoqɐ ǝq p1noʍ ʎɹoʇsıɥ uɐɯnɥ ʇnoɥbnoɹɥʇ ǝʇɐɹ ɥʇʍoɹb ɟo uoıʇɐɔı1ddɐ ǝ1qɐɔıʇɔɐɹd .ɹɐǝʎ ɹǝd %2 ʇnoqɐ sı sǝɯıʇ ʇuǝɔǝɹ uı ǝʇɐɹ ɥʇʍoɹb uoıʇɐ1ndod p1ɹoʍ .obɐ sɹɐǝʎ ɟo ”suoı11ıq“ uǝǝq ǝʌɐɥ p1noɔ ɹǝʌǝ ǝɹǝɥʇ uǝɥʇ ǝɹǝɥdsoɯʇɐ ɹno uı ʍou uoqɹɐɔ ǝɹoɯ sı ǝɹǝɥʇ .buoɹʍ sı buıʇɐp uoqɹɐɔ ʎɥʍ ǝɹoɯ uǝʌǝ ʍoɥ os1ɐ ʇɔɐɟ sıɥʇ .sɹɐǝʎ ɟo puɐsnoɥʇ ʍǝɟ ɐ uıɥʇıʍ 'bunoʎ sı ʎɹoʇsıɥ ǝɹıʇuǝ s,ɥʇɹɐǝ ʇɐɥʇ ǝʇɐɹʇsuoɯǝp ɐʇɐp ǝsǝɥʇ .ɯɹoɟ ʇou p1noɔ sǝssǝɔoɹd ǝɟı1 ɹoɟ ʎɹɐssǝɔǝu sɯoʇɐ ǝɥʇ ɟo ʎuɐɯ suoıʇıpuoɔ ǝsoɥʇ ɹǝpun .ɹɐʇs ɔıʇǝubɐɯ ɐ ɟo ʇɐɥʇ ǝʇɐɯıxoɹddɐ p1noʍ obɐ sɹɐǝʎ 000'02 ɥʇbuǝɹʇs sʇı uoıʇɐɔı1ddɐ 1ɐɔıʇɔɐɹd uı .sɹɐǝʎ 004'1 ʎ1ǝʇɐɯıxoɹddɐ ǝq oʇ ǝɟı1-ɟ1ɐɥ sʇı buıʇɐɹʇsuoɯǝp 'ǝʇɐɹ 1ɐıʇuǝuodxǝ uɐ ʇɐ buıʎɐɔǝp ʎ1qɐɹnsɐǝɯ uǝǝq sɐɥ p1ǝıɟ ɔıʇǝubɐɯ s,ɥʇɹɐǝ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ uʍoɥs ǝʌɐɥ 9281 ǝɔuıs suoıʇɐʌɹǝsqo ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs 4.p1ǝıɟ sıɥʇ uı ʞɹoʍ ǝʌıʇıuıɟǝp ǝɥʇ pǝɥsı1qnd sɐɥ 'osɐd 1ǝ ʇɐ sɐxǝʇ ɟo ʎʇısɹǝʌıun ǝɥʇ ʇɐ sɔısʎɥd ɟo ɹossǝɟoɹd snʇıɹǝɯǝ 'sǝuɹɐq sɐɯoɥʇ .ɹp

        uoıʇɐ1ndod ʇuǝɹɹnɔ/ɥʇɹɐǝ ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝbɐ

        .sǝıɔǝds ɹoɟ uoıʇɐuɐ1dxǝ 1ɐɹnʇɐuɹǝdns ǝɥʇ sʇɹoddns ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ǝɥʇ .suoıʇɔıpǝɹd puɐ suoıʇɐʌɹǝsqo ʎɹoʇɐɹoqɐ1 ǝɥʇ sɯɹıɟuoɔ ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ 1ıssoɟ .ǝbuɐɥɔ ʇsısǝɹ ʇɐɥʇ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɟo suoıʇɐ1ndod "pǝʇɐ1osı" '1ɐuoıʇɔunɟ ʎ11nɟ ʍoɥs p1noʍ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ pǝʇɔıpǝɹd ʎ1ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ 1ǝpoɯ uoıʇɐǝɹɔ ǝɥʇ
        .ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ɟo ǝɔuǝsqɐ ǝɥʇ ɹoɟ ǝsnɔxǝ uɐ sı ʇı .ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ʇou sı pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıʇɐʇǝɹdɹǝʇuı sıɥʇ .ʎ1ʞɔınb os ǝɔɐ1d ʞooʇ ǝbuɐɥɔ ǝɥʇ ǝsnɐɔǝq buıssıɯ ǝɹɐ ɹǝɥʇouɐ oʇuı ɯsıuɐbɹo ɟo puıʞ ǝuo ɯoɹɟ uoıʇn1oʌǝ buıʇuǝɯnɔop s1ıssoɟ 1ɐuoıʇısuɐɹʇ 'snɥʇ .pǝzı1ıssoɟ ǝq oʇ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɹoɟ ʇsıxǝ sǝıʇıunʇɹoddo ʍǝɟ ooʇ ʇɐɥʇ (sɹɐǝʎ uoı11ıɯ oʍʇ oʇ ǝuo uı sɐ) ʇɹoɥs os sı poıɹǝd ǝɯıʇ ǝɥʇ 'ǝʌ1oʌǝ suoıʇɐ1ndod uǝɥʍ .pǝzı1ıssoɟ ǝq oʇ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɹoɟ ʎʇıunʇɹoddo sʍo11ɐ ǝɯıʇ ɟo poıɹǝd sıɥʇ .sɹɐǝʎ ɟo suoı11ıɯ ɹoɟ ǝbuɐɥɔ ʇsısǝɹ sɯsıuɐbɹo ɟo suoıʇɐ1ndod ʇɐɥʇ sʍoɥs pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ buıʇʇıɯpɐ ǝɹɐ ʎǝɥʇ .pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uı buıssıɯ ǝɹɐ sʞuı1 buıssıɯ ǝɥʇ ʎɥʍ uıɐ1dxǝ oʇ ɯnıɹqı1ınbǝ pǝʇɐnʇɔund ɟo ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ buısnodsǝ ʍou ǝɹɐ sʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ ʎuɐɯ 'ʇɔɐɟ uı   
        .(41 .d '7991 p1ɹoʍ) ”ǝɔuǝıɔs sɐ buıpɐɹǝnbsɐɯ ɯsı1ɐɹnʇɐu sı ɯsıuıʍɹɐp“ ʇɐɥʇ ʎ1ʇun1q ǝɹoɯ sǝʇɐʇs 'uoıʇɐı1ıɟɟɐ ɔıɟıʇuǝıɔs uɐɔıɹǝɯɐ ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıssıɯɯoɔ uoıʇɐɔnpǝ ǝɔuǝıɔs ǝɥʇ ɟo uɐɯɹıɐɥɔ 'ɹǝʇsıǝʍ uɥoظ .(31 .d 7991 ɥɔɹɐɯ 'p1ɹoʍ .uıʍɹɐp buıʞunqǝp :ɥsɐ1ʞɔɐq uoıʇn1oʌǝ ǝɥʇ .dı11ıɥd 'uosuɥoظ) ”ʎɥdoso1ıɥd ɔıʇsı1ɐɹnʇɐu ɯoɹɟ uoıʇɔnpǝp ɐ sɐ sʇɔɐɟ ǝɥʇ ɯoɹɟ ǝɔuǝɹǝɟuı uɐ ɥɔnɯ os ʇou sı ɯsıuıʍɹɐp“ .sǝʇıɹʍ ʎǝ1ǝʞɹǝq ǝɥʇ ɟo uosuɥoظ .ǝ dı11ıɥd
        ”.ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ ʇsuıɐbɐ pǝbɹn ǝq uɐɔ ɥɔıɥʍ uoıʇɔǝظqo snoıɹǝs puɐ snoıʌqo ʇsoɯ ǝɥʇ sı 'sdɐɥɹǝd 'sıɥʇ 'ʇɐɥʇ sɐʍ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ ɟo pıɐs ʎ11ɐǝɹ uıʍɹɐp ʇɐɥʍ .(1891 'ʞɹɐɯ 'ʎǝ1pıɹ) ”.sǝı1ddɐ 11ıʇs ʇuǝɯnbɹɐ ǝɯɐs ǝɥʇ .ʇı uı sdɐb sɐɥ ʇı ǝsnɐɔǝq uoıʇɐǝɹɔ 1ɐıɔǝds puɐ uoıʇn1oʌǝ uǝǝʍʇǝq buıʇsǝʇ ɹoɟ ssǝ1ǝsn sɐʍ pɹoɔǝɹ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ pǝʍoɥs uıʍɹɐp 'sǝıɔǝds ɟo uıbıɹo ǝɥʇ uı pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ uo sɹǝʇdɐɥɔ ǝɥʇ uı .uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɹoɟ ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ ǝɥʇ ɟo ʇɹɐd uǝǝq ɹǝʌǝu sɐɥ sǝıɔǝds 1ıssoɟ ɟo ǝbuɐɥɔ 1ɐnpɐɹb ǝɥʇ“
        ”.uoıʇɐǝɹɔ 1ɐıɔǝds oʇ pǝsoddo sɐ uoıʇn1oʌǝ ɟo ʎɹoǝɥʇ ǝɥʇ ɟo ɹoʌɐɟ uı ǝɔuǝpıʌǝ sɐ pɹoɔǝɹ 1ıssoɟ ǝɥʇ sǝsn 'ʇsıuoıʇɐnʇɔund ɹo ʇsı1ɐnpɐɹb ɹǝɥʇǝɥʍ 'ʇsıuoıʇn1oʌǝ 1ɐǝɹ ou ...“ 'ǝʇoɹʍ ʎʇısɹǝʌıun pɹoɟxo ɟo ʎǝ1pıɹ ʞɹɐɯ
        .(91 .d.;75-65 dd '2891 'sp1ǝıɟ puɐ ɹouʞɔıʇ :.uuoɔ 'uǝʌɐɥ ʍǝu 'buoɹʍ ʇuǝʍ uıʍɹɐp ǝɹǝɥʍ :ǝɟɟɐɹıb ǝɥʇ ɟo ʞɔǝu ǝɥʇ 'sıɔuɐɹɟ 'buıɥɔʇıɥ) ʇɐɥʇ puɐ dnoɹb sıɥʇ uǝǝʍʇǝq 1ɐuoıʇısuɐɹʇ 'ǝq ʇɥbıɯ ɹo 'ʇ’usı ɹo 'sı 1ıssoɟ ɹɐ1nɔıʇɹɐd ɐ ɹǝɥʇǝɥʍ ʇnoqɐ uo sǝob ʇuǝɯnbɹɐ ssǝ1puǝ ʇɐɥʇ ǝɹɐɹ os ǝɹɐ ʎǝɥʇ ɹo '11ɐ ʇɐ ʇsıxǝ ʇ’uop ʎǝɥʇ ɹǝɥʇıǝ .ʇqnop puoʎǝq snʇɐʇs ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd oʇ sɹǝqɯnu ɥbnouǝ uı ʇou 'ʇsɐǝ1 ʇɐ ;ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇ’uǝɹɐ ʎ1dɯıs ʎǝɥʇ 's1ɐɯıuɐ ɟo sdnoɹb ɹoظɐɯ uǝǝʍʇǝq sʞuı1 ɹoɟ ʞoo1 noʎ uǝɥʍ“ :buıɥɔʇıɥ sıɔuɐɹɟ
        .(981 '181 dd '0891 '

    6. rhamson profile image75
      rhamsonposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I only had time enough to go through and bolden the areas where you make comments only to inflame, state inuendo, out and out opinion based on your perception or group ideas that are not germain to your argument.  What you in essence have done in the process is demonstrate your bias in the argument and quoted people to add some sort of authenticity.  All in all I find it bad writing and prooves your refusal to objectivley tackle the subject by being the authority with your method.  I feel I can't add or detract from the topic with you based on this nonsense you write. Good luck defending it based on this argument you offer

    7. atomswifey profile image67
      atomswifeyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Loved this and loved how the opposition cannot really debate it just throw out insults and say you lied etc. LOL
      lol

      Gods truth is revealed and satans lies exposed!! Brilliant smile

      1. rhamson profile image75
        rhamsonposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        And your bias as well

      2. spiderpam profile image58
        spiderpamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        I've noticed that too lol
        Evoluntionist are funny.

    8. spiderpam profile image58
      spiderpamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Deleted

      1. yoshi97 profile image90
        yoshi97posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        That's the point I keep trying to make, Pam. Evolution should never be a theological argument. Where in the statement 'less complex creatures evolve into more complex ones' does it ever say anything about religion?

        Further in point ... Why does John Paul II (the former pope) embrace evolution if it's anti-christian? (I posted this somewhere on these forums and it went mostly ignored).

        This is my problem with evolution vs. creationism. This is like debating Fred Flintstone vs. Barney the Dinosaur. It's not a religious debate and never should have been brought to the religious forum. It's also not a debate of belief as evolution is a proven theory.

        What really upsets me is that this was brought to the religious forum to cause the religious debate a certain party new it would bring and that person stands on the religious side of the ball allowing us all to fight while they sit back and left at us.

        We're not serving a debate ... we're serving another person's debate to stand believers against non-believers, and we're just foolish enough to let it all happen.

        I can't do any more than offer the proof I already have for evolution, so I'm going to bow out of this conversation as it only serves the agenda of the person who originally posted it.

        This is not a religious debate, so unless evolution is moved to another forum where is can be discussed without religious implications (as again, evolution is not a religious debate any more than gravity is) then I think I'll pass.

        Continue if you want Pam, but understand that you are being pulled by the same string every one else is in this forum and understand that this thread was originally created to permeated hatred between believers and non-believers ... and belief is not about hatred ...

        Just ask yourself ... did Jesus say to spread the word or to attack those who chose not to believe in it. I heard it said here once before ... Jesus never forced the word on those who refused to listen.

        I'm removing the strings from my back to go write something useful. I'm through allowing the original creator of this thread to puppet me any further.

  2. Colebabie profile image60
    Colebabieposted 7 years ago

    Um no one is gonna read all this. 

    Why not make this a hub? Since you have none. Get out all of your frustrations there.

    1. AsherKade profile image78
      AsherKadeposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      lol....I was thinking the same thing....

    2. andromida profile image75
      andromidaposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I completely agree with you regarding making a hub.I think he has already written enough stuff to make couple of hubs.smile

      1. Mark Knowles profile image60
        Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        He couldn't make a hub with this - it is all copied and pasted from other internet sites. It would be flagged as dupe content. wink

    3. Lisa HW profile image83
      Lisa HWposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Wow - and I thought some of my embarrassingly long posts were way too much.  They seem like fortune-cookie fortunes compared to this.    This thing makes me feel much better, even if there's no way in heck I'd read it all.   smile

    4. zadrobi profile image60
      zadrobiposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Seriously.

  3. Randy Godwin profile image95
    Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago

    I disagree!

  4. 0
    Leta Sposted 7 years ago

    God, that was painful.  Just a statement.  I'd place you in sophomore college level English. Need to learn some paragraph structure, audience reading ease pointers and modes of hook...and maybe brush up on some grammar rules, just a bit.

    Critical thinking and sourcing: I don't even wanna go there.

    (Sorry! wink)

    1. johnmatrix profile image61
      johnmatrixposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      WHy do you have this need to typecast, stereotype, or "place" people in little boxes in your mind. Are we writing to entertain BA's, MA's or Phd's in English, or mostly just the common folk?

      Clearly your attack is a self arrogating put down in order to pump yourself up (in your own mind) above the person that posted this article.

      It appears you didn't understand the first paragraph.....you know....the part about ridicule not being an argument.

      Evolution is hitting a brick wall these days, and it won't be long before embarrassment calamity and humiliation commonly describe it's proponents.

      http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn58/tinycode.htm

      1. Evolution Guy profile image59
        Evolution Guyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        lol lol

        Deary me. Jeebus is getting really scared these days.

        Oh well........ Yet another great reason not to believe in Jeebus.

        If it helps - lying is not an argument either. Unless it is for jeebus apparently.

        So - what is your proof for jeebus again? Oh yes - a mistranslated 2000 year old book. Hmmmm. lets see if we can keep our children dumb. Maybe they will believe in Jeebus then.... lol

        1. johnmatrix profile image61
          johnmatrixposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          So - what is your proof for claiming mistranslation?
          Children are already being kept dumb and getting dumber by evolutionist brainwashing. One glance at the senseless violence stats amoung youth (and adults for that matter) demonstrates the result of evolutionist doctrines(natural selection, survival of the fittest, random chance, etc.)

          You have to be completely brain dead not to see the intelligence behind a belief in God and His Love, Humility, Meekness, and Patience.

          But the sleeping deadheads follow the way of covetousness, envy, pride, and wrath.

          I can't wait for your correct translation of the Bible....especially the new testament.

          But tell me, what does that have to do with the downfall of evolution or belief in creation?

          The 3 billion letter OS within the DNA of every living cell is good enough to prove to me ID is behind it.

          You missed the instruction in the first sentence concerning straw man arguments and ridicule.

          Oh, and the correct spelling is Jesus, but you can use JC.

          1. Evolution Guy profile image59
            Evolution Guyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Jeebus works fine for me thanks. If you can call him God, I can take a few liberties also.

            And - no offense, but you leave a person little option but to resort to ridicule. And the day I start listening to the maniac religionist who gave the "instructions" is the day I kill myself.

            As for the rest of your argument. LOLOLOL

            Sorry - that is all you deserve. You think the bible is perfectly translated? lololo 1800 years of fighting over what it means? lol lol

            Sure.......

            You wouldn't happen to have been banned three times would you?

            1. johnmatrix profile image61
              johnmatrixposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              When you are ready to be serious and say something intelligent, I will respond to you.

              Otherwise, take a hike.

              PS: Today is my first time for posting here, so your assumption is wrong....as is the primary and all the secondary assumptions concerning evolution that you put your faith in....including all the lies and fraud therein.

              1. Evolution Guy profile image59
                Evolution Guyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                LOL

                I take that as a "yes" then...........

                Serious?

                Show me some proof for the invisible super being and Jeebus.

                Then we can talk. wink Lies and fraud ? Dear oh deary me. Jeebus really is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

                So, where were we - oh yes. Proof that macro evolution does not happen or at least a realistic alternative to the theory of evolution.

                Hmmmm - An invisible super being with no evidence in favor of? Ding! Nope. No good. Try again.

      2. Make  Money profile image72
        Make Moneyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        I have never considerd myself a monkey's uncle.  John that web site on DNA that you posted should be the death knell for the theory of evolution.  It is worth posting some of the paragraphs from it here.


        Isn't God great.

        And with all the evidence against it isn't it about time that we stop forcing our children to learn Darwin's false theory of evolution in our schools.

        1. johnmatrix profile image61
          johnmatrixposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I don't think it will be too much longer before "evolution" is completely put to rest and even the mention of of it will cause it's past proponents to cover their faces in humiliation and embarrassment.

          I joined your fan list.

          1. Make  Money profile image72
            Make Moneyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            For sure John.  When it comes to the fact that Darwin's theory of evolution becomes a laughing stock, as it is, it's time to put it to rest.  You and Pam are doing a great job in here.  You both would have a lot more support in this thread if it wasn't for the fact that we have been through this ridiculous argument umpteen times before in other threads.  They like to start new threads because there is just so much evidence against evolution in the other threads.  Some of us are just too bored with the topic any more.  It needs to go away like the fairy tale that it is.  Thanks, I'll join your fan club as well.

            Mike

          2. Ron Montgomery profile image60
            Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Yes, this will be accomplished by the next Republican president. lol

  5. Colebabie profile image60
    Colebabieposted 7 years ago

    And I have worked with Drosophila and you have no idea what you're talking about smile

    1. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Are you addressing me?

      1. Colebabie profile image60
        Colebabieposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Uh yes. But read my other post. Not worth discussing it.

        1. 0
          thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I am aware Drosophila. What is your point?

      2. goodfriendiam profile image60
        goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        I am going to tell you something, and I mean this with sincerity. What would God say to you, if he was standing right in front of you? I believe he would say " how different are you from them? You say they are inhumane? But I have found you the same my child. For are not these my children also? Pointing fingers, is no different then killing someone. And because I am a good father, I have had to correct you on this" I believe this is exactly what he would say to you. For this is not the way, nor is it love. The God that I worship, is kind, yet firm, is gentle, yet correcting like a good father should, and lastly, he needs not our help, in his story, for it is his after all. peace

        1. Colebabie profile image60
          Colebabieposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          Huh?

          1. goodfriendiam profile image60
            goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            no not you colebabie....lol

  6. tantrum profile image60
    tantrumposted 7 years ago

    Good Luck with your thread! I hope no one comes 2 mess it up.  You should put all this in hubs,you can make a serial.  smile

    1. tantrum profile image60
      tantrumposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Well it seems they came while iwas reading your post !  2 bad sad

  7. Colebabie profile image60
    Colebabieposted 7 years ago

    Hey this is your opinion and I totally respect that. My advice is to turn it into a few hubs and take the advice of others so far. Those who are interested will read it. Better than putting it here where it is just gonna get torn apart.

  8. ElElyone profile image61
    ElElyoneposted 7 years ago

    Mercy, mercy, all of this talk about me.

    If you believe in me and I exist, then you will have your proper place with me.

    If you believe in me and I do not exist, then you will have lived a righteous life and feel great when you die.

    If you do not believe in me and I do not exist, then you were right and lived however you wanted and you are just dead and cease to exist because I do not exist. You will also have nobody to tell how right you were either.

    If you do not believe in me and I exist, then you have made a tremendously  great error and I will miss you very much.

    x ElElyone

    1. tantrum profile image60
      tantrumposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      ????????????????yikes

  9. 0
    Leta Sposted 7 years ago

    What, you mean GOD?  What of us who don't take things soooo literally, may not know what happens after death, etc., etc., and also kinda resent (not to mention question the sanity of) somebody, uh, taking on the voice of God?

    Wow. This just gets more painful.  I need Advil...gotta go.

    1. 0
      sandra rinckposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Right behind you...

      1. Colebabie profile image60
        Colebabieposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Yup. Me too! Peace out! ☮

  10. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago

    It would have better if you had included some FSM quotes.  People like that, they don't like you FALSE PROPHET.

  11. earnestshub profile image86
    earnestshubposted 7 years ago

    I am not at all surprised it was left out, the whole thing is a hotchpotch of lies, half truths and poor research. I'm not wasting any more time on it. Typical religionist propaganda.
    I'm outta here!

    1. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      "religionist propaganda" Thank you for proven my point. You are so predictable.  You are too far gone. Goodbye.

    2. ElElyone profile image61
      ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      "I'm not wasting any more time on it. Typical religionist propaganda.
      I'm outta here!"

      Dear man:

      Your statement above, did you mean it?
      Do you do as you say like I do?
      Have you been back and posted more things?
      Being double minded is not good for you son.
      If you say you are not going to waste anymore of your time on something.
      Is that what you do?
      Or were you emotions out of your control son?

      If you would get to know me, I could teach you self control and to do exactly as you say, not letting any of your words be idle or in vain.

      You see, when I speak, everything I say happens without question and without failure.

      Getting to know me would bring results in your life like these.
      Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

      If you do not desire to know me, then I accept your response.

      But you too will have to accept my response to YOUR choices.

      I love you and care for you very much.

      I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

  12. Colebabie profile image60
    Colebabieposted 7 years ago

    Oh ok smile I thought you were yelling at me for working with Drosophila smile

    1. goodfriendiam profile image60
      goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      No I just didn't want to have to repost this book again....lol

  13. goodfriendiam profile image60
    goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago

    oops to late

    1. Colebabie profile image60
      Colebabieposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      You can edit your post still.

      1. goodfriendiam profile image60
        goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        thanks for reminding me, lost my head there for a moment, I get really annoyed when, everyone attacks everyone. I call them out on it.

  14. Eric Graudins profile image59
    Eric Graudinsposted 7 years ago

    Gee. that's got to be a record for the longest posting ever on hubpages.

    26 screens full.

    Can someone please reply to it, and add another post of 26 screens, and create a post of 52 screens.

    And kkep going so that eventually the whole hubPages system will grind to a halt processing a million screens or so.

    You all may be really clever theologians, but do you think you could possibly learn to delete the excess text from the posts you are quoting?
    It's not hard. Really.

    And welcome to HubPages forums thetruthhurts2009.
    Looks like you've sprung from the same place as our other beloved forum members, quietnessandtrust and windbeneathmywings (or something similar to that)

    0 fans, 0 hubs,and you describe yourself in your profile as a "Soilder of Truth!!
    I think you made a typo. It should be "Soiler of Truth". lol

    Hope you have a great time here on hubpages.

    1. Randy Godwin profile image95
      Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      enderwiggins-underhiswings, almost an anagram.  Coincidence?

    2. White Teeth profile image61
      White Teethposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      ARGGHH, MATEY!

    3. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Oh I see you are familar with zeros let see if can get this right. Take your time 0+0=

  15. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    goodfriendiam- tell them the truth.
    Romans 1:19–20 Paul adds, “For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.”

    1. goodfriendiam profile image60
      goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      So what are you saying then? That they are damned for hell? I don't believe so. For that is not the God that I worship. For the God that I worship loves all, and wants nothing more then for his children to be happy, would it bring him great joy if they wanted to get to know him of course, but does a true father force his will upon his on children, "now you listen here you will sit down and have a talk with me, and that is on a daily basis to boot" my God is not like that.  further more, I believe that this earth is all the hell we are ever going to see. For our spirits which came from him will go back to him. And our body will just be buried. For now is the time for life, and that my friend is to the fullest. So if these people want evolution, to believe in then why not. If it makes them happy, then great.


      Why would anyone want to worship your God. For your God condemns, my does not.

      1. 0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        You have created a false god that does not exist, I think you know that, it is called Idolatry, accepting a false idea of God in which you are comfortable, and I'll leave you to that. I serve the One True God, He does not wish for anyone to perish that is why we have the Great Commission. Take Care

        1. goodfriendiam profile image60
          goodfriendiamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          The great commission? What to condemn? To try and scare the shit right out of them! NO lady he didn't!  For he loved the common folk, for he ate, talked, and laughed with murders, tax innovators, sluts, mothers, fathers, evolutionist, atheist, children, kings, queens, crazy people, doctors, fisherman and the list could go on...but the point is he would have corrected you or ignored you. Because of your self righteousness. But not them. For even he said for he came not for the self righteous, but the common people.

  16. yoshi97 profile image90
    yoshi97posted 7 years ago

    TheTruthHurts2009:

    I won't refute any of these facts, as I wasn't here 4500 years ago any more than you were. Instead, we will accept what you have stated as fact.

    Now, interestingly, to prove something false, you look for items to refute what is accepted as truth ... just as you did. Given the facts you present, evolution appears to be an utter lie.

    Of course, then we are left with creationism. Let's see how it holds up. smile


    First off, the basis of creationism is what is written in the Bible ... in Genesis. We will start by accepting it as total fact. After all, to disprove something, we must first accept it as total truth and then find that which doesn't work.

    According to the Bible, God created Man first ... animals second. This is a *major* important fact, as this must be proven true for creationism to stand. If one fact falls, then we must question the rest ... as we did with evolution.

    Okay, so Man came first and animals came second ... dinosaurs were animals, so man came before dinosaurs. Maybe *just* before, but before none-the-less.

    Now, as large as dinosaurs were, why are they never mentioned in the Bible? Other animals are mentioned, so it's not like ancient man ignored them, right? He also had names for every creature ... as it is stated that Adam named all the creatures of the Earth. As such, dinosaurs had names ... what were they? And what happened to them? How did they become extinct? Humans didn't have the capacity to kill them off. So, did God knock them off? I wouldn't think a creator would cull a creation a short while after creating it.

    And there are the cave paintings of ancient man which depict woolly mammoths. Now, this is direct proof that ancient man shared his world with woolly mammoths, seeming to say man was created and then dinosaurs .. backing the original claim in Genesis that man came first., so we are back to creationism being true, right?

    One big problem ... ancient man never drew cave paintings of the Tyranosaurus Rex or any of the other large ancient reptilian dinosaurs. How could early man miss drawing something that must have frightened him ... and hunted him night and day?

    Also, how does creationism explain the extinction of the giant reptiles, the extinction of the giant mammals, and many other mass extinctions that occurred? Man mentions the great flood that destroyed nearly all life in Noah's time, so that explains it, right?

    Wrong ...

    Again, the Bible states that Noah collected two of *every* beast and placed them on the ark. As such, Noah saved all creatures from extinction.

    Given the biodiversity that exists today, and throwing out the possibility that new species can crop from old ones (as that is a theory given to evolution) then this means every creature that exists today *must* have existed in Noah's time.

    I can accept that, but how did Noah get two of every one of these species in one ark? Considering the size of the ark (that is given in the bible) this just isn't possible?

    Also, why do species develop on Australia and Madagascar that are different from other places? Given the biodiversity presented by the case of Noah, all creatures within a given certain tropical zone should be identical, not unique. A zebra could exist on any grassland, so all grasslands should have zebras ... and yet they don't. The same argument falls for kangaroos ... why do they only exist in Australia? Don't fret, as Darwin was puzzled by this one as well. In fact, this is the dogma that got him rolling on evolutionism to begin with.


    So, is creationism right and evolution wrong? If poking holes in what's considered fact makes it untrue, then *both* theories lose.


    However, I (and many others) believe the truth to be far simpler. It's possible that mutations (brought about by tenuous changes on the Earth) create the biodiversity present. Ice ages, greenhouse effects, all these things change what can survive ... some things adapt, some don't, and some creatures magically arrive on the scene (perhaps a hint at creationism).

    We have found life in many places on the Earth we never thought possible. As such, we know that life will do anything to adapt and thrive on Earth. When the rules of life change (too much heat, too much cold, no land, or lack of water) life grows extinct that can't adapt, and life springs forth that is capable of holding its ground. As such, life evolves to meet the circumstances, but it doesn't necessarily evolve because it can perceive a need for a certain mutation and bring it forth.


    Darwin believed in survival of the fittest ... In this finest moment, Darwin was wrong.

    Survival is about the most adaptable. Many creatures in the fossil record showed adaptations that would have made them forever dominant, had the environment not changed on Earth and ruined their long run ... Instead, those creatures that could adapt to change lived on, and many creatures devolved in a sense, losing some of the many gains of previous species, in favor of becoming able to live in more environments. That doesn't make them the fittest ... that makes them the most adaptable.

    It's interesting how the fossil record shows a dramatic change in the biosphere after each cataclysm on Earth. As such, it would seem our creator constantly got bored of the current creatures and plants, sending tragedy upon the Earth which allowed everything to start over fresh. Those creatures that could adapt survived, and from them the populous was rebuilt.


    It is not wrong to believe in God, anymore than it is wrong to realize the Bible is a work of man, and as such, could possibly be wrong about many facts. As such, I suggest we not stick our heads in the sand and ignore the science that we can't refute ... the dinosaurs ... as they tell us that we *did not* come first (regardless of what is written in Genesis) and that we just might be one of many in a long line of God's *chosen ones*.


    Of course, would men of faith be able to accept that we weren't God's first loved ones, even if we were the last? To state our creator could never have made another is pretty presumptuous, as I know the Bible says God made man and the animals, but I don't remember reading anywhere that he never created anything beforehand.

    For all we know ... maybe Genesis isn't about creation ... but rather ... a recreation ... where God decided to start over.

    Given that as true, a lot of pieces would fall in place that would support both claims. And why would early man not know of this previous life God had made? Maybe God wanted us to feel special and feared our jealousy if we knew we were not the first, or our fear that we might not be the last.


    So, believe what you will, but know there are inconsistencies in everything, and science is all about assuming everything is true until it can be proven false. Remember, a theory is an assumption that is believed to be true as enough facts don't yet exist to prove it false.

    Point given ... it was once a theory that the world was flat, until someone postulated it was round. By finally proving the Earth to be round, we proved the Earth could not be flat, destroying the Flat-Earth theory.

    However, we wrote about the Flat-Earth for centuries, accepted it as true, and would still believe the same today, had we not sought out to test the Round-Earth theory.

    Books do not issue proof of anything, regardless of their source. Instead, we must come up with theories, accept that they might be true, then try to disprove them until we are certain we no longer can ... as then we find the truth of things. As such, satellites orbiting the Earth are the final nail in the Flat-Earth Theory, as satellites could never orbit a flat Earth.


    As a final note ... creationists (and only those who believe in it with all of their heart) must also believe we are not alone. For if God can create life once, then who are they to say he couldn't do it twice? After all, where did God promise never to repeat life elsewhere? (not that he didn't, but that he never would, as he might have said we were the only one's yesterday then just as easily could have changed his mind today ... and all writings handed to us from God come from the past, so we have no current updates from our creator). After all, God's love is for mankind, and mankind was made in his image ... so who is to say he did not place his image elsewhere?


    And why do I go there? Because most creationists feel as threatened by the idea of evolution as they are by the idea we are not alone in the universe. If you have already accepted creationism and admit God to be all powerful, then who is to say he might not have another world stowed away ... a hidden Earth, lightyears away. After all, he did create the Heavens and the Earth, so could he not do so again?


    And no, I do not chose to write a hub on this as I am not out to destroy anyone's beliefs or create a new belief system for others to follow. Instead, I am presenting this information to help us do what humans were designed to do ... to question everything around us ... as we are the only creatures on this Earth seemingly capable to do so, and this gift (as we should be believe)was installed upon us to be used to its potential.

    Question everything ... or prefer to live on a flat Earth. I prefer mine round and I'm glad my forefathers thought the same. smile

    1. White Teeth profile image61
      White Teethposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      OMFG, write a Hub! smile

      1. yoshi97 profile image90
        yoshi97posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Nah ... Making what I wrote a hub makes it sound like a 'believe this or else' kind of thing.

        I'm not here to change anyone's beliefs ... just doing my job of giving everyone something to consider as we never prosper as a species unless we are willing to question everything around us.

        Plato was poisoned for his quest for knowledge ... I chose not to see the same happen in modern society.

        So, my response is not hub material, as it presents food for thought and not verifiable facts we should all accept and believe as true. I can claim nothing in my response as fact, but if it makes one person's mind open up to consider (not necessarily believe) other possibilities, then it has earned more for the human race than any hub ever could.

        So to speak ... I'm not in this thread to refute or prove anything ... I'm here to make us all question the truth and to give us the tools necessary to determine it for ourselves, based on what we know, what we believe, what we can accept, and what we can learn that might make us chose differently. smile

        (and I'm also researching new hubs as I write all of this)

  17. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    To yoshi97. Dinosaurs are in the bible they're are just different words. Behemoth Job 40:15-24,Job chapter 41, Leviathan Psalm 104:25,26 and Isaiah 27, tanniyn (dragon). Many drawings of these animals have been found, everywhere which disproves the age of the earth. If humans never lived with dinosaurs how could we draw them? Noah collected two of every, kind not two of every species, that where people too often get confused, I stated in my original post that scientist have done studies to prove that when to mate to of the same kinds you may get different variations, but the will still be that same kind. The roots of T-Rex were only 2 inches deep. Had he bit into the hide of another dinosaur he would have lost teeth
    They cut a tooth in half og a unearthed T-Rex and found in deeply impureated with CHLOROPHYLL! That's right, Chlorophyll is the main substance found in PLANTS not meat! T-REX was a plant eater. By the way, this discovery validates the Bible once again! How so? See this passage...Genesis 1:30, "And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so." Look it up! Evolution is nothing to fear it's simply an false idea(like Columbus discovered America), Science is nothing to fear use science. It works more in our favor. Genesis is a great place to start if you learn how it all really happened, and if you really want to learn more I suggest to look up The Hovind Theory. Be Blessed.

    1. yoshi97 profile image90
      yoshi97posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Drawings of dinosaurs? Where? Remember, when I speak of dinosaurs I am speaking of very large lizards - not woolly mammoths.

      As for T-Rex losing teeth ... he did ... He had new teeth that grew in behind the others to replace those he lost.

      T-Rex a plant eater? Ever see an alligator eat plants? Those teeth are made to eat meat and won't work well for grass eating.

      Also, we eat plants (as do other herbivores and omnivores) so if something eats the undigested contents of our stomachs, they will inevitably digest some chlorophyll. And T-Rex ate *many* plant eaters, so of course, he digested plant matter secondhand.

      And the last note I would like to add is that I do not consider the Bible a book of science as it is written by men and handed down through the generations. Who is to say things weren't mistranslated?

      Let's not forget ... Many books were written claiming the Earth to be flat and not one of them proved true in the end.

      And if Noah collected two of every kind, he still needed to collect two dinosaurs, where are they today?

      I don't question your faith, as I feel reverence for how strong you are in your beliefs, but I do question how you refute proof by consulting a book written before such proof ever existed.

      And you still have not explained why the dinosaurs disappeared. Was this an act of our creator? and if so ... why?

      Also, if Behometh and Leviathan are mentioned *after* the great flood, then (according to the Bible) this means Noah *did* take dinosaurs onboard the ark, or else they could not exist afterwards. So, again I ask, how did he get them onto the ark, when they were as large (some even larger) than the boat?

      1. ElElyone profile image61
        ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        My dear man.

        My scriptures are not put together in the book they have titled "The Bible" in the order of when they took place. My servant Job and his story were written long before my servant Moses wrote down what I told him to write. They are not in a chronological order my dear man.

        I love you. I am a loving, kind and compassionate Father who wants to help his creation. If you would study more carefully, you would speak more wisely my dear man.

        I want nothing less for you than love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

        x ElElyone

        1. earnestshub profile image86
          earnestshubposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          and a belief that includes A hell created by God, a world fallen as a result of God's negligence, a separation from God imposed... by God.

        2. 0
          thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

          You are very knowledgeable of God's Word. Be Blessed and Thank you for your input here.

      2. 0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Behometh and Leviathan are dinosaurs read how the bible describes them. If you want to know what the bible say about Dinosauar visit these to sites

        http://www.creationists.org/dinosaurs-h … d-art.html

        http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q3_bib … 0scripture

  18. Randy Godwin profile image95
    Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago

    It's funny most of these BT's (bible thumpers) seem to have no information about themselves on their profiles.  Why do they not write some hubs since they are members?  They usually have the longest posts of any other group, yet they don't care to post an article. 

    They also speak in God's name and tell us how proud they are to serve him.  But yet they are ashamed to let others know their names.  I know, many members do not use their real names and this is fine, but the BT's claim to be spreading the word of God. 

    So, if you want to prove you are truly an instrument of God then quit hiding behind these stupid names.  Otherwise I can only assume you are already known by another, more familiar name.

    The BT's should jump at the chance to be "Martyrs for Jesus" if they are true believers so let's see who is really serious about about their faith.

    1. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      It's not about me, but God. To God alone be the glory. If you would like continue this later please remember Ridicule is not an argument, it just show lack. 
      2 Peter 3:4-7 "Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:  7But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men."

  19. ElElyone profile image61
    ElElyoneposted 7 years ago

    yoshi97
        208 posts
        Joined: 2 months ago
        Hubs: 19
        Fans: 106



    "According to the Bible, God created Man first ... animals second. This is a *major* important fact, as this must be proven true for creationism to stand. If one fact falls, then we must question the rest ... as we did with evolution.

    Okay, so Man came first and animals came second ... dinosaurs were animals, so man came before dinosaurs. Maybe *just* before, but before none-the-less."


    Dear man, you seem to have made it "appear" that I created Mankind before the animals. I am so sad that you are in error on this matter young man. I was there and this is was happened. So please, if you are going to say that something is a "major important fact", please state it correctly, other wise your fellow mankind may take you for a ????? or one of those words you all use on earth.

    My dear young man. Here is what I did. This is what happened on the 6th day. Before this I created everything else.

    Gen 1:24 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth every kind of animal-livestock, small animals, and wildlife." And so it was.
    Gen 1:25 God made all sorts of wild animals, livestock, and small animals, each able to reproduce more of its own kind. And God saw that it was good.
    Gen 1:26  Then God said, "Let us make people in our image, to be like ourselves. They will be masters over all life-the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the livestock, wild animals, and small animals."
    Gen 1:27 So God created people in his own image; God patterned them after himself; male and female he created them.


    I love you and care for you more than you can imagine and i desire for you to have love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

    x EllElyone

  20. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    It's time for rest. Please continue writing I will respond tomorrow. Goodnight and take care well.

  21. Randy Godwin profile image95
    Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago

    As I said, ashamed to let others know who you really are.  Troll!

  22. Bibowen profile image90
    Bibowenposted 7 years ago

    I have my doubts about evolution being the greatest story ever told, but I do believe it's the greatest story ever sold.

    1. White Teeth profile image61
      White Teethposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      ONIGTGTBN (Oh No, I Got To Go To Bed Now...)

      Al Frankenstein, now the Abortion Party Senator from Minivoter,...funny...stuff???...no se....

      (btw, this is not my real account, it's Hubpages', so don't try to get me banned...bitches....)

    2. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Exactly!

      1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
        Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Right on brothers!  Those lying scumbag scientists will surely roast in Hell for all eternity.

        Praise the lord!

  23. arthriticknee profile image88
    arthritickneeposted 7 years ago

    I've always wondered why god was racist.
    Why wouldn't he or she work out a better way of spreading the good word to the people of Central and South America than sending small pox ridden missionaries to decimate a population. What made the people of the middle east the centre of the world while the rest of the world's population (happy in their ignorance)had to wait for the invention of ocean going vessels.
    If only they knew what they were missing out on.........

  24. ElElyone profile image61
    ElElyoneposted 7 years ago

    yoshi97
        211 posts
        Joined: 2 months ago
        Hubs: 19
        Fans: 106

    My dear man;

    I have left you 2 messages here, I hope you received them.

    x ElElyone

    1. yoshi97 profile image90
      yoshi97posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      It took me a bit to realize the message ... as I was as much caught up in hub research as I was this thread.

      Thetruthhurts2009, I welcome you to continue on issuing in the next Dark Ages, but not on my dime. I'm off to write a hub, which I consider a far more productive usage of my time.

      Enjoy! smile

  25. arthriticknee profile image88
    arthritickneeposted 7 years ago

    This just keeps on getting crazier and crazier....

    nothing like a religion post to get everyone fired up.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Especially when it is a religionist with an opinion on a scientific theory it has never even read. wink

      They are just upset because evolution proves there is not a god and they have been lying for years. They call it the "truth" just to confuse everyone and hide behind numerous fake user names though - just like it says in the bible. lol

  26. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    "If you speak with an Evolutionist you will find that two rarely agree on what evolution is, because it’s a lie and it too often changes, and when you have them in a corner they used one of these escape sayings, “you’re just religionist nut“, “You (enter swear words here)”, Sarcastic/with smiles remarks the void or intelligence response, or my fav “You’re just afraid of Science.” I find this one particularity funny, because evolution is anything, but science."

    If you look over the responses so far you can easily see who the brainwashed atheist/evolutionist are. They didn't read it, but they had to comment. Simply amazing.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I feel your pain here. I know that evolution has proven that your god is a lie - but please don't your frustrations out here. This is not a meaningful discussion - nor is it intended to be. Evolution is a proven fact, and you are being deliberately obtuse. The theory is an ever evolving scientific theory which changes as new information comes to light - it never challenges the fact of it happening - only the method.

      I heartily suggest (and there is no malice in this) that it is probably time to go to a meeting. If there are none in the close vicinity, try phoning a few further away - I am sure they will come get you.

      1. 0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Atheist 1 you have been brainwashed I can’t help you, you need to read the article check the facts and find the truth you are wrong and I've proved it not with the bible, but with math and science evolution is a lie and if you want to believe the lie go ahead, but stop calling it fact, it's Sci-Fi.

        1. Mark Knowles profile image60
          Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          You are deliberately distorting the "facts." lol  I have read the article - and I have read much of the same rubbish elsewhere before.

          Sorry your god doesn't exist. Not really sure what you think you are doing, but I am sorry you are too ignorant to be able to understand the proven facts that show evolution happens.

          You have no proved anything other than you need some help. Badly - go to a meeting.

          1. 0
            thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

            “The main problem with atheist and evolutionist is not the arguments for and against evolution and creation. Their problem is they can't bring themselves to reject evolution, because they have already rejected God. Humans have a big mental fault. They are not able to admit they were wrong. Therefore, they are trapped in their previous decision to reject God.”
            You really believe you're right. Why all the fraud if it is fact? Why are Scientist refuting the theory. You're are willfully ignorant. The bible has already foretold about people like you. You will believe anything, but the thought of God. I understanding Evolution is all you got, so I suspect you to continue to defend your beliefs like any other religion. Evolutionism is dead, praise the Creator.

            1. Mark Knowles profile image60
              Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              LOL

              Seriously dude - you think attacking a proven scientific fact will get me to change my tune about your invisible super being? lol

              I came to the perfectly rational decision that your religion is a lie many years before I understood how evolution proved me correct.

              No scientist refutes the fact that evolution happens and the few that "refute the theory" have alternative theories - they are not refuting evolution, merely the method of it's actions.

              Perhaps if you had had an opportunity for an education you would understand this. I am really sorry you didn't - but - it is not to late to educate yourself. I will help if you want......

              1. 0
                thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Keep ignoring the qusetions and keep you religion. Just wrath wrath yourself up with those lies and deny, deny, deny.
                BTW Explain how something can come from nothing in contradiction to the first law of thermodynamics.
                The universe is experiencing heat death as predicted by the second law of thermodynamics. So how do evolutionists justify proposing that energy always existed and had no beginning?
                I'll wait while you go google an answer.

                1. Mark Knowles profile image60
                  Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  Oh I am sorry - just what exactly does the proven facts that demonstrate evolution happening have to do with the first law of thermodynamics?

                  1. 0
                    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    If you would read the article, and if evolution is right you should have an answer. I wonder why you don't ummmmmm

  27. MontyApollo profile image60
    MontyApolloposted 7 years ago

    Pretty much every university science dept on the planet fundamentally accepts evolution as the basis of modern biology.

    This is really only debated by non-scientist Americans with poor high school science educations trying to stop high school science education from improving.

    1. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      If any university science dept professor rejects evolution which many do they will lose their jobs, Ben Stein did a documentary about this. “Expelled: No intelligence allowed” watch it.
      Thanks for the correction it helped  knowing the Jean was an atheist. Thanks

      1. MontyApollo profile image60
        MontyApolloposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Jean said that evolution was a fact (the other quote I gave you), but you are using one of his quotes as "evidence" of a prominent scientist that doesn't believe.

        1. 0
          thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

          Jean Rostand said
          "It is becoming harder and harder to find Darwinists willing to make a serious attempt to defend their theory, and explain how it could account for the complexity of life, they are almost entirely in attack mode*. Their three main arguments are 1) ID is not science 2) ID is not science and 3) ID is not science. I believe ID is science, but I can understand the concern many have about it being taught in science classrooms, so I would like to propose a compromise. How about we simply “have the courage to recognise that we know nothing of the mechanism” of evolution, and leave it at that? Each student can decide for himself/herself what the most likely explanation might be"

          1. MontyApollo profile image60
            MontyApolloposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            LOL. Dude, that was an Intelligent Design blogger commenting on Rostand, not a quote from Rostand. You are falling all over yourself trying to fix your original misquote.

            Rostand's actual quote that the blogger was commenting on was this:

            “If it is true that neither Lamarckism nor mutationism [Darwinism] enable us to understand the mechanism of evolution, we must have the courage to recognise that we know nothing of this mechanism…Some people may perhaps feel that such a confession of ignorance plays into the hands of those who are still fighting the doctrine of evolution. But quite apart from the fact that the most elementary intellectual honesty demands that we should say ‘I do not know’ where we believe that this is so, I think that this doctrine is now so solidly grounded on its own merits that it needs no support from false advocacy. I must add that however obscure the causes of evolution appear to me to be, I do not doubt for a moment that they are entirely natural.”

            1. 0
              thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

              Straw man. What is your point?  Jean doubted his own theory that why I used the quote. When you are out of straw. Read the entire article, or keep this up whatever works for you.

              1. MontyApollo profile image60
                MontyApolloposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                I don't know how using fake scientists with fake titles to support your position, then coming up with a fake quote for a real scientist has anything to do with straw men...but you lied about sources, cherry-picked a sentence you thought helped your cause even though the scientist was a firm believer of evolution, and then you did not have the basic reading comprehension skills to tell who was saying what and ending up false-quoting again.

                Why would I care what you had to say in your little thesis if you are a lier or just stupid?

                1. 0
                  thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  Fake Scientist? Troll. This foum is not for you. Believe in the evolution lie that is your choice. Removing the quote changing nothing. If you read it you would have known that or maybe you read it and "misquote" is all you got.

                  1. MontyApollo profile image60
                    MontyApolloposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    Yes, the supposed Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research, who doesn't really exist. You originally attributed that first quote of yours to him because he looks impressive. But he is fake (and a lie).

    2. Earthscribe profile image59
      Earthscribeposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      More sanity in a wayward thread! big_smile

  28. Greek One profile image80
    Greek Oneposted 7 years ago

    I think ALL science after Aristotle is bunk

    1. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Aristotle was to think of evolution in a very vague way,but he was the first to be recorded thinking of such things.

  29. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    I'm off! I'll return in a few hours to answer in further questions. Be Well.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I don't understand - you didn't answer any questions. Off to look up what the theory of evolution says? lol

      See you in your next sock puppet.

  30. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy!

    1. Randy Godwin profile image95
      Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Well, we know there's not a rule against bull$#!7.  Your first long post proved that!

      1. 0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        If you to continue believing in evolution and your just an super-evolved rock this forum is not for you. btw I still didn't get  for proof of evolution and if you have it you better go claim that prize money.

        1. Mark Knowles profile image60
          Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          Any time you would like to tell us what the theory of evolution states........

          Or would you like me to educate you?

          Would that be easier? lol

          1. yoshi97 profile image90
            yoshi97posted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Mark, I think you're a great person, which is why I dropped back into this thread to tell you that you are being trolled ... nothing more.

            This person you continue to debate with is issuing words in a book for proof, and could have just as easily said 'The Hindi Bible' is the real truth, if they had chosen a Hindu slant instead.

            After all, a scientist can no more refute the Hindi Bible's words  than they could the Christian Bible, due to the old argument ... none of us were there.

            As such, I will give you one lifeline to keep going with this thread (should you decide you are here to enlighten those who wish to carry on), but I believe you are an asthmatic being exhausted of important breath, by a source who cares not about the truth, but how they can use a book to drive you in a logical frenzy to prove what most of us already know and accept.

            And so, I leave you with this gem ...

            According to The Bible, God created the Garden of Eden and everything inside of it. If this is a fact, then God also created the tree of knowledge, knowing full well the temptation it would be for Adam and Eve. He then left them alone with that temptation and allowed them to eat - and we know he allowed it, as he could have prevented it by not placing the tree there to begin with or by placing something there to guard the tree.

            If we go with the ignorance that God just 'expected' Adam and Eve to obey him without question, then we must assume God is *not* all knowing or else he would have known that they would disobey him (and this is canon in The Bible - God is all-knowing - nothing in the Bible refutes this).

            So, God knew Adam and Eve would betray him and eat from the tree, yet he knowingly left them alone with the tree and did nothing to prevent them from eating from it. As such, this was an act of temptation ... and temptation is an action given to Satan, not God.

            So, did Satan put the tree there? Again, according to the Bible, God created *everything* in the garden - including the tree.

            So ... either God wanted us to have knowledge ... or we were tempted by our own creator to do something wrong, which seemingly points to the direction of our creator having a dual existence as protector and temtationist - making him God and Devil in one.


            So, Mark, there's a new (non-scientific) platform that allows you to wrestle on an even keel. Is The Bible right, or does it only tell the truth when the facts given represent the outcome needed?

            Have fun with this one! smile


            Oh yeah, and the next comeback will be that Satan was a snake in the garden sent to guard the tree ... so again, God all-knowing, allowed a rebel angel to guard it, never knowing of the rebellion
            that was about to occur. Hmmm...

            1. Mark Knowles profile image60
              Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              LOL

              I know. But - as these people do not seem to grasp - this is a public forum, viewable by the entire internet. I am not really speaking to them. I know he will never ever be able to understand how ridiculous his arguments are - but, what he also does not seem to grasp is that he is the best argument against his religion ever devised. wink

              And I am happy to share the love. smile

  31. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago

    "you want stay that way" ?

    WTF? Is Tonto posting in your name now?

  32. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    Another question open to all evolutionist?
    What evidence suggests that mutation and natural selection changes have no limits?
    When google lets you down look up Antony Flew.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Still waiting for your explanation of what the theory of evolution states.

      You do know - right? lol lol lol lol lol

      No?.............................................

  33. Make  Money profile image72
    Make Moneyposted 7 years ago

    Evolutionism the greatest folly ever told.

    Excellent original post thetruthhurts2009.

    Yep it's time to put the theory of evolution to rest before atheists go on another killing spree like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao Tse-tung or Kip Kinkle.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Quite right - no more catholic child abuse, I agree with you Make Money. We should stop the child sex offenders in The Catholic Church from having sex with kids. Or is that not what you meant?

      No more abortions for children sexually abused by the clergy. I am with you 100% Make Money. For once we agree.......

      lol

      What a pathetic belief system..............

      Still waiting for quietnessandtrust or hisperfecttool or underhiswings or whateverheishhidingbehind to say something sensible.

      A long wait I suspect Making Money From Abusing Children . Oh well.....

      Still - I have left you alone to argue about whatever you are arguing about in the christ's whatever thread. Now that is christian behavior right there. No sex with kids involved.

      1. 0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Deflect and insult another great tactic brought to by the Church Of Atheism

        1. Mark Knowles profile image60
          Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          Still waiting for your understanding, and any time you would care to share the theory of evolution rather than spreading your hatred as it tells you to in the bible.... lol

          Any time..............

          1. 0
            thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

            You got nothing you still haven't answered my first question, don't deflect to me answer my question.

            1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
              Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              But your deflection of his question questioning the deflection of your question.........

              My head hurts.

              1. 0
                thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Go lay down.

                1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
                  Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  I can't, I'm too excited about your forthcoming hub!

  34. Uninvited Writer profile image83
    Uninvited Writerposted 7 years ago

    Adolf Hitler was actually brought up Catholic...

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Nooooooooooooooooooooo!!

      Quick, duck   there's a rant about to be lobbed!

      1. Uninvited Writer profile image83
        Uninvited Writerposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        I had to say it...

    2. Make  Money profile image72
      Make Moneyposted 7 years ago in reply to this
    3. 0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      True, but he soon quit the church, and got a copy of the evolutionary bible "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, but in order convince  his followers that he was following god's order he had he counsel photograph he leaving churches. Pretty devious, but all true. You didn’t read the article.

      1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
        Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Produce a hub.  See if you can break 40.

      2. Mark Knowles profile image60
        Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this
        1. 0
          thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

          Deflect!! Amazing!

  35. yoshi97 profile image90
    yoshi97posted 7 years ago

    Great debate and all ... but ... I got bored and went off to write another hub. smile

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      See truthandwingsthingy?  Some Hubbers........write hubs

    2. ElElyone profile image61
      ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I AM
      ע ל ע ל י ו ן

      TO: the one who calls himself Yoshi97:

      I had previously written you and yet it seems you ignored it, seeing as how you replied to other posts here in the forum. So I will write it again for you dear man.

      Here is what you said:
      "According to the Bible, God created Man first ... animals second. This is a *major* important fact, as this must be proven true for creationism to stand. If one fact falls, then we must question the rest ... as we did with evolution.

      Okay, so Man came first and animals came second ... dinosaurs were animals, so man came before dinosaurs. Maybe *just* before, but before none-the-less."

      Dear man, you seem to have made it "appear" that I created Mankind before the animals. I am so sad that you are in error on this matter young man. I was there and this is was happened. So please, if you are going to say that something is a "major important fact", please state it correctly, other wise your fellow mankind may take you for a ????? or one of those words you all use on earth.

      My dear young man. Here is what I did. This is what happened on the 6th day. Before this I created everything else.

      Gen 1:24 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth every kind of animal-livestock, small animals, and wildlife." And so it was.
      Gen 1:25 God made all sorts of wild animals, livestock, and small animals, each able to reproduce more of its own kind. And God saw that it was good.
      Gen 1:26 Then God said, "Let us make people in our image, to be like ourselves. They will be masters over all life-the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the livestock, wild animals, and small animals."
      Gen 1:27 So God created people in his own image; God patterned them after himself; male and female he created them.

      I love you and care for you more than you can imagine and i desire for you to have love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

      Can you answer and correct your errors?

      I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

    3. ElElyone profile image61
      ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      [b]

      I left you others messages to which you have not replied so I will post this one again as well as i did the other above it.

      You had said:
      "Also, if Behometh and Leviathan are mentioned *after* the great flood, then (according to the Bible) this means Noah *did* take dinosaurs onboard the ark, or else they could not exist afterwards. So, again I ask, how did he get them onto the ark, when they were as large (some even larger) than the boat?"

      My dear man.

      My scriptures are not put together in the book they have titled "The Bible" in the order of when they took place. My servant Job and his story were written long before my servant Moses wrote down what I told him to write. They are not in a chronological order my dear man.

      I love you. I am a loving, kind and compassionate Father who wants to help his creation. If you would study more carefully, you would speak more wisely my dear man.

      I want nothing less for you than love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

      Getting your studies in order would be a good thing for you too.

      I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

      1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
        Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this
        1. ElElyone profile image61
          ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          Dear young man;

          Inserting words below the original things I wrote and trying to make it appear as if I said it? This is nothing new under the sun, men have been doing this for years.
          ע ל ע ל י ו ן hears it all the time.

          I love you my dear Ron. I forgive you for this. I often must wink at what my servants do, especially when they try to change what i said. even some that claim to know me try and change what I have said.

          Draw near to me Ron, I will draw near to you.

          I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

          1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
            Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            I love you too baby.  Let's cuddle.

            1. ElElyone profile image61
              ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              My dear Ron:

              Please do not add to what I say.
              I do not do it to you.
              This is only right, is it not?
              You were taught not to do this were you not dear Ron?

              I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

              1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
                Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Yes, but you are forgiving and kind.  I am not.

      2. yoshi97 profile image90
        yoshi97posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        I already have corrected my errors, by going back to writing hubs, but I still manage to sneak in and read for my own amusement. smile

        yoshi97
        214 posts
        Joined: 2 months ago
        Hubs: 20
        Fans: 108

        The message I get from this is that I typically allow 10 posts in the forum for each hub, which means I'm due to write a hub, lest I upset my quota.

        I also generate five fans per hub, which means, right now, I am letting down eight new fans by not writing something new.

        So, as such, I will go back to writing hubs and allow the minions to battle it out, as I am unable to reason facts against a book written centuries ago, no more so than you can reason the existence of one God, versus the fact the Hindi Bible claims that there are many gods and not just one.

        What physical scrap can you offer to prove the Hindu claim wrong? Save your breath, as that answer will undoubtedly come from the Bible as well, which I can then refute using the Hindi Bible.

        If words in a book are all you have to back up your battles, then I suggest you read Dr. Seus, as his writings have been brainwashing kids for years. smile


        Must run ... must run ... have hubs to write ...

        Write on ... write on ... you'll see the light ...

        smile

        1. ElElyone profile image61
          ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          My dear Yoshi97:

          Did you wish to state the errors?
          Come now, let us go line by line Yoshi.
          Let us not miss anything and be thorough.
          Are these the only errors you have made here?
          Do you wish to offer an apology for those errors my servant?
          I can forgive you if you would but ask dear man.

          I am compassionate, kind, patient, meek and gentle.

          Even though I make no errors, i am willing to forgive mankind for his.

          I love you dear Yoshi. Draw near to me and I will draw near to you.
          Do not be afraid dear Yoshi, I accept you as you are, then I can show you how you can have peace in your life, to be kind, faithful, true, full of joy, the joy that i give, not as the world gives. I desire you to know me and learn from me for I am LOVE.

          I look forward to hearing from you dear man.

          I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

  36. 0
    Am I dead, yet?posted 7 years ago

    I am still waiting for the aliens to show up and respond to this thread.

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I think they started it.

      1. 0
        Am I dead, yet?posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        xD ROFL!

  37. 0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    Like suspected the atheist and evolutionist achieved an Epic Fail in making a real argument against my post, well because most of them didn’t even read it. They simply ignored everything resorted back to the same ol ridicule, mockery and name-calling. Typical if you know any atheist and I know it will only continue after I leave this forum. So you atheist go back to debating against what you call nothing. But if it's there is nothing why are your guys debating Christians? You’re right. Right? Wrong! Truth is you don’t know, but you have faith in your side. If I’m wrong you guys should be out enjoying that life of yours, Oh wait….but  according to you have been freed from the bondslaves(as they looking for quotes from the Old Testament regarding slavery) of religion, Why are you here, debating with religious fervor? Go out and enjoy your life leave us crazy Christians to our faith, Let us minister to those, who aren’t so “sure”  of themselves, but you won’t because you guys are so insecure that you have to engage in debate in order to convince yourselves. If you thought for a second your were right you would dismiss us Christians and go on with your life, but since you doubt Church of Atheism and it’s promise of nothing, you have to constantly engage Christians in verbal combat and when get into a tight corner instead coming up with an answer you swear, name call, and use BIG FONT.
    We disagree, I have a l great life Praise God(as they type “which god?”) because I know I’m right, you on the other hand are still in denial.
    BTW To Atheist 1, I really hope that you are fraud maybe an angry teenager with issues?  Using daddy’s picture(that would explain all the smiles) to gain friends and feel accepted. I hope so, but if are as old as the guy in the picture, I’m feel true sorrow for you, because there is nothing more sad then a dying atheist. Goodbye to this forum, but please continue to name-call and shake your fist at the sky.
    If you ever need prayer, please contact me.

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Jesus Christ!

  38. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago

    Wow, those symbols are really cool!  Are you the artist formerly known as God?

  39. Davinagirl3 profile image60
    Davinagirl3posted 7 years ago

    "Evolutionism"?  Is that supposed to be clever, or is this a real word?  Where have I been?

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      "the artist" can use whatever words he chooses.  he created words.

  40. Mighty Mom profile image91
    Mighty Momposted 7 years ago

    Holy Scopes Monkey Trial, Batman!
    Are we really conversing with the Great Creator here in the Forums? How come "His" presence has not been promoted to the entire HP community by Admin?
    They are missing out on the biggest PR opp of the year.
    WOW!

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      The HubPages team works in mysterious ways!

  41. ElElyone profile image61
    ElElyoneposted 7 years ago

    earnestshub
    3425 posts
    Joined: 12 months ago
    Hubs: 68
    Fans: 386

    "and a belief that includes A hell created by God, a world fallen as a result of God's negligence, a separation from God imposed... by God"


    My dear earnestshub:

    I am used to being blamed for many things, much like a child blames his or her parents for things he did and they take it in stride as they consider the source of the blame. Some children still blame the parents when they are themselves in they're 50's, 60's and 70's. It keeps them bitter and resentful and they blame many others for what they do as well.

    I get blamed for plenty and I still love my creation and long to fellowship with them.

    Adam blamed me too when he said to me "it is the woman that you gave me, it's her fault"...as if to say that had I not given him the woman, none of this ever would have happened, yet Adam chose to not follow my instructions, if he had, things would not be as they are. And Eve blamed the serpent and the serpent just said nothing...at least he took his lumps.

    I told them both to be fruitful and multiply and to fill the earth and have dominion over it all, to subdue it and rule over it.

    I honor peoples choice about the response they make to me.
    They will honor my response to them as well.

    I desire men to know me, nothing less.

    I love you and care for you earnestshub.

    Draw near to me and I will draw near to you.

    I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

  42. Shadesbreath profile image91
    Shadesbreathposted 7 years ago

    LOL 

    I would say more, but that pretty much sums it up.

  43. Mighty Mom profile image91
    Mighty Momposted 7 years ago

    Whew! Thank GOD you arrived just in time, Shadesbreath! When people start getting rebuked for offering to cuddle, you know things are going south quickly!

    1. ElElyone profile image61
      ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      If my servant Ron was sincere, then I would draw near to him and cuddle with him, I would be with him wherever he goes.

      I rebuked him not, I only asked him to not insert words where I did not say them.

      I have his reply and I accept it and honor it as sincere. "Yes, but you are forgiving and kind.  I am not."

      He seems to mean what he says, even though he does not know what he says anymore then he knows what he does. This is why I wink at what many of my servants do.

      I can offer Ron all of the love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control that I have if he would draw near to me.

      I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

      1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
        Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Well........how "near" do you mean?  Are we talking priest/alterboy near, or let's grab a beer and pick up chicks near?  I mean, you do go for girls right?  If God is gay... I mean,I'm cool with that and all........

        man, I'm confused.

        My head hurts.

        1. ElElyone profile image61
          ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I agree my dear Ron:

          "man, I'm confused."

          Your insincerity has you most confounded and this causes your head to hurt. It also causes others around you to hurt.

          You see my dear man. Someone who is double minded is unstable in all his ways and he says things he does not do. He does things he should not do as well.

          Many of his words are idle.

          Any man who harms a child would be better off tying a boat anchor around his neck and toss himself into the deep, compared to what I will do to him.

          I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן and I see all and will have justice served.

          I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

          1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
            Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            So, you're gonna get the priest who came into my room that night and.........

            Oh God (just an expression don't take it literally Artist).........the memories are flooding back

          2. 0
            sandra rinckposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Have justice served when everyone is dead? The more you speak the more I can't stand you.  Go away god poser because if you believe as much as you think you do then you know that your god will cook you like the rest right?

            1. ElElyone profile image61
              ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              Yes dear Sandra:

              You see, people being dead physically means nothing to me in that they are not beyond my grasp to deal with them for the evil they did while alive. Nothing escapes my notice.

              I even know when a sparrow falls to the ground.

              I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

              1. 0
                sandra rinckposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Children don't do evil.  And I can tell that life means nothing to you so go away.  I hate you even more then I did five post ago. big_smile

                1. ElElyone profile image61
                  ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  Dear Sandra:

                  I was not speaking about children in the context and I know you know that dear one.
                  If I wanted to say children do evil, I would have done so. I said people, as in adults and I know that you know that is what I meant dear Sandra.

                  I was speaking of your parents, if they had done evil to you. Again, i know that you know that.

                  What did they do to you dear Sandra?

                  Children eventually reach an age when they are accountable and only I know when that is.

                  I love you Sandra, even if you do really hate me.

                  I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

                  1. 0
                    sandra rinckposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    Stop saying you love me because you don't.  It's annoying.  And no, I didn't know you were talking about adults but now your saying that children are not people.

                    Is that why you treat them so bad?

  44. 0
    sandra rinckposted 7 years ago

    I am praying that he will go away. big_smile

    1. ElElyone profile image61
      ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      My dear Sandra Rinck:
      I like the meaning of your name:
      The surname of RINCK was derived from the old English name 'hringan' meaning a bell-ringer.

      This term is not possible with me, "I am praying that he will go away." for I am Omnipresent.

      I love you too Sandra. I care for you and desire to know you very much.

      I long for you to have peace in your life, to have love, joy, patience, kindness, gentleness and self control, with all meekness and humility.

      I long for you to become the woman that I created you to be.

      Draw near to me and I will draw near to you and be with you wherever you go.

      I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

  45. 0
    sandra rinckposted 7 years ago

    See, god doesn't answer prays. wink

    1. ElElyone profile image61
      ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      My dear Sandra the Bell Ringer:

      I answer prayers.

      Sometimes yes and sometimes no.

      Just like your mother and father did...or still do?

      I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

      1. 0
        sandra rinckposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Wrong again, they never answer either.

        1. ElElyone profile image61
          ElElyoneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          My dear Sandra:

          If that is the truth, that your parents "never" answered you, then they failed and that they will answer to me for. Even after they are dead and even while they live.

          I wonder though. Did they "really never answer you?"
          Each and every time you asked a question?

          If they treated you with evil, perhaps this is why you hate authority, yes?

          I do not do this, I always give and answer to all of my servants.

          I AM  ע ל ע ל י ו ן

  46. Shadesbreath profile image91
    Shadesbreathposted 7 years ago

    I like the line, "I rebuked him not."

    That's good stuff.

    <wave at MM... "Hi!  LTNS">

  47. Randy Godwin profile image95
    Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago

    Just once I would like one of these nut cases to impersonate Satan.  At least they might act like they had a little sense.

  48. tantrum profile image60
    tantrumposted 7 years ago

    i wonder who's hiding behind God....

  49. ElElyone profile image61
    ElElyoneposted 7 years ago

    Mercy, mercy, all of this talk about me.

    If you believe in me and I exist, then you will have your proper place with me.

    If you believe in me and I do not exist, then you will have lived a righteous life and feel great when you die.

    If you do not believe in me and I do not exist, then you were right and lived however you wanted and you are just dead and cease to exist because I do not exist. You will also have nobody to tell how right you were either.

    If you do not believe in me and I exist, then you have made a tremendously  great error and I will miss you very much.

    I AM ע ל ע ל י ו ן

    1. 0
      sandra rinckposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      How many times you gonna post the same stupid thing? Go away please.

    2. tantrum profile image60
      tantrumposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        I won't miss you at all. So bye bye God! Nice 2 meet you. I will find out who you are. Just give me some more time! big_smile

  50. 0
    zampanoposted 7 years ago

    This is one result of too much reading in too short a time.

Closed to reply
 
working