What is different from animals and believers?

1. 57

   marinealways24posted 14 years ago

   -What is different from animals and believers? They both follow a script. Is there a difference?

   replyreport
   1. 0

      sandra rinckposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      animals are innocent. lol

      replyreport
      1. 57

         marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

         I didn't expect that one. I can't argue it either. Brilliant!

         replyreport
   2. 0

      Brenda Durhamposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      A better question might be What's the difference between animals and non-believers.....
      
      but I agree with sandra rinck---on both...(animals are innocent)...

      replyreport
      1. 57

         marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

         Do animals and believers not follow a script?

         replyreport
         1. 0

            Brenda Durhamposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            Animals follow their instincts,  if you wanna call that a script...
            Believers actually deny much of their "animalistic instincts" in order to follow Christ,  because we were created with a higher decision-making capability than animals.

            replyreport
            1. 57

               marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

               I meant that animals follow natures script. Believers follow the bibles script. We have the ability to individualize from the script, yet believers follow. This is where I am making the relation of believers and animals.

               replyreport
               1. 0

                  Brenda Durhamposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                  What's your point?
                  ....Believers follow, yes.  And it's because we know there's something (actually Someone!)  who's so much...MORE...than we are....

                  replyreport
                  1. 57

                     marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

                     What's my point? My point is that your 1 system belief is the same as an animal mind. No individual thought!

                     replyreport
   3. 0

      cosetteposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      i agree, animals are innocent and therefore, not accountable for their sometimes violent actions. instinct is part of the 'script' for all living things, but Man ignores his instinct through rationalization, sometimes to his detriment.

      replyreport
      1. 57

         marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

         Well said. And then believers get faith and throw rationalization and logic out the window.

         replyreport
         1. 0

            sneakorocksolidposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            You ever hear the old saying,'Lame as a Liberal.'

            replyreport
            1. 57

               marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

               ^^^^^^^
               
               
               The believer.

               replyreport
         2. 56

            atomswifeyposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            you can argue this point with God someday I am sure He will get a big kick out of your "logic". LOL

            replyreport
            1. 57

               marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

               I would enjoy a debate with your government God. Afterall, he created the individual mind right? If he wanted everyone to be robotic sheep, he should have created all with follower minds.

               replyreport
               1. 56

                  atomswifeyposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                  debate and or argue with God? Ok if you say so.
                  thinking themselves wise they became as fools...

                  replyreport
                  1. 57

                     marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

                     Not thinking at all, they became ignorant robots of a government belief system.
                     
                     Guess who's quote that is?

                     replyreport
   4. 62

      tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      The difference is human mind
      animal follow their instincts
      Believers their dreams.

      replyreport
2. 58

   Jeramiposted 14 years ago

   Everyone is a believer of something.
       Believers in a God try to follow directions as best as they know.
       If we are not going anyplace in particular,  any road will take us there. If we have a particular destination in mind we will need to follow a map.

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Not everyone is a believer of a grouped belief. Not everyone needs a map to get to their destination. A map sometimes defeats the purpose of a free ride.

      replyreport
3. 68

   torimariposted 14 years ago

   Well, as we are animals...just with conscious and higher intellect...and animals have their tradeoff of smell, strenght, speed.
   
   Anyhoo, animals, aside from us, behave in my opinion less barbaric, selfishly, and aren't so corrupt. Nonetheless, humanity is intriguing.

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Well said, we do have higher intellect and consciousness and the ability to individualize yet believers choose to live unconscious through faith and grouped belief.

      replyreport
4. 60

   magdielqrposted 14 years ago

   Believers act by faith and not by instincts.

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Believers seeking faith for something to believe is an instinct. Why do you think there are so many grouped and set beliefs? Believers are dependent on something to believe.

      replyreport
5. 0

   Brenda Durhamposted 14 years ago

   ..You also said "unconscious"....
   
   It's not uncoscious.
   It's a very conscious knowledge of God...

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      It's an assumption of absolute belief wrapped around the believers emotions to govern them.

      replyreport
6. 58

   LEFT HAND OF GODposted 14 years ago

   Well now:
   
   I am an individual who thnks in logical terms and learns things from many different experiences which lead me to conclude the truth in a given matter.

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      No truth is absolute. That may not be absolute.
      
      
      How are you an individual with a grouped belief?

      replyreport
7. 58

   LEFT HAND OF GODposted 14 years ago

   You ass / u / me ...me to have many things I do not.

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      You said before that you are a prophet. Your name is "left hand of God" God is defined from the bible. The bible is a 1 belief system contradicting your individual mind.

      replyreport
      1. 58

         LEFT HAND OF GODposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         Nothing I have read and now believe from any book contradicts my individual anything at all. I prove things to myself first.
         Use logic to draw a conclusion.
         
         If I am working on my car I read the repair manual to learn.
         
         You still assume much about me and are trying to lump me into your belief so you can label it and move out.
         
         I have no label and am even rejected by people who say they are believers.
         
         Quit wasting time trying to convince me of something I am NOT !!
         
         I can think like an individual or like a group, it depends on the situation at hand and what is the best thing at the moment.
         
         In a fire~fight, group is good.
         Taking a piss, individual is good.

         replyreport
         1. 57

            marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

            If you believe in an individual belief, why did you jump on the believer train to assault me for my individual ideas that the bible is a simple conspiracy to group belief? I didn't see your individualism to ask questions of my idea. All I seen was a believer trained assault. Protect the faith. I must say, I am very impressed by what you wrote. Sounds like you have a strong individual mind that has no need of a grouped belief. I simply don't understand why you define God in your name. God is defined from a grouped belief. Not an individual belief.

            replyreport
8. 56

   yoshi97posted 14 years ago

   If you are speaking of humans and mammals, then yes, they are quite different.
   
   Mammals rarely feast on their own kind ...

   replyreport
   1. 57

      marinealways24posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Got me on that one. lol

      replyreport