jump to last post 1-11 of 11 discussions (49 posts)

Biblical worldview vs Secular worldview Mark vs. Gardner

  1. AEvans profile image71
    AEvansposted 7 years ago

    The subject has been chosen for the serious debate!

    1. The debate is between Mark and Gardner it is not between all others on HP this thread is not open to others commenting please keep your comments to yourselves, as an audience you may ask questions but you may not harass, badger or post deragatory comments against either side.


    2. Both parties will respect each others comments and debate as professionals without mocking one another.

    3. All judges will discuss and will gather at the end of the debate via e-mail and come to a conclusion should there be a tie then all will respect one another.

    Last the objective of this debate should be able to provide both sides with a better understand of Biblical vs. Secular worldviews. 

    Gentleman get ready , let's get readddyyyyyy to rumbbbbllllleee!!!

    Remember people outside of Mark and Gardner, ssshhhhhhh only questions please. smile

    1. profile image0
      cosetteposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      epic title.

  2. Don W profile image83
    Don Wposted 7 years ago

    My popcorn is getting cold.

  3. Bovine Currency profile image61
    Bovine Currencyposted 7 years ago

    MOoo From the Cow, judge present.

  4. Bovine Currency profile image61
    Bovine Currencyposted 7 years ago

    What is going on here

  5. AEvans profile image71
    AEvansposted 7 years ago

    It it supposed to begin tomorrow. smile

    1. Bovine Currency profile image61
      Bovine Currencyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Ok, nice one smile

  6. profile image0
    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago

    Are we still doing this or what?

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Waiting on you. wink

  7. profile image0
    lynnechandlerposted 7 years ago

    Could you both give a little overview of your side to get things started here?

    1. Mark Knowles profile image60
      Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      No. We have agreed a set format.

      @ Gardner - I suggest you start a new thread and re state your proposition.

      "Biblical theory better describes the origins of human life as opposed to Evolution Theory."

      Three rounds of:

      The Affirmative always goes first(that would be Gardner)

      Then the Negative gets to cross-examine and asks question to the affirmative

      Then the Negative presents their case

      Then the Affirmative get to  cross examine and ask the negative questions

      The Affirmative does their rebuttal (no new arguments) just refutation

      Then the Negative gives rebuttal (no new arguments)  and closing

      Then the Affirmative closes

      Then the judges vote

      1. profile image0
        thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Are you starting a new thread or should I post here?

        1. AEvans profile image71
          AEvansposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I would recommend posting it here everyone has been anxiously waiting. smile

        2. Mark Knowles profile image60
          Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I will start a new one as we already have a bunch of comments on this one. Cleaner. big_smile

          1. AEvans profile image71
            AEvansposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Get your batooty in gear all of us are excited! smile

  8. profile image0
    lynnechandlerposted 7 years ago

    Sorry, didn't know that was just curious about a little background is all. Let the games begin.

  9. GeneralHowitzer profile image65
    GeneralHowitzerposted 7 years ago

    Looks like Mark is fired-up, Good luck to the two of you, Can I play arbiter nyahahaha just kidding... big_smile

  10. Mark Knowles profile image60
    Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago

    LOL

    Gardner already made his opening statement and I am considering my response. I have a week to pose questions if I remember rightly. wink

    http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/30050

    1. AEvans profile image71
      AEvansposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      You certainly do! smile

      1. Mikel G Roberts profile image87
        Mikel G Robertsposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        AEvans, are you going to put the debate into a hub at it's conclusion, for those of us that come along later?

        1. AEvans profile image71
          AEvansposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I never thought about that one since it is your idea I would recommend that you should, I would not take someone's idea away from them.smile

          1. Mikel G Roberts profile image87
            Mikel G Robertsposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Oh I would have...but I can't read or type in english....sorry.... wink The truth is I think you'd do a better job than I would... Have Fun Mikel

            1. earnestshub profile image86
              earnestshubposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              Mikel, really? You can't type or write in English? smile

              1. Mikel G Roberts profile image87
                Mikel G Robertsposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Can someone tell what that says??? wink

            2. AEvans profile image71
              AEvansposted 7 years ago in reply to this

              I see passing the buck, lololo ...mmmmmmm well if you wish for me to and I see that you write in english very, very well! lololo juast for you I will do it. smile

              1. Mikel G Roberts profile image87
                Mikel G Robertsposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Muaaahhh  wink

                1. earnestshub profile image86
                  earnestshubposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  Slippery Mikel, very slippery. lol lol

              2. GeneralHowitzer profile image65
                GeneralHowitzerposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Wow the debate started with a blast coming from truth... hehehe, Mark will surely have his hands full with this... as he tries to mount his refutations... interesting indeed, Mark indirectly ask for a week to give his response wink

                1. Paraglider profile image89
                  Paragliderposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  A five minute job wink

                  1. GeneralHowitzer profile image65
                    GeneralHowitzerposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    ROFL on that Para wink I hope it is... the audience like me is eager to see how this debate will push through though... wink

                2. Mark Knowles profile image60
                  Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  LOLOL

                  Well - seeing as the entire thing amounts to "science is lying," I am actually considering what a reasonable response is.

                  I could do it in 5 minutes - as Paraglider says, because there really is nothing to respond to, but I am hoping to respond in such a fashion as we learn something from each other and perhaps get across the fact that evolution is a scientific theory attempting to explain the facts we have observed - rather than a philosophy.

                  I am not really sure where the bible says that T Rex was actually a 900 year old lizard that mysteriously died out after the flood, and am deciding which parts to respond to without resorting to ridicule.

                  I realize Gardner took around 3 minutes to formulate his opening statement - and it shows. I also have other things to do. wink

                  1. GeneralHowitzer profile image65
                    GeneralHowitzerposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    I'm just eager Mark, as I am keeping my eye on your reply with that of Gardner's... Hmmm it seems to me you are doing your homework, looking for some weaknesses... That remains to be seen though... Goodluck Mark and to Gardner as well... I just broke your silence with this thread hehehe a bit sorry for that though wink

                  2. profile image0
                    thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                    If you think you're right don’t draw this out ask your questions lets  keep this debate going, don't stall. Btw theme is not “science is lying” it's evolutionism is a lie There a BIG difference. Evolutionists presented Ida, Ardi and Lucy etc. as facts and missing links. Scientists were honest and retracted them as just bones and drawings, and not proof of evolution.

  11. Daniel Carter profile image91
    Daniel Carterposted 7 years ago

    Question:
    So this is the thread that you can both call names and insult because the other thread  is sacrosanct? Civility in the "real" thread then becomes nullified by this thread, does it not?

    Just observing...

    1. profile image0
      thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

      True. I suggest we both stay out of any other thread discussing the debate, but I doubt that mark can control himself. lol

      1. Mark Knowles profile image60
        Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        That is what I said in the first place.

        Thank you.

        1. profile image0
          thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

          neutral No you came here first with your back-handed attacks and weak attempts to belittle me outside the designated thread. From now on keep the ridicule to yourself save your refutations for the debate okay.

          1. Mark Knowles profile image60
            Mark Knowlesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            LOL

            Scroll up. I was responding to another religioniost.

            1. profile image0
              thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

              Back-handed, third party still count.

              1. GeneralHowitzer profile image65
                GeneralHowitzerposted 7 years ago in reply to this

                Stay cool GeneralHowitzer... wink

                1. profile image0
                  thetruthhurts2009posted 7 years ago in reply to this

                  cool

 
working