jump to last post 1-9 of 9 discussions (17 posts)

Do insurance policy still exclude "Acts of god?"

  1. earnestshub profile image88
    earnestshubposted 7 years ago

    Have insurance companies dropped this clause, or is it still considered that "god" damaged your property?

    1. profile image0
      SirDentposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      LOL, this is a good question. I am not sure if they still use that phrase or not. I may have to look and find out.

  2. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 7 years ago

    Well I am not an agent but when I worked gor the Restoration Company about 10 years ago "Acts of God" where not covered by most insurance companies.

  3. profile image0
    SirDentposted 7 years ago

    I think a better question might be, what would be considered an act of God?

  4. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 7 years ago

    "Acts of God" were at least then defined as natural disasters. Tornado, Hurricane, flood, that kind of stuff. It is the reason most insurance companies offer special riders to cover these things, especially if you live in an area that is prone to such events like Tornado Alley in the Mid-west or The Mississippi Flood Plain.

    1. profile image0
      SirDentposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      A good enough lawyer could say that everyhting, no matter what happened, is an act of God. He/she could make a good argument to support their case.

      1. Ohma profile image74
        Ohmaposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Agreed. I think that it is really just like any other ploy to embezel money from the poor working stiffs of the world. It is really sad that I have seen the Act of God clause applied to water damaged structures because the roof leaked when it rained. This is not an Act of God it is a structural fault but I have seen insurance companies get away with it.

  5. earnestshub profile image88
    earnestshubposted 7 years ago

    We just had a lot of insurance claims for bushfires in our state.
    I just heard a non-believer on the radio say that if this clause applies to is property he is going to challenge the insurance company to prove there is a god. Should be interesting if they do apply this clause. smile I wonder if a good lawyer can prove that?

  6. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 7 years ago

    while that is an interesting approach I think he will not win. As you know I am more agnostic than anything else and I will not enter into the is there or isn't there a god discussion, but the belief in god has survived for so long that I think he would be hard put to challenge it in a court room.

    1. earnestshub profile image88
      earnestshubposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I am inclined to agree. He may have a loss on that one. I would have a go though.
      Religiosity as a sub-conscious process perhaps, citing Jung et al?

  7. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 7 years ago

    WOW! Sorry to go off topic a little here but this has got to be a first. I agree with Sir Dent and Earnest agrees with me! does that mean that there might be a little room for the two of you to come closer together on your so adamant beliefs about religion?

    1. profile image0
      SirDentposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I had to put timbers up in my house to keep the roof from caving in on me. tongue

      1. earnestshub profile image88
        earnestshubposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        lol lol lol

        1. profile image0
          SirDentposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I am going to bed now. I sent you an email Earnest. Good night.

          1. earnestshub profile image88
            earnestshubposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            Goodnight SirDent. Sleep well. smile

  8. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 7 years ago
  9. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 7 years ago

    Good Nigt SirDent!

 
working