jump to last post 1-20 of 20 discussions (88 posts)

Prior to Eve, did Adam have "reproductive" organs?

  1. qwark profile image60
    qwarkposted 6 years ago

    Let's see,mmm, this "god" thing created Adam:

    "And The Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being." (Genesis 2:7).

    "The Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be all alone." (Genesis 2:18)

    "So The Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, He took one of the man's ribs [also translated took part of the man's side] and closed up the place with flesh. Then The Lord God made a woman from the rib He had taken out of the man, and He brought her to the man. The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man."

    Now pls explain this to me, prior to Eve, what would have been the purpose of  a "reproductive' organ?
    It seems to me that this perfect, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent "god" thing of bible scripture, didn't
    properly plan the creation of the first 2 humans.
    Is it possible that this biblical "god" thing made a mistake by not prethinking his "creation?"Did "it" have to create an after market " penis and gonads" so that the 2 could go forth and multiply?
    Golly! The ramifications are endless...........lol  :-)

    1. SomewayOuttaHere profile image60
      SomewayOuttaHereposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      ...you're too much Quark LOL!....i'm picturing the 'Ken' doll now....there is no penis or any gonads either....

      ...dropped by for a moment...gotta get back to work....

      1. qwark profile image60
        qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Someway:
        Lol....just offering food-for-thought....:-)

        1. SomewayOuttaHere profile image60
          SomewayOuttaHereposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          ...i found Ken....

          http://www.salamandersociety.com/temple/barbie/barb_ken_nosex.jpg

          1. qwark profile image60
            qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            ...wow! Adam and EVe....lol

    2. Bob Way profile image60
      Bob Wayposted 2 years ago in reply to this

      God created Adam as imortal, I see the Bible loses time and it might have been hundreds of years before Adam seemed unhappy to God, so Eve was given to him, also imortal.  When Eve ate the Forbidden fruit and God cast them out of Eden, that was the embarrassing fig covering the sex parts.

  2. Greek One profile image81
    Greek Oneposted 6 years ago

    you got the wrong order Qwark...

    It was AFTER Eve that Adam (like all men in a long term relationship) lost his reproductive organs

    1. qwark profile image60
      qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Golly Greek:
      lol.. been there done that!
      I'd sure like to see a good solid argument against my question from an "enlightened" believer.
      Someone must have an opinion.  eh?

  3. Greek One profile image81
    Greek Oneposted 6 years ago

    if God have preordained everything, then He knew that He would have eventually give Adam a partner.

    My bet is therefore did have sexual organs prior to Eve, but they were dormant... much like mine were through puberty

    1. qwark profile image60
      qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Greek:
      If ya read the entire scripture, Eve was not even a thought until this god thing felt Adam would be lonely.....lol

      1. Greek One profile image81
        Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        yeah, but HE would have known that Adam WOULD feel lonely.. gotta let life and events playout

        1. qwark profile image60
          qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Greek:
          uh uh ...that'd just make this biblical god thing look even more screwed up. lol
          "It'd" have forethought the whole thing and created the 2 of them at the same time.
          Being the perfect father "it" would have planned this creation perfectly...but "it" didn't. "It" made a mistake...period!  :-)

          1. Greek One profile image81
            Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            What is perfect?

            1. qwark profile image60
              qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              Greek:
              lol...beats me!
              Believers always tell me that this biblical god thing is "perfect." I think they mean it is flawless, infallible and incapable of failing.
              If that's the case, their "god thing" couldn't have made a mistake in planning or wouldn't have allowed adam, the keeper of the garden, to get lonely and as a 2nd thought, provide him with company.

              1. luvpassion profile image60
                luvpassionposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                Well strip poker wouldn't have been much fun...wink

              2. Greek One profile image81
                Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                but who is to say a perfect God must create beings that feel only joy or happiness?

                1. qwark profile image60
                  qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  Greek:
                  Again, beats me.
                  God? Perfection? Both are imagined.
                  I'm just trying to get a well reasoned answer from those who can't provide one.
                  It's fun and entertaining.
                  You know as well as I that there is no answer to my question.
                  Nothing other than opinion and conjecture.
                  The same kind of answer I get when I ask for someone to provide me a definition of this god thing in a form other than opinion and conjecture.
                  I think ya get the drift.
                  Luv has it right: "silly hubbers."

                  1. Greek One profile image81
                    Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    But do you think that it is a logical jump to say since God and His 'thinking', by His very nature, can't be defined by us, means that his existance isn't real?

              3. Joy56 profile image61
                Joy56posted 6 years ago in reply to this

                do you really wanna know??????

    2. 61
      nebraskanposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      adam as well as eve had many advantages two of the most relevant they escaped teething and diaper training...remember the book of Genesis is not the first chronologically. The garden was not a physical enity.  Ergo a sound , logical start...

  4. luvpassion profile image60
    luvpassionposted 6 years ago

    Well he had to pee didn't he? roll What with all the wine and stuff.

    1. qwark profile image60
      qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Luv:
      Do you have a penis? NO?
      How the heck do you pee?
      Maybe adam had a "pee hole?"

      1. pisean282311 profile image56
        pisean282311posted 6 years ago in reply to this

        well you got this right...adam could have had pee hole...may be it was god's first experiment of creation...he didnt create anything before..we think god is perfect but god knows his own self more wink

    2. 0
      Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Very true.  I was waiting for someone to throw in that tidbit of common sense! big_smile

  5. luvpassion profile image60
    luvpassionposted 6 years ago

    Yes but women were an upgrade lol lol lol

    1. Greek One profile image81
      Greek Oneposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      sounds like there was a parts shortage, not an upgrade tongue

      1. luvpassion profile image60
        luvpassionposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        No No, No parts shortage...silly answer to silly question. Silly hubbers. tongue

        1. qwark profile image60
          qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Hahaha  Luv...silly hubbers..yep!  :-)

      2. 0
        Baileybearposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        well some animals (like my pet lizard and some insects) have TWO penises - maybe the parts got mixed up?

        1. 0
          china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          NO  -  just greedy  !!  big_smile

  6. 0
    Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago

    Silly wabbits.  Don't they know twix are for kids?

  7. starme77 profile image87
    starme77posted 6 years ago

    im sure they did have reproductive organs - but most likley not now smile smile lol

  8. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 6 years ago

    He had them, although they were minuscule - thus the fig leaf to hide his shame.

    1. mom101 profile image61
      mom101posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      And the shall become one........No, in my opinion he did not have.

      1. qwark profile image60
        qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        mom...you are a typist of reason...lol ty

        1. mom101 profile image61
          mom101posted 6 years ago in reply to this

          oops. two

    2. starme77 profile image87
      starme77posted 6 years ago in reply to this

      lol lol

  9. J.R. Smith profile image60
    J.R. Smithposted 6 years ago

    well, since God already knew he was going to have the earth populated, why wouldn't he have sex organs? A better question would be did he have a belly button?

    1. qwark profile image60
      qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      JR:
      Does this "god thing" have sex organs? your quote:
      " since God already knew he was going to have the earth populated, why wouldn't he have sex organs?"
      This 'god thing" with sex organs? What does "he" do with it in heaven? Join martyrd muslims in a menage a trois?
      Hell a belly button again proves "his" ineptness.
      Why didn't this "god thing" just create as many of us as he wanted and be done with it. Birth from the belly of a "female" is uncalled for when ya can create a universe...
      I know this is a bit too profound for ya, but mull it over. give it some thought. That little light above your head may be lit and twinkle with enlightenmnent!
      ...I won't hold my breath.    :-)

      1. J.R. Smith profile image60
        J.R. Smithposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        so you answer is no? no need to attack me, totally different day. This isn't my forum. At our last exchange you couldn't even remember your babble three posts back. the beauty of hubpages is you can read them over and over. I get it, you think our reason to live is no different than animals. Fine and I'm glad that works for you, it just doesn't for me. You must be immoral,unethical and free of conscience. Animals are. I just thought it would be interesting to bring up the belly button. No offense.

        1. qwark profile image60
          qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          This is not disrespectful. It is just what I read and understand when you reply. This is my honest but blunt opinion.

          Ah but JR, you again make us all aware of your ignorance and religious bigotry! Your quote:
          ". You must be immoral,unethical and free of conscience. Animals are."
          WE ARE ANIMALS!
          Your comments lack thought and correctness.
          Just as I expected.

          1. J.R. Smith profile image60
            J.R. Smithposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            So are you immoral,unethical,and without conscience?

            1. qwark profile image60
              qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              JR...the depth of your sophistication ends at the tip of your short nose.
              ALL of mankind is "immoral,unethical,and without conscience..."
              At this very moment we humans are planning our "reduction."
              We imagine and create weapons of mass destruction so that we may tap a key on a computer keyboard and end life as we know it.
              We want to be able to do it without compunction.
              You exist as just one of the billions of the primitive misleds.
              As I typed once before: "Ignorance is bliss."

              1. J.R. Smith profile image60
                J.R. Smithposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                What is sophisticated about attacking others beliefs while interjecting your own?We have differing views on sophistication.Isn't that a quality you hate in christians? People are not immoral,unethical or without conscience. You may be, but I don't think the human race would endorse you as their spokesperson.As for your moniker "ignorance is bliss", it must be. You seem quite happy. I believed I asked YOU if you were immoral,unethical or without conscience. Look at how you answered, incapable of any accountability whatsoever.It's no wonder you don't believe in a higher power.You'd have to take a step back. At this very moment, some people are planning peace,goodwill and charity.You may not be a good person,but they are out there.I'm sorry you haven't met one yet.

                1. qwark profile image60
                  qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  Sorry RJ, but the history of that which guides your life has been and still is rife with death, pain and destruction. You are but a "blind" and unstudied follower.
                  Your ilk gives lip service to love and forgiveness but the past 2000 yrs portrays your concept of a loving and forgiving creator as one that betrays your spoken intent.
                  No, you are but one of the intellectually lesser evolved, who have it in thier minds that we are something of value and deserving of a life after life. When in reality, we exist, accomplish nothing and worship the fallacy of the supernatural.
                  Vene Vidi Vici and gone!

                  1. J.R. Smith profile image60
                    J.R. Smithposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    you don't believe man has ever done anything positive,ever? You seem intelligent,how does that make sense? And again, are you an immoral person depraved of decency, since you are an animal?

                  2. getitrite profile image80
                    getitriteposted 6 years ago in reply to this



                    EXACTLY!

  10. getitrite profile image80
    getitriteposted 6 years ago

    Yes Adam did have a penis.
    Then in later generations, God decided he made another mistake and commanded man to cut off the tips of their penises.

    God will get it right one day.

    1. hanging out profile image59
      hanging outposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      the did not cut the tips off their penises, it was the foreskin they cut off. Recall please, the arid climate and scarcity of water, which came mostly from wells drawn up with a bucket, no running water even in towns. Today is different. The removal of the foreskin aside from metaphorical aspects was for sanitation. Yes god created a foreskin through his foresight he knew at some point in history we would not need to cut it off but way back in time it sufficed the purposes of demarcation and ritual cleanliness.

      1. 0
        china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        big_smile big_smile big_smile   This is better than Tom and Jerry.  God had the foresight to know that the foreskin would become redundant after it had served its purpose of being a cockscombe big_smile

        1. 0
          Baileybearposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          well they "served a purpose" as proof of how many of "the enemy" were slaughtered - how gross is that?  Killing them and then having to hack a piece off their penis to show how many thousands they killed

      2. 0
        Baileybearposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        sounds very odd - so God makes a body part which he orders "his chosen people" to butcher off for a ritual?  Why bother with this piece of flap in the first place?

      3. getitrite profile image80
        getitriteposted 6 years ago in reply to this



        http://i536.photobucket.com/albums/ff324/dktdk51/Smiley%20Icons%201/shocked.png

      4. Beelzedad profile image60
        Beelzedadposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        LMAO! My sides are a splittin'! That is hilarious!

  11. 0
    china manposted 6 years ago

    No - what happened was that god sewed up the shape that was to be Adam's companion but when he blew life into it - it was inside out !     

    We all make c**k ups now and then, the best way to hide them is to say they are a new invetion  big_smile

  12. 0
    china manposted 6 years ago

    When in reality, we exist, accomplish nothing and worship the fallacy of the supernatural.



    Exactly - that is all it is - phallus y worship.

    1. qwark profile image60
      qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      TY China man!  :-)

  13. Onusonus profile image86
    Onusonusposted 6 years ago

    Adam was made in the image of god, Wiener and all.

    1. qwark profile image60
      qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Onus;
      What does this god thing use
      "its" "wiener" for?

      1. Onusonus profile image86
        Onusonusposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        going potty, ofcourse.

        1. qwark profile image60
          qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          ...is that why we sometimes get yellow rain?

          1. Onusonus profile image86
            Onusonusposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            I've never seen yellow rain. Why do you assume that he is hovering over us? I mean He is God, I'm sure he has a toilet.

        2. 0
          china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          Wow - I wonder who gets to empty a god-size potty - is this the source of all pollution and you wouldn't want to be standing under on the day after god-chilli dinner day big_smile

      2. 0
        Baileybearposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        the big bang?

        1. qwark profile image60
          qwarkposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          hahahaha...this god thing has a penis and it caused a
          big bang!  gotta love it. I've experienced a few big bangs in my life too...jeez this god thing and I have sumthin' in common...lolol   :-)

        2. getitrite profile image80
          getitriteposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          http://i717.photobucket.com/albums/ww173/prestonjjrtr/Funny/SmileySignroflmao.gif

    2. 0
      Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Deleted

      1. 0
        china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        Now we are beginning to see even more 'eye to eye' !  Wow.

        It is all METAPHOR - an idea that starts out with good intentions and contains some kind of truth, goodness and guidance for people.  Making the 'word' into 'reality' is simply nonsense and is the cause of all the problems with religion and non-religion.

        1. 0
          Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          haha
          oh dear...
          I deleted my post after I wrote it 'cause I just KNEW it might evoke this kind of discusssion! lol

          Well.....you see, I know God is REAL, not a metaphor.  He's just intangible.  And by that, I know that the main, most important part of us humans is that intangible part.  Even though the intangible has the ability to reason, to feel, to "see", and such...

          It is the intangible in humans that Christians want to see ultimately saved----the souls of mankind....

          1. 0
            china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            gotta be quicker than that to get past me  big_smile

            I think you have a typo - by tangible I think you mean tangle, any idea that there is any reality in this invention has no foundation and IS the misdirection of thinking that the 'more original' writers put into jesus' lines against exactly this issue - the bits about false prophets and the rise of the anti-christ; the false words of those who want to use the original messages of peace, love, humility and grace that have been perverted out of all recognition.

            1. 0
              Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              I'm tangled-up! ha
              Do you mean that you consider God to be all benign and without any Judgement?  Or that there is no God?
              For the record, I personally don't believe there is nor will be a literal AntiChrist in the form of any one person.

              1. 0
                china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                I believe that the unknown can be thought of through the metaphor of a god - that contains the good thoughts of people, that can embody rules for the guidance of people - and if it contains judgement then that is for the metaphor, or your reality,   ONLY  - and it is not for any person to 'embody' in talking for any god, literal or metaphorical.

                Whichever way you like it nobody can talk for a real or metaphorical god, least of all those who like to sit in judgement on others.  This aspect of ego only reveals the thoughts of the one who would set themselves up in a place of judgement.

                1. 0
                  Brenda Durhamposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                  People make judgements all the time.
                  The legal system of any Nation is an instrument of judgement.
                  I understand that many non-Believers and Believers as well have some major resistance to the concept of someone else judging them.  And I think it's partly because they don't want to judge themselves either.   Yet we must judge ourselves too.  That's what our consciences are for.  Another intangible aspect of humanity, one that's often buried under mounds of rebellion and fear and that intangible "ego" you mentioned.

                  P.S.  AP's poem was interesting.  I was tempted to respond in a sort of battle of poetry, but I refrain....and I remain...a rightwinger and fool for Christ. big_smile

                  1. 0
                    china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

                    Oh go on - do!

                    He might reply - but be careful, he can't get banned any more than he is already  big_smile big_smile big_smile

  14. hanging out profile image59
    hanging outposted 6 years ago

    Adam was made flesh, flesh that ate food so the eliminating organs were present.
    Eve was made from flesh and therefore the same applies to her as well.
    To my understanding, the garden was not a place for reproduction. The command to multiply was given to adam and eve after the expulsion from the garden. (genesis 1 is an overview of creation, genesis 2 gives more detail about genesis 1 and genesis 3 deals with the issue of the garden) I am persuaded that the organ for sexual reproduction were present but inactive. Since innocents prevailed in the garden, the heart would not pump the blood to stiffen the organ in desire and eve did not menstruate in the garden. These abilities occurred outside the garden.
    Did God know mankind would fall? I conjecture He did or at least he had a b plan.

    1. 0
      china manposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      I still get a fit of girlish giggles when you post in these penis oriented threads - sorry big_smile

    2. 0
      Baileybearposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      why did Adam have nipples?  Men get breast cancer too. Seems like a bit of unintelligent design there

      Also some animals have vaginas, and some have to make to with the one hole for reproduction, pee & poo

    3. 0
      Baileybearposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      he set them up to "fail" - the story of the "fall" is like a kid stealing a cookie and then everyone born ever since being threatened with a punishment that doesn't fit the crime.   What kind of parent uses trickery and then extreme punishment?

  15. 68
    logic,commonsenseposted 6 years ago

    After Eve was made, Adam no longer had his junk.  It was in Eve's purse!

  16. qwark profile image60
    qwarkposted 6 years ago

    How do you circumsize a whale?




    Ya send down four...oooops ...foreskin divers!

  17. qwark profile image60
    qwarkposted 6 years ago

    How does this jesus save the peoples of other parts of the world who existed 4-5-6 thousand years b4 he existed? If he indeed existed?
    This god of mose didn't exist prior to 3400 yrs ago when moses ALLEDGEDLY created it.
    I feel so sorry for them! They didn't get a chance to be saved!
    That really isn't fair ya know!   :-)
    Now, lets get back to the question.
    When did this god thing get the idea of a penis and a vulva/vagina?
    Did this god thing (the CEO) have a bevy of Dead" engineer souls at the table making suggestions and giving presentations?
    I wanna know!

  18. christiansister profile image60
    christiansisterposted 6 years ago

    Very interesting thought but then it would seem that since Adam had something taken away to form eve, then he would have an "inny" and she would have an "outty". smile

  19. 59
    postcardingworksposted 6 years ago

    God new what He was doing.  He made man and it's obvious that Adam had the "equipment".

  20. rLcasaLme profile image50
    rLcasaLmeposted 5 years ago

    When God said it is not good for man to be alone, He is not telling us that He had just realised it, but rather, He was telling that to us so that we may know. He is just citing an information that we otherwise could have not known.
    Why can't we just be thankful that God created the woman? I'm sure everyone would agree that the creation of woman was the most beautiful thing God did.

 
working