Most of us are aware that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were not the only followers, Apostles to have written Gospels or Epistles. Judas, Mary Magdelane, Thomas, Andrew, even Mary the Mother of Jesus, and others wrote Gospels, that have been transcribed. Why is it these writings were not included in the original writings of the Holy Bible nor have they been submitted as additional "Biblically" Approved and or authorized scriptural readings? I believe this would give us a more complete knowledge of Jesus, His life and time, and possibly shed light upon questions left unanswered.
Would it be better to know if the original gospels were written by the people who claim to have written them in the first place?
About 40+ years ago, handwriting analysis was taken on many scriptures- and the results were astounding.
A few of the scriptures were written identical to one another, not because those people were actually there when it was said, but copied from one to another.
Many of the gospels were written many decades after Jesus was executed, because the disciples were waiting for Jesus' return, which actually never happened. The disciples began to die off without ever writing down what they learned.
Just a thought.
How do you know the people that transcribed the gospels weren't honest men Mr. Cagsil...really, look for the good in man and consider the possibility of honesty in the world. (((hug)))
Hi Dave, my knowledge of Christian history is very minimal, but I think one of the reasons that certain gospels have not been included in the new testament is that these gospels have promoted different ideas/beliefs about Jesus, Christianity, the relationship to God, etc that seemed way out of the mainstream. An attempt to have some consensus to Christian doctrine was the Council of Nicea. This was when the church elders decided to sift through material that so many people were promoting as Christianity - what they came up with was the Nicene creed in an attempt to define the core beliefs of Christianity.
by Captain Redbeard22 months ago
I just read a post from someone stating that Christianity is based on the Bible which stands to reason, "If Christianity is based off the bible then that means it would have never come to furition since the book...
by Mark Knowles8 years ago
Christians have killed again and again in the name of their god. Does this mean we should stop a christian from running for the presidency?"Because Christians believe that Jesus Christ suffered for the sins of...
by Elisah19576 years ago
The Gentiles are no longer enemies of G-d. Under the New Covenant they are Messianists (being one in the Messiah Yeshua). G-d word says from:(Galatians 3:8-9) Whats more, the scriptures looked forward to this time...
by Mark6 years ago
I haven't been on HP for very long, but I have read through quite a few of the threads on here...I often see someone who claims to be "Christian" saying that "this is wrong" or "that is...
by marty19686 years ago
Topic: Difference Between Christianity and Religion Christianity is unique in the fact that it is the ONLY faith which is not a religion- as a 'religion'- by definition means "to be bound"...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter13 months ago
Since I became a Christian in 1978, I have taken many discipleship classes. Some used acrostics and acronyms to facilitate sharing the gospel. Early on when I spoke with Jehovah's Witnesses, I would say...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.