I think that it would be safe to say that civilization has existed on the earth numerous times.
Buildings have been found hundreds of feet under the sea.
Human bones have been found that are 10s of thousands of years old and older.
And science seems to agree that the beginning of civilization as we know it did begin less than 10,000 years ago.
Genesis does NOT say that Adam and Eve were Gods first human creations upon the earth.
Genesis also Does NOT say that Abraham was the first and only human that he reveled any aspect of himself to, after the flood.
There is as much or more truth revealed in what wasn't written, as there is in what is written.
I science and religion both accepted this lst scentence ?
What do you think?
I think I'm so tired of this particular debate. It really is a hopeless debate. Nobody is going to win it. What I don't get is why people are so fascinated by this topic.
I have a question for you. I agree with you that people like to talk about this kind of thing. It always keeps them talking. But why do you think it fascinates them so much?
That is a really good question and is due more thought than I am giving it in this quick responce. But here goes.
I think that it all has to do with selfrightiousness.
Selfrightiousness is is not a religious condition. It is not a respector of persons. Everyone is sucsceptible to it.
Until we can get past that... there will always be conflict.
Just my opinion.
by Kathryn L Hill2 years ago
1. What is the psychological makeup of those who "bully" ?2. What contributes to it? 3. Is it a question of Nurture over Nature? 4. Are the tendencies to bully present at birth?5. If the tendencies can be...
by Hokey6 years ago
A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project indicate that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of...
by Eric Dierker3 years ago
In the story of the upper room Thomas even doubts his eyes. And he asks the master to let him touch the wounds to be sure that it is real. He did not operate on blind faith. He did not let his sense of awe cloud his...
by paarsurrey4 months ago
As its name suggests it is useful in science only. It has not been designed for religion and or philosophy. Right? PleaseRegards
by StevenPayne6 years ago
For christians, what do you rely on for your beliefs outside the bible? For athiests, what proof do you have God does not exist?
by pisean2823112 years ago
What do you guys think on this?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.