The Church of Reality. I'm not kidding, they say they have gained tax exempt status.
The Church of Reality is a new breed of religion that is based on reality rather than mythology. We answer the great questions that other religions address, like what is right and wrong, how do people live together in a community, and what are our responsibilities to ourselves and to each other. We address these concerns in the context of our evolutionary history, our present reality, and our future evolution. We are particularly focused on the future, which we call the Sacred Direction.
The Church of Reality recognizes the fact that the human race has a vast amount of shared knowledge. We call this shared knowledge the Tree of Knowledge, and it is through the growth of this tree that we can explore the universe around us. As the Tree of Knowledge grows, we evolve toward a better tomorrow, one where we will know more about reality than we know today. Realism is not just a casual acceptance of reality as real. Realism is a deeply felt choice, a commitment to a disciplined approach to determine what's real and to allow us to evolve in a positive direction.
And then there's this, emphasis added by me-
The Church of Reality provides a religious identity for people who have made a personal commitment to pursue reality the way it really is. When we are asked, "What religion are you?," we answer that we are Realists; we practice Reality because we believe in Reality. We also provide a sense of community, a social structure, and a moral compass to define right and wrong. We provide a sense of purpose about who we are, why we exist, and how we live our lives, in the context of science and logic.
Any thoughts on such a 'religious' concept?
Just another cult.
Very ironic how they've tried to borrow the Tree of Knowledge from the Bible.....and even call themselves a "church". The tax exempt status, and the "status" as a "church" plainly shows they're a poor imitation of any kind of "sacred" anything. And shows how stupid the government (whatever government it's under) is to allow them any status at all.
Brenda have you forgotten that Christianity was once also called a cult?
It still is.
Definition; A system or community of religious worship and ritual.
Definition of CULT
1: formal religious veneration : worship
2: a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents
3: a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also : its body of adherents
4: a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator <health cults>
5a : great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially : such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad b : the object of such devotion c : a usually small group of people characterized by such devotion
I guess I have to agree (with the possible exclusion of the highlighted section)...
That's like twice in the same month....Hell must be frozen over...
Brenda how about all the stories that christianity borrowed from other religions?
Doesn't interest me what points people think Christianity borrowed from other religions.
There is obvious Truth in the "religion" of Christianity----a Being who created the heaven and earth and who Loves us so much He planned the Sacrifice that offers us Salvation.
Much more beautiful words and actions than that of a bunch of little chubby Buddha statues that can neither speak to us nor declare Love for us.
So you're proudly ignorant of what your religion has stolen from other religions it would call pagan, and evidently ignorant about anything regarding Buddhism whatsoever.
Please don't make a fool of yourself. That little chubby statue is much, much more recent than Siddharta. And what words an actions would you even expect from a statue? Any more than you'd expect from a wooden cross?
Don't be silly.
The statues represent a man, while the Cross represents the man/God who died for the sins of the whole world.
Buddha is dead, while my Savior lives!
Did Buddha die for you? Did he love you so much he would lay down his life for you? I don't think so, and you can see the difference.
It's a wrong representation. You must believe Siddharta was fat, which is completely wrong. And if you know it's just a symbol, why would you expect it to talk?
While Siddharta has died, I am Buddha and you are too. Jesus is dead though, I'm sorry to have to be the one to tell you that.
Buddha left his home and his place as a prince, and his wife and familiy (much like Jesus encouraged others to do, so Siddharta must have learnt from Jesus... oh wait, he lived before Jesus), to become enlightned, and he taught to be true to ourselves and not be dependent of anyone else. Also, not to believe anything anyone said regardless of who they were, just because they said so.
All they up to is tax exempt status..Nettbutikker
I like the concept, a "truth" based religion. But it sounds very cold and clinical, calculated and unemotional, much like scientology. Even if it is completely truthful it will be a hard thing for many to accept because easy lies that stroke our egos and make us feel important are so much easier to sell. Truth is sometimes very hard to accept, because it won't allow us to believe we are more than we are.
Personally I prefer a hard truth to an easy lie... everytime.
From the link, which sums it up rather nicely:
"Our motto is, "If it's real, we believe in it." Since no one knows all of reality, the Church of Reality is about the pursuit of reality the way it really is. We commit to being intellectually honest with ourselves, and with others, so that we can cut through the mythology and understand the understanding of understanding."
I like it.
...pls give me an example of this: "and a moral compass to define right and wrong."
Yeah I don't think they have that line of thought very deeply developed yet, Qwark. Something pretty lame about if we kill people they can't contribute to the human evolution, a fact which I'm sure will sway a murderer every time.
Well, they're working on it I guess. Need to read Sam Harris's new book, maybe that will help them.
A lot of writings on the site, I'd say they're quite serious, but not all of it is what I'd call well thought out.
Still, nice to see someone trying. Probably won't get very far I guess.
The Church of Reality is a religion based on the practice of Realism, which which is a dedication to the pursuit of the understanding of objective reality. Our motto is, "If it's real, we believe in it." Since no one knows all of reality, the Church of Reality is a religious commitment to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. We think about thinking.
How do they ascertain reality? What are their tools to reach reality?
Well the status is merely as a charitable organization. It just indicates perhaps that they're organized and serious.
A cult of fact seekers. Who won't settle for dead man's opinions to form the base of their knowledge and understanding.
Horror of horrors.
They seek truth. Why would that offend you?
PB. Anything that challenges the christian belief is so scary to them. They not only cant see the truth but when it is shown to them they attack like a bunch of wolves. It does not surprise me at all to see Brenda say that she is offended by the truth. If she wasnt then she wouldnt be a christian. They are terrified of the truth.
What is called Paganism or nature worship spirituality is reality based, meaning natural reality is a spiritual realm.
"BUMP to bring up somebody's post typically by posting the word "bump" on a message board Can also stand for Bring Up My Post." Have done it
a few times but didn't know it had a name. Like
Bump you to the top. Cool. Thanks for the info.
A shot and a bump.
This thread made me laugh out loud. A couple of times. Pandora is there significance to your name?
Ignostism: Hmmm... If a tree falls in the woods and there is no one there to hear it fall, does it make any noise? Ignostic answer: Does it matter?
http://www.churchofreality.org/wisdom/d … ostic.html
"If a tree falls in the woods and there is no one there to hear it fall, does it make any noise?" To the heart of the metaphysical matter. The essence of the posit that the existence of consciousness would be necessary for all physical existence to not only exist but to matter.
So just in jest as follow-up question, which comes first the tree or the ear? Like the idea of the church of reality. We need a spirituality that unifies the religious and secular. But I can't even figure out what they mean by 'Root Axiom'.
"...pls give me an example of this: "and a moral compass to define right and wrong." Quark in conjunction with another thread: ..."But the brain has developed very rapidly over the past couple million yrs, faster than any other mammal, because of "competition." Seems competition would be your proposed compass.
Qzarks:"I wasn't concerned about mine."
If you aren't concerned about 'mine' why should I be?
Ya have no answer. Portrays you, to me, as a "hubber" with nothing credible to offer.
That's good enuf for me.
Forget I asked. I know you already have...:
"There is no one reality, there is only people’s perspective of reality, that’s why all cult’s or one and only way religions to god, falls apart.".
There are things we can fairly agree, like the sensory experience of the body. Neither of us will probably be found walking in traffic. If two or people react the same way to the same stimuli at exactly the same time,
would indicate a form of objectivity.
Yes, for what human being do know out there, we can agree on 95% of the things out there.
If one group claims to have most of the answers to the World's and Universe 99% unknowns to each and every one of us. Then that group's a perspective of reality become greatly elusive and evasive.
Mass Hysteria...Lots of people in a confined area that "get" sick because they think something is contagious.(E.G.) The Truth is...None of them are really sick it is all a mental thing. Just a personal thought...this can sound alot like "religious/spiritual feelings" that people have while in church...Just my opinions and thoughts...
"Then that group's a perspective of reality become greatly elusive and evasive." As opposed to the body discussed above, which
is singular, the mind can create any vehicle of interpretation it likes and any number as well. As you say, there is propensity in this
modern world of conflict between body and mind.
I like your ID - know your self , my life is 50% about me as I serve myself first and the other 50% is about everyone else.
Too choose one group out of thousands of groups to choose from. Then to over obey that group, live by their morals rather than my feeling of ethics That would end up being a great disservice to my personal growth an limit my thinking.
Yet to share the best from all group and not to belong to any, limits the over ego world problem and advances our own learning process and probability and better physical situation
Having one's growth limited to a single 2-3000 year old perspective is a real drag. Perhaps that is why America is in such a bad way these days. All knowledge -- and growth -- stops at the bible.
True enough, but if I suggested at a town meeting here that the Bible was not the truth and we shouldn't be basing our laws and education on it, I would not be surprised if I were tarred and feathered on the spot.
What do you imagine we should base our laws upon, then?
They already are.
How about Sharia Law?
The Devil's "book"?
"How To Win Friends and Influence People"?
And last but not least---
They already are....
So, just how much freedom do you recommend we go for in America?
Yes, I would recommend we base our laws on reason and reality. We are capable of such.
The Church of Reality
What is the source of finding reality by the Church of Reality? Is it Word of Revelation from the Creator-God?
Yeah I think not, Sweetie. Sorry. Reality.
Something my mum used to say to me.
Shut your mouth,
Open your eyes,
And you will get
A Big Surprise!
This little snippet of wisdom can be useful whenever searching for misplaced shoes, your favorite sweater, lost keys, or even -- Reality!
Try it. I dare you. Quit spouting scripture and tell us what you yourself really see.
You shut you eyes and you will see darkness only. Won't you?
It does not matter; one can face reality with open eyes more instead of the closed ones; one sees more clearly.
A person usually has to retrace their steps (a thing called remembering) in order to find lost keys, etc.
That doesn't in any way detract from the legitimacy of Spiritual knowledge; matter of fact, it only enhances it.
It's not a surprise, even.
So your point seems very silly to me.
You talk a lot. You profess to know. Yet you blind yourself to reality.
That is why it says
Shut your mouth
Open your eyes.
But you won't do it. Easier to talk than to seek truth. Plus all your lines are written.
Brenda says why wouldn't a search for truth offend her, and paar can't see where one finds reality if not from revelation.
I'm not surprised you both missed the point. The only stunner here is that I'm still talking to you about it.
No, I said why wouldn't a group trying to make a mockery of God's word offend me. And especially they're supposedly searching for "reality"? Umm.....indeed if one looks around them, they see reality all day long. So they've confined their search to things that are already known and obvious.
Indeed it is stunning that you're speaking to us about this! Are you trying to ....gulp....convert us to the "church of reality"?
by DK5 years ago
Considering God is supposedly omnipotent and omniscient, he would have known before he even made Adam & Eve, that if he made them the way he did, they would have been too weak to resist the temptation.My question...
by Jack Lee2 hours ago
In discussion here on hubpages, we hear some accuses religion people of being judgemental and more over accuses religious people of forcing their believes and policies on the American people through laws...That is not...
by MickeySr5 years ago
I believe that while much of contemporary American Christendom is plagued by false doctrine, non-Biblical teaching, and often downright goofy unChristian 'Christianity', we CAN understand what the Bible presents as the...
by pisean2823116 years ago
Ok..being atheist , you dont believe in any intelligent supreme being ...my question is, you began atheist because of your observiation , experience and what role has religion played in making you atheist?
by Baileybear6 years ago
I'm reading Tania Levin's memoir about being in and out of a pentecostal megachurch (Hillsong - formed from AoG). It's a fascinating read, and I share a lot of her observations. Tania describes Hillsong as a cult...
by Grace Marguerite Williams2 years ago
Wilderness has a way of presenting a logical and intelligent conclusion to many arguments. What makes so many people drawn to religion although the bases of religion aren't based upon any logical premise? ...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.