jump to last post 1-9 of 9 discussions (75 posts)

Is Religion Becoming Irrelevant?

  1. pisean282311 profile image58
    pisean282311posted 5 years ago

    In current times do you think religion in present form in becoming irrelevant?

    1. kess profile image60
      kessposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Once we exist under the knowledge of good and evil religion will increase in relevancy .

      For there are those who will promote it and the others who debunk it ...to both it will continue to be relevant.
      But once one is beyond the knowledge of good and evil, then religion will lose all relevancy or we may also say ....Only that one religion alone will be relevant because all are it.

    2. Titen-Sxull profile image93
      Titen-Sxullposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      What do you mean becoming, IMO religion already became irrelevant. Religion has been largely irrelevant since the industrial revolution, arguably even before that during the Enlightenment. Hopefully it will continue to decline into more and more moderate forms until all we're left with is Superstition lite.

    3. Quilligrapher profile image91
      Quilligrapherposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Hi there, pisean282311.

      Is religion becoming irrelevant? Since you asked, here is my two cents. If it’s too much just keep the change. lol

      Human life has dimensions that science has not yet identified much less measured. Religions appear to be expressions of humanity’s spirituality through metaphors. They are relevant simply because they are intangible facets of human nature. While science has its theories about DNA programming, cell division, the expanding universe, and drams of other stuff, there are still tons of things about life that science can’t explain and, as of now, much more it doesn’t even know exist. 

      For example, science can not explain…
      Why are placebos consistently effective on nearly every condition from warts to knee surgery?
      What causes dreams and what purpose do they serve?
      Why do humans blush and why is the process involuntary?
      Why do humans yawn and why is it contagious?
      Why is adolescence not found in other species?
      Why do humans have pubic hair and what is its purpose?

      It seems that everything that science claims to know is miniscule compared to what it doesn’t know and can’t explain. Science can not explain how prayers or miracles work any more then it can explain the placebo effect. But it has observed and studied the results of all three mysteries.

      The biggest mystery of all is why so many extremists in the non-religious minority feel threatened by others who benefit from believing and trusting in an imaginary friend they call God and who get comfort and peace of mind from talking to it. In contrast, the extreme religious majority seems to feel threatened by pragmatists who rely solely on their intellect and logic for making life’s choices? Why don’t each just leave the others alone to do their own thing? It is time everyone became comfortable in his or her own skin. Stop blaming God for wars and atrocities that we all know are caused by men who highjack religious beliefs to serve their own goals. It is time people stopped accusing religious of child abuse because they teach their children about the faith they find so personally rewarding. Their children will exercise their own free will and intellect in time. The planet is large enough to contain many more philosophies then exist right now.

      Religions do appear to be relevant to both believers and non-believers.  It is the endless bickering that seems to be irrelevant.

      I hope, fellow traveler, we find hope and fair weather in the new day.

      1. Jean Bakula profile image95
        Jean Bakulaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        Hello,
        Your comments are very interesting and I like them. I am currently reading James Redfileld's the Twelfth Insight. It's about how religious extremists are trying to start Armegeddon (apocolyptics) because both Christians and Muslims think once this awful war comes, they will all be raptured up to whatever they believe. The book has a group of  people, one a scientist, who approaches this issue much like you did. How can science measure spirtuality? It's not easy. But in this book, very timely, it basically says groups of moderate people must band together, and decide that the main religions have the same things in common, love, repspect, etc. If they can hold onto that thought, more people around them will be influenced. The end of the Mayan calender in 2012 only means the same, that it's time for a new understanding of spirit, and more people need to agree and concentrate on the points where they agree. I approached the book not expecting much, and really liked what it's message, much like what you said here.

    4. A Troubled Man profile image61
      A Troubled Manposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Like any other mythology, the religions of today are completely irrelevant. It is their followers who take the mythologies seriously that are dangerous and unpredictable.

      At the very least, even the Flat Earth Society members are far more peaceful. smile

    5. profile image67
      paarsurreyposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Religion is very relevant in the present times as it was in the past.

      1. profile image67
        paarsurreyposted 5 years ago in reply to this
      2. profile image67
        paarsurreyposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        In the present times; religion in its pristine and truthful form is most needed for the peace of the world; atheism is no substitue of it; the truthful religion is based on certainty while atheism is based on doubt. Life stems from certainty not from doubt.

  2. earnestshub profile image87
    earnestshubposted 5 years ago

    Yes, and becoming less believable with every new documentary on history or religion. smile

    The religiously impaired will find a way to avoid it all though even if it means trashing the TV. smile

    1. pisean282311 profile image58
      pisean282311posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      @earnest...ya but trashing t.v. wont stop coming generations to keep asking questions..isn't it?

      1. earnestshub profile image87
        earnestshubposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        That's true. Of course the fundamentalist's children won't get the opportunity to ask questions. sad

        1. pisean282311 profile image58
          pisean282311posted 5 years ago in reply to this

          some day may be they would have opportunity...

  3. profile image0
    Emile Rposted 5 years ago

    I don't think religion will become irrelevant in the near future. We all move through a stage where we ask questions. Religion is either a step along the journey, or the journey's end; but it will always play a part in society until we find enough definitive answers to render it irrelevant.

    @ernest
    Everyone has the opportunity to ask questions. Whether they are willing to ask them is another thing entirely.

    1. pisean282311 profile image58
      pisean282311posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      @emile how can religion be end of journey..if it was so ...we wont have had current religions...they wont have come into existence...

      1. profile image0
        Emile Rposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        We have the diversity of religions because, as  I said, for some the journey continues on. People think, come up with what they consider to be answers, and then they share them. Some create ideas around religion in order to make money and gather a flock.

        Until we have cold hard facts concerning the question, religion will always be with us and the number of ideas will continue to grow.

        I personally think fear of the unknown drives both organized religion and hard core atheism. People who need to think there are no questions because all have been answered will draw their line in the sand however suits their personality type.

        Whether any choose to admit it or not, the question stands unchanged. It's all speculation.

  4. earnestshub profile image87
    earnestshubposted 5 years ago

    What is hard core atheism?

    One does not need to be hard core to deny someone else the right to abuse them by proxy with an invisible fairy.

    1. profile image0
      Emile Rposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      No, you are correct. You are hard core anti religious; in my opinion.

      Hard core atheism, by my definition, are atheists who religiously insist that we know everything about everything and laugh at anyone that doesn't agree with their narrow opinions. They are as narrow minded as the fundamentalists.

      1. earnestshub profile image87
        earnestshubposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        Rubbish, I don't claim to know everything, I just know horsehooe when I see it.
        and I am not an atheist I don't need a god to exist so I can disbelieve in it, I can prove to myself there is no god empirically as can anyone else who is literate enough to read and write.

        1. profile image0
          Emile Rposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          Um, I said I thought you were anti religious. You've said you aren't an atheist before. I take your word for that.

          1. earnestshub profile image87
            earnestshubposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Sorry Emile I misread that. smile

          2. earnestshub profile image87
            earnestshubposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Sorry Emile I misread that. smile

        2. MelissaBarrett profile image60
          MelissaBarrettposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          Apparently not smile as there are many wonderful writers of all faiths (I assume that means they can read as well) 

          Maybe they've read but just disagree?  It happens I've been told wink

          1. profile image0
            Emile Rposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            You can't agree to disagree with those who take religion seriously.

          2. earnestshub profile image87
            earnestshubposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Fair enough. You are right, there are educated religionists. I apologise for that generality.

            The point I was trying to make is that there is a massive amount of information out there on this subject, and unless one is familiar with the arguments for either belief or lack of it, quoting one book that is the only confirmation of it's own belief system is not enough to bring to a real discussion.

            Goddunnit and a pile of selected scripture does not constitute a discussion let alone a valid argument in my view.

            1. MelissaBarrett profile image60
              MelissaBarrettposted 5 years ago in reply to this

              I actually agree completely...

              LOL go figure.

    2. Matt Bunch profile image59
      Matt Bunchposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      I may not always agree with you, but that line is PRICELESS!! Had me laughing for a while. Funniest thing I'd seen all day!!! Thanks.

      1. earnestshub profile image87
        earnestshubposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        You're welcome! I don't always agree with me either. smile

  5. profile image0
    RookerySpoonerposted 5 years ago

    Religion will never become irrelevant, because it provides people with hope that death is not the end for us or our loved ones.  This is the primary reason why religion has not disappeared, even though science has now provided the answers to the questions of our origins, and even though all the creation myths have been shown to be false.  If science could ever find a cure for death, then I believe religion would slowly disappear, because there would no longer be a need for it.

    1. OutWest profile image58
      OutWestposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Science has an answer for our origins...please tell me because I missed that one.

      1. profile image0
        RookerySpoonerposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        If you missed it, then no matter how many times it is pointed out to you, you will continue to miss it, because evidence is not a part of your view of life.  So, there really would be little point in me trying to describe the evidence to you, but I'm sure you're already aware of that.  Any description would necessarily involve the evolution of the species, and if you live in a part of the world where science has not yet reached, then this will be amazing to you, and not something you would be able to believe in.

        1. profile image0
          jomineposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          You are amazing!

          1. profile image0
            RookerySpoonerposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Thank you!

            1. OutWest profile image58
              OutWestposted 5 years ago in reply to this

              So where did the monkey's come from?

              1. Cagsil profile image59
                Cagsilposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                Why ask a question which you know you're not going to accept the answer? hmm

                1. OutWest profile image58
                  OutWestposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                  Maybe you'll change my mind...actually you have no answer

                  1. Cagsil profile image59
                    Cagsilposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                    I wasn't planning on answering your question. The fact that you said "maybe I'll change my mind" already says you cannot be honest with who you were asking the question of in the first place. You just asked the question to be a "smart ass", because you know that very few individuals actually and truly understand evolution.

                    So, it shows your actions to be more mocking than anything else. And, you know what that says about you? It shows that you're not honest with yourself, much less anyone else and that you would rather create distortion than actually learn something.

                    But, nice try.

    2. pisean282311 profile image58
      pisean282311posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      @rookery you have a point...it is strange that so many myths have been busted but still religion holds people...but some day it would disappear and yes "death" is vital for that...

  6. Cammie 1016 profile image60
    Cammie 1016posted 5 years ago

    Absolutely not. Trust in God and he will shower blessings toward you. That's what's happened to me and my family, when one door closes, another 3 open...

  7. lone77star profile image90
    lone77starposted 5 years ago

    Perhaps it is becoming irrelevant, but not yet.

    Soon, God won't need the vehicle of religion to convey the message. There will be the haves and the have nots -- those who chose to follow and those who choose to stay turned away.

  8. Mikel G Roberts profile image88
    Mikel G Robertsposted 5 years ago

    Evolution does not dis-prove a creator.

    Saying science does not accept magical beings as an answer does not dis-prove a creator.

    I said Science is not proof that God doesn't exist...science is the discovery of how God did some of what God does.

    The link you ignored was to scientific proof to the existence of God.

    1. A Troubled Man profile image61
      A Troubled Manposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      lol

      1. Mikel G Roberts profile image88
        Mikel G Robertsposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        Then prove it isn't correct.

        1. A Troubled Man profile image61
          A Troubled Manposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          I already told you your argument was a logical fallacy. Get back to us when you've figured that one out. lol

    2. profile image67
      paarsurreyposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      I agree with your above words; I have to further add that science is a  common tool of believers and non-believers; both participate in the advancement of science.

  9. kynthia2374 profile image75
    kynthia2374posted 5 years ago

    Religion (and government alike) was created as a way to control the masses.  Religion teaches one to look outside of one's self for the answers.  The powers that be decided many many ages ago that the easiest way to control humanity is to introduce organized religion.

    If you wish to enslave a man, allow him to believe that he is already free.  This is the epitome of what religion offers to humanity today.  But it is becoming more evident everyday that people are starting to discover that this is not so prevalent anymore.  Why give a god credit for a job well done through our own sweat and tears instead of taking it for ourselves?

    Humanity is starting to wake up to the fact there we are in control of our own ships.  There is no other entity at the helm.  We are in control and have started taking responsibility for that control.  It is only when we don't want to take responsibility that we gravitate towards religion because it offers the opportunity to lay the responsibility on someone else.

    And then or course there is the fear factor.  But that is just another topic of discussion...

    I think that it is pretty obvious that religion is indeed becoming irrelevant.

 
working