jump to last post 1-6 of 6 discussions (25 posts)

Believer's Funny Logic

  1. jainismus profile image76
    jainismusposted 4 years ago

    http://s2.hubimg.com/u/6638573.png
    If 2+2 is four, not 3 or 5, the God exists.

    1. mischeviousme profile image60
      mischeviousmeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      I don't follow, try using syntax and a logical premise.

    2. profile image0
      Sooner28posted 4 years ago in reply to this

      As a free thinker who thinks most religion is useless, except for controlling people, I don't know what you are arguing.  Could you expand?

    3. EinderDarkwolf profile image61
      EinderDarkwolfposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Haha, that's a good one! For those who don't get it, the standard logic of a believer, is that no matter what happened, and no matter what you show, God did it. Doesn't matter that the big bang happened and is perfectly explainable, God's the reason for it, though science shows a lack of need for God in order for it to happen.

      Anyway, good one, I needed a laugh.

      1. profile image0
        JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Actually, science has no idea how it could happen, and no current theory for how it happened. Big Bang Theory doesn't address the specifics of the singularity, where it came from, what started it expanding, etc... Big Bang Theory starts at the moment of expansion.

        1. Cagsil profile image60
          Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Isn't the singularity a completely random event? Just curious.

          1. profile image0
            JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Nobody knows and the BBT doesn't address the 'cause' of the singularity.

        2. EinderDarkwolf profile image61
          EinderDarkwolfposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Perhaps you need to study more to realize how much a lie that is. They can't say with absolute certainty that the big bang caused everything, but like everything else they "explain" it is the most plausible theory.

          1. jacharless profile image81
            jacharlessposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Yup, exactly why science is a religion too. Now, we're gettin` somewhere. lol
            James

          2. profile image0
            JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            That's not what I said. I didn't say it isn't the most likely theory. I said BBT doesn't address what caused the Big Bang.

            1. mischeviousme profile image60
              mischeviousmeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              Why does it need a cause? It's going too far back for me to care... So why does anyone else? Because the need to understand, outweighs the need to exist.

              1. profile image0
                JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                It needs a cause, scientifically, because every event has a cause.

                My point was that Big Bang Theory isn't mutually exclusive with belief in God.

                1. mischeviousme profile image60
                  mischeviousmeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                  True, there's really no difference, just the convayance of the idea...

    4. profile image0
      JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      It's really irrelevant.

      If God exists, truth is truth because it is.

      If not, truth is truth because it is.

    5. Chris Neal profile image84
      Chris Nealposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Okay, even after reading EinderDarkwolf's explanation, I'm a little stumped.

      Nonetheless, why would it not be logical that God would create a world with a logical set of rules that we humans need to adhere to? Thus, 2+2=4. Humans need oxygen. What goes up, must come down. E=MC2.

      The fact that He himself has been known to bend those rules does not in and of itself prove that He doesn't exist. The Big Bang is perfectly consistant with Genesis.

      If humans could force 2+2 = 5, then that would be clearer proof that God does not exist.

      1. Cagsil profile image60
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        lol

        1. Chris Neal profile image84
          Chris Nealposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Those who can, do.

          Those who can't, teach.

          Those who can't teach, laugh.

    6. SandyMcCollum profile image79
      SandyMcCollumposted 4 years ago

      Yes, what is your point? You have my attention now. smile

    7. Repairguy47 profile image60
      Repairguy47posted 4 years ago

      Math God?

    8. jacharless profile image81
      jacharlessposted 4 years ago

      (neutral)2, (positive)2 is equal to 4.
      Hmm, okay, four units of two properties, yes.
      So, where's the argument or logic?

      z= ?


      (negative)4, (positive)4 is equal to 8 or equal to 0?

    9. Shanna11 profile image93
      Shanna11posted 4 years ago

      The profoundness of this thread is dazzling. My mind has been pushed to its most possible capacities, and still, it cannot manage to comprehend the sheer velocity of overwhelming wisdom and understanding that this single sentence seeks to bestow upon it's quivering corners.

      1. Cagsil profile image60
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        lol lol

    10. MelissaBarrett profile image61
      MelissaBarrettposted 4 years ago

      I think the real evidence of God would be the presentation of an acceptable answer as to WHY 2+2=4.

      1. Cagsil profile image60
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Cause humans created math. lol lol

        1. profile image0
          Sooner28posted 4 years ago in reply to this

          We did.  Didn't you get the memo?

     
    working