In my opinion it should not be, based on the evidence that almost every biker doped or used drugs. During the time of Armstrong's Tour De Frances, biking was more dirty of a sport, than baseball in the late 1990's. It doesn't make it right just because everyone else is doing it, however people are overlooking the main impact that Lance had on millions of people. He fought off cancer, and gave plenty of people reasons to believe they could also. Overall that should be the reputation of Lance Armstrong.
His reputation is based on what people think of him.
If people think he cheated to win, that is usually regarded as a negative. The attention he brought to the Live-Strong Foundation probably helped a lot of people.
It's great that he won a personal cancer battle-- that's always something to cheer about, but what if the chemicals he used promoted his cancer?
by Steven Escareno21 months ago
Recently several of Lance Armstrong's teammates have come out and admitted that they not only took performance enhancing drugs..but they saw and KNOW that Lance took them as well. Although there's no positive...
by Denise Handlon4 years ago
Is Lance Armstrong guilty or innocent of doping? Do you think that he should have all titles and possibly his Olympic medal removed? How about that fact that he has 'given up the fight' because he feels it...
by Monique4 years ago
In my opinion- I believe- Antonio Nogueira, Drew Brees and Paul Pierce.What are your suggestions?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.