Submarines Past to Present

Cornelius Van Drebbel is usually credited with building the first submarine. He was a noted Dutch doctor and inventor born in 1572 at Alkmaar in the Netherlands. The craft was made of wood sealed with greased, waterproofed leather and built in England during the 1620s. It was powered by 12 oarsmen and could carry several passengers. Air was supplied by snorkel tubes supported on the surface by floats. It should be noted here, although Van Drebbel built it, it was actually designed by William Bourne, a former Royal Navy gunner about 1578.

Van Drebbel may have been the first to actually build a vessel for the purpose of underwater travel, but was by no means the only one who had the dream. An ancient Egyptian wall painting shows duck hunters, stalking their prey underwater and breathing through hollow papyrus reeds. Although Van Drebbel built several larger craft using the same principles the British Navy showed little interest in adopting it as part of its fleet.

It wasn’t until 1776 the first submarine used for warfare was designed and built by American engineer David Bushnell, a Yale graduate. It was a one-man, egg shaped vehicle powered by a hand operated propeller. It submerged by allowing water to fill the hull and resurfaced by forcing it out with a hand pump. Dubbed “Bushnell’s Turtle,” the little craft was armed with a keg of powder which was to be attached to the hull of British warships in New York Harbor and detonated by a time fuse.

Although there are no written naval records to substantiate the account, an unsuccessful attack on the 64 gun British warship HMS Eagle was attempted on the night of September 7, 1776. The boring device failed to penetrate the vessel's hull and the keg of powder drifted away. It detonated about an hour later alerting the British who subsequently moved their ships out of the harbor.

The next milestone in submarine evolution was in1800 when American inventor Robert Fulton built his 21 foot submarine the Nautilus. It was the first to resemble modern day submarines and had two additions previous vessels hadn’t. They were rudders for vertical and horizontal manipulation and a supply of compressed air. Although it resembled more modern day craft, it was still a far cry from today’s technologically advanced vessels. It still used old fashioned hand powered propellers when submerged, however, on the surface it became a sailing ship with sails.

Hunley Replica

During the Civil War, the Confederacy built four submarines. One was the famed Hunley built in 1864 which destroyed the USS Housatonic in Charleston, South Carolina, Harbor. But in doing so, it was also destroyed by the explosion.

It soon became obvious a better method of propulsion would be needed to make submarines a more viable option for warfare. Compressed air, steam and electricity were all experimented with, but proved inadequate to the task. The next innovation was made in1898 with the free-flooding superstructure designed by American engineer Simon Lake.

However, the first with a reliable power source was the brain child of American inventor John Philip Holland in 1898 who used a gasoline engine, for surface travel and an electric motor for underwater. The U.S. government bought the 53 foot boat in 1900 and named it the USS Holland in his honor.

But, it was German engineers who adapted diesel engines for submarines in 1906. When periscopes and self-propelled torpedoes became standard equipment, the submarine became a formidable foe. Its usefulness as a deadly weapon became apparent during World War I, when German submarines, known as U-boats, were used extensively.

By World War II many other improvements had been added, such as sonar for enemy ship detection and radio communications. A typical U.S. submarine had a surface speed of about 18 knots and a submerged speed of 8 knots using battery operated electric motors. The major drawback was the limited range of batteries which forced submarines to surface frequently to recharge.

To eliminate this drawback, Germany introduced a new device, called the snorkel. The snorkel allowed submarines to recharge their batteries while cruising at periscope depth. The snorkel contained inlet and outlet ducts to supply air and remove engine exhaust. This innovation greatly increased the underwater range of submarines. In 1950 a submerged distance record was set by sailing from Hong Kong to Honolulu, about 5200 miles, in 21 days.

A few years later a new type of hull was introduced which dramatically increased submerged speeds. The new design was a teardrop-hull configuration resembling a blimp. It was first used on the USS Albacore, launched in 1953. It was so successful the design was incorporated on nearly all future submarines.

But, the submarine was still in its infancy. In 1954 the British navy developed a new propulsion system using turbines powered by hydrogen peroxide fuel. It was first used on the submarine HMS Explorer which experienced even greater underwater range. However, the same year the first nuclear-powered submarine, the USS Nautilus, was launched.

From the first simple wood and leather submersibles to the nuclear age, submarines have indeed come a long way.

More by this Author


Comments 8 comments

PETER LUMETTA profile image

PETER LUMETTA 5 years ago from KENAI, ALAKSA

Good history and interesting reading, Thanks,

Peter


JamaGenee profile image

JamaGenee 5 years ago from Central Oklahoma

I'm currently reading "Warlord", a biography of Winston Churchill who oversaw the Royal Navy in WWI and was briefly head of the Admiralty again before becoming Prime Minister at the beginning of WWII. Churchill had known what a formidable danger to enemy navies and shipping German U-boats were in WWI. But the rest of the British government never took them seriously until Churchill became PM and warlord-by-default in 1940. Before Brit subs could be built, many more Brit military and merchant ships were needlessly sunk by the U-boats prowling shipping lanes.

Considering how habitually slow England was in responding to new military technology used against them and that so many of their military operations were doomed before they ever began, it boggles the mind that they were able to resist invasion by the Germans in either world war! ;D


david 5 years ago

Much wrong there.

The French were the first to adapt the diesel to a submarine, the Germans were still using kerosene in their subs right up to 1914.

As for JamaGenee, you ought to change your reading habits.

As for the UK being slow to take to the submarine, they still formed their submarine service in 1901, the Germans not until 1906. At the out break of WW1 the Royal Navy had the largest submarine fleet in the world, the E class submarine was second to none in its capability.

WW2 the UK had the same amount of submarines as the Germans 55, the largest submarine fleet the Italians, didn't do them much good. The American naval historian Clay Blair in his 2 volume history of the WW2 U-boat campaign the Hunters and the Hunted, shows quite convincingly that it was a total failure, and despite what is widely believed, never came close to defeating the UK.

As for why the UK wasn't invaded by the Germans in either WW, they just weren't capable of it.


JY3502 profile image

JY3502 5 years ago from Florence, South Carolina Author

Anybody agree with David's comments?


JamaGenee profile image

JamaGenee 5 years ago from Central Oklahoma

Actually, David, there was a time in the early days of WWII when Germany *could have* easily invaded England. At that time the coastal areas were not yet fortified and the UK expected an invasion by sea at any moment. Had German intelligence been more on the ball, they would have known this, but obviously they weren't and they didn't.


JY3502 profile image

JY3502 5 years ago from Florence, South Carolina Author

Jama, I was waiting to see if david would respond, before I said anything else. Mainly, because I felt he was rude the way he addressed you and I. Not, that he was wrong, mind you. In all fairness, he is right on many counts. By that I mean some sources do say what he claims. The difference is because in cases such as this I tend to stick with the generally accepted version. Otherwise, I would have to write an encyclopedic sized article explaining the different views.


JamaGenee profile image

JamaGenee 5 years ago from Central Oklahoma

JY, I'm pretty sure "David" is a troll and was only looking to stir things up by leaving a rude comment. The best defense against trolls is NOT to respond in kind. As Joe Friday would say "Just stick to the facts, ma'am", so I did. Yes, I agree David was right on many counts, but we should also remember whoever wins writes the histories.


JY3502 profile image

JY3502 5 years ago from Florence, South Carolina Author

Of course, you are right. But, as a responsible journalist perhaps I should have included a few opposing views.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working